Journal List > Allergy Asthma Respir Dis > v.6(3) > 1095178

An, Cho, Baek, Sung, Yoon, Choi, Sheen, and Han: Clinical features of Mycoplasma pneumonia in comparison with viral pneumoina in children: A multicenter, cross-sectional study

Abstract

Purpose

This study was conducted to compare clinical features between Mycoplasma pneumonia and viral pneumonia.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 428 patients requiring hospitalization among children younger than 18 years of age in 5 hospitals in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do. There were 131 patients with M. pneumonia and virus coinfection, 167 patients with M. pneumonia without virus coinfection, and 130 patients with viral pneumonia. All subjects had radiographic evidence of pneumonia with specimens available for both M. pneumonia and viral testing. Virus was identified using the polymerase chain reaction assay in a nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab. M. pneumoniae pneumonia was diagnosed serologically.

Results

Human rhinovirus was detected in 60.3% (79 of 131) of children with M. pneumonia accompanied by virus coinfection. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) was detected in 38.2% (50 of 130) of children with viral pneumonia. The mean age was significantly lower in the viral pneumonia group than in the M. pneumonia group with and without virus coinfection. The sex distribution did not differ significantly among the 3 study groups. The procalcitonin level was higher in viral pneumonia and erythrocyte sedimentation rate level was higher in the M. pneumonia group although no significant difference was found in C-reactive protein level between the M. pneumonia and viral pneumonia groups.

Conclusion

Clinical features and inflammatory markers between M. pneumonia and viral pneumonia may be useful for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

REFERENCES

1. Pfuntner A, Wier LM, Stocks C. Most frequent conditions in U.S. Hospitals, 2011: Statistical Brief #162. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US);2006.
2. Lee GE, Lorch SA, Sheffler-Collins S, Kronman MP, Shah SS. National hospitalization trends for pediatric pneumonia and associated complications. Pediatrics. 2010; 126:204–13.
crossref
3. Eun BW, Kim NH, Choi EH, Lee HJ. Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Korean children: the epidemiology of pneumonia over an 18-year period. J Infect. 2008; 56:326–31.
crossref
4. Niitu Y, Hasegawa S, Suetake T, Kubota H, Komatsu S, Horikawa M. Resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae to erythromycin and other antibiotics. J Pediatr. 1970; 76:438–43.
crossref
5. Dumke R, von Baum H, Luck PC, Jacobs E. Occurrence of macrolide-re-sistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae strains in Germany. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010; 16:613–6.
crossref
6. Peuchant O, Ménard A, Renaudin H, Morozumi M, Ubukata K, Bébéar CM, et al. Increased macrolide resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in France directly detected in clinical specimens by realtime PCR and melting curve analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009; 64:52–8.
crossref
7. Okada T, Morozumi M, Tajima T, Hasegawa M, Sakata H, Ohnari S, et al. Rapid effectiveness of minocycline or doxycycline against macrolide-re-sistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in a 2011 outbreak among Japanese children. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 55:1642–9.
crossref
8. Chang MW, Kim KH, Park ID, Song GY, Kim SW, Lee EY, et al. Isolation of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and antimicrobial susceptibilities of the isolates(III). J Life Sci. 2005; 15:479–85.
crossref
9. Hong KB, Choi EH, Lee HJ, Lee SY, Cho EY, Choi JH, et al. Macrolide resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, South Korea, 2000-2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013; 19:1281–4.
10. Lee E, Cho HJ, Hong SJ, Lee J, Sung H, Yu J. Prevalence and clinical manifestations of macrolide resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in Korean children. Korean J Pediatr. 2017; 60:151–7.
crossref
11. Ahn HS, Shin HY, editors. Hong Chang Eui pediatrics. 11th ed.Seoul: Mirae N;2016. p. 697.
12. Sensini A, Zuccherini F, Cerboni1 G, Galullo M, Meli L, Maso GD, et al. Serological diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: a complicated puzzle. Microbiol Med. 2012; 27:171–6.
crossref
13. Iwane MK, Prill MM, Lu X, Miller EK, Edwards KM, Hall CB, et al. Human rhinovirus species associated with hospitalizations for acute respiratory illness in young US children. J Infect Dis. 2011; 204:1702–10.
crossref
14. Hayden FG. Rhinovirus and the lower respiratory tract. Rev Med Virol. 2004; 14:17–31.
crossref
15. Jartti T, Lee WM, Pappas T, Evans M, Lemanske RF Jr, Gern JE. Serial viral infections in infants with recurrent respiratory illnesses. Eur Respir J. 2008; 32:314–20.
crossref
16. García-García ML, Calvo C, Pozo F, Villadangos PA, Pérez-Breña P, Casas I. Spectrum of respiratory viruses in children with community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012; 31:808–13.
crossref
17. Jain S, Williams DJ, Arnold SR, Ampofo K, Bramley AM, Reed C, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. children. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372:835–45.
crossref
18. Pavia AT. Viral infections of the lower respiratory tract: old viruses, new viruses, and the role of diagnosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52(Suppl 4):S284–9.
crossref
19. Bradley JS, Byington CL, Shah SS, Alverson B, Carter ER, Harrison C, et al. The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 53:e25–76.
crossref
20. Jacobs JW, Lund PK, Potts JT Jr, Bell NH, Habener JF. Procalcitonin is a glycoprotein. J Biol Chem. 1981; 256:2803–7.
crossref
21. Reinhart K, Karzai W, Meisner M. Procalcitonin as a marker of the systemic inflammatory response to infection. Intensive Care Med. 2000; 26:1193–200.
crossref
22. Becker KL, Nylén ES, White JC, Müller B, Snider RH Jr. Clinical review 167: Procalcitonin and the calcitonin gene family of peptides in inflammation, infection, and sepsis: a journey from calcitonin back to its precursors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 89:1512–25.
23. Müller B, Becker KL, Schächinger H, Rickenbacher PR, Huber PR, Zim-merli W, et al. Calcitonin precursors are reliable markers of sepsis in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2000; 28:977–83.
crossref
24. Baer G, Baumann P, Buettcher M, Heininger U, Berthet G, Schäfer J, et al. Procalcitonin guidance to reduce antibiotic treatment of lower respiratory tract infection in children and adolescents (ProPAED): a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e68419.
crossref
25. Esposito S, Tagliabue C, Picciolli I, Semino M, Sabatini C, Consolo S, et al. Procalcitonin measurements for guiding antibiotictreatment in pediatric pneumonia. Respir Med. 2011; 105:1939–45.
26. Moulin F, Raymond J, Lorrot M, Marc E, Coste J, Iniguez JL, et al. Procalcitonin in children admitted to hospital with community acquired pneumonia. Arch Dis Child. 2001; 84:332–6.
crossref
27. Toikka P, Irjala K, Juvén T, Virkki R, Mertsola J, Leinonen M, et al. Serum procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 for distinguishing bacterial and viral pneumonia in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000; 19:598–602.
crossref
28. Stockmann C, Ampofo K, Killpack J, Williams DJ, Edwards KM, Grijalva CG, et al. Procalcitonin accurately identifies hospitalized children with low risk of bacterial community-acquired pneumonia. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2018; 7:46–53.
crossref
29. Menéndez R, Sahuquillo-Arce JM, Reyes S, Martínez R, Polverino E, Cil-lóniz C, et al. Cytokine activation patterns and biomarkers are influenced by microorganisms in community-acquired pneumonia. Chest. 2012; 141:1537–45.
crossref
30. Nascimento-Carvalho CM, Cardoso MR, Barral A, Araújo-Neto CA, Guerin S, Saukkoriipi A, et al. Procalcitonin is useful in identifying bac-teraemia among children with pneumonia. Scand J Infect Dis. 2010; 42:644–9.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Distribution of age according to age groups. M. pneumonia, Mycoplasma pneumonia.
aard-6-155f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Number of identified viruses in viral pneumonia and Mycoplasma pneumonia coinfected with virus groups. RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
aard-6-155f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Identified viruses according to age group. RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
aard-6-155f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Pathogens detected, according to month in children with pneumonia June, 2015 through May, 2016. RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
aard-6-155f4.tif
Table 1.
Characteristics of subjects studied
Characteristic Mycoplasma pneumonia (n=298) Viral pneumonia (n=130) P-value
Without virus coinfection (n=167) With virus coinfection (n=131)
Age (yr) 5.5±2.9 3.9±2.7 3.4±2.7 <0.001
Age group (yr)       <0.001
 <2 27 (16.2) 50 (38.2) 58 (44.6)  
 2–4 41 (24.6) 36 (27.5) 34 (26.2)  
 5–9 82 (49.1) 37 (28.2) 35 (26.9)  
 ≥10 17 (10.2) 8 (6.1) 3 (2.3)  
Male sex (%) 42.2 56.5 60.6 0.007
Hospitalization        
 Length of stay (day) 4.29±2.78 4.22±2.83 3.88±2.06 0.362
 Invasive mechanical ventilation 1 (0.6) 2 (1.5) 7 (5.4) 0.019

