Journal List > J Gynecol Oncol > v.29(4) > 1094703

Ju, Kang, and Kim: Is the ovarian preservation safe in young women with stages IB–IIA villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix?

Abstract

Objective

Because villoglandular adenocarcinoma (VGA) of the uterine cervix has favorable features and outcomes, patients receive less radical surgery and young women preserve their ovaries. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological features and outcomes of VGA and to see if the ovarian preservation is safe in young women with VGA.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed medical records and identified patients with VGA, who had been treated and followed from January 2004 to December 2015.

Results

This study consisted of 17 patients with VGA, including 9 premenopausal women. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB1 disease was found in 12 patients (70.6%), IA1 in 2, IA2 in 1, IB2 in 1, and IIA1 in 1. Of the 12 women diagnosed with stage IB1 disease, a young woman received only conization and she has not showed a recurrence. During a median follow-up of 58 months (range: 12–116), 4 patients, who had undergone radical surgery for stage IB1 disease, had a recurrence and one of them died due to disease progression. Among patients with stages IB–IIA disease, 2 premenopausal women did not receive simultaneous oophorectomy or chemoradiation therapy. Both of them had a recurrent tumor at adnexa.

Conclusion

This study revealed favorable features and outcomes of VGA. However, the appropriate treatment for young women with early-stage VGA must be cautiously selected. Ovarian preservation might not be safe when young women with stages IB–IIA VGA undergo surgical procedures.

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix has increased over the last several decades whereas that of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has decreased [12]. Compared to women with SCC, patients with adenocarcinoma tend to be younger and manifest different responses to treatment [234]. Additionally, compared to SCC, adenocarcinoma is known to be commonly associated with lymph node (LN) involvement and distant metastasis and have poorer prognosis [456]. Villoglandular adenocarcinoma (VGA), as rare subtype of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma, is generally detected in younger women and it has better prognosis than the usual adenocarcinoma [789101112]. VGA is known to show a superficial invasion, rare lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and few LN involvements [789101112].
Standard surgical procedures for patients with stages IA2–IIA1 cervical cancer consist of radical hysterectomy (RH) and pelvic LN dissection (PLND), occasionally accompanied by bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) [56]. However, early-stage cervical cancer, particularly in the absence of high-risk pathological factors, has a favorable prognosis with 5-year survival rates reaching approximately 90% [56]. Therefore, much attention has been devoted to the preservation of normal tissues and physiological functions [13]. Furthermore, fertility-sparing surgeries including conization and trachelectomy have been proposed as alternatives for young women desiring childbearing [14]. Especially, the favorable features of VGA have led many oncologists to conduct conservative treatments such as conization or trachelectomy.
Ovarian preservation improves quality of life. However, the safety of ovarian preservation in young women with early-stage cervical cancer remains unclear. Although risk factors for ovarian metastasis are not well established, the histological types have been associated with ovarian metastasis [1516]. Oophorectomy eliminates the possibility of ovarian metastasis. However, it can trigger a surgical menopause in young women. A study demonstrated that while ovaries could be preserved in young patients with stages IB–IIA SCC, ovaries should be removed from all patients with adenocarcinoma [16]. On the other hand, a few authors concluded that ovarian preservation is oncologically safe for young women with stage I adenocarcinoma because it is not associated with increased risk of cancer-specific or overall mortality [17].
