Journal List > J Gynecol Oncol > v.27(1) > 1093774

Kim, Lim, Lim, Won, Seo, Kang, and Park: Incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer according to histologic subtypes in Korea, 1999 to 2012

Abstract

Objective

To investigate trends in the incidence of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), according to histologic subtypes, in Korean women between 1999 and 2012.

Methods

Data from the Korea Central Cancer Registry recorded between 1999 and 2012 were evaluated. The incidences of EOC histologic subtypes were counted. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) and annual percentage changes (APCs) in incidence rates were calculated. Patient data were divided into three groups based on age (<40, 40 to 59, and >59 years), and age-specific incidence rates were compared.

Results

Overall, the incidence of EOC has increased. Annual EOC cases increased from 922 in 1999 to 1,775 in 2012. In 1999, the ASR was 3.52 per 100,000 and increased to 4.79 per 100,000 in 2012 (APC, 2.53%; p<0.001). The ASRs in 2012 and APCs between 1999 and 2012 for the four major histologic subtypes were as follows (in order of incidence): serous carcinoma (ASR, 2.32 per 100,000; APC, 4.34%; p<0.001), mucinous carcinoma (ASR, 0.73 per 100,000; APC, –1.05%; p=0.131), endometrioid carcinoma (ASR, 0.51 per 100,000; APC, 1.48%; p=0.032), and clear cell carcinoma (ASR, 0.50 per 100,000; APC, 8.13%; p<0.001). In the sub-analyses based on age, clear cell carcinoma was confirmed as the histologic subtype whose incidence had increased the most since 1999.

Conclusion

The incidence of EOC is increasing in Korea. Among the histologic subtypes, the incidence of clear cell carcinoma has increased markedly across all age groups since 1999.

INTRODUCTION

In Korea, the incidence of ovarian cancer has been increasing gradually and was estimated to comprise 1.7% (2,374) of all newly diagnosed female cancers during 2015 [12]. Among gynecologic malignancies, ovarian cancer has the poorest survival rate owing to a lack of initial symptoms and effective screening tools, which results in relatively more advanced stage at diagnosis, and higher recurrence rates after treatment [1]. Moreover, it exhibits significant histologic heterogeneity and a wide variety of histologic features. The majority of ovarian cancers are epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs; 90%) that are further grouped into different histologic subtypes [3].
Histologic subtype is a well-established prognostic factor in EOC [456]. Unlike serous carcinomas, most endometrioid carcinomas are identified at an early stage and tend to be relatively chemo-sensitive, consequently contributing to a better prognosis compared with other subtypes [789]. Clear cell carcinoma also presents at an early stage and has a relatively good prognosis. However, advanced stage clear cell carcinoma of ovary has a worse prognosis compared with serous or endometrioid carcinomas because it is less sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy [1011]. Both endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas are associated with endometriosis, which is a common benign disease in women of reproductive age. Endometriosis is a known precursor of endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas, although the molecular mechanisms underlying the malignant transformation have not been elucidated fully [1213].
Although the prognosis and underlying carcinogenesis for EOC histologic subtypes are different, the current management strategies are the same. Extensive cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy are commonly recommended for maximal survival [14151617]. Consideration of histologic subtypes is necessary to devise individualized treatment plans for patients with EOC. Knowing the exact distribution of each histologic subtype would be the initial step in facilitating such treatment plans; however, to our knowledge, the distribution in Korean women has not yet been evaluated.
Thus, this study aimed to investigate trends in the incidence of EOC, according to histologic subtypes, in Korean women between 1999 and 2012. This nation-wide database analysis was conducted through exploration of the Korea Central Cancer Registry (KCCR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Study design

This study was conducted as a subgroup analysis of the previously published study which reported nationwide cancer statistics in Korea [2]. In that study, incidence data between 1999 and 2012 had been obtained from the KCCR. For the current study, the data of primary EOCs and each histologic subtype during the same period were extracted and analyzed. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) and annual percentage changes (APCs) in incidence rates were calculated. Patient data were divided into three groups based on age (<40, 40 to 59, and >59 years), and age-specific incidence rates were compared.

2. The Korea Central Cancer Registry

Historically, the KCCR began as a nation-wide, hospital-based cancer registry, set up by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in 1980. In 1999, the registry was expanded to cover the entire population [18]. Accurate nation-wide cancer incidence data is provided by the KCCR, named as the Korea National Cancer Incidence Database.

