Journal List > Ann Lab Med > v.33(2) > 1091124

Park, Kim, Park, Jang, Chi, Koh, Im, and Seo: Presence of Differentiating Neuroblasts in Bone Marrow is a Favorable Prognostic Factor for Bone Marrow Metastatic Neuroblastoma at Diagnosis

Abstract

Background

The prognostic impact of the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in bone marrow (BM) remains unclear in BM metastatic neuroblastoma (NB). We aimed to identify the prognostic impact of differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis and after chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 51 patients diagnosed with BM metastatic NB at Asan Medical Center between January 1990 and July 2005 were enrolled. BM histology and laboratory data along with overall survival (OS) were compared with regard to the differentiation status of neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis and after chemotherapy.

Results

Among the 51 patients, 13 (25.5%) exhibited differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis and 17/51 (33.3%) exhibited them after chemotherapy. The only significant difference among patient groups was the improved OS in patients with differentiated neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis (P=0.021). In contrast, the differentiation status of neuroblasts in BM after chemotherapy did not affect OS (P=0.852).

Conclusions

Our study is the first report describing the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM. The presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis may be a favorable prognostic factor for patients with BM metastatic NB; however, the same phenomenon after chemotherapy is irrelevant to prognosis.

INTRODUCTION

Neuroblastic tumors are embryonal tumors that form around sympathetic nerve ganglions. The relative proportion of Schwann cells and neuroblasts distinguishes stroma-rich tumors such as ganglioneuromas from stroma-poor tumors such as neuroblastomas (NB). Ganglioneuroma is the most benign type of neuroblastic tumor and is characterized by numerous Schwann cells with dispersed maturing ganglionic cells. NB is the most malignant tumor type and consists primarily of neuroblastic cells with a low proportion of Schwann cells [1, 2].
NBs can be distinguished according to the degree of differentiation of the neuroblastic cells (poorly differentiated, undifferentiated, or differentiating). Poorly differentiated NB is characterized by the presence of small round blue cells with high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratios and obvious neurite extensions. Undifferentiated NB shows similar characteristics but lacks neurite outgrowths. Finally, differentiating NB is composed of at least 5% differentiating neuroblastic cells that exhibit synchronous maturation of the cytoplasm, nucleus, and neurofibrils [1, 2].
A marked variability exists in the clinical behavior of NB [3]. Approximately 60% of patients with clinically diagnosed NB have stage 4 disease, which is associated with a very poor prognosis. In stage 4S disease (defined as age <1 yr with a localized primary tumor defined as stage 1 or 2, with dissemination limited only to the liver, skin, or bone marrow [BM] with less than 10% of BM nucleated cells are tumor cells) or International Neuroblastoma Risk Group stage MS (defined as metastatic disease 'special', where MS is equivalent to stage 4S), spontaneous maturation and regression without treatment is a well-established phenomenon that improves prognosis and increases survival rates [4, 5]. This phenomenon is known to occur exclusively in infants younger than 1 yr with a localized primary tumor [6-9].
A similar phenomenon was reported in a single previous study, in which spontaneous regression of stage 4 NB was observed in patients with multiple metastases of the brain, scalp, and skeleton [10]. However, in that report, stage 4 was assessed based only on the multiple metastases and not on the BM metastasis. Therefore, it is likely that the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in the BM of patients with stage 4 NB has not yet been reported. Because retinoic acid is used as a differentiating agent in therapeutic regimens, differentiating neuroblasts are expected to be observed in BM after chemotherapy in some cases. Therefore, the prognostic impact of the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM needs to be investigated.
In the present study, we aimed to identify the prognostic impact of the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM both at diagnosis and after chemotherapy in patients with BM metastatic NB (stage 4). To determine the clinical significance of differentiation, we compared histology and laboratory data along with overall survival (OS) with regard to the differentiation status of neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis and after chemotherapy.

METHODS

1. Patient selection and evaluation of clinical data

A total of 51 patients who were diagnosed with BM metastatic NB at the Asan Medical Center between January 1990 and July 2005 were enrolled in this study. Patients diagnosed before August 2005 were selected to examine long-term prognosis. We analyzed the distributions of gender and age; complete blood cell counts; 24-hr urinary vanillylmandelic acid (VMA) and homovanillic acid (HVA) values; serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE), ferritin, and lactate dehydrogenase (LD) values; BM pathology; karyotype of BM aspirates at diagnosis; treatment modality including chemotherapy regimen; and the date of death or last follow-up. All clinical data were obtained through a retrospective review of electronic medical records. OS was defined as the time from diagnosis to death or last follow-up.
Microscopic examinations of BM aspirates and biopsies were performed to determine the presence of differentiating neuroblasts. Tumors consisting of at least 5% differentiated ganglion cells were defined as having differentiating neuroblasts [11]. The presence of differentiating neuroblasts was determined by 2 independent laboratory pathologists who are experts in this area. Out of 51 total patients in our study, a BM metastatic lesion of NB was evident in BM aspirates of only 11 patients at diagnosis, and these patients also showed a definite BM metastatic lesion in a BM biopsy or clot section. In the remaining 40 patients, the evidence of BM metastasis of neuroblastoma at diagnosis was found only in a BM biopsy or clot section. Therefore, the presence of differentiating neuroblasts was primarily determined based on BM biopsy or clot section findings followed by an examination of BM aspiration samples. Differentiating neuroblasts were defined as differentiating cells that fulfilled the criteria provided by the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (INPC), including 1) synchronous differentiation of the nucleus (an enlarged, eccentric nucleus with a vesicular chromatin pattern and usually a single prominent nucleolus) and 2) conspicuous, eosinophilic or amphophilic cytoplasm [2].

2. Categorization of patients

To determine the prognostic impact of differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis and after chemotherapy in BM metastatic NB, we categorized patients into 2 groups according to the differentiation status of neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis. Subsequently, each group was further divided into 3 groups according to differentiation or BM metastasis after chemotherapy (Table 1). In this categorization system, the diff(-) group was defined as patients with poorly differentiated or undifferentiated neuroblasts in the BM metastatic lesion and the diff(+) group was defined as patients with differentiating neuroblasts in the BM metastatic lesion. We then compared clinical variables and OS with regard to the differentiation status of neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis and after chemotherapy.

3. Treatment regimens

All the patients enrolled in this study were treated with 3 different therapeutic regimens: CCG3881, CCG3981, and POG9243 (described below). The CCG3881 regimen comprised approximately 9 months of 4-drug combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide as well as surgical removal of the tumor after induction followed by local radiation for the residual tumor after surgery. The CCG3891 regimen used the same 4 chemotherapeutic agents with a more dose-intensive induction. Chemotherapy was followed by consolidation therapy with randomized assignment to either myeloablative therapy with carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan along with total body irradiation with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) or consolidation with continuous infusion of cisplatin, etoposide, doxorubicin, and ifosfamide [12]. The POG9243 regimen was followed, with the treatment protocol as described previously [13].

4. Statistical analysis

Pearson's chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests (for low frequencies) were used to compare categorical variables between patient groups. The Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare continuous variables between groups. OS estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses of OS with respect to the differentiation status of neuroblasts both at diagnosis and after chemotherapy were performed using Cox's proportional hazards model. All tests were two-tailed, and P≤0.05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS 13.0.1 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

1. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with BM metastatic NB

Fig. 1 shows examples of differentiating neuroblasts in BM after conventional chemotherapy. Of the 51 patients with BM metastatic NB, 13 (25.5%) exhibited differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis. Of these 13 patients, differentiating neuroblasts were detected in 4 patients but not in 3 patients and no evidence of BM metastasis was observed in 6 patients after chemotherapy. The remaining 38 patients (74.5%) did not exhibit differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis. Of these 38 patients, differentiating neuroblasts were detected in 13 patients but not in 5 patients and no evidence of BM metastasis was observed in 20 patients after chemotherapy.
The patient groups did not differ with regard to gender (P=0.851), age (P=0.154), VMA (P=0.769), HVA (P=0.511), NSE (P=0.438), ferritin (P=0.289), LD (P=0.399), or blood cell counts (hemoglobin, P=0.661; white blood cells, P=0.772; platelets, P=0.703) (Table 1). Karyotype analysis of BM aspirates at diagnosis was available for 32 of the 51 patients. Ten of these 32 patients (31.3%) showed cytogenetic abnormalities, and among these 10 patients, only 4 showed hyperploidy whereas the remaining 6 showed a complex karyotype. No correlation was noted between karyotype abnormalities and differentiation status of neuroblasts in BM. Chemotherapy regimens and proportions of patients who underwent BMT during treatment were not significantly different among the patient groups (Table 2).

2. Comparison of clinical and laboratory characteristics and prognosis according to differentiation status of neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis

Of the 13 patients who exhibited differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis, 7 were males and 6 were females, with age ranging from 0.8 to 9.5 yr (median, 3.6 yr). Among these patients, only 2 were younger than 2 yr at diagnosis. Of the 38 patients who did not exhibit differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis, 20 were males and 18 were females, with age ranging from 0.1 to 23.0 yr (median, 3.3 yr). Among these patients, 11 were younger than 2 yr. Clinical variables did not differ according to the differentiation status of neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis; these variables included gender (P=0.940), age (P=0.239), VMA (P=0.964), HVA (P=0.251), NSE (P=0.527), ferritin (P=0.495), LD (P=0.081), and blood cell counts (hemoglobin, P=0.341; white blood cells, P=0.559; platelets, P=0.863).
The presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis was significantly associated with longer OS (80.6 months vs. 53.8 months, P=0.021) (Table 3, Fig. 2). Further analysis indicated that this was the case regardless of the differentiation status in BM after chemotherapy (P=0.082 for a comparison between groups I-1 and II-1, members of which exhibited differentiating neuroblasts in BM after chemotherapy; P=0.053 for a comparison between groups I-2 and II-2, members of which did not exhibit differentiating neuroblasts in BM after chemotherapy; P=0.084 for a comparison between groups I-3 and II-3, members of which exhibited no BM metastasis after chemotherapy) (Fig. 3).

3. Comparison of clinical and laboratory characteristics and prognosis with regard to differentiation status in BM after chemotherapy

Of the 17 patients who exhibited differentiating neuroblasts in BM after chemotherapy, 9 were males and 8 were females, with age ranging from 0.1 to 9.5 yr (median, 2.9 yr). Of the 8 patients who did not exhibit differentiating neuroblasts in BM after chemotherapy, 3 were males and 5 were females, with age ranging from 3.2 to 10.2 yr (median, 4.5 yr). Of the 26 patients with no BM metastasis after chemotherapy, 15 were males and 11 were females, with age ranging from 0.1 to 23.1 yr (median, 3.3 yr).
Clinical and laboratory variables did not differ among these 3 groups; these variables included gender (P=0.606), age (P=0.104), VMA (P=0.420), HVA (P=0.912), NSE (P=0.663), ferritin (P=0.433), LD (P=0.521), and blood cell counts (hemoglobin, P=0.698; white blood cells, P=0.618; platelets, P=0.537). Additionally, OS was similar among the 3 groups (patients with differentiating neuroblasts in BM after chemotherapy, 57.7 months; patients without differentiating neuroblasts in BM after chemotherapy, 35.7 months; patients with no BM metastasis after chemotherapy, 54.1 months; P=0.852) (Table 3). Further analysis indicated that the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM after chemotherapy was not significantly associated with OS regardless of the differentiation status of neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis (P=0.545 in group I, members of which exhibited differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis; P=0.944 in group II, members of which did not exhibit differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis).

4. Multivariate analysis of overall survival with regard to the differentiation status at diagnosis and after chemotherapy

We subsequently performed a multivariate analysis, which demonstrated that differentiation of neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis was associated with a statistically significant positive prognostic impact on OS (hazard ratio, 0.336; P=0.030). However, the presence of differentiation in BM after chemotherapy did not have any prognostic impact on OS (hazard ratio, 1.066; P=0.914). Even in patients without BM involvement after chemotherapy, the prognostic impact was not evident (hazard ratio, 1.149; P=0.807) (Table 4).

DISCUSSION

NB maturation is the process by which a morphologically undifferentiated tumor becomes a mature ganglioneuroma [1]. The INPC uses both cytoplasmic and nuclear enlargement as morphologic indicators of neuroblastic differentiation [14]. Increasing numbers of differentiating neuroblasts are considered a sign of tumor maturation, suggesting a good prognosis [14]. Several studies have reported that spontaneous maturation of primary tumors in patients who did not receive antitumor therapy is associated with improved survival rate and prognosis [6-8]. According to these reports, the factors that correlated with spontaneous maturation were age (<1 yr) and disease stage (stage 1, 2, and 4 tumors) [15].
However, few reports have described the presence of differentiating neuroblasts after chemotherapy in the BM of patients with stage 4 NB. One report described the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in tissue from a patient with chemoresistant stage 4 NB after a 2-week treatment with [131I] metaiodobenzylguanidine [16]; however, this patient died 2 months later, suggesting that histological maturation after chemotherapy did not affect survival. Another study reported that 10 patients treated with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy (with or without maturation-inducing agents) exhibited differentiating neuroblasts at advanced stages (3 or 4); however, this phenomenon did not correlate with prognosis [15].
In this study, we found that 13 patients (25.5%) had differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis and 13 patients had differentiating neuroblasts in BM after chemotherapy. A variety of agents can induce neurite outgrowth in human NB cell lines, including retinoic acid, cyclic AMP-elevating agents, prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and nerve growth factor [15, 17]; however, our patients did not receive these agents, and the chemotherapy regimen did not differ among the 6 patient groups. Consistent with previous studies, our results reveal that the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis and after chemotherapy is relatively common among patients with BM metastatic NB regardless of the use of differentiation-inducing agents. To our knowledge, our study is the first report that describes the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis and after chemotherapy in patients with BM metastatic NB.
In addition, we found that the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis was associated with significantly better prognosis even though other prognostic markers such as urinary VMA and HVA as well as serum NSE and LD levels did not differ among the groups categorized by differentiation status of neuroblasts in BM. Among all patient subgroups categorized by differentiation status of neuroblasts in BM after chemotherapy, the prognosis appeared to be better for patients who exhibited differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis. Our results are consistent with previous studies reporting that spontaneous maturation of primary tumors in patients who do not undergo antitumor therapy predicts better prognosis and longer survival. In contrast, the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM after chemotherapy was not associated with prognosis or OS, regardless of the differentiation status of neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis. These findings suggest that the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM after chemotherapy may indicate localized progression only.
During ganglion differentiation, Schwann cells are recruited from surrounding non-neoplastic tissue by neoplastic neuroblasts that produce mitogens and chemotactic factors. Schwann cells already present in the tumor tissue are thought to produce anti-proliferative and differentiation-inducing factors crucial to neuronal differentiation [1]. Although Schwann cells are present in BM, they are difficult to identify in BM aspirates. Moreover, they cannot easily be observed on microscopy because myelin and axons cannot be stained using the May-Grunwald-Giemsa method, and only thick nerve bundles are stained using hematoxylin and eosin [18]. Although we did not detect Schwann cells in BM aspirate specimens, the nerve bundles observed in BM biopsies indicated the presence of differentiating neuroblasts.
Generally, more highly differentiated tumors secrete more mature form of catecholamine [19, 20]. Levels of HVA, which is a metabolite of dopamine, are often elevated in patients with mature NB. In contrast, VMA, which is a metabolite of epinephrine and norepinephrine, suggests the presence of a less differentiated tumor [11]. Thus, patients with more mature NB are expected to have higher levels of HVA than VMA. However, in our study, VMA and HVA levels did not differ among the patient groups regardless of neuroblast differentiation status in BM at diagnosis or after chemotherapy.
Because NB does not appear in a homogeneous manner in BM, the results of an metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scan and BM biopsy may show discrepant findings, i.e., BM may be MIBG positive with no tumor cells observable in a BM biopsy. This discrepancy could bias the results of our study. Therefore, we evaluated the validity of an MIBG scan during the follow-up period of all 51 patients under investigation. Except for 9 patients who were initially diagnosed prior to 1995, 42 of the 51 (82.4%) patients underwent an MIBG scan during follow-up. The results of these MIBG scans corresponded perfectly with those of BM biopsies. The 17 patients who showed BM metastasis in BM biopsies at a particular time during the follow-up period were all MIBG positive at that time. The 25 patients who did not show BM metastasis in BM biopsies at a specific follow-up time were all MIBG negative at that time. Therefore, the negative predictive value of MIBG scans was 100%. The association between the differentiation status of neuroblasts at the primary site and in the BM metastatic lesion has not been evaluated adequately and therefore needs to be investigated. In our study, we often found concordance between the differentiation status of the primary tumor and the BM metastatic lesion at diagnosis. Indeed, 9 out of 13 cases with differentiated neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis also showed differentiating neuroblasts at the primary site. However, the prognostic impact of differentiation in the primary tumor was not evident from our analysis. A comprehensive study with more patients is required for accurate evaluation of the prognostic impact of differentiation in the primary tumor.
Our study has some limitations. First, the results of known prognostic markers (e.g., MYCN amplification, CD44 expression, Trk-A expression) could not be included in our analysis, and karyotype data were available only for two-thirds of patients. Therefore, a thorough multivariate analysis including these proven prognostic factors could not be performed. A more comprehensive study including these markers needs to be conducted in the future. Second, because we divided the 51 patients into 6 patient groups and then performed subgroup analysis, the numbers used for comparison were sometimes small, which could result in low statistical power. In the future, a study that includes larger numbers will be required to confirm the prognostic impact of the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis and after chemotherapy.
In conclusion, we found that the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis and after chemotherapy is common in patients with BM metastatic NB. The presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM at diagnosis is associated with significantly better prognosis; however, the presence of differentiating neuroblasts in BM after chemotherapy is irrelevant to prognosis.

