Minimum Measurement Time Affecting the Reliability of the Heart Rate Variability Analysis

Won-Jun Choi; Byung-Chae Lee; Kee-Sam Jeong; Yong-Jae Lee

doi:10.15384/kjhp.2017.17.4.269

Journal List > Korean J Health Promot > v.17(4) > 1089926

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Choi, Lee, Jeong, and Lee: Minimum Measurement Time Affecting the Reliability of the Heart Rate Variability Analysis

Original Article

Korean Journal of Health Promotion 2017; 17(4): 269-274.

Published online: 28 December 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15384/kjhp.2017.17.4.269

Minimum Measurement Time Affecting the Reliability of the Heart Rate Variability Analysis

Won-Jun Choi^1,², Byung-Chae Lee³, Kee-Sam Jeong³, Yong-Jae Lee¹

¹Department of Family Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

²Department of Medicine, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

³Deptartment of Medical Information System, Yongin Songdam College, Yongin, Korea.

Corresponding author: Yong-Jae Lee, MD, MPH, PhD. Department of Family Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06273, Korea. Tel: +82-2-2019-2630, Fax: +82-2-3462-8209, ukyjhome@yuhs.ac

Received 21 October 2017 Accepted 6 December 2017

Korean Society for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention

(open-access, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/):

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

Heart rate variability (HRV) test is in widely used for measurement of autonomic nerve system. Although the standard measurement time for short-term HRV analysis is regarded as 5 minutes, it could be varied depending on the clinical situation. Thus, we examined that the valid minimum measurement time for HRV through comparison of HRV among 10 segments per 30 seconds from 30 seconds to 300 seconds.

Methods

The study included 1,457 adult participants who visited the health promotion center in Seoul, Korea from the March 2009 to December 2012. The variables of the time domain and frequency domain analysis of HRV among 10 segments from 30 seconds to 300 seconds were compared using one-way ANOVA test with post-hoc analysis.

Results

Compared with 5-minute (300 seconds) HRV, the components of HRV measurement were statistically equal in condition with 180 seconds for standard deviation of all normal-to-normal interval (SDNN), 270 seconds for NN50, 180 seconds for total power, 180 seconds for low frequency power in normalized units (LFn), and 180 seconds for high frequency power in normalized units (HFn), respectively.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that the minimum duration of HRV measurement might be more or than 180 seconds.

Keywords: Heart rate variability, Autonomic nervous system, Measures

Figures and Tables

Table 1

Age distribution of the study population

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Table 2

Index of heart rate variability

Table 3

Comparison of heart rate variability among 10 segments per 30 seconds from 30 seconds to 300 seconds

Abbreviations: mRR, mean R-R interval; mHR, mean heart rate; SDNN, standard deviation of all NN interval; RMSSD, root mean square differences of successive R-R intervals; NN50, number of pairs of adjacent NN intervals differing by more than 50 ms in the entire recording; pNN50, NN50 count divided by the total number of all NN interval; VLF, very low frequency; LF, low frequency; HF, high frequency; TP, total power, LFn, LF power in normalized units; HFn, HF power in normalized units.

^aP values were calculated using 1-way ANOVA test.

Table 4

Results of post-hoc analysis of ANOVA among 10 segments per 30 seconds from 30 seconds to 300 seconds

Abbreviations: mRR, mean R-R interval; mHR, mean heart rate; SDNN, standard deviation of all NN interval; RMSSD, root mean square differences of successive R-R intervals; N50, number of pairs of adjacent NN intervals differing by more than 50 ms in the entire recording; pNN50, NN50 count divided by the total number of all NN interval; VLF, very low frequency; LF, low frequency; HF, high frequency; TP, total power, LFn, LF power in normalized units; HFn, HF power in normalized units.

Values are presented as P-values by post-hoc Tukey test.

^aP value >0.05 by post-hoc Tukey test.

Table 5

Results of minimum measurement time for heart rate variability

^aP values were calculated using 1-way ANOVA test (mRR, mHR, RMSSD, pNN50, LF, LF/HF) and post-hoc Tukey test (SDNN, NN50, VLF, HF, TP, LFn, HFn).

References

1. Lee YJ, Kim MS, Kim BT, Kwak TH, Shim JY, Lee HR. Heart rate variability in metabolic syndrome. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 2002; 23(12):1432–1439.

2. Mani AR, Montagnese S, Jackson CD, Jenkins CW, Head IM, Stephens RC, et al. Decreased heart rate variability in patients with cirrhosis relates to the presence and degree of hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009; 296(2):G330–G338.

3. Griffin MP, Moorman JR. Toward the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis and sepsis-like illness using novel heart rate analysis. Pediatrics. 2001; 107(1):97–104.

4. Akselrod S, Gordon D, Ubel FA, Shannon DC, Barger AC, Cohen RJ. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. Science. 1981; 213(4504):220–222.

5. Pomeranz B, Macaulay RJ, Caudill MA, Kutz I, Adam D, Gordon D, et al. Assessment of autonomic function in humans by heart rate spectral analysis. Am J Physiol. 1985; 248(1 Pt 2):H151–H153.

6. Pagani M, Lombardi F, Guzzetti S, Rimoldi O, Furlan R, Pizzinelli P, et al. Power spectral analysis of heart rate and arterial pressure variabilities as a marker of sympatho-vagal interaction in man and conscious dog. Circ Res. 1986; 59(2):178–193.

7. Hirsch JA, Bishop B. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia in humans: how breathing pattern modulates heart rate. Am J Physiol. 1981; 241(4):H620–H629.

8. Malliani A, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Cerutti S. Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain. Circulation. 1991; 84(2):482–492.

9. Montano N, Ruscone TG, Porta A, Lombardi F, Pagani M, Malliani A. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability to assess the changes in sympathovagal balance during graded orthostatic tilt. Circulation. 1994; 90(4):1826–1831.

10. Rickards CA, Ryan KL, Convertino VA. Characterization of common measures of heart period variability in healthy human subjects: implications for patient monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput. 2010; 24(1):61–70.

11. Salahuddin L, Jeong MG, Kim D. Ultra short term analysis of heart rate variability using normal sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation ECG data. In : e-Health Networking, Application and Services, 2007 9th International Conference on; Taipei; IEEE. 2007. p. 240–243.

12. McNames J, Aboy M. Reliability and accuracy of heart rate variability metrics versus ECG segment duration. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006; 44(9):747–756.

13. Lin GH, Chang YH, Lin KP. Comparison of heart rate variability measured by ECG in different signal lengths. J Med Biol Eng. 2005; 25(2):67–71.

14. Lee C, Choi WS, Lee BC, Jeong KS, Cho YJ. Clinical use of heart rate variability by comparison of measurement for 3 and 5 minutes. Korean J Fam Pract. 2015; 5:Suppl 3. S523–S528.

TOOLS

Similar articles