Ovarian preservation in young women with early-stage VGA has not yet to be reported. Because VGA is a rare tumor, there are limitations in evaluating the natural history of VGA and selecting optimal management options. Therefore, we aimed to examine the clinicopathological features and outcomes of VGA and to see if the ovarian preservation is safe in young women with VGA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 1,952 patients who were diagnosed with cervical cancer from January 2004 to December 2015 at Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea. We excluded 1,558 patients with SCC and 55 patients with other types of cervical cancer except adenocarcinoma. Among 339 patients with adenocarcinoma, 17 patients with VGA were identified. The design of this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Chonnam National University (approval No. 2015-049).
All patients underwent cervical cytology of Thin-Prep and human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA Chip test at the initial visit. We performed pelvic examination and, if needed, colposcopy. We carried out punch biopsy of cancerous lesion of the cervix or conducted conization when tumor was uncertain. After VGA was histologically confirmed, all patients underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for preoperative evaluation of invasion to adjacent organs or distant metastasis. After thorough consultation with patients about the results, we decided the appropriate treatment option which was acceptable for each patient.
Clinical characteristics of patients included age, menopausal status, initial symptoms, results of cervical cytology, HPV infections, and stage according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). Pathological findings of tumor included macroscopic features, tumor size, histological grade, depth of cervical stromal invasion, resection margin, LVSI, and LN involvement status. Data pertaining to treatments and outcomes included primary treatments, adjuvant therapies, follow-up period, recurrence of disease, and survival. Histological diagnosis was based on analysis of biopsies or hysterectomy specimens. Tumor size was calculated according to the clinical stage. The resection margin was considered negative when the margin was greater than 10 mm from carcinoma in cases of hysterectomy and when the safety of 3 mm or more was secured in conization. Histology and cytology slides were finally confirmed by a single gynecologic pathologist of our institution. LN status before initial treatment was determined by pelvic MRI and PET-CT. Concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) was combined with cisplatin. HPV DNA chip test, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based HPV DNA microarray system, is a HPV genotyping method for 15 high-risk HPV types (HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 53, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68) and 9 low-risk HPV types (HPV types 6, 11, 34, 40, 42, 43, 44, 57, and 70).
Descriptive statistics were calculated for age and follow-up period. Overall survival (OS) time was calculated as the number of months from the date of initial treatment until the date of death. Disease-free survival (DFS) time was calculated as the number of months from the date of initial treatment to the date of recurrence. Follow-up was updated in January 2017. All data were analyzed using Statistical Package Service Solution (SPSS) software for Windows version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients are listed in Table 1. The median age was 50 years (range, 28 to 68 years) and 9 patients (52.9%) were premenopausal. Results of cervical cytology revealed adenocarcinoma in 14 patients and atypical glandular cells in 3. Sixteen women (94.1%) were infected with HPV. Stage IB1 disease (70.6%) was most common. Thirteen patients underwent different types of surgical procedures and one of them received postoperative CCRT due to pelvic LN metastasis (LNM). Three patients received primary CCRT without any surgery. A woman with stage IB1 disease was not treated surgically because of poor medical status. The remaining 2 patients received primary CCRT due to stage IIA1 or IB2 disease. A young woman with stage IB1 disease was conservatively treated with only conization. Pelvic LNM was suspected in 2 patients based on preoperative imaging. One of the patients, the only woman with LVSI, had histological LNM after PLND. Another one received primary CCRT without histological confirmation.
Table 1

Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with VGA of the uterine cervix

jgo-29-e54-i001
Clinical characteristics No. (%)
Age (yr) 50 (28–68)
≥50 9 (52.9)
≥40 and <50 6 (35.3)
≥30 and <40 1 (5.9)
<30 1 (5.9)
Menopause
Pre-menopause 9 (52.9)
Post-menopause 8 (47.1)
Presenting symptom
Vaginal bleeding 6 (35.3)
Leukorrhea 3 (17.6)
Asymptomatic 8 (47.1)
Cervical cytology (Thin-Prep test)
Adenocarinoma 14 (82.4)
Atypical glandular cell 3 (17.6)
HPV type
16 6 (35.3)
18 9 (52.9)
18, 31 1 (5.9)
Negative 1 (5.9)
FIGO stage
IIA1 1 (5.9)
IB2 1 (5.9)
IB1 12 (70.6)
IA2 1 (5.9)
IA1 2 (11.7)
LN status by imaging before primary treatment*
Involved 2 (11.7)
Not involved 15 (88.3)
Primary treatment
Surgery 13 (76.5)
CCRT 3 (17.6)
Conization 1 (5.9)
LVSI
Positive 1 (5.9)
Negative 13 (76.5)
Unknown 3 (17.6)
LN status by histology after PLND
Involved 1 (5.9)
Not involved 7 (41.2)
Unknown (not PLND) 9 (52.9)
Follow-up (mo) 58 (12–116)
Recurrence 4 (23.5)
Non-recurrence 13 (76.5)
Data shown are median (range) or number of patients (%).
CCRT, concurrent chemoradiation therapy; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; HPV, human papillomavirus; LN, lymph node; LVSI, lymphovascular space invasion; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET-CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography; PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection; VGA, villoglandular adenocarcinoma.
*Determination by pelvic MRI and PET-CT.
The median follow-up period was 58 months (range, 12 to 116 months). At the time of review, 13 women (76.5%) were alive without recurrence and, 4 patients (23.5%) showed a relapse. Three of them were alive after receiving appropriate treatments, however, one died due to disease progression. Consequentially, the 2-year and 5-year OS rates were 100.0% and 92.3%, respectively. The 2-year and 5-year DFS rates were 87.4% and 72.6%, respectively. Details are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

Details of patients with VGA of the uterine cervix

jgo-29-e54-i002
No. Age (yr) Menopause Macroscopic finding Size (mm) Cervical cytology HPV genotype FIGO stage Primary treatment Grade DOI Resection margin LVSI LNM F/U (mo) Outcome (mo)* Secondary treatment
1 68 Yes Ulcerative surface 20 AC 16 IIA1 CCRT 1 ? ? ? - 116 NED -
2 53 Yes Ulcerative surface 20 AC 16 IB1 LRH BSO PLND 1 <1/2 Neg. - - 108 NED -
3 57 Yes Exophytic mass 50 AC 16 IB2 CCRT 1 ? ? ? + 107 NED -
4 43 No Exophytic mass 35 AGC 18 IB1 RH BSO PLND → CCRT 1 <1/2 Neg. + + 90 NED -
5 50 No Exophytic mass 30 AC 18 IB1 MRH BSO PLND 1 <1/2 Neg. - - 80 NED -
6 55 Yes Exophytic mass 30 AC 18 IB1 RH BSO PLND 2 >1/2 Neg. - - 67 ROD (22) – Vagina stump CCRT
7 60 Yes Exophytic mass 35 AC 16 IB1 CCRT 1 ? ? ? - 66 NED -
8 28 No Ulcerative surface 30 AC 18, 31 IB1 Conization 1 <1/2 Neg. - - 65 NED -
9 54 Yes Ulcerative surface 30 AC 18 IB1 LMRH BSO 1 <1/2 Neg. - - 58 ROD (42) – Liver ChemoTx
10 46 No Polypoid mass 30 AC 18 IB1 LRH PLND 1 <1/2 Neg. - - 54 ROD (34) – Adnexa BSO & ChemoTx
11 56 Yes No mass No AGC 18 IA1 TVH BSO 1 <1/2 Neg. - - 54 NED -
12 31 No Exophytic mass 20 AC 16 IB1 LMRH 1 <1/2 Neg. - - 41 ROD (12) – Adnexa BSO & ChemoTx
DOD (42)
13 46 No No mass No AGC No IA1 TLH 1 <1/2 Neg. - - 44 NED -
14 64 Yes No mass No AC 18 IA2 MRH BSO PLND 1 <1/2 Neg. - - 37 NED -
15 47 No Ulcerative surface 20 AC 18 IB1 MRH BSO PLND 1 >1/2 Neg. - - 36 NED -
16 48 No Exophytic mass 20 AC 18 IB1 LRH BSO PLND 1 <1/2 Neg. - - 18 NED -
17 46 No Exophytic mass 10 AC 16 IB1 LMRH BSO 1 <1/2 Neg. - - 12 NED -
AC, adenocarcinoma; AGC, atypical glandular cell; BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; CCRT, concurrent chemoradiation therapy; DOD, death of disease; DOI, depth of invasion; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; F/U, follow-up; HPV, human papillomavirus; LMRH, laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy; LNM, lymph node metastases; LRH, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy; LVSI, lymphovascular space invasion; MRH, modified radical hysterectomy; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NED, no evidence of disease; Neg., negative; PET-CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography; PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection; RH, radical hysterectomy; ROD, recurrence of disease; TVH, total vaginal hysterectomy; TLH, total laparoscopic hysterectomy; VGA, villoglandular adenocarcinoma.
*Time intervals between completion of initial surgery and recurrence or death; Pelvic LNM diagnosed by pelvic MRI and PET-CT; Pelvic LNM confirmed by imaging and histology.
Ten of 12 patients with stage IB1 disease underwent surgical procedures including RH or modified RH with or without BSO. Seven of them received PLND, however, the remaining 3 refused to undergo PLND due to the risk of postoperative lymphatic complications. Patient 4, who was confirmed with left hypogastric LNM after receiving RH and PLND with BSO for stage IB1 disease, received postoperative CCRT. She has been alive without any recurrence. Of the 2 patients treated without surgery, patient 7 was treated by primary CCRT and patient 8 underwent only conization. The disease in patient 8 was characterized by the 30 mm flat lesion without definitive mass, and the patient underwent conization initially for accurate diagnosis. Her cone specimen revealed well-differentiated tumor without LVSI, complete resection with clear margin, and invasion <50% of thickness. Additionally, preoperative images showed no LNM. We suggested further treatments. However, she declined surgery or radiation because she desired to preserve her fertility and was extremely afraid of surgery. She finally decided to follow-up without further treatment. She is alive without recurrence.
Patient 1 with stage IIA1 disease and patient 3 with IB2 received primary CCRT. No recurrence was found in either case. Patient 14 with stage IA2 disease underwent modified RH and PLND with BSO. Two patients with stage IA1 disease underwent total vaginal hysterectomy with BSO (patient 11) or total laparoscopic hysterectomy (patient 13). None of the 3 women with stage IA disease showed recurrence.
Four patients (patients 6, 9, 10, and 12) with recurrence were diagnosed at stage IB1. All of them underwent surgical procedures without adjuvant treatments. Two patients did not simultaneously receive BSO and had recurrent tumor at adnexa later. The remaining 2 patients had recurrent tumor at vaginal stump and liver, respectively. Three patients were cured with appropriate treatments. However, patient 12 died due to disease progression.
Patient 6 underwent RH and PLND with BSO for a 30 mm exophytic tumor. Her disease was diagnosed with grade-2 tumor without LVSI and invasion >1/2 of cervical thickness. Tumor recurred at vaginal stump 22 months later and the patient was treated with radiation combined with cisplatin. She has been alive without second recurrence for 45 months after treatment for recurrence. Patient 9 underwent laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy (MRH) with BSO for the 30 mm ulcerative mass. Her disease was diagnosed with grade-1 tumor without LVSI and invasion <1/2 of cervical thickness. Recurrent hepatic tumor was seen 42 months later. She received systemic chemotherapy (cisplatin with paclitaxel). No second recurrence was detected during 29 months since treatment for recurrence. Patients 10 and 12 had recurrent tumor at adnexa, 42 and 12 months later after first operation, respectively. Neither patient underwent simultaneous BSO. They were confirmed to have grade-1 tumor without LVSI, invasion <1/2 of cervical thickness, and no LNM. They underwent BSO and received further chemotherapy (cisplatin with paclitaxel). Patient 10 has been alive without second recurrence for 33 months after treatment for recurrence. However, patient 12 had progressive disease and died 30 months later since the first recurrence, despite multiple courses of chemotherapy.

