Journal List > Korean J Health Promot > v.15(2) > 1089871

Kim: The Risk Factors of Suicidal Ideation by Age Groups among the Elderly in Korea

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to compare the prevalence and risk factors of suicidal ideation by age groups among the elderly in Korea.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used Fifth Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (V-3, 2012). The participants were divided into two age groups: the young-old (n=1,016, 65-74 years), old-old (n=579, 75 years or greater) groups. Multiple logistic regression was used for data analysis.

Results

The prevalence of suicidal ideation was 19.6% of young-old and 22.7% of old-old, respectively. There was no difference on prevalence of suicidal ideation by age groups. Risk factors of suicidal ideation differ by age groups. In the young-old group, higher suicidal ideation showed significant correlation with a higher level of depression, perceived stress and a lower level of education, self-rated health. In the old-old group, higher suici-dal ideation showed significant correlation with a higher level of depression, perceived stress, restriction of ac-tivity, and pain/discomfort.

Conclusions

Age group-specific nursing strategies may be required for prevention of suicidal ideation in elderly.

REFERENCES

1.Statistics Korea. Population Projections 2010-2060. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2010. [Accessed June 10, 2014].http://kosis.kr.
2.Statistics Korea. Cause of death statistics. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2012. [Accessed June 10, 2014].http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/6/2/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=308559&pageNo=1&rowNum=10&navCount=10&currPg=&sTarget=title&sTxt=.
3.Ministry of Health & Welfare. 「OECD Health data 2014」 Analysis of major index. Sejong: Ministry of Health & Welfare;2014. [Accessed June 10, 2014].http://www.mw.go.kr/front_new/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&CONT_SEQ=301867&page=1.
4.Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Emergency department based injury in-depth surveillance, 2006. Cheongwon: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2006. [Accessed September 10, 2014].http://cdc.go.kr.
5.Szanto K., Gildengers A., Mulsant BH., Brown G., Alexopoulos GS., ReynoldsIII CF. Identification of suicidal ideation and pre-vention of suicidal behaviour in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 2002. 19(1):11–24.
crossref
6.Kim HS. A study on epistemology of Korean elder's suicidal thought. J Korean Gerontol Soc. 2002. 22(1):159–72.
7.Statistics Korea. The survey on the actual conditions of older person in Korea. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2011. [Accessed June 10, 2014].http://kosis.kr.
8.Miller JS., Segal DL., Coolidge FL. A comparison of suicidal thinking and reasons for living among younger and older adults. Death Stud. 2001. 25(4):357–65.
crossref
9.Mun YH., Im MY. Suicidal ideation and associated factors of the elderly according to residence area - focusing on the compar-isons between urban and rural areas -. J Korean Public Health Nurs. 2013. 27(3):551–63.
crossref
10.Kim HK., Ko SH., Jeong SH. Suicidal ideation and risk factors among the elderly in Korea. J Korean Acad Public Health Nurs. 2010. 24(1):82–92.
11.Fairweather AK., Anstey KJ., Rodgers B., Jorm AF., Christensen H. Age and gender differences among Australian suicide idea-tors: prevalence and correlates. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2007. 195(2):130–6.
12.Choi YH., Kim SH. Suicide ideation and related factors according to depression in older adults. J Korean Gerontol Soc. 2008. 28(2):345–55.
13.Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The fifth Korea national health and nutrition examination survey (KNHANES V-3). Cheongwon: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2012. [Accessed June 10, 2014].http://knhanes.cdc.go.kr/knhanes/index.do.
14.Choi HA., Lee DS., Kim YJ. Analysis on depression and suicidal ideation of Korean female adults-by using Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES Ⅳ). J Korean Data Anal Soc. 2011. 13(2):709–20.
15.Lee SH. Comparative study on influencing factors of suicidal ideation according to sex in the elderly. J Korean Public Health Nurs. 2013. 27(3):500–12.
crossref
16.Cho KH., Kim YK. Influencing factors on depression, suicidal thought, and life satisfaction of Korean elders. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Edu. 2008. 14(2):176–87.
17.Statistics Korea. Cause of suicidal ideation and suicidal trial of elderly according to general characteristics (2011). Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2011. [Accessed June 10, 2014].http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=117&tblId=DT_11771_2011N087&conn_path=I2.
18.Statistics Korea. Adolescents statistics. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2013. [Accessed June 10, 2014].http://kostat.go.kr.
19.Kim HS. The elderly and deviant behavior (suicide). J Welf Aged. 2000. 10(1):25–45.
20.Tajvar M., Arab M., Montazeri A. Determinants of health-related quality of life in elderly in Tehran, Iran. BMC Public Health. 2008. 8:323.
crossref
21.Awata S., Seki T., Koizumi Y., Sato S., Hozawa A., Omori K, et al. Factors associated with suicidal ideation in an elderly urban Japanese population: a community-based, cross-sectional study. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005. 59(3):327–36.
crossref
22.Jeon EY., Choi YH. Factors affecting the health-related quality of life according to age in vulnerable aged men. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2010. 40(3):400–10.
crossref
23.Idler EL., Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997. 38(1):21–37.
crossref
24.Kõlves K., Värnik A., Schneider B., Fritze J., Allik J. Recent life events and suicide: a case-control study in Tallinn and Frankfurt. Soc Sci Med. 2006. 62(11):2887–96.
crossref

