Abstract
Background
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Figures and Tables
Table 1
Data was presented as frequency and percentage.
a)Posthoc comparison was performed by Bonferroni's method, Posthoc comparison: ij means that the i-th group and j-th group had a significant difference (i, j=1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; group 1=Seoul and Gyeonggi-do, group 2=Gangwon-do, group 3=Chungcheong-do, group 4=Jeolla-do, group 5=Gyeongsang-do, group 6=Jeju-do).
NBLSS, national basic livelihood security supply; NDLS, national dietary life supply; yr, year.
Table 2
Data was presented as mean and standard deviation.
a),b)Posthoc comparison was performed by Bonferroni's method.
a)Posthoc comparison: ij means that the i-th group and j-th group had a significant difference (i, j=1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; group 1=Seoul and Gyeonggi-do, group 2=Gangwon-do, group 3=Chungcheong-do, group 4=Jeolla-do, group 5=Gyeongsang-do, group 6=Jeju-do).
b)Posthoc comparison: ij means that the i-th group and j-th group had a significant difference (i, j=1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; group 1=age ≤13 yr, group 2=14-19 yr, group 3=20-29 yr; group 4=30-49 yr, group 5=50-64 yr, group 6=≥65 yr).
NAR, nutrient adequacy ratio; ND, nutrient density; yr, year.
Table 3
Data was presented as mean and standard deviation.
a),b)Posthoc comparison was performed by Bonferroni's method.
a)Posthoc comparison: ij means that the i-th group and j-th group had a significant difference (i, j=1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; group 1=Seoul and Gyeonggi-do, group 2=Gangwon-do, group 3=Chungcheong-do, group 4=Jeolla-do, group 5=Gyeongsang-do, group 6=Jeju-do).
b)Posthoc comparison: ij means that the i-th group and j-th group had a significant difference (i, j=1, 2, 3, 4; group 1=low income, group 2=middle-low, group 3=middle-high, group 4=high); all means that all pairs of groups had a significant difference.
NAR, nutrient adequacy ratio; ND, nutrient density; yr, year; NBLSS, national basic livelihood security supply; NDLS, national dietary life supply.