DISCUSSION

VGA of the uterine cervix is a rare subtype of adenocarcinoma. Similar to adenocarcinoma, VGA is generally found in younger women [789101112]. In this study, 52.9% were premenopausal women, in addition, 20s and 30s women were also found. However, VGA is a distinct histological entity with more favorable prognosis compared to usual adenocarcinoma. VGA has been associated with well-differentiated tumor, superficial invasion, uncommon LVSI, and rare LNM (Table 3). Like other series, our study also showed favorable features of VGA. These features of VGA might support less radical management approaches, especially for young women. Some authors have postulated that while SCC has lymphatic spread, adenocarcinoma has hematogenous metastasis [16]. Absence of LNM in preoperative image and LVSI in biopsy may obviate the need for lymphadenectomy, although further study is needed. Sentinel LN biopsy may be an alternative, but this is also to require more research.
Table 3

Literature review of series published on VGA of the uterine cervix

jgo-29-e54-i003
References Cases Median age (yr) LND LVSI LNM ROD DOD
Kaku et al. [7] 7 45 7 2 2 1 1
Jones et al. [8] 12 38 12 0 ? 2 1
Khunamornpong et al. [9] 15 39 15 3 2 0 0
Utsugi et al. [10] 13 45 13 4 1 0 0
Lataifeh et al. [11] 28 38 21 ? 2 5 5
Kim et al. [12] 15 40 10 2 1 3 0
Present report 17 50 8 1 2 4 1
DOD, death of disease; LND, lymph node dissection; LNM, lymph node metastases; LVSI, lymphovascular space invasion; ROD, recurrence of disease; VGA, villoglandular adenocarcinoma.
Among various prognostic parameters of survival in patients with cervical cancer, the most important factors include clinical stage and LN status [18]. Additionally, high-grade tumor, positive resection margin, parametrial invasion, and deep cervical invasion are considered as high-risk factors for recurrence of early-stage cervical cancer (stage IA2–IIA) [181920]. In our study, all cases of recurrence represented stage IB1 disease. Patient 6 manifested high-risk factors such as grade-2 tumor and deep cervical invasion. However, the remaining 3 patients showed no high-risk factor. Patients had well-differentiated tumor, superficial cervical invasion, no LVSI, and no LNM. These results suggest that VGA might have prognostic factors different from other types of cervical carcinoma. VGA is too rare to provide a detailed and concrete description on its clinicopathological features and survival outcomes.
In contrast to favorable outcome of VGA, our study disputes the safety of ovarian preservation in young women with VGA. In studies of cervical cancer, several risk factors of ovarian metastasis have been proposed, including large tumor size, high-grade tumor, deep stromal invasion, LVSI, LNM, and endometrial invasion [2122]. In our study, however, 2 patients had a recurrence at adnexa despite the absence of risk factors. A recent meta-analysis of stages IB–IIB cervical cancer revealed that adenocarcinoma (2.7%) increased the risk of ovarian metastasis compared with SCC (0.7%) [15]. Although the number of patients in this study was small, the results showed that adnexal recurrence may be more common in VGA, compared to usual adenocarcinomas.
Ovarian function is important for quality of life in premenopausal women. Although BSO in young patients with cervical cancer eliminates the possibility of concealed metastasis in adnexa, the procedure can induce surgical menopause. Currently, there is no consensus on ovarian preservation in young patients with early-stage cervical cancer. The decision on performing simultaneous BSO is mainly based on 2 factors: patient's age at diagnosis and likelihood of ovarian metastasis. A prior study suggested that ovarian preservation was considered in SCC, while BSO was recommended in patients with adenocarcinoma irrespective of age [16]. No study has reported the safety of ovarian preservation in young patients with VGA. The results of our study show that simultaneous BSO is appropriate for young women with stage IB–IIA VGA undergoing surgical procedures.
This study had a small number of cases due to rarity of VGA. In addition, this study was retrospectively designed at a single institution. Nonetheless, all patients had long-term follow-up data to provide valuable information on survival outcomes.
In conclusion, we observed that VGA of the uterine cervix was associated with favorable prognosis and commonly occurred in younger women. Because of favorable features, less radical surgery or fertility-sparing surgery is safe for patients with early-stage VGA, especially in young women. However, the management of young women with VGA of stage IB or higher must be selected cautiously. Young women with stages IB–IIA VGA may be safe to receive simultaneous BSO when undergoing surgical procedures. A large prospective study is required to investigate the treatments for and outcomes of VGA of the uterine cervix.

Notes

Conflict of Interest No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author Contributions

  • Conceptualization: K.S.M.

  • Data curation: J.U.C.

  • Formal analysis: J.U.C.

  • Funding acquisition: K.S.M.

  • Investigation: J.U.C.

  • Methodology: J.U.C.

  • Project administration: K.W.D.

  • Resources: K.S.M.

  • Software: J.U.C.

  • Supervision: K.S.M.

  • Validation: K.W.D.

  • Visualization: J.U.C.

  • Writing - original draft: J.U.C.

  • Writing - review & editing: J.U.C.

