Journal List > Korean J Adult Nurs > v.25(5) > 1094446

Korean J Adult Nurs. 2013 Oct;25(5):567-573. Korean.
Published online October 31, 2013.  https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.5.567
© 2013 Korean Society of Adult Nursing
A Study on Fluid Intake Measurements
Chang Kwan Lee, Yu Kyung Kim, Myung Hwa Seo, Kyung Mee Lee and Ju Eun Lee
Department of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author: Lee, Chang Kwan. Department of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center, 81 Irwon-ro Gangnam-gu, Seoul 135-710, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3410-2104, Fax: +82-2-3410-0031, Email: ckj.lee@samsung.com
Received June 25, 2013; Revised September 04, 2013; Accepted October 24, 2013.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compared two methods for measuring fluid intake and to assess the most effective method.

Methods

Data from 44 hospitalized patients with chronic kidney disease was analyzed. Two methods were used. The liquid method is to measure the daily intake of water in the form of pure water or some other beverage and IV fluid, the liquid-solid method is to measure the daily intake of water which enters by the oral route and IV fluid.

Results

The daily intake of fluid was 1483.10mL and 2245.99mL respectively. The fluid output was 1883.72 mL. The Intra-Class Correlation (ICC) between the liquid method and the liquid-solid method and fluid output was 0.64 and 0.69, respectively. The correlation between differences of fluid in two methods and body weight change was r=.47 (p<.001) and r=.56 (p<.001), respectively.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that there are no difference between the two measuring methods as to reflecting the most close value to fluid output. And the difference between intake and output by two methods is correlated with body weight change. Therefore, it can be suggested that the either method could be useful as patients' fluid intake measurement.

Keywords: Fluid balance; Body weight measurements; Intake

Tables


Table 1
General and Disease-related Characteristics of the Participants (N=44)
Click for larger image


Table 2
Comparison of Amount of Fluid Intake and Output between Two Different Methods (N=44)
Click for larger image


Table 3
Difference of Intra-class Correlations between Liquid and Liquid-solid Methods (N=44)
Click for larger image


Table 4
Correlation between Differences in Fluid Intake and Output by Two Different Methods and Weight Change (N=44)
Click for larger image

References
1. Bae SY. In: Sodium intake and excretion in adult women, and excessive sodium intake contributes food. Daegu: Keimyung University; 2011.
2. Brez S, Steen E, Handke A. Teaching patients INs and OUTs. Can Nurse 1998;94(4):51–52.
3. Choi-Kwon S, Yang YH, Jung Y. A study on fluid intake and output measurements. J Nurs Acad Soc 1995;25(1):88–98.
4. Guyton AC, Hall JE. In: Pocket companion to textbook of medical physiology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 2006.
5. Kim GS. In: Basic nursing practice. Seoul: Seoul National University Press; 1998.
6. Lee SJ, Song WS, Yoon SO. Correlation between the method of measurement of intake, output and the weight change-Lung resection patients; Paper presented at Samsung Medical Center Nursing Conference; Seoul. 2004.
7. Machin D, Campbell MJ, Tan SB, Tan SH. In: Sample size tables for clinical studies. 3rd ed. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
8. Mank A, Semin-Goossens A, Lelie J, Bakker P, Vos R. Monitoring hyperhydration during high-dose chemotherapy: Body weight or fluid balance? Acta Haematol 2003;109(4):163–168.
9. Meiner SE. Fluid balance documentation: A case study of daily weight and intake/output omissions. Geriatr Nurs 2002;23(1):46–47.
10. National Academy of Agricultural Science. Menugen. 2010 [Retrieved August 1, 2009].
from the National Academy of Agricultural Science Web site: http://koreanfood.rda.go.kr/mgn/mgnmealinfo_mealquery.aspx.
11. Potter PA, Perry AG. In: Fundamentals of nursing. 7th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2009.
12. Song KA, Park HS, Hong YH, Yoon EJ, Lee KY, Cho BH. In: Fundamentals of nursing. Seoul: Soomunsa; 2008.
13. Travers B, O'loughlin C, Murphy N, Ryder M, Coulon C, Ledwidge M, et al. Fluid restriction in the management decompansated heart failure: No impact on time to clinical stability. J Card Fail 2007;13(2):128–132. [doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2006.10.012]
14. Wise LC, Mersch J, Racioppi J, Crosier J, Thompson C. Evaluating the reliability and utility of cumulative intake and output. J Nurs Care Qual 2000;14(3):37–42.
15. Yang YH, Choi KS, Kim EK, Sung IS. A study of the fluid balance of the patients on soft diets. J Nurs Acad Soc 1996;26(3):688–696.
TOOLS
Similar articles

A Study on Fluid Intake and Output Measurements

A Study on Fluid Intake among Nursing Home Residents

The Experience of Fluid Management in Hemodialysis Patients

A Study of the Fluid Balance of the Patients on Soft Diets

Early Sodium and Fluid Intake and Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants