Journal List > Korean J Adult Nurs > v.29(5) > 1096441

Ha and Hyun: Attitudes and Type Analysis of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation among Hospital Nurses in Emergency Room and Intensive Care Units

Abstract

Purpose

Subjective Attitudes toward cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be diverse. The purpose of this study was to identify subjective attitudes toward CPR among hospital nurses working in emergency room and intensive care units.

Methods

The Q methodology was used. The 42 Q-statements selected by each of the 38 participants were classified into a shape of normal distribution. The collected data were analyzed using a QUANL program.

Results

Three types of attitudes emerged: ‘ TypeI, CPR requires professionalism(medical person-nel-centered)’, ‘ Type II, CPR requires reality (patient-centered)’, and ‘ Type III, CPR requires ethicality (human dignity-centered)’.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that nursing intervention programs for the three types should be developed. Mandatory repeat education programs for TypeI, Development of guidelines for the prohibition and termination of CPR for TypeII. Continuing education on wills and advance directives for TypeIII can be helpful

REFERENCES

1. Yuksen C, Sawatmongkornkul S, Tuangsirisup J, Sawanyawi-suth K, Sittichanbuncha Y. The CPR outcomes of online medical video instruction versus on-scene medical instruction using simulated cardiac arrest stations. BMC Emergency Medicine. 2016; 16(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-016-0092-3.
crossref
2. Vural M, Koş ar MF, Kerimoğ lu O, Kı zkapan F, Kahyaoğ lu S, Tuğ rul S, et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge among nursing students: a questionnaire study. Anatolian Journal of Cardiology. 2017; 17(2):140–5. https://doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.7156.
crossref
3. van de Glind EM, van Munster BC, van de Wetering FT, van Delden JJ, Scholten RJ, Hooft L. Pre-arrest predictors of survival after resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the elderly a systematic review. BMC Geriatrics. 2013; 13:68. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-13-68.
crossref
4. Fallahi M, Banaderakhshan H, Abdi A, Borhani F, Kaviannez-had R, Karimpour HA. The Iranian physicians attitude toward the do not resuscitate order. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. 2016; 9:279–84. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S105002.
5. Kumari KM, Amberkar MB, Alur SS, Bhat PM, Bansal S. Clinical awareness of do's and don'ts of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) among university medical students-A questionnaire study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014; 8(7):MC08–11. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/8541.4567.
6. Saramma PP, Raj LS, Dash PK, Sarma PS. Assessment of long-term impact of formal certified cardiopulmonary resuscitation training program among nurses. Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 2016; 20(4):226–32. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.180043.
crossref
7. Clarke S, Carolina Apesoa-Varano E, Barton J. Code Blue: methodology for a qualitative study of teamwork during simulated cardiac arrest. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(1):e009259. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009259.
8. Toubasi S, Alosta MR, Darawad MW, Demeh W. Impact of simulation training on Jordanian nurses' performance of basic life support skills: a pilot study. Nurse Education Today. 2015; 35(9):999–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.03.017.
crossref
9. Zimmerman E, Cohen N, Maniaci V, Pena B, Lozano JM, Lina-res M. Use of a metronome in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a simulation study. Pediatrics. 2015; 136(5):905–11. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-1858.
crossref
10. Sulzgruber P, Sterz F, Poppe M, Schober A, Lobmeyr E, Datler P, et al. Age-specific prognostication after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-The ethical dilemma between ‘ life-sustaining treatment' and ‘ the right to die' in the elderly. European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care. 2017; 6(2):112–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872616672076.
11. Oliver D. David Oliver: resuscitation orders and reality. BMJ. 2016; 352:i1494. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1494.
crossref
12. Jeong SY, Kim CW, Yoon TH, Kim YJ, Hong SO, Choi JA. The factors influencing neurological outcome of out-of hospital cardiac arrest with cardiac etiology. Journal of the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine. 2016; 27(2):165–72.
13. Citolino Filho CM, Santos ES, Silva RDCG, Nogueira LDS. Factors affecting the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in inpatient units: perception of nurses. Revista da Escola de En-fermagem da USP. 2015; 49(6):907–13. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420150000600005.
crossref
14. Kim EJ, Lee KR. Relationship between non-technical skills and resuscitation performance of nurses' team in in-situ simulated cardiac arrest. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2015; 27(2):146–55. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2015.27.2.146.
crossref
15. Hwang SH. Knowledge, attitude, confidence, and experience of community health practitioner regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The Korean Journal of Emergency Medical Services. 2014; 18(1):55–66. https://doi.org/10.14408/KJEMS.2014.18.1.055.
16. Mentzelopoulos SD, Bossaert L, Raffay V, Askitopoulou H, Perkins GD, Grief R. et al. A survey of key opinion leaders on ethical resuscitation practices in 31 European countries. Resuscitation. 2016; 100:11–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.12.010.
17. Akhtar-Danesh N, Baumann A, Cordingley L. Q-methodolo-gy in nursing research: a promising method for the study of subjectivity. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2008; 30(6):759–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945907312979.
18. Kim HK. Q Methodology: philosophy, theories, analysis, and application. Seoul: Communication Books;2008.
19. Sjöberg F, Schönning E, Salzmann-Erikson M. Nurses' experiences of performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation in intensive care units: a qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2015; 24(17-18):2522–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12844.
crossref
20. Wang C, Huang CC, Lin SJ, Chen JW. Using multimedia tools and high-fidelity simulations to improve medical students' resuscitation performance: an observational study. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(9):e012195. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012195.
crossref
21. Sahin KE, Ozdinc OZ, Yoldas S, Goktay A, Dorak S. Code Blue evaluation in children's hospital. World Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2016; 7(3):208–12. https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2016.03.008.
crossref
22. Spence AD, Derbyshire S, Walsh IK, Murray JM. Does video feedback analysis improve CPR performance in phase 5 medical students? BMC Medical Education. 2016; 16(1):203. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0726-x.
crossref
23. Jeon HJ, Lee IS, Kim SC. Comparison of manual CPR versus X-CPRTM during simulative out of hospital. Korean Journal of Society for Wellness. 2015; 10(2):181–9.
24. Riggs KR, Becker LB, Sugarman J. Ethics in the use of extra-corporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults. Resuscitation. 2015; 91:73–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.03.021.
crossref
25. Brummell SP, Seymour J, Higginbottom G. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions in the emergency department: an ethnography of tacit knowledge in practice. Social Science & Medicine. 2016; 156:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.03.022.
crossref
26. Yi MS, Oh SE, Choi EO, Kwon IG, Kwon SB, Cho KM, et al. Hospital nurses experience of do-not resuscitate in Korea. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2008; 38(2):298–309. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2008.38.2.298.
27. Woo MK, Kim MY. Nurses' experiences of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) by the narrative inquiry. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2013; 25(3):322–31. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.3.322.
crossref
28. Cho JL, Lee EN, Sim SH, Lee NY. Comparison of physicians and nurses' attitudes toward family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2013; 25(1):41–52. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.1.41.
crossref
29. Chan WL. The " do-not-resuscitate" order in palliative surgery: ethical issues and a review on policy in Hong Kong. Palliative & Supportive Care. 2015; 13(5):1489–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951514001370.

Figure 1.
Sample of completed Q-Sort table.
kjan-29-484f1.tif
Table 1.
Q-Statements and Z-Scores according to Types of Attitude (N=38)
Q-Statement Z-Score
Type I (n=19) Type II (n=15) Type III (n=4)
1. CPR is a medical action in emergency situations. 1.52 1.30 0.38
2. CPR minimizes brain damages and helps a rapid recovery. 1.51 0.72 0.38
3. CPR is simply to extend the length of life. -1.81 -0.56 -0.95
4. CPR helps people to live another life. 0.42 -0.01 -0.76
5. CPR is unnecessary if the further medical treatment is meaningless. -0.96 1.85 -0.38
6. CPR is unnecessary if there is family consent or DNR notice. 0.16 2.17 -0.19
7. CPR should be done even if rescuers are in a dangerous situation or tired. -0.79 -1.01 -0.57
8. Attitude of rescuers toward CPR may vary with the patient's age -0.82 1.37 -0.57
9. No one has the right to stop CPR because human life is precious. 0.04 -1.45 -1.52
10. CPR is unnecessary when absolute clinical evidence of death exists. -0.20 0.75 -0.76
11. CPR is unnecessary if the patient wants to die with dignity. 0.41 1.82 1.90
12. CPR should be done until family members come even if there is little hope for recovery. -1.51 -1.09 -0.76
13. CPR is unnecessary if the patient is highly likely to become a vegetative state after being resuscitated. -1.57 0.25 -1.71
14. CPR is unnecessary if the patient is brain-dead. -1.18 -0.03 -0.19
15. Communication with the patient's family is necessary while CPR is performed on the patient. 0.34 1.42 -0.19
16. Success of CPR depends on early detection and rapid response and hospital systems. 1.87 1.33 0.00
17. CPR is unnecessary if the chance of survival is low. -1.46 0.39 -1.90
18. Review the quality of CPR performance applied can increase the success rate of the next CPR case. 1.00 0.63 -0.94
19. CPR requires the teamwork and rescuers' willingness to resuscitate. 1.25 0.34 -1.71
20. Updating on the latest CPR knowledge is necessary. 1.22 0.79 -0.94
21. CPR is really hard and psychologically stressful every time. -0.01 -0.09 0.76
22. Even if the patient is resuscitated, there is psychological burden on future treatment. -0.17 -0.41 0.57
23. I feel good when the CPR went well whereas I feel guilty when the CPR went wrong. -0.35 -1.32 -0.38
24. CPR seems like a show for the patient's family. -1.10 -0.19 0.75
25. After performing CPR without any feelings, I become depressed. 0.18 0.29 1.90
26. I think about ethics when medical teams do not seem serious while performing CPR. 0.79 -0.44 0.18
27. CPR requires a lot of experience and expertise. 1.69 0.68 0.57
28. Post-CPR routine workloads are overwhelmingly difficult to manage (e.g., records, etc). -0.24 -0.99 -1.14
29. Human dignity is not present if physical damages occur to the patients due to the CPR. -1.16 -0.41 1.71
30. I think about the patient's quick resuscitation only during CPR. 0.60 -0.83 0.00
31. I am proud of being a nurse when the patient is resuscitated after performing the CPR 1.30 -0.49 1.33
32. After CPR performance is completed, I feel like I should do better for my patients. 0.73 -0.50 -0.19
33. I become emotional when the family grieve for the loss of their beloved one after CPR. 0.55 -0.71 0.95
34. When the patient dies even after CPR, I feel the futility of life. -0.44 -1.18 1.33
35. I always feel there is something lacking after CPR. -0.25 -1.33 0.94
36. CPR is always a tense and difficult situation even for the experienced medical teams. 1.00 -0.05 -0.00
37. I hate medical teams shouting or screaming at each other during the CPR. -0.08 0.22 0.76
38. CPR usually requires a lot of training and simulation. 1.32 1.01 -0.00
39. I feel limited as a nurse whenever CPR case occurs. -1.07 -1.99 -1.14
40. Because the CPR seems too painful, I do not want CPR to my parents and family. -0.95 -0.23 1.14
41. I feel limited ability of human and medicine while CPR is performed. -0.86 -1.42 -1.52
42. I want to help the patient dies with dignity rather than receiving CPR. -0.88 -0.61 1.14