Table 1.
Characteristics and suicidal ideation according to age-specific groups (n=1,595)
Characteristics Young-old elderly (n=1,016) Old-old elderly (n=579) χ2/t Pa
Mean (±SD)/N (%) Mean (±SD)/N (%)
Suicidal ideation Yes 172 (19.6) 108 (22.7) 1.38 0.242
No 774 (80.4) 375 (77.3)
Sociodemographic characteristics
Age, y Sex Male 69.31 (±0.12) 452 (45.4) 78.68 (±0.18) 221 (34.9) 9.29 0.003
Female 564 (54.6) 358 (65.1)
Education ≤Elementary 547 (60.5) 356 (77.3) 26.59 <0.001
Middle≤ 401 (39.5) 127 (22.7)
Living condition With family 765 (75.4) 289 (47.4) 80.03 <0.001
Place of residence Alone Rural 243 (24.6) 730 (70.6) 288 (52.6) 344 (59.1) 3.16 0.003
Urban 286 (29.4) 235 (40.9)
Household income 1 quartile (lowest) 411 (41.7) 352 (65.2) 55.17 <0.001
2 quartile≤ 584 (58.3) 217 (34.8)
Health characteristics
Chronic disease Yes No 388 (38.7) 628 (61.3) 211 (35.4) 368 (64.6) 1.07 0.301
Restriction of activity Yes 153 (17.9) 104 (21.9) 1.68 0.197
No 799 (82.1) 381 (78.1)
Pain/discomfort Yes 264 (27.8) 188 (37.7) 10.38 0.002
No 690 (72.2) 304 (62.3)
Depression Yes 133 (14.9) 86 (19.2) 2.46 0.118
Self-rated health No Bad 814 (85.1) 290 (32.4) 396 (80.8) 180 (37.3) 2.77 0.098
Good 663 (67.6) 313 (62.7)
Perceived stress More 195 (20.9) 101 (21.7) 0.08 0.775
Less 751 (79.1) 379 (78.3)
Walking, min 74.89 (±3.45) 57.55 (±3.65) 2.64 0.106
Sleeping, h 6.44 (±0.06) 6.58 (±0.11) 0.01 0.912

a Calculated by chi-square test/t-test.

Table 2.
Factors related to suicidal ideation in the young-old elderly (n=1,016)
Characteristics Model 1b Model 2c
OR (95% CI) Pa OR (95% CI) Pa
Sociodemographic characteriistics
Sex Male 0.83 (0.52-.1.32) 0.830 1.00 (0.50-2.00) 0.990
Female 1 1
Education ≤Elementary Middle≤ 2.29 1 (1.38-3.80) 0.001 2.23 1 (1.10-4.51) 0.025
Living condition With family 0.90 (0.56-1.46) 0.678 1.26 (0.57-2.79) 0.565
Alone 1 1
Place of residence Rural 0.88 (0.58-1.32) 0.538 0.71 (0.38-1.34) 0.295
Urban 1 1
Household income 1 quartile (lowest) 1.33 (0.83-2.12) 0.226 0.84 (0.47-1.53) 0.585
2 quartile≤ 1 1
Negelkerke R2 0.06
F (P) 4.46 (0.001)
Health characteristics
Chronic disease Yes 0.71 (0.38-1.33) 0.294
No 1
Restriction of activity Yes No 1.35 1 (0.56-3.25) 0.501
Pain/discomfort Yes 1.39 (0.76-2.54) 0.273
No 1
Depression Yes 14.15 (6.13-32.65) <0.001
No 1
Self-rated health Poor Good 2.67 1 (1.52-4.69) 0.001
Perceived stress More 2.31 (1.10-4.82) 0.026
Less 1
Walking 1.00 (0.99-1.00) 0.828
Sleeping 1.08 (0.98-1.31) 0.400
Negelkerke R2 0.40
F (P) 8.17 (<0.001)

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

a Assessed by multiple logistic regression.

b Entered variables in model 1 were sociodemographic characteristics.

c Entered variables in model 2 were sociodemographic and health characteristics.

Table 3.
Factors related to suicidal ideation in the old-old elderly (n=579)
Characteristics Model 1b Model 2c
OR (95% CI) Pa OR (95% CI) Pa
Sociodemographic characteristics
Sex Male 0.77 (0.35-.1.70) 0.523 - - -
Female 1
Education ≤Elementary 1.77 (0.77-4.05) 0.170 - - -
Middle≤ 1
Living condition With family 0.78 (0.43-1.41) 0.416 - - -
Alone 1
Place of residence Rural 1.21 (0.68-2.17) 0.500 - - -
Urban 1
Household income 1 quartile (lowest) 0.80 (0.44-1.45) 0.477 - - -
2 quartile≤ 1
Negelkerke R2 0.04
F (P) 1.37 (0.236)
Health characteristics
Chronic disease Yes 1.32 (0.45-3.82) 0.602
No 1
Restriction of activity Yes 3.11 (1.28-7.53) 0.012
No 1
Pain/discomfort Yes 2.54 (1.15-5.63) 0.021
No 1
Depression Yes 2.49 (1.09-5.68) 0.030
No 1
Self-rated health Poor 1.52 (0.72-3.21) 0.269
Good 1
Perceived stress More 3.21 (1.28-8.01) 0.013
Less 1
Walking 0.99 (0.99-1.00) 0.746
Sleeping 1.18 (0.95-1.48) 0.124
Negelkerke R2 0.31
F (P) 5.08 (<0.001)

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

a Assessed by multiple logistic regression.

b Entered variables in model 1 were sociodemographic characteristics.

c Entered variables in model 2 were health characteristics.

TOOLS
Similar articles