Journal List > Pediatr Infect Vaccine > v.22(3) > 1095990

0h: Hand Hygiene Compliance of Healthcare Workers in a Children's Hospital

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of study was to estimate the hand hygiene (HH) compliance of healthcare workers (HCWs) in a children's hospital.

Methods

This study was conducted in a hospital which is a tertiary and educational children's hospital with 313 beds and 533 HCWs. Data were collected by direct observation methods from November 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010

Results

A total of 2,999 opportunities for HH were observed, and the overall HH rate was 95.3%. HH rate of the registered nurse, physicians and transferer was 97.7%, 89.2%, and 72.1%, respectively (P<0.001). Among physicians, HH rate of the fellows, professors, residents and interns was 97.5%, 93.9%, 89.7%, and 80.9%, respectively (P<0.001). HH rate in the emergency room, operation room, outpatient department (OPD), and the intensive care unit (ICU) was 97.2%, 97.2%, 95.4%, and 92.5%, respectively (P<0.001). Hand rubbing was the most frequently used (81.1%), and hand washing was frequently used in the case of 'after body fluids exposure risk' (37.7%) and ‘after touching patient surroundings’ (28.5%). HH methods were not statistically different from each departments (P=0.083), however, they were significantly different according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 5 Moments (P<0.001). Distributions in WHO 5 Moments by the job titles were significantly different (P<0.001). The odds ratio of physicians, ICU and OPD was 0.353 (95% Cl, 0241—0519), 0.291 (95% Cl, 0174-0487), and 0.484 (95% Cl, 0281-0834), respectively.

Conclusions

Compliance 01‘ HH was different by the job titles and departments. Effective custom—tailored HH programs for each job title and department need to be developed.

REFERENCES

1. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS—CoV). Available from. http://Www.wh0.int/emergencies/mers—cov/en/[accessed. on 15 July 2015].
2. Bolyard EA, Tablan OC, Williams WW, Pearson ML, Shapiro CN, Deitchmann SD. Guideline for infection control in healthcare personnel, 1998. Hospital infection control practices advisory committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1998; 19:407–63.
3. Hong KB, Oh HS, Song IS, Lim JH, Kang DK, Son IS, et al. Investigation and control of an outbreak of imipenem—resistant Acinetobacter baumannji infection in a pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Infect Dis I. 2012; 31:685–90.
4. Ciofi degli Atti ML, Cuttini M, Ravé L, Ceradini I, Paolini V, Ciliento G, et al. Trend of healthcare-associated infections in children: annual prevalence surveys in a research hospital in Italy, 2007—2010. I Hosp Infect. 2012; 80:6— 12.
crossref
5. WHO. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: First global patient safety challenge clean care is safer care. Geneva: World Health Organization;2009. Available from. http://WWW.Who.int/gpsc/Smay/en/[accessed. on 1 May 2015].
6. Buser GL, Fisher BT, Shea IA, Coffin SE. Parent willingness to remind health care workers to perform hand hygiene. Am I Infect Control. 2013; 41:492–6.
crossref
7. Randle I, Firth I, Vaughan N. An observational study of hand hygiene compliance in paediatric wards. J Clin Nurs. 2013; 22:2586–92.
crossref
8. Ciofi degli Atti ML, Tozzi AE, Ciliento G, Pomponi M, Ri— naldi S, Raponi M. Healthcare workers' and parents' percep—tions of measures for improving adherence to hand—hygiene. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:466.
crossref
9. Esteban E, Ferrer R, Urrea M, Suarez D, Rozas L, Balaguer M, et al. The impact of a quality improvement intervention to reduce nosocomial infections in a PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013; 14:525–32.
crossref
10. Harris BD, Hanson C, Christy C, Adams T, Banks A, Willis TS, et al. Strict hand hygiene and other practices shortened stays and cut costs and mortality in a pediatric intensive care unit. Hea1th A3. 2011; 30:1751–61.
11. Oh HS, Park ES, Ieong SY, Cheon HG, Kim SR, Chang YS, et 3.1. Activation of infection prevention and control program in hospital via healthcare accreditation system. Final report. Korea Association of Infection Control Nurses. 2011.
12. Sax H, Allegranzi B, Chra'iti MN, Boyce I, Larson E, Pittet D. The World Health Organization hand hygiene observation method. Am I Infect Control. 2009; 37:827–154.
crossref
13. Pittet D, Simon A, Hugonnet S, Pessoa—Silva CL, Sauvan V, Perneger TV. Hand hygiene among physicians: performance, beliefs, and perceptions. Ann Intern Med. 2014; 141:1–8.
crossref
14. Rosenthal VD, Pawar M, Leblebicioglu H, Navoa-Ng IA, Villamil—Gémez W, Armas—Ruiz A, et al. Impact of the international nosocomial infection control consortium (INICC) multidimensional hand hygiene approach over 13 years in 51 cities of 19 limited—resource countries from Latin America, Asia, the Middle East, and Europe. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013; 34:415–23.
crossref
15. Graf K, Ott E, Wolny M, Tramp N, Vonberg RP, Haverich A, et al. Hand hygiene compliance in transplant and other special patient groups: an observational study. Am J Infect Control. 2013; 41:503–8.
crossref
16. Korniewicz DM, El—Masri M. Exploring the factors associated with hand hygiene compliance of nurses during routine clinical practice. Appl Nurs Res. 2010; 23:86–90.
crossref
17. Dierssen-Sotos T, de la Cal—Lépez M, Navarro—Cérdoba M, Rebollo—Rodrigo H, Antolin—Iuarez FM, Llorca I. Factors related with the performance of a proper hand hygiene. Med Clin. 2010; 135:592–5.
18. Alsubaie S, Maither Ab, Alalmaei W, Al—Shammari AD, Ta—shkandi M, Somily AM, et al. Determinants of hand hygiene noncompliance in intensive care units. Am I Infect Control. 2013; 41:131–5.
crossref

