1. Pellegrino A, Vizza E, Fruscio R, Villa A, Corrado G, Villa M, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009; 35:98–103.

2. Vizza E, Pellegrino A, Milani R, Fruscio R, Baiocco E, Cognetti F, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011; 37:364–369.

3. Li G, Yan X, Shang H, Wang G, Chen L, Han Y. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 105:176–180.

4. Park DA, Yun JE, Kim SW, Lee SH. Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017; 43:994–1002.

5. Corrado G, Chiantera V, Fanfani F, Cutillo G, Lucidi A, Mancini E, et al. Robotic hysterectomy in severely obese patients with endometrial cancer: a multicenter study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23:94–100.

6. Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Kim FJ, Han DH, Lee SW, Yinghao S, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases. Eur Urol. 2011; 60:998–1005.

7. Scheib SA, Fader AN. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212:179.e1–179.e8.

8. Yoon A, Yoo HN, Lee YY, Lee JW, Kim BG, Bae DS, et al. Robotic single-port hysterectomy, adnexectomy, and lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22:322.

9. Tateo S, Nozza A, Del Pezzo C, Mereu L. Robotic single-site pelvic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2014; 134:631.

10. Bogliolo S, Musacchi V, Cassani C, Babilonti L, Gardella B, Spinillo A. Robotic single-site technique allows pelvic lymphadenectomy in surgical staging of endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22:695–696.

11. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (US). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Uterine and cervical neoplasms, version 1. 2017 [Internet]. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network;2017. cited year month day. Available from:
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/uterine.pdf.
12. National Cancer Institute (US). Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.03 [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute;2010. cited 2017 Aug 1. Available from:
http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/.
13. World Medical Association Inc. Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Indian Med Assoc. 2009; 107:403–405.
14. Barletta F, Corrado G, Vizza E. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with the use of SNAIL Tenaculum™. A simplified uterine manipulator for the management of early cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015; 27:9–13.
15. Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9:297–303.

16. Fagotti A, Bottoni C, Vizzielli G, Gueli Alletti S, Scambia G, Marana E, et al. Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for benign adnexal disease: a randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96:255–259.e2.

17. Yim GW, Jung YW, Paek J, Lee SH, Kwon HY, Nam EJ, et al. Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203:26.e1–26.e6.

18. Moukarzel LA, Fader AN, Tanner EJ. Feasibility of robotic-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in the gynecologic oncology setting. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017; 24:258–263.

19. Sinno AK, Tanner EJ 3rd. Robotic laparoendoscopic single site radical hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping and pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2015; 139:387.

20. Silva E, Silva A, Fernandes RP, Araujo MP, Carvalho JP, Carvalho FM, et al. Single-site robotic radical hysterectomy and sentinel lymphnode biopsy in cervical cancer: a case report. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2017; 39:35–40.

21. Markman M. Chemoradiation in the management of cervix cancer: current status and future directions. Oncology. 2013; 84:246–250.

22. Loizzi V, Cormio G, Vicino M, Selvaggi L. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy: an alternative option of treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008; 65:96–103.

23. Benedetti Panici P, Bellati F, Pastore M, Manci N, Musella A, Pauselli S, et al. An update in neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 107:S20–S22.

24. Fleming ND, Ramirez PT. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Curr Opin Oncol. 2012; 24:547–553.

25. Vizza E, Corrado G, Zanagnolo V, Tomaselli T, Cutillo G, Mancini E, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by robotic radical hysterectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a multi-institution study. Gynecol Oncol. 2014; 133:180–185.

26. Corrado G, Mereu L, Bogliolo S, Cela V, Freschi L, Carlin R, et al. Robotic single site staging in endometrial cancer: a multi-institution study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016; 42:1506–1511.

27. Benito V, Carballo S, Silva P, Esparza M, Arencibia O, Federico M, et al. Should the presence of metastatic para-aortic lymph nodes in locally advanced cervical cancer lead to more aggressive treatment strategies? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017; 24:609–616.