3. Classification of histologic subtypes

Based on the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd edition (ICD-O-3), data from women diagnosed with primary cancer of the ovary (C56) were retrieved. And those were converted according to the International Classification of Disease, 10th revision (ICD-10) [19]. Among them, only the data from those with EOCs including serous carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, endometrioid carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified, other specified carcinoma, and unspecified carcinoma were analyzed. Non-EOCs such as sex-cord stromal tumors and germ cell tumors were excluded. Mixed cell adenocarcinomas consisting of different histologic subtypes were also excluded.

4. Statistical analyses

The ASRs were calculated using Segi’s world standard population [20]. For the estimation of trends in incidence rates for all EOCs and individual histologic subtypes, APCs were calculated as follows: [exp(β)-1]×100, and the regression coefficient (β) was obtained by a linear regression of log-transformed ASRs in a calendar year. Testing the hypothesis that the APC is equal to zero is equivalent to the hypothesis that the slope of the line in the equation is equal to zero. Statistical analyses were performed to test the trend. SAS 9.3 statistical software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for all calculations and a p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Overall, the number of newly diagnosed EOC cases between 1999 and 2012 has increased continuously: annual EOC cases increased from 922 in 1999 to 1,775 in 2012 (Table 1).
Table 1

Age-standardized incidence rates per 100,000 and annual percent changes (%) of epithelial ovarian cancer

jgo-27-e5-i001
Histologic subtype 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 APC p-value
All ovarian cancer
 ASR 5.0 4.8 4.8 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.9 5.6 5.4 5.9 5.8 6.0 1.7
Epithelial ovarian cancer
 Case 922 944 949 1,013 1,091 1,136 1,211 1,282 1,457 1,430 1,439 1,588 1,597 1,775
 ASR 3.52 3.48 3.42 3.54 3.77 3.77 3.92 4.03 4.47 4.22 4.12 4.54 4.44 4.79 2.53 <0.001
Serous carcinoma
 Case 406 351 378 432 516 538 582 623 713 727 734 826 819 878
 ASR 1.57 1.33 1.38 1.53 1.79 1.80 1.90 1.97 2.18 2.14 2.11 2.33 2.26 2.32 4.34 <0.001
Mucinous carcinoma
 Case 193 228 206 198 231 205 214 200 238 176 204 213 233 247
 ASR 0.71 0.82 0.75 0.69 0.80 0.70 0.72 0.65 0.77 0.55 0.62 0.67 0.70 0.73 -1.05 0.131
Endometrioid carcinoma
 Case 100 106 96 120 111 110 114 139 133 152 133 157 138 184
 ASR 0.38 0.39 0.34 0.42 0.38 0.36 0.36 0.43 0.40 0.45 0.38 0.45 0.38 0.51 1.48 0.032
Clear cell carcinoma
 Case 42 62 68 69 79 65 85 104 111 132 142 159 165 182
 ASR 0.16 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.27 0.22 0.27 0.32 0.33 0.39 0.41 0.45 0.46 0.50 8.13 <0.001
Adapted from Jung et al. [2].
ASR, age-standardized incidence rate.
The ASRs and APCs for all EOCs and histologic subtypes are presented in Table 1, Fig. 1. The ASR for all EOCs has increased between 1999 and 2012, producing a significant APC over this period (2.53%; p<0.001). In 2012, the four most common histologic subtypes were serous, mucinous, endometrioid, and clear cell carcinoma.
Fig. 1

Age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) per 100,000 of epithelial ovarian cancer in Korea between 1999 and 2012.

jgo-27-e5-g001
Among the four major histologic subtypes, the incidence of mucinous carcinoma alone decreased between 1999 and 2012, although the APC was not significant (–1.05%; p=0.131). By contrast, the incidences of serous carcinoma (APC, 4.34%; p<0.001) and endometrioid carcinoma (APC, 1.48%; p=0.032) increased significantly. During the same period, the incidence of clear cell carcinoma increased the most with statistical significance (APC; 8.13%, p<0.001).
Table 2, Fig. 2 show the ASRs and APCs for all EOCs and the four major histologic subtypes stratified according to age. Between 1999 and 2012, the incidence of EOCs increased significantly across all three age groups; the APCs were 1.87% for the younger age group (<40 years; p=0.001), 2.48% for the middle age group (40 to 59 years; p<0.001), and 3.02% for the older age group (>59 years; p<0.001). A trend of increasing APCs was observed as age increased. Similar findings were noted in serous carcinoma type.
Table 2

