Kasabach-Merritt syndrome (KMS) is characterized by a giant hemangioma with thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and consumptive coagulopathy that can lead to life-threatening bleeding [1]. KMS usually develops in infancy, and it is usually associated with kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma, rather than the classic hemangioma of infancy [2]. Untreated KMS can be life threatening because of the involvement of multiple organs and the unresponsiveness of the condition to treatment, and it has shown relatively high mortality rates of up to 30% [3]. Since the first report of KMS in 1940 by Kasabach and Merritt [4], various types of treatment, including medical treatment, vascular embolization, radiation therapy, and surgery, have been attempted to achieve hematologic and clinical response [56789]. A number of treatments for KMS have been reported, but none have been uniformly effective. In addition, estimates of the effectiveness of different treatment modalities are limited because KMS is a rare condition and most previous reports have been small case series. As a result, standard regimens and definitive guidelines for the treatment of KMS have not yet been established.

Herein, we report our single-center experience of patients with KMS who received combined medical treatments without surgical intervention or radiotherapy.

A retrospective review of the medical records was performed for 13 patients who were diagnosed with KMS between January 1997 and December 2012 at Samsung Medical Center. The diagnosis of KMS was defined as superficial or visceral hemangioma with thrombocytopenia and/or abnormal hematologic data suggesting disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Hemangioma was confirmed by gross appearance in cases when it was located externally and by imaging studies such as ultrasonography, blood pool scan, and magnetic resonance imaging when it was located internally. Biopsy was performed in only one case, but the procedure was not routinely performed for the diagnostic confirmation of hemangioma.

All patients were initially treated with combined medical therapy composed of oral prednisolone or intravenous methylprednisolone (2 mg/kg/day), oral propranolol (2 mg/kg/day), and interferon-alpha (IFNα) (100,000 IU/kg/day). If the platelet count did not increase substantially by 2 weeks, or if significant complications occurred, weekly vincristine (0.05 mg/kg for <1 year or 1.5 mg/m² for ≥1 year) was considered. Details of treatment are provided in Table 1. Treatment outcome was classified as hematologic complete response (HCR) if the patient’s platelet count exceeded 130×10⁹/L without transfusion support and as clinical complete response (CCR) if the patient showed either complete disappearance of the tumor or had a small residual vascular tumor that displayed lack of proliferation for at least 6 months after discontinuation of treatment. For statistical analysis, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate HCR and CCR. The institutional review board (IRB) of Samsung Medical Center approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent (IRB No. 2015-01-063).

KMS is frequently associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Fatal complications of the syndrome are diverse, including hemorrhage, cardiac failure, and invasion of vital organs. Although different therapies for KMS have shown variable responses and outcomes [101112131415161718], the optimal treatment and consensus guidelines for KMS have not been established, a circumstance largely attributable to the rarity of the syndrome. Currently, various treatment options available for KMS include medical treatments, vascular embolization, radiation therapy, and surgery [56789]. Enjolras et al. [2] reported the risks associated with embolization treatment including ischemic damage, infarction of vital organs, worsening of hematological parameters, and the eventual formation of collateral vessels. As revealed by previous studies, radiation therapy may be associated with severe complications such as opportunistic infection, fibrosis of the lung, bone deformities, growth impairment, and the development of a secondary tumor, most of which are especially problematic in growing children compared to adults [192021]. On the other hand, surgical removal of a huge vascular lesion can lead to significant complications, including massive bleeding and tissue ischemia, which require urgent medical treatment [22]. In the present study, we demonstrated an excellent outcome for patients with KMS with medical treatments alone, with no patient experiencing life-threatening complications. Thus, we believe that most patients with KMS can be initially treated with medical treatment alone under circumstances in which close monitoring is warranted and rapid intervention can be provided whenever needed.

Corticosteroid has generally been used as the first-line treatment for KMS. However, the outcomes of steroid therapy have varied, ranging from no efficacy to significant regression of the lesion [82324]. IFNα has also been used for patients with steroid-resistant disease and has shown good overall outcomes [1525]. The majority of the patients (92.3%) in our study received steroid and IFNα concomitantly and showed excellent outcomes without grade 3 or 4 adverse effects, findings that justify the administration of these two agents in combination as a reasonable initial treatment approach.

Vincristine has recently emerged as a first-line treatment option or as a second-line treatment for steroid-resistant KMS. Haisley-Royster et al. retrospectively reviewed 15 patients with KMS and reported that 11 (74%) were successfully treated with a combination of corticosteroid and vincristine as first-line therapy [1]. Although the remaining patients (26%) relapsed, they were eventually treated successfully with a second course of 4 doses of weekly vincristine. Fahrtash et al. [26] reported that only 3 (42.9%) of 7 patients with KMS were successfully treated using vincristine alone, a finding that suggests the limitation of vincristine monotherapy as an initial treatment modality. In the present study, vincristine was administered to 2 patients who had poor responses to steroid and IFNα, one of whom achieved HCR and CCR, while the other was lost to follow-up before the treatment response could be assessed. Considering these findings together, vincristine might serve as a promising agent for patients with disease that is resistant to first-line treatment with steroid and/or IFNα. Given the proven efficacy of vincristine in some patients with KMS, further studies are needed to determine the clear benefit of vincristine as a first-line treatment in combination with other agents. However, the well-known and severe adverse effects of this agent, including peripheral neuropathy and severe ileus, should be closely monitored.

Propranolol is a nonselective beta-blocker that has been observed to bring about dramatic involution of hemangiomas with few significant complications [272829]. Hermans et al. [16] reported that a 6-week-old boy with KMS achieved remission after receiving upfront propranolol in combination with 4 doses of weekly vincristine. Chiu et al. [12] reported on the efficacy of upfront propranolol in 11 patients with kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and the related variant tufted angioma, among whom 6 were diagnosed with KMS; only 4 patients (36%) out of the entire group, including 2 patients with KMS, showed favorable responses to propranolol. Those who did not respond to propranolol required another agent for disease control, a finding that implies the limitation of propranolol monotherapy upon diagnosis of KMS. However, the role of propranolol either as an initial drug in combination with other agents or as a maintenance drug in KMS needs to be defined. With the awareness that long-term use of steroid and/or IFNα can cause various complications, ways to minimize the use of those agents should be sought whenever possible. In this context, our data suggest the beneficial role of propranolol, which was used in 2 patients, demonstrating that one patient could be managed with a relatively short duration of IFNα treatment (case 12) while the other was able to achieve CR with no use of steroid at all (case 13). Because of the current lack of sufficient evidence regarding the efficacy of propranolol in KMS, a large prospective study will be required prior to the routine incorporation of this relatively safe drug in treatment of the syndrome.

The present study is limited by its small sample size and retrospective design. In addition, patients in our cohort were treated with heterogeneous treatment regimens, while all of the patients received only medical treatments that were adjusted depending on the individual responses. However, this adaptive treatment strategy ultimately led to HCR and CCR in all of the patients who were compliant with the treatments. According to our data, we can predict that more than half of patients and more than three quarters of patients are able to achieve CCR and HCR at 1 year, respectively. These data also show that a significant proportion of patients require years of continued treatments, which necessitates the development of a well-designed protocol that could maximize treatment efficacy and minimize treatment-related toxicity, focusing not only on cure but also on quality of life in patients with KMS.

In conclusion, our data suggest that initial treatment with a two-drug combination (any two of steroid, IFNα, and propranolol) is a reasonable strategy for most patients with KMS to control the proliferation of a vascular tumor and its related complications. Individualized treatment adaptation according to response may be very important for the successful treatment of patients with KMS.