Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/fonts/TeX/fontdata.js

Journal List > J Korean Surg Soc > v.82(6) > 1093003

Park, Park, Kwon, Kim, and Cho: Extrinsic compression of left iliac vein does not predict the development of post thrombotic syndrome in left side deep venous thrombosis

Abstract

Purpose

Left side deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is associated with May-Thurner's anatomical variation and is often instigated by invasive treatment. The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of left iliac vein narrowness on incidence of post thrombotic syndrome (PTS) that developed after left side DVT.

Methods

Forty-one left side DVT cases that were followed up for more than 1 year were enrolled. The iliac vein narrowness was measured by the shortest distance from the right iliac artery to the 5th lumbar vertebra overlying left iliac vein in computed tomography (CT) scan. The incidence of PTS was measured by phone-call history taking for specific symptoms of PTS. The means of the shortest distance were compared by independent t-test.

Results

The number of PTS cases was eleven (26.8%). The level of thrombus, demographic data and other risk factors were similar in both PTS and non-PTS groups except the mean risk factor score. The mean of the shortest distance of PTS group and non-PTS group were 5.56 mm and 5.89 mm, respectively.

Conclusion

The degree of left iliac vein narrowness measured by the shortest distance from the right iliac artery and the 5th lumbar vertebral body was not a predictive factor for PTS.

INTRODUCTION

There are two main goals in treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremities: One is to reduce the chance of fatal pulmonary embolism and the other is to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) [1]. We try to find out a high risk patient of DVT and to prevent the development of DVT in a sense that it is not easy to achieve the former once the DVT is established. Prevention of PTS can be a main focus of managing lower extremity DVT. Several studies have shown that the frequency of PTS to be up to 30 to 40% and PTS was associated with worsened quality of life [2,3]. Recent studies report the efficacy of early invasive treatment for acute DVT in order to achieve a high venous patency rate and to preserve valve function [4,5]. However, some researchers argue that an invasive treatment such as thrombolytic therapy couldn't prevent the long-term outcomes, PTS [6]. And proximal DVT of the left side is closely related to iliac vein compression syndrome or May-Thurner syndrome [7]. We report that the minor diameter of the left iliac vein between the right iliac artery and the 5th vertebral body impacted the incidence of left side proximal DVT [8].
This study aims to investigate a new non-invasive method to predict PTS after acute DVT. We focused the left iliac vein narrowness measured by the shortest distance from right iliac artery to the 5th vertebral body overlying left iliac vein in computed tomography (CT) scan.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-six limbs in 113 patients with DVT diagnosed by duplex scan with serum d-dimer test in one institute were reviewed. CT scan was performed to detect presence of pulmonary embolism as well as to determine the exact location of the thrombus in the vein (Fig. 1). We used a uniform protocol for CT pulmonary arteriography and indirect venography [9]. We excluded twenty cases that received thrombolysis or other invasive treatments. Among the 146 cases, CTs for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism were checked in 131 cases. We contacted 65 cases of the left side DVT over a year after the first diagnosis and ended up with forty one cases for analysis. All the cases were recommended one year of oral anticoagulation and anti-gravity stockings. Anticoagulation was performed by treatment with oral warfarin maintaining the prothrombin time between 2 to 2.5 international normalized ratio. CT scan and duplex scan were performed at a year follow-up of oral anticoagulation. We evaluated the recanalization of thrombosed vein by CT scan and duplex scan at a year follow-up. According to our definitions, recanalization was the partial or complete resolved thrombus while non-recanalization was complete occlusion of a whole venous lumen in any segment of thrombosed vein.
The shortest distance from right iliac artery to 5th vertebral body was measured in picture archiving and communicating system program using π-ViewSTAR (INFINITT Healthcare Co., Seoul, Korea). The distance was measured at the shortest distance between the right iliac artery and the 5th vertebral body overlying left iliac vein on cross sectional view (Fig. 2).
Diagnosis of PTS was checked by phone call with questionnaire. We used the Ginsberg measure of PTS diagnosis [10]. We asked the following questions: 1) Do you have newly onset chronic venous insufficiency signs, such as varicose veins, swelling of foot or calf, skin pigmentation or discoloration, and venous ulcers? 2) Is there any newly onset spontaneous calf pain when walking or standing? 3) Are you experiencing newly onset heaviness of leg? We sorted the cases to the PTS group if he or she answered 'yes' to least one of the above questions.
New York Heart Association DVT risk score system was used for DVT risk assessment [10].
The mean of the shortest distance from the right iliac artery to the 5th vertebral body was compared between PTS group and non PTS group by independent t-test. The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS ver. 11.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were finally enrolled in the study. Median follow-up period was 16 months (Fig. 3). Eleven of forty-one cases (26.8%) had PTS symptoms or signs. Male and female ratio of PTS group was 6:5 and 13:16 for non-PTS group. Mean ages were 63.9 for PTS group and 54.9 for non PTS group. The levels of thrombus were 5 iliac veins, 4 femoral veins and 2 popliteal veins in PTS group and 13 iliac veins, 8 femoral veins and 3 femoral veins in non-PTS group. The recanalization rate was achieved in 81.8% (9/11) of PTS group and 82.8% (24/29) of non-PTS group. Mean of DVT risk score for PTS group was 2.00 and 0.08 for non-PTS group. Most clinical features were similar except the DVT risk score by means of Fisher exact test or t-test (Table 1). Mean of the shortest distance from right iliac artery to 5th vertebral body of PTS group was 5.56 mm and 5.89 mm in non-PTS group (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