Age-specific incidence rates per 100,000 and annual percent changes (%) of epithelial ovarian cancer

jgo-27-e5-i002
Histologic subtype Age group (yr)
<40 40-59 >59
All epithelial ovarian cancer
 1999 0.61 1.86 1.04
 2005 0.68 2.05 1.19
 2012 0.74 2.55 1.49
 APC 1.87 2.48 3.02
 p-value 0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Serous carcinoma
 1999 0.20 0.89 0.48
 2005 0.15 1.11 0.64
 2012 0.17 1.30 0.85
 APC 2.56 3.67 6.27
 p-value 0.059 <0.001 <0.001
Mucinous carcinoma
 1999 0.28 0.28 0.15
 2005 0.34 0.25 0.13
 2012 0.25 0.32 0.15
 APC -1.37 0.02 -2.74
 p-value 0.275 0.979 0.010
Endometrioid carcinoma
 1999 0.05 0.24 0.09
 2005 0.07 0.22 0.07
 2012 0.09 0.32 0.10
 APC 3.14 1.29 0.66
 p-value 0.007 0.152 0.687
Clear cell carcinoma
 1999 0.03 0.13 0.00
 2005 0.06 0.18 0.02
 2012 0.10 0.31 0.08
 APC 10.00 7.39 13.08
 p-value 0.001 <0.001 0.007
APC, annual percent changes.
Fig. 2

Annual percent changes (APCs, %) of epithelial ovarian cancer according to age groups between 1999 and 2012.

jgo-27-e5-g002
In mucinous carcinoma, the ASRs did not change significantly for the younger and middle age groups, whereas for the older age group, the incidence of mucinous carcinoma decreased with a significant APC (–2.74%; p=0.010). In endometrioid carcinoma, the ASRs increased within the younger age group with a significant APC (3.14%; p=0.007).
In clear cell carcinoma, the ASRs increased significantly across all age groups; the APCs were 10.00% for the younger age group (p=0.001), 7.39% for the middle age group (p<0.001), and 13.08% for the older age group (p=0.007).
The age-specific incidence rates for all EOCs and the four major histologic subtypes in 2012 are shown in Fig. 3. While the incidence of serous carcinoma was highest among patients in their early 60s, that of endometrioid carcinoma reached its peak among patients in their late 40s. The incidence of clear cell carcinoma was highest among patients with late 50s, and decreased thereafter.
Fig. 3

Age-specific incidence rates of epithelial ovarian cancer for 2012 in Korea.

