Abstract
Background
This study aimed to compare the prevalence and risk factors of suicidal ideation by age groups among the elderly in Korea.
Methods
This cross-sectional study used Fifth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (V-3, 2012). The participants were divided into two age groups: the young-old (n=1,016, 65-74 years), old-old (n=579, 75 years or greater) groups. Multiple logistic regression was used for data analysis.
Results
The prevalence of suicidal ideation was 19.6% of young-old and 22.7% of old-old, respectively. There was no difference on prevalence of suicidal ideation by age groups. Risk factors of suicidal ideation differ by age groups. In the young-old group, higher suicidal ideation showed significant correlation with a higher level of depression, perceived stress and a lower level of education, self-rated health. In the old-old group, higher suici-dal ideation showed significant correlation with a higher level of depression, perceived stress, restriction of ac-tivity, and pain/discomfort.
REFERENCES
1.Statistics Korea. Population Projections 2010-2060. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2010. [Accessed June 10, 2014].http://kosis.kr.
2.Statistics Korea. Cause of death statistics. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2012. [Accessed June 10, 2014].http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/6/2/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=308559&pageNo=1&rowNum=10&navCount=10&currPg=&sTarget=title&sTxt=.
3.Ministry of Health & Welfare. 「OECD Health data 2014」 Analysis of major index. Sejong: Ministry of Health & Welfare;2014. [Accessed June 10, 2014].http://www.mw.go.kr/front_new/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&CONT_SEQ=301867&page=1.
4.Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Emergency department based injury in-depth surveillance, 2006. Cheongwon: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2006. [Accessed September 10, 2014].http://cdc.go.kr.
5.Szanto K., Gildengers A., Mulsant BH., Brown G., Alexopoulos GS., ReynoldsIII CF. Identification of suicidal ideation and pre-vention of suicidal behaviour in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 2002. 19(1):11–24.
6.Kim HS. A study on epistemology of Korean elder's suicidal thought. J Korean Gerontol Soc. 2002. 22(1):159–72.
7.Statistics Korea. The survey on the actual conditions of older person in Korea. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2011. [Accessed June 10, 2014].http://kosis.kr.
8.Miller JS., Segal DL., Coolidge FL. A comparison of suicidal thinking and reasons for living among younger and older adults. Death Stud. 2001. 25(4):357–65.
9.Mun YH., Im MY. Suicidal ideation and associated factors of the elderly according to residence area - focusing on the compar-isons between urban and rural areas -. J Korean Public Health Nurs. 2013. 27(3):551–63.
10.Kim HK., Ko SH., Jeong SH. Suicidal ideation and risk factors among the elderly in Korea. J Korean Acad Public Health Nurs. 2010. 24(1):82–92.
11.Fairweather AK., Anstey KJ., Rodgers B., Jorm AF., Christensen H. Age and gender differences among Australian suicide idea-tors: prevalence and correlates. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2007. 195(2):130–6.
12.Choi YH., Kim SH. Suicide ideation and related factors according to depression in older adults. J Korean Gerontol Soc. 2008. 28(2):345–55.
13.Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The fifth Korea national health and nutrition examination survey (KNHANES V-3). Cheongwon: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2012. [Accessed June 10, 2014].http://knhanes.cdc.go.kr/knhanes/index.do.
14.Choi HA., Lee DS., Kim YJ. Analysis on depression and suicidal ideation of Korean female adults-by using Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES Ⅳ). J Korean Data Anal Soc. 2011. 13(2):709–20.
15.Lee SH. Comparative study on influencing factors of suicidal ideation according to sex in the elderly. J Korean Public Health Nurs. 2013. 27(3):500–12.
16.Cho KH., Kim YK. Influencing factors on depression, suicidal thought, and life satisfaction of Korean elders. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Edu. 2008. 14(2):176–87.
17.Statistics Korea. Cause of suicidal ideation and suicidal trial of elderly according to general characteristics (2011). Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2011. [Accessed June 10, 2014].http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=117&tblId=DT_11771_2011N087&conn_path=I2.
18.Statistics Korea. Adolescents statistics. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2013. [Accessed June 10, 2014].http://kostat.go.kr.
19.Kim HS. The elderly and deviant behavior (suicide). J Welf Aged. 2000. 10(1):25–45.
20.Tajvar M., Arab M., Montazeri A. Determinants of health-related quality of life in elderly in Tehran, Iran. BMC Public Health. 2008. 8:323.
21.Awata S., Seki T., Koizumi Y., Sato S., Hozawa A., Omori K, et al. Factors associated with suicidal ideation in an elderly urban Japanese population: a community-based, cross-sectional study. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005. 59(3):327–36.
22.Jeon EY., Choi YH. Factors affecting the health-related quality of life according to age in vulnerable aged men. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2010. 40(3):400–10.
Table 1.