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%) unless otherwise indicated.

Chi-square test.

Table 2.
Comparisons of laboratory findings of study subjects
Variable Mycoplasma pneumonia (n=298) Viral pneumonia (n=130) P-value
Without virus coinfection (n=167) With virus coinfection (n=131)
WBC count (×103/μL) 7,995±3,885, 9,991±5,206 9,846±4,405 <0.001
Neutrophil (%) 62.4±13.6 60.2±16.1 54.8±17.2 <0.001
Lymphocyte (%) 27.4±12.4 29.9±14.1 34.9±16.2 <0.001
Monocyte (%) 5.1±2.4 5.5±2.9 6.5±2.9 <0.001
Eosinophil (%) 2.6±2.6 2.4±3.1 1.6±2.0 0.005
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 12.34±0.80 12.40±1.03 12.34±0.97 0.840
Platelet count (×103/μL) 291±88 299±107 274±93 0.098
Protein (g/dL) 7.0±0.6 6.9±0.3 6.9±0.4 0.974
Albumin (g/dL) 4.3±0.25 4.2±0.2 4.2±0.2 0.773
AST (IU/L) 35.1±7.78 28.7±8.4 40.0±34.3 0.372
ALT (IU/L) 15.7±6.8 14.3±7.6 29.7±70.0 0.456
CRP (mg/dL) 3.3±3.8 2.5±3.2 2.7±2.9 0.121
ESR (mm/hr) 46.6±22.5, 40.6±25.5 31.5±19.4 <0.001
Procalcitonin (ng/mL) 0.8±2.8 0.9±2.4 2.1±7.5 <0.001

WBC, white blood cell; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

Kruskal-Wallis test.

P<0.5 vs. with virus coinfection.

P<0.5 vs. with viral pneumonia.

TOOLS
Similar articles