Table 1.
Compliance of Hand Hygiene by Job Titles, Depart ments, Months and World Health Organization (WHO) 5 Moments
Variables Hand hygiene Total observation P value∗
Done N (%) Not done N (%)
Job title       P<0.001
  Registered nurses 1,737 (97.7) 41 (2.3) 1,778  
  Technicians 469 (96.3) 18 (3.7) 487  
  Nurse aids 206 (94.5) 12 (5.5) 218  
  Physicians 247 (89,7) 47 (108‘ 1389  
  Transferers 62 (72.1) 24 (27.9‘ 86  
  Others 37 (90.2) 4 (9.8) 41  
Physicians       P<0.001
  fellow 39(97.5) 1(2.5) 40  
  Professors 93(93.9) mam 99  
  Residents 130(89.7) 15(10.3) 145  
  Interns 85 (80.9) 20 (19.0) 105  
Departments        
  Wards 857 (97.8) 19 (2.2) 876 P<0.001
  Emerqency department 175 (97.2) 5 (2.8) 180  
  Operation rooms 103 (97.2) 3 (2.8) 106  
  Outpatient departments 786 (9‘34) 28 (4,6) R74  
  Intensive care unit 937(92.5) 76(7.5) 1,013  
Months       P=0.183
  November 709 (94.4) 42 (5.6) 751  
  December 2,149 (95.6) 99 (4.4) 2,248  
WHO 5 Moments       P=0.112
  After touching patient surrounding 362 (97.3) 10 (2.7) 372  
  After touchina a patient 762 (95.7) 34 (4.3) 796  
  After body fluid exposure risk 401(95.7) 152143 419  
  Before touching a patient 914(94.8) 50(5.2) 964  
  Before aseptic/clean procedure 419 (93.5) 29 (6.5) 448  
Total 2,858 (95.3) 141 (4.7) 2,999  
∗x2 test result
Table 2.
Hand Hygiene Methods used by Departments and WHO Moments
Variables Hana rubbing N (%) Hana washing N (%) Total observations P value∗
Departments P=0.083
  Wards 706 (82.4) 51 (17.6) 857  
  Emergency department 144 (82.3) 31(17.7) 175  
  Intensive care unit 762 (81.3) 75 (18.7) 937  
  Outpatient departments 634 (80.7) 52 (19.3) 786  
  Operation rooms 73(70.9) 30(29.1) 103  
WHO 5 Moments P<0.001
  Before touching a patient 851(93.1) 63(6.9) 914  
  After touching a patient 622 (81.6) 40 (18.4) 762  
  Before aseptic/clean procedure 337 (80.4) 82 (19.6) 419  
  After touching patient surroundings 259 (71.5) 03 (28.5) 362  
  After body fluid exposure risk 250(62.3) 151(37.7) 401  
Total 2,319(81.1) 39 (18.9) 2,858  

x2 test result.

Table 3.
Two Months Trend of Hand Hygiene Compliance by job Titles and Physicians
Variables November December
Total observation (N) Hand hygiene N (%) Total Oservation (N) Hand hygiene N (%)
Job titles
  Technical 150 148(98.7) 337 321(95.3)
  Registered nurse 398 378 (95.0) 1,380 1,359 (98.5)
  Nurse aids 20 19 (95.0) 198 187(94.4)
  Physician 161 I46 (90.7) 228 201(88.2)
  Transfer 117 13(76.5) 69 49(71.0)
  Other 5 5(100.0) 36 32(88.9)
  Subtotal 751 709(94.4) 2,248 2,149(95.6)
Physician
  Fellow 21 21(100.0) 19 18(94.7)
  Professors 41 39(95.1) 56 540.411)
  Residents 51 45 (88.2) 94 85(90.4)
  Interns 48 41 (85.4) 57 44(77.2)
  Subtotal 161 146(90.7) 228 201(88.2)
Table 4.
Distributions of WHO 5 Moments accordinq to Job Titles
Variables Before touching a patient N (%) Before aseptic/ clean procedure N (%) After body fluid exposure risk N (%) After touching a patient N (%) After touching patient surroundings N (%) Total observations
Physicians 125 (32.1) 60 (15.4) 72 (18.5) 121 (31.1) 11 (2.8) 389
Registered nurse 566 (31.8) 313(17.6) 257 (14.5) 443 (24.9) 199 (11.2) 1,778
Technicians 191 (39.2) 53 (10.9) 65(133) 148 (30.4) 30 (6.2) 487
Nurse aids 43 (19.7) 18 (8.3) 20 (9.2) 37 (17.0) 100 (45.9) 218
Transferer 36 (41.9) 2 (2.3) 0 (0.0) 45 (52.3) 3 (3.5) 86
Others 3 (7.3) 2 (4.9) 5 (12.2) 2 (4.9) 29 (70.7) 41
Total 964 (32.1) 448 (14.9) 419 (14.0) 796 (26.5) 372 (12.4) 2,999

x2 test results p<0.001.

Table 5.
Results of Multivariate Logistic AnaIysis according to Job Titles and Departments
Variables B Odds ratio 95% CI Pvalue
Lower Upper
Job titles
Physicians -1.040 0.353 0.241 0.519 <0.001
Departments
IntenSIve care Unit -1.233 0.291 0.174 0.487 <0.001
outpatient department’ -0.726 0.484 0.281 0.834 0.009

Dummy variables: physicians (1), me other job titles (0).

Dummy variables; intensive care unit (1), the other departments (0).

Dummy variables; outpatient department (1), the other departments (0).

TOOLS
Similar articles