jgo-27-e5-g003

DISCUSSION

In this study, a gradual increase in the incidences of EOCs was observed between 1999 and 2012. In Korea, the age-adjusted incidence rate of ovarian cancer is known to be much lower than that in Western countries. However, recent studies have reported that the incidence of ovarian cancers has been increasing continuously in Korea, and that this trend might be explained by the westernization of diet and life styles, as well as changes in sociodemographic factors [121]. Of the whole ovarian cancers, EOC is the most commonly identified (90%), and it is known to be affected by reproductive factors [3].
In 2012, the most common EOC histologic subtypes in Korean women were serous, mucinous, endometrioid, and clear cell carcinomas, representing 49.5%, 13.9%, 10.4%, and 10.3% of all EOC cases, respectively. Among the four major subtypes, we found statistically significant annual increases in serous, endometrioid, and clear cell carcinomas between 1999 and 2012. A similar trend was also observed in the study of another East Asian country, Taiwan [22].
However, in the current study, the incidence rate of mucinous carcinoma alone decreased between 1999 and 2012. There are a number of possible reasons for this decrease. First, recent advances have been made in the pathological diagnosis of ovarian mucinous carcinoma [23], suggesting that, before these advances, misdiagnoses of mucinous carcinoma could have led to overestimated incidence rates. For the precise distinctions between primary and metastatic ovarian mucinous carcinomas, pathologists began to utilize refined immunohistochemistry techniques. Prior to this, a substantial proportion of metastatic cases could have been misinterpreted as primary ovarian mucinous carcinomas [2425]. In addition, exclusion of borderline ovarian tumors, as well as pseudomyxoma peritonei, resulted in less common pure ovarian mucinous carcinoma cases than previously reported [26].
Second, influence of the reproductive factors on the development of EOCs might differ by histologic subtypes. Conditions suppressing ovulation, such as parity and oral contraceptive use, are known to have protective effects against EOC, more so for non-mucinous carcinomas compared with mucinous carcinomas [27282930]. In a case-control study, Soegaard et al. [29] reported that use of oral contraceptives was associated with a decreased risk of serous and endometrioid carcinomas, but not for mucinous carcinoma. Similarly, a meta-analysis of 45 epidemiological studies also concluded that the incidence of mucinous carcinoma was little affected by oral contraceptive use, whereas its protective effects against other subtypes were observed [30]. However, in Korean women, both the parity (total fertility rates per woman, 1.3 in 2013) and the prevalence of oral contraceptive use (percentage of women among those of reproductive age who are married or in union, 2.0% in 2009) are much lower than those in women from Western countries [3132]. Thus, combined protective effects of parity and oral contraceptive use might be reduced in Korean women, resulting in a relative increase in non-mucinous carcinomas.
Third, according to cohort studies and meta-analysis, cigarette smoking is related with an increased risk of ovarian mucinous carcinoma, but is not associated with an increased risk of serous or endometrioid carcinomas [3334]. Korea has the lowest prevalence for female cigarette smoking among the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development member countries (5.8% in 2012) [35], which might explain the relatively low incidence rate of mucinous carcinoma.
In this study, the incidence rate of clear cell carcinoma between 1999 and 2012 increased markedly across all age ranges, which was consistent with the results of a study in Taiwanese women [22]. Interestingly, whereas clear cell carcinoma constitutes only a small portion of EOCs in Western country, it accounts for approximately 20% of EOCs in Japan, another East Asian country [36].
Causes for the marked increase in the clear cell carcinoma type in Korean women might be explained by endometriosis, a common gynecologic disorder that occurs in 5% to 10% of reproductive-age women. Women with endometriosis are predisposed to developing EOC, with the risk of clear cell carcinoma being 3-fold greater than that of the other histologic subtypes [121337]. In addition, endometriosis is associated with excessive estrogen exposure [38]. For the Korean women, westernization of diet and life styles has led to earlier menarche, increased obesity, and decreased childbearing [2139]. All these conditions are associated with an increased exposure to estrogen and might influence the prevalence of endometriosis, resulting in a consequential increase in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.
As mentioned earlier, histologic subtype is a prognostic factor for the patients with EOC [456]. Although stage at diagnosis, sensitiveness to platinum-based chemotherapy, recurrence after treatment, and survival is known to be different among the types [78910111213], the current management strategies are the same [14151617]. However, efforts to devise specific treatments according to histologic subtypes of EOC have been made. A Japanese randomized controlled trial in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (JGOG3017/GCIG) is the representative. In this trial, the efficacy of an irinotecan-cisplatin regimen was compared with a conventional paclitaxel-carboplatin regimen as a first line chemotherapy. Although the irinotecan-cisplatin regimen did not show a survival benefit, it was suggested as an alternative treatment choice for ovarian clear cell carcinoma because of the different toxicity profile [40]. Like this trial, further studies, which explore individualized treatment strategies for specific EOC histologic subtypes, are encouraged indeed.
Up to our knowledge, the current study is the first to report the incidence rates of EOC according to histologic subtypes in Korea. Nevertheless, this study has several limitations. Patients' demographic characteristics, except age at diagnosis, were not obtained. Detailed information including cancer stage, treatment courses, and survival data were also not investigated. Whether the changes in pathological diagnostic criteria were reflected in the database was not clear. In addition, recent simplified classification systems that assign EOC into type I and type II, according to morphological, molecular, and clinical features, have not yet been employed in the database. Despite these limitations, secular trends in incidence rates of all EOCs and individual histologic subtypes were clearly demonstrated.
In conclusion, the incidence of EOC increased continuously from 1999 to 2012 in Korea. Among the four major histologic subtypes, only the incidence of mucinous carcinoma has decreased; however, without significance. During the same period, ovarian clear cell carcinoma has remarkably increased in all ages. Identification of precursors and carcinogenesis courses for each histologic type are needed to understand its nature. By the efforts to reveal proper treatment methods and their impact on survival, more individualized treatment plans could be provided for the patients.