CPR=cardiopulmonary resuscitation; DNR=do not resuscitate;

Consensus statement of three types.

Table 2.
Demographic Characteristics of and Correlations among Types of Attitude (N=38)
Variables Categories Type I (n=19) Type II (n=15) Type III (n=4)
Eigenvalue (Variance, %) 10.95 (28.8) 4.35 (11.5) 2.37 (6.3)
Age (year) M± SD 24.92±6.58 30.07±5.37 25.50±4.36
Range 23~45 23~40 22~31
Gender (%) Female 17 (89.5) 13 (86.7) 4 (100.0)
Male 2 (10.5) 2 (13.3) 0 (0.0)
Religion (%) Yes 11 (57.9) 2 (13.3) 2 (50.0)
No 8 (42.1) 13 (86.7) 2 (50.0)
Marital status (%) Married 5 (26.3) 7 (46.7) 0 (0.0)
Not married 14 (73.7) 8 (53.3) 4 (100.0)
Nursing education completed (%) Community college 3 (15.8) 6 (40.0) 2 (50.0)
4-year program 11 (57.9) 7 (46.7) 2 (50.0)
Master's program 5 (26.3) 2 (13.3) 0 (0.0)
Work experience (year) M± SD 6.11±6.78 7.87±5.54 3.25±3.30
Range 1~25 2~20 1~8
Working unit (%) Emergency room 7 (36.8) 6 (40.0) 1 (25.0)
Intensive care unit 12 (63.2) 9 (60.0) 3 (75.0)
Job title (%) Staff nurse 18 (94.7) 14 (93.3) 4 (100.0)
Unit manager 1 (5.3) 1 (6.7) 0 (0.0)
Correlations Type I 1
Type II .36 1
Type III .42 .27 1
TOOLS
Similar articles