References

1. Smith HO, Tiffany MF, Qualls CR, Key CR. The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States--a 24-year population-based study. Gynecol Oncol. 2000; 78:97–105.
crossref
2. Bray F, Carstensen B, Moller H, Zappa M, Zakelj MP, Lawrence G, et al. Incidence trends of adenocarcinoma of the cervix in 13 European countries. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005; 14:2191–2199.
crossref
3. Liu S, Semenciw R, Mao Y. Cervical cancer: the increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in younger women. CMAJ. 2001; 164:1151–1152.
4. Gien LT, Beauchemin MC, Thomas G. Adenocarcinoma: a unique cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 116:140–146.
crossref
5. Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YM, Kim YT, Nam JH. Outcomes after radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix. Br J Cancer. 2010; 102:1692–1698.
crossref
6. Lee YY, Choi CH, Kim TJ, Lee JW, Kim BG, Lee JH, et al. A comparison of pure adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy in stage IB-IIA. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 120:439–443.
crossref
7. Kaku T, Kamura T, Shigematsu T, Sakai K, Nakanami N, Uehira K, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix with predominantly villoglandular papillary growth pattern. Gynecol Oncol. 1997; 64:147–152.
8. Jones MW, Kounelis S, Papadaki H, Bakker A, Swalsky PA, Woods J, et al. Well-differentiated villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: oncogene/tumor suppressor gene alterations and human papillomavirus genotyping. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2000; 19:110–117.
crossref
9. Khunamornpong S, Siriaunkgul S, Suprasert P. Well-differentiated villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: cytomorphologic observation of five cases. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002; 26:10–14.
crossref
10. Utsugi K, Shimizu Y, Akiyama F, Umezawa S, Hasumi K. Clinicopathologic features of villoglandular papillary adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 92:64–70.
crossref
11. Lataifeh IM, Al-Hussaini M, Uzan C, Jaradat I, Duvillard P, Morice P. Villoglandular papillary adenocarcinoma of the cervix: a series of 28 cases including two with lymph node metastasis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013; 23:900–905.
crossref
12. Kim HJ, Sung JH, Lee E, Ahn S, Song SY, Choi CH, et al. Prognostic factors influencing decisions about surgical treatment of villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014; 24:1299–1305.
crossref
13. Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC, Peters AA, Kenter GG. A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001; 11:180–186.
crossref
14. Ramirez PT, Pareja R, Rendo'n GJ, Millan C, Frumovitz M, Schmeler KM. Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care? Gynecol Oncol. 2014; 132:254–259.
crossref
15. Hu T, Wu L, Xing H, Yang R, Li X, Huang K, et al. Development of criteria for ovarian preservation in cervical cancer patients treated with radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20:881–890.
crossref
16. Shimada M, Kigawa J, Nishimura R, Yamaguchi S, Kuzuya K, Nakanishi T, et al. Ovarian metastasis in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 101:234–237.
crossref
17. Lyu J, Sun T, Tan X. Ovarian preservation in young patients with stage I cervical adenocarcinoma a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2014; 24:1513–1520.
crossref
18. Berek JS, Novak E. Berek & Novak's gynecology. 15th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2012.
19. Kim MK, Jo H, Kong HJ, Kim HC, Kim JW, Kim YM, et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting risk of recurrence after radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010; 20:1581–1586.
20. Biewenga P, van der Velden J, Mol BW, Stalpers LJ, Schilthuis MS, van der Steeg JW, et al. Prognostic model for survival in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Cancer. 2011; 117:768–776.
crossref
21. Natsume N, Aoki Y, Kase H, Kashima K, Sugaya S, Tanaka K. Ovarian metastasis in stage Ib and II cervical adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1999; 74:255–258.
crossref
22. Sakuragi N, Takeda N, Hareyama H, Fujimoto T, Todo Y, Okamoto K, et al. A multivariate analysis of blood vessel and lymph vessel invasion as predictors of ovarian and lymph node metastases in patients with cervical carcinoma. Cancer. 2000; 88:2578–2583.
crossref
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

U Chul Ju
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0483-338X

Woo Dae Kang
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3952-9724

Seok Mo Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2318-0334

Similar articles