Notes

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

References

1. Shimada H, Ambros IM, Dehner LP, Hata J, Joshi VV, Roald B. Terminology and morphologic criteria of neuroblastic tumors: recommendations by the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Committee. Cancer. 1999; 86:349–363. PMID: 10421272.
2. Peuchmaur M, d'Amore ES, Joshi VV, Hata J, Roald B, Dehner LP, et al. Revision of the International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification: confirmation of favorable and unfavorable prognostic subsets in ganglioneuroblastoma, nodular. Cancer. 2003; 98:2274–2281. PMID: 14601099.
3. Howman-Giles R, Shaw PJ, Uren RF, Chung DK. Neuroblastoma and other neuroendocrine tumors. Semin Nucl Med. 2007; 37:286–302. PMID: 17544628.
crossref
4. Brodeur GM, Seeger RC, Barrett A, Berthold F, Castleberry RP, D'Angio G, et al. International criteria for diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 1988; 6:1874–1881. PMID: 3199170.
crossref
5. Maris JM, Hogarty MD, Bagatell R, Cohn SL. Neuroblastoma. Lancet. 2007; 369:2106–2120. PMID: 17586306.
crossref
6. Haas D, Ablin AR, Miller C, Zoger S, Matthay KK. Complete pathologic maturation and regression of stage IVS neuroblastoma without treatment. Cancer. 1988; 62:818–825. PMID: 3293764.
crossref
7. Iwanaka T, Yamamoto K, Ogawa Y, Arai M, Ito M, Kishimoto H, et al. Maturation of mass-screened localized adrenal neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Surg. 2001; 36:1633–1636. PMID: 11685689.
crossref
8. McLaughlin JE, Urich H. Maturing neuroblastoma and ganglioneuroblastoma: a study of four cases with long survival. J Pathol. 1977; 121:19–26. PMID: 874625.
crossref
9. Rozmus J, Langer M, Murphy JJ, Dix D. Multiple persistent ganglioneuromas likely arising from the spontaneous maturation of metastatic neuroblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2012; 34:151–153. PMID: 22052163.
crossref
10. Eklof O, Sandstedt B, Thönell S, Ahström L. Spontaneous regression of stage IV neuroblastoma. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1983; 72:473–476. PMID: 6880739.
11. Lonergan GJ, Schwab CM, Suarez ES, Carlson CL. Neuroblastoma, ganglioneuroblastoma, and ganglioneuroma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2002; 22:911–934. PMID: 12110723.
12. Schmidt ML, Lukens JN, Seeger RC, Brodeur GM, Shimada H, Gerbing RB, et al. Biologic factors determine prognosis in infants with stage IV neuroblastoma: A prospective Children's Cancer Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18:1260–1268. PMID: 10715296.
crossref
13. Bagatell R, Rumcheva P, London WB, Cohn SL, Look AT, Brodeur GM, et al. Outcomes of children with intermediate-risk neuroblastoma after treatment stratified by MYCN status and tumor cell ploidy. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23:8819–8827. PMID: 16314642.
crossref
14. Tornóczky T, Semjén D, Shimada H, Ambros IM. Pathology of peripheral neuroblastic tumors: significance of prominent nucleoli in undifferentiated/poorly differentiated neuroblastoma. Pathol Oncol Res. 2007; 13:269–275. PMID: 18158560.
crossref
15. Ogita S, Tokiwa K, Arizono N, Takahashi T. Neuroblastoma: incomplete differentiation on the way to maturation or morphological alteration resembling maturity? Oncology. 1988; 45:148–152. PMID: 3368191.
crossref
16. Ben Arush MW, Ben Itzhak O, Yossilevski G, El Hasid R, Postovsky S, Israel O. Neuroblastoma maturation by [131I] metaiodobenzylguanidine in chemoresistant neuroblastoma. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1999; 33:418–419. PMID: 10491557.
17. Reynolds CP, Matthay KK, Villablanca JG, Maurer BJ. Retinoid therapy of high-risk neuroblastoma. Cancer Lett. 2003; 197:185–192. PMID: 12880980.
crossref
18. Calvo W, Forteza-Vila J. Schwann cells of the bone marrow. Blood. 1970; 36:180–188. PMID: 5427453.
crossref
19. Nakagawara A, Ikeda K, Tasaka H. Dopaminergic neuroblastoma as a poor prognostic subgroup. J Pediatr Surg. 1988; 23:346–349. PMID: 3385588.
crossref
20. Candito M, Thyss A, Albertini M, Deville A, Politano S, Mariani R, et al. Methylated catecholamine metabolites for diagnosis of neuroblastoma. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1992; 20:215–220. PMID: 1574031.
crossref
Fig. 1
Undifferentiated neuroblasts in bone marrow aspirate (A, Wright stain, ×400) and a clot section (B, H&E stain, ×400) at diagnosis. The tumor consisted of immature neuroblasts with dispersed nuclear chromatin and scanty cytoplasm embedded in a fibrillar matrix. Some mitotic cells were detected. Differentiating neuroblasts in a bone marrow clot section (C, H&E stain, ×400) and immunohistochemical stain with CD56 (D, CD56 immunohistochemical stain, ×400). Synchronous differentiation of the nucleus (an enlarged, eccentric nucleus with a vesicular chromatin pattern and usually a single prominent nucleolus) and conspicuous, eosinophilic or amphophilic cytoplasm suggests differentiating neuroblasts (indicated by an arrow).
alm-33-89-g001
Fig. 2
Overall survival of patients with bone marrow metastatic neuroblastoma according to differentiation status of neuroblasts in bone marrow at diagnosis.
Abbreviation: Diff, differentiation.
alm-33-89-g002
Fig. 3
Overall survival of patients with bone marrow metastatic neuroblastoma according to the differentiation status of neuroblasts in bone marrow after chemotherapy (A, patients who exhibited differentiating neuroblasts in bone marrow after chemotherapy; B, patients who did not exhibit differentiating neuroblasts in bone marrow after chemotherapy; C, patients who did not exhibit bone marrow metastasis after chemotherapy).
Abbreviation: Diff, differentiation.
alm-33-89-g003
Table 1
Comparison of clinical and laboratory findings of the total 51 patients with BM metastatic neuroblastoma according to differentiation status of neuroblasts in BM both at diagnosis and after chemotherapy
alm-33-89-i001

