Journal List > J Korean Soc Hypertens > v.18(3) > 1089804

Cho, Yim, Jin, Sohn, Hwang, Park, Jin, and Kim: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study Determines Factors Affecting Blood Pressure Response to Valsartan

Abstract

Background

Valsartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker and is used for patient with hypertension. Although response to valsartan varies each individual, there is no study about factors affecting the variability of valsartan response.

Methods

To investigate the effects of valsartan on the baseline characteristics of blood pressure, single group, open label, pre- and post-comparison clinical study was conducted. Total 21 male Korean volunteers were enrolled. Each subject was administered no drugs in first period and valsartan 80 mg (Diovan HCT) in second period. For pharmacodynamic analysis, 24 hours blood pressure changes were monitored by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Twenty-four hour blood pressure changes were matched to valsartan concentration and analyzed by correlation analysis. Changes in blood pressure pattern were also analyzed. Subjects were divided into responder, non-responder, and reverse responder according to pre- and post- 24 hours blood monitoring results. For determination of pharmacokinetic parameters, plasma concentration of valsartan was measured by a validated ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters including area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from 0 hour to the last measurable concentration (AUCt), area under the plasma concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and time required to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) were calculated by noncompartmental models in the BA-CALC 2008 program ver. 1.0.0.

Results

There were no significant associations between blood pressure changes and pharmacokinetic parameters of valsartan. Blood pressure pattern change analysis showed significant results. For AUCt, total amount of absorbed valsartan was 25,808 ± 6,863.0 ng·hr/mL, 20,683 ± 8,782.7 ng·hr/mL, and 12,502 ± 5,566.6 ng·hr/mL in responder, non-responder, and reverse responder, respectively (p = 0.041). In Cmax, maximum concentration of valsartan was 4,314 ± 1,522.6 ng/mL, 2,588 ± 1,273.9 ng/mL, and 2,056 ± 1,075.5 ng/mL, respectively.

Conclusions

These results showed that response to valsartan was not associated with blood concentration in healthy volunteers and changes in blood pressure patterns to valsartan might be associated with the amount of drugs which are absorbed to subjects.

Introduction

Valsartan is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist with particularly high affinity for the type I angiotensin II receptor.1) By blocking the action of angiotensin, valsartan reduces blood pressure and used for long time for treatment of hypertension, heart failure.2-4) After a single oral morning dose, the onset of its blood pressure-lowering action started within 2 hours with peak effect occurring 4 to 6 hours. Morning once-a-day dosing ranging from 80 to 320 mg/day results in blood pressure reduction throughout the day.5,6)
In most drugs, after administration of drugs patients are divided into responder and non-responder. The effect of valsartan is affected by various factors. These factors are including age,9) sex,10,11) genetic factors,12) and so on.
In this study, we hypothesized that the individual differences in valsartan effect might be result from amount of drug absorbed. To prove this hypothesis, single group, two-sequence, open label, pre- and post-comparison clinical trial was conducted. Subjects were assigned to free of medication in the first period; in the second period, they received the valsartan 80 mg (Diovan HCT, Novartis Korea, Seoul, Korea). The blood concentration of valsartan was determined by rapid and sensitive ultra-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