Notes

Funding This work was supported by the National Cancer Center Grant (1310220), the same grant with the previous work [2].

Conflict of Interest Myong Cheol Lim and Sokbom Kang serve as Editors for the Journal of Gynecologic Oncology, but have no role in the decision to publish this article. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Lim MC, Moon EK, Shin A, Jung KW, Won YJ, Seo SS, et al. Incidence of cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer in Korea, 1999-2010. J Gynecol Oncol. 2013; 24:298–302.
2. Jung KW, Won YJ, Oh CM, Kong HJ, Cho H, Lee DH, et al. Prediction of cancer incidence and mortality in Korea, 2015. Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 47:142–148.
3. Cho KR, Shih IM. Ovarian cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2009; 4:287–313.
4. Clark TG, Stewart ME, Altman DG, Gabra H, Smyth JF. A prognostic model for ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2001; 85:944–952.
5. Agarwal R, Kaye SB. Prognostic factors in ovarian cancer: how close are we to a complete picture? Ann Oncol. 2005; 16:4–6.
6. Makar AP, Baekelandt M, Tropé CG, Kristensen GB. The prognostic significance of residual disease, FIGO substage, tumor histology, and grade in patients with FIGO stage III ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 1995; 56:175–180.
7. Tidy J, Mason WP. Endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary: a retrospective study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988; 95:1165–1169.
8. Kline RC, Wharton JT, Atkinson EN, Burke TW, Gershenson DM, Edwards CL. Endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary: retrospective review of 145 cases. Gynecol Oncol. 1990; 39:337–346.
9. Storey DJ, Rush R, Stewart M, Rye T, Al-Nafussi A, Williams AR, et al. Endometrioid epithelial ovarian cancer : 20 years of prospectively collected data from a single center. Cancer. 2008; 112:2211–2220.
10. Chan JK, Teoh D, Hu JM, Shin JY, Osann K, Kapp DS. Do clear cell ovarian carcinomas have poorer prognosis compared to other epithelial cell types? A study of 1411 clear cell ovarian cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 109:370–376.
11. Goff BA, Sainz de la Cuesta R, Muntz HG, Fleischhacker D, Ek M, Rice LW, et al. Clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a distinct histologic type with poor prognosis and resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy in stage III disease. Gynecol Oncol. 1996; 60:412–417.
12. Pearce CL, Templeman C, Rossing MA, Lee A, Near AM, Webb PM, et al. Association between endometriosis and risk of histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13:385–394.
13. Munksgaard PS, Blaakaer J. The association between endometriosis and ovarian cancer: a review of histological, genetic and molecular alterations. Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 124:164–169.
14. Bristow RE, Tomacruz RS, Armstrong DK, Trimble EL, Montz FJ. Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20:1248–1259.
15. Chi DS, Franklin CC, Levine DA, Akselrod F, Sabbatini P, Jarnagin WR, et al. Improved optimal cytoreduction rates for stages IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer: a change in surgical approach. Gynecol Oncol. 2004; 94:650–654.
16. Wimberger P, Wehling M, Lehmann N, Kimmig R, Schmalfeldt B, Burges A, et al. Influence of residual tumor on outcome in ovarian cancer patients with FIGO stage IV disease: an exploratory analysis of the AGO-OVAR (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Ovarian Cancer Study Group). Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17:1642–1648.
17. Lim MC, Lee HS, Jung DC, Choi JY, Seo SS, Park SY. Pathological diagnosis and cytoreduction of cardiophrenic lymph node and pleural metastasis in ovarian cancer patients using video-assisted thoracic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009; 16:1990–1996.
18. Shin HR, Won YJ, Jung KW, Kong HJ, Yim SH, Lee JK, et al. Nationwide cancer incidence in Korea, 1999~2001; first result using the national cancer incidence database. Cancer Res Treat. 2005; 37:325–331.
19. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. 10th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization Press;1994.
20. Segi M, Fujisaku S. Cancer mortality for selected sites in 24 countries (1950-1957). Sendai: Department of Public Health, Tohoku University School of Medicine;1960.
21. Park B, Park S, Kim TJ, Ma SH, Kim BG, Kim YM, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of ovarian cancer in Korea. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 21:241–247.
22. Chiang YC, Chen CA, Chiang CJ, Hsu TH, Lin MC, You SL, et al. Trends in incidence and survival outcome of epithelial ovarian cancer: 30-year national population-based registry in Taiwan. J Gynecol Oncol. 2013; 24:342–351.