Diff(-) group was defined as the patients with poorly or undifferentiated neuroblasts in the BM metastatic lesion and diff(+) group was defined as the patients with differentiating neuroblasts in the BM metastatic lesion.

*P value was obtained from the comparison between 6 patient groups (Chi-square test); P value was obtained from the comparison between 6 patient groups (Kruskal-Wallis test).

Abbreviations: Diff, differentiation; Dx, diagnosis; CTx, chemotherapy; BM, bone marrow; VMA, vanillylmandelic acid; HVA, homovanillic acid; NSE, neuron-specific enolase; LD, lactate dehydrogenase; WBC, white blood cell; PLT, platelet.

Table 2
Summary of treatment regimens used for the total 51 patients with BM metastatic neuroblastoma
alm-33-89-i002

Diff(-) group was defined as the patients with poorly or undifferentiated neuroblasts in the BM metastatic lesion and diff(+) group was defined as the patients with differentiating neuroblasts in the BM metastatic lesion.

*CCG3881 regimen consisted of approximately 9 months of 4 drug combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and etoposide as well as surgical removal of residual tumor after induction, followed by local radiation for residual disease after surgery; POG9243 regimen was described by Bagatell et al [13]; CCG3891 regimen used the same 4 chemotherapeutic agents in more dose-intensive induction. Chemotherapy was followed by consolidation therapy with randomized assignment to either myeloablative therapy with carboplatin, etoposide, melphalan, and total-body irradiation with autologous BMT or consolidation with continuous infusion of cisplatin, etoposide, doxorubicin and ifosfamide.

Abbreviations: BM, bone marrow; Diff, differentiation; Dx, diagnosis; CTx, chemotherapy; BMT, bone marrow transplantation.

Table 3
Comparison of the overall survival of the patients with BM metastatic neuroblastoma according to the differentiation status in BM at diagnosis and after chemotherapy
alm-33-89-i003

Diff(-) group was defined as the patients with poorly or undifferentiated neuroblasts in the BM metastatic lesion and diff(+) group was defined as the patients with differentiating neuroblasts in the BM metastatic lesion.

*Overall survivals were compared using Kaplan-Meier methods and P values were obtained using log-rank test.

Abbreviations: Diff, differentiation; Dx, diagnosis; CTx, chemotherapy; BM, bone marrow; CI, confidence interval.

Table 4
Multivariate analysis of the overall survival with respect to differentiation status both at diagnosis and after chemotherapy
alm-33-89-i004

Hazard ratio represents the relative risk compared from differentiation (-) patients in each group and P values were adjusted with differentiation status both at diagnosis and after chemotherapy.

Diff(-) group was defined as the patients with poorly or undifferentiated neuroblasts in the BM metastatic lesion and diff(+) group was defined as the patients with differentiating neuroblasts in the BM metastatic lesion.

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; BM, bone marrow; Dx, diagnosis; CTx; chemotherapy; NS, not significant; Diff, differentiation.

TOOLS
Similar articles