About twenty-five percent of all the patients with DVT in their lower extremities developed PTS within a year, and PTS is one of the most important complications of DVT [11]. In our study, a figure of 26.8% incidence of PTS is similar to that of other study that reported on patients who used elastic stockings [12]. However, there was a variation in the incidence of PTS because of a difference of diagnostic criteria and follow-up duration.
While several studies reported that invasive treatment such as catheter directed thrombolysis could reduce the risk of PTS in short-term results [6], long-term results were not established and the complication of invasive treatment was not possible to overcome.
We reported that the shortest distance between the right iliac artery and the 5th vertebral body overlying the left iliac vein could be a risk factor for developing DVT in the left proximal vein [9]. The main mechanism in the development of DVT might be similar to that of iliac compression syndrome or May-Thurner syndrome. According to our hypothesis, this short distance representing the narrowness of the iliac vein would be also related to the incidence of PTS after left-side DVT. If this method could predict PTS development, we could easily select patients who are in need of invasive treatment. However, no result could be found to show any relationship between them. Rather, the result concluded that the higher the risk factor scores are, the higher the PTS incidence is (Table 1). It is acknowledged that DVT risk factors such as the previous documented DVT are shared with PTS risk factors [3]. There are some other risk factors such as development of PTS after DVT. The recanalization rate of thrombosed vein is considered one of the risk factors for PTS [13]. It is found in this study that the recanalization rates were similarly achieved in both groups.
There were some limitations in this study: small number of cases, short follow-up period, and inexactitude of diagnostic criteria for PTS. The thrombolysis cases were excluded in that they were suspected as severe iliac vein compression.
We aimed for a non-invasive and simple method to predict the necessity of invasive intervention for DVT. However, it doesn't seem that this study provides strong effects on external iliac vein compression in the development of PTS after left-side DVT or less effect than DVT risk factor scores.

Figures and Tables

jkss-82-370-g001
Fig. 1
Indirect computed tomogram (CT) venography. White arrows indicate the thrombus in the left iliac and femoral vein.

Download Figure

jkss-82-370-g002
Fig. 2
Distances are measured in cross-sectional views. The shortest distance is measured from right iliac artery to 5th vertebral body overlying left iliac vein by picture archive communication system software. RIA, right iliac artery; IVC, inferior vena cava; LV, lumbar vertebra.

Download Figure

jkss-82-370-g003
Fig. 3
Patient selection diagram for evaluation of left side post thrombotic syndrome after deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

Download Figure

Table 1
Clinical characteristics of left side DVT
jkss-82-370-i001

PTS, post-thrombotic syndrome; DVT, deep venous thrombosis.

a)Complete or partial resolution of venous lumen/total number.

b)DVT risk scores were followed by New York Heart Association protocols.

Download Table

Table 2
The mean of the shortest distance from right iliac artery to 5th vertebral body
jkss-82-370-i002

PTS, post-thrombotic syndrome.

Download Table

Notes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Lee JS, Kim YS. Deep vein thrombosis in lower extremity. J Korean Surg Soc. 1990. 38:110–118.
2. Kahn SR, Shrier I, Julian JA, Ducruet T, Arsenault L, Miron MJ, et al. Determinants and time course of the postthrombotic syndrome after acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 2008. 149:698–707.
3. Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Cogo A, Cuppini S, Villalta S, Carta M, et al. The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 1996. 125:1–7.
4. Couturaud F, Kearon C. Treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Semin Vasc Med. 2001. 1:43–54.
5. Wells PS, Forster AJ. Thrombolysis in deep vein thrombosis: is there still an indication? Thromb Haemost. 2001. 86:499–508.
6. Schweizer J, Kirch W, Koch R, Elix H, Hellner G, Forkmann L, et al. Short- and long-term results after thrombolytic treatment of deep venous thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000. 36:1336–1343.
7. Ouriel K, Green RM, Greenberg RK, Clair DG. The anatomy of deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity. J Vasc Surg. 2000. 31:895–900.
8. Kim SJ, Park SJ, Kwon EK, Park HJ, Rho SY, Hwang JC, et al. Impact of distance from the right iliac artery to the lumbar vertebra in left side deep venous thrombosis. Korean J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011. 27:71–75.
9. Yi JH, Park SJ, Kwon EK, Oh YJ, Kang TW, Hwang JC, et al. The usefulness of the computed tomography for diagnosing deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities. J Korean Soc Vasc Surg. 2009. 25:12–16.
10. Gloviczki P. Handbook of venous disorders: guidelines of American venous forum. 2009. 3rd ed. London: Hodder Anold.
11. Scarvelis D, Wells PS. Diagnosis and treatment of deep-vein thrombosis. CMAJ. 2006. 175:1087–1092.
12. Tick LW, Kramer MH, Rosendaal FR, Faber WR, Doggen CJ. Risk factors for post-thrombotic syndrome in patients with a first deep venous thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2008. 6:2075–2081.
13. Byun JW, Kwun WH, Suh BY. Predictor of recanalization in lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. Korean J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012. 28:43–47.
TOOLS
Similar articles