Characteristics | Young-old elderly (n=1,016) | Old-old elderly (n=579) | χ2/t | Pa | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (±SD)/N (%) | Mean (±SD)/N (%) | ||||
Suicidal ideation | Yes | 172 (19.6) | 108 (22.7) | 1.38 | 0.242 |
No | 774 (80.4) | 375 (77.3) | |||
Sociodemographic characteristics | |||||
Age, y Sex | Male | 69.31 (±0.12) 452 (45.4) | 78.68 (±0.18) 221 (34.9) | 9.29 | 0.003 |
Female | 564 (54.6) | 358 (65.1) | |||
Education | ≤Elementary | 547 (60.5) | 356 (77.3) | 26.59 | <0.001 |
Middle≤ | 401 (39.5) | 127 (22.7) | |||
Living condition | With family | 765 (75.4) | 289 (47.4) | 80.03 | <0.001 |
Place of residence | Alone Rural | 243 (24.6) 730 (70.6) | 288 (52.6) 344 (59.1) | 3.16 | 0.003 |
Urban | 286 (29.4) | 235 (40.9) | |||
Household income | 1 quartile (lowest) | 411 (41.7) | 352 (65.2) | 55.17 | <0.001 |
2 quartile≤ | 584 (58.3) | 217 (34.8) | |||
Health characteristics | |||||
Chronic disease | Yes No | 388 (38.7) 628 (61.3) | 211 (35.4) 368 (64.6) | 1.07 | 0.301 |
Restriction of activity | Yes | 153 (17.9) | 104 (21.9) | 1.68 | 0.197 |
No | 799 (82.1) | 381 (78.1) | |||
Pain/discomfort | Yes | 264 (27.8) | 188 (37.7) | 10.38 | 0.002 |
No | 690 (72.2) | 304 (62.3) | |||
Depression | Yes | 133 (14.9) | 86 (19.2) | 2.46 | 0.118 |
Self-rated health | No Bad | 814 (85.1) 290 (32.4) | 396 (80.8) 180 (37.3) | 2.77 | 0.098 |
Good | 663 (67.6) | 313 (62.7) | |||
Perceived stress | More | 195 (20.9) | 101 (21.7) | 0.08 | 0.775 |
Less | 751 (79.1) | 379 (78.3) | |||
Walking, min | 74.89 (±3.45) | 57.55 (±3.65) | 2.64 | 0.106 | |
Sleeping, h | 6.44 (±0.06) | 6.58 (±0.11) | 0.01 | 0.912 |
Table 2.
Characteristics | Model 1b | Model 2c | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | (95% CI) | Pa | OR | (95% CI) | Pa | ||
Sociodemographic characteriistics | |||||||
Sex | Male | 0.83 | (0.52-.1.32) | 0.830 | 1.00 | (0.50-2.00) | 0.990 |
Female | 1 | 1 | |||||
Education | ≤Elementary Middle≤ | 2.29 1 | (1.38-3.80) | 0.001 | 2.23 1 | (1.10-4.51) | 0.025 |
Living condition | With family | 0.90 | (0.56-1.46) | 0.678 | 1.26 | (0.57-2.79) | 0.565 |
Alone | 1 | 1 | |||||
Place of residence | Rural | 0.88 | (0.58-1.32) | 0.538 | 0.71 | (0.38-1.34) | 0.295 |
Urban | 1 | 1 | |||||
Household income | 1 quartile (lowest) | 1.33 | (0.83-2.12) | 0.226 | 0.84 | (0.47-1.53) | 0.585 |
2 quartile≤ | 1 | 1 | |||||
Negelkerke R2 | 0.06 | ||||||
F (P) | 4.46 (0.001) | ||||||
Health characteristics | |||||||
Chronic disease | Yes | 0.71 | (0.38-1.33) | 0.294 | |||
No | 1 | ||||||
Restriction of activity | Yes No | 1.35 1 | (0.56-3.25) | 0.501 | |||
Pain/discomfort | Yes | 1.39 | (0.76-2.54) | 0.273 | |||
No | 1 | ||||||
Depression | Yes | 14.15 | (6.13-32.65) | <0.001 | |||
No | 1 | ||||||
Self-rated health | Poor Good | 2.67 1 | (1.52-4.69) | 0.001 | |||
Perceived stress | More | 2.31 | (1.10-4.82) | 0.026 | |||
Less | 1 | ||||||
Walking | 1.00 | (0.99-1.00) | 0.828 | ||||
Sleeping | 1.08 | (0.98-1.31) | 0.400 | ||||
Negelkerke R2 | 0.40 | ||||||
F (P) | 8.17 (<0.001) |
Table 3.
Characteristics | Model 1b | Model 2c | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | (95% CI) | Pa | OR | (95% CI) | Pa | ||
Sociodemographic characteristics | |||||||
Sex | Male | 0.77 | (0.35-.1.70) | 0.523 | - | - | - |
Female | 1 | ||||||
Education | ≤Elementary | 1.77 | (0.77-4.05) | 0.170 | - | - | - |
Middle≤ | 1 | ||||||
Living condition | With family | 0.78 | (0.43-1.41) | 0.416 | - | - | - |
Alone | 1 | ||||||
Place of residence | Rural | 1.21 | (0.68-2.17) | 0.500 | - | - | - |
Urban | 1 | ||||||
Household income | 1 quartile (lowest) | 0.80 | (0.44-1.45) | 0.477 | - | - | - |
2 quartile≤ | 1 | ||||||
Negelkerke R2 | 0.04 | ||||||
F (P) | 1.37 (0.236) | ||||||
Health characteristics | |||||||
Chronic disease | Yes | 1.32 | (0.45-3.82) | 0.602 | |||
No | 1 | ||||||
Restriction of activity | Yes | 3.11 | (1.28-7.53) | 0.012 | |||
No | 1 | ||||||
Pain/discomfort | Yes | 2.54 | (1.15-5.63) | 0.021 | |||
No | 1 | ||||||
Depression | Yes | 2.49 | (1.09-5.68) | 0.030 | |||
No | 1 | ||||||
Self-rated health | Poor | 1.52 | (0.72-3.21) | 0.269 | |||
Good | 1 | ||||||
Perceived stress | More | 3.21 | (1.28-8.01) | 0.013 | |||
Less | 1 | ||||||
Walking | 0.99 | (0.99-1.00) | 0.746 | ||||
Sleeping | 1.18 | (0.95-1.48) | 0.124 | ||||
Negelkerke R2 | 0.31 | ||||||
F (P) | 5.08 (<0.001) |