1. Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod. 1988. 14:346–351.
2. Gambill JM, Alder M, del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod. 1996. 22:369–375.
3. Glossen CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, del Rio CE. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1995. 21:146–151.
4. Elliott LM, Curtis RV, Pitt Ford TR. Cutting pattern of nickel-titanium files using two preparation techniques. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1998. 14:10–15.
5. Cheung GSP. Instrument fracture: mechanisms, removal of fragments, and clinical outcomes. Endodontic Topics. 2009. 16:1–26.
6. Kramkowski TR, Bahcall J. An
in vitro comparison of torsional stress and cyclic fatigue resistance of ProFile GT and ProFile GT Series X rotary nickel-titanium files. J Endod. 2009. 35:404–407.
7. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1997. 23:77–85.
8. Sattapan B, Nervo GJ, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use. J Endod. 2000. 26:161–165.
9. Kuhn G, Tavernier B, Jordan L. Influence of structure on nickel-titanium endodontic instruments failure. J Endod. 2001. 27:516–520.
10. Gambarini G. Advantages and disadvantages of new torque-controlled endodontic motors and low-torque NiTi rotary instrumentation. Aust Endod J. 2001. 27:99–104.
11. Berutti E, Negro AR, Lendini M, Pasqualini D. Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of ProTaper rotary instruments. J Endod. 2004. 30:228–230.
12. Barbosa FO, Gomes JA, de Araújo MC. Fractographic analysis of K3 nickel-titanium rotary instruments submitted to different modes of mechanical loading. J Endod. 2008. 34:994–998.
13. Li UM, Lee BS, Shih CT, Lan WH, Lin CP. Cyclic fatigue of endodontic nickel titanium rotary instruments: static and dynamic tests. J Endod. 2002. 28:448–451.
14. Park SH, Seo HW, Hong CU. An evaluation of rotational stability in endodontic electronic motors. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2010. 35:246–256.
15. Melo MC, Pereira ES, Viana AC, Fonseca AM, Buono VT, Bahia MG. Dimensional characterization and mechanical behaviour of K3 rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2008. 41:329–338.
16. Plotino G, Grande NM, Cordaro M, Testarelli L, Gambarini G. A review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2009. 35:1469–1476.
17. Bahia MG, Buono VT. Decrease in the fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use in curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005. 100:249–255.
18. Haikel Y, Gasser P, Allemann C. Dynamic fracture of hybrid endodontic hand instruments compared with traditional files. J Endod. 1991. 17:217–220.
19. Haïkel Y, Serfaty R, Bateman G, Senger B, Allemann C. Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1999. 25:434–440.
20. Cheung GS, Darvell BW. Fatigue testing of a NiTi rotary instrument. Part 1: strain-life relationship. Int Endod J. 2007. 40:612–618.
21. Schäfer E, Dzepina A, Danesh G. Bending properties of rotary nickel-titanium instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003. 96:757–763.
22. Ullmann CJ, Peters OA. Effect of cyclic fatigue on static fracture loads in ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod. 2005. 31:183–186.
23. Shin YM, Kim ES, Kim KM, Kum KY. Effect of surface defects and cross-sectional configuration on the fatigue fracture of NiTi rotary files under cyclic loading. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2004. 29:267–272.
24. Lee JK, Kim ES, Kang MW, Kum KY. The effect of surface defects on the cyclic fatigue fracture of HEROShaper Ni-Ti rotary files in a dynamic model: a fractographic analysis. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2007. 32:130–137.