23. Hart WR. Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a review. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2005; 24:4–25.
24. Leen SL, Singh N. Pathology of primary and metastatic mucinous ovarian neoplasms. J Clin Pathol. 2012; 65:591–595.
25. McCluggage WG. Immunohistochemistry in the distinction between primary and metastatic ovarian mucinous neoplasms. J Clin Pathol. 2012; 65:596–600.
26. Seidman JD, Kurman RJ, Ronnett BM. Primary and metastatic mucinous adenocarcinomas in the ovaries: incidence in routine practice with a new approach to improve intraoperative diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003; 27:985–993.
27. Purdie DM, Siskind V, Bain CJ, Webb PM, Green AC. Reproduction-related risk factors for mucinous and nonmucinous epithelial ovarian cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 153:860–864.
28. Tung KH, Goodman MT, Wu AH, McDuffie K, Wilkens LR, Kolonel LN, et al. Reproductive factors and epithelial ovarian cancer risk by histologic type: a multiethnic case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 158:629–638.
29. Soegaard M, Jensen A, Høgdall E, Christensen L, Høgdall C, Blaakaer J, et al. Different risk factor profiles for mucinous and nonmucinous ovarian cancer: results from the Danish MALOVA study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16:1160–1166.
30. Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies of Ovarian Cancer. Beral V, Doll R, Hermon C, Peto R, Reeves G. Ovarian cancer and oral contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of data from 45 epidemiological studies including 23,257 women with ovarian cancer and 87,303 controls. Lancet. 2008; 371:303–314.
31. World Health Organization. World health statistics 2015 [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization;c2015. cited 2015 Nov 6. Available from: http://who.int/gho/publications/world_health_statistics/2015/en/.
32. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World contraceptive use 2011 [Internet]. New York: United Nations Publication;c2011. cited 2015 Nov 6. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/contraceptive2011/contraceptive2011.htm.
33. Gram IT, Lukanova A, Brill I, Braaten T, Lund E, Lundin E, et al. Cigarette smoking and risk of histological subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer in the EPIC cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2012; 130:2204–2210.
34. Jordan SJ, Whiteman DC, Purdie DM, Green AC, Webb PM. Does smoking increase risk of ovarian cancer? A systematic review. Gynecol Oncol. 2006; 103:1122–1129.
35. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD health statistics 2015 [Internet]. Paris: OECD;c2015. cited 2015 Nov 6. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-data.htm.
36. Sugiyama T, Kamura T, Kigawa J, Terakawa N, Kikuchi Y, Kita T, et al. Clinical characteristics of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary: a distinct histologic type with poor prognosis and resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer. 2000; 88:2584–2589.
37. Kobayashi H, Sumimoto K, Moniwa N, Imai M, Takakura K, Kuromaki T, et al. Risk of developing ovarian cancer among women with ovarian endometrioma: a cohort study in Shizuoka, Japan. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007; 17:37–43.
38. Vlahos NF, Kalampokas T, Fotiou S. Endometriosis and ovarian cancer: a review. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2010; 26:213–219.
39. Lim S, Shin H, Song JH, Kwak SH, Kang SM, Won Yoon J, et al. Increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Korea: the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for 1998-2007. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34:1323–1328.
40. Okamoto A, Sugiyama T, Hamano T, Kim JW, Kim BG, Enomoto T, et al. Randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin therapy versus irinotecan plus cisplatin therapy as first line chemotherapy for clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (JGOG3017/GCIG Trial) [Internet]. Tokyo: JGOG Administration;c2011. cited 2015 Nov 6. Available from: http://www.jgog.gr.jp/pdf/20140616_3017_ASCO.pdf.
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

Se Ik Kim
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9790-6735

Myong Cheol Lim
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8964-7158

Jiwon Lim
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3322-7792

Sokbom Kang
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8428-9555

Sang-Yoon Park
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8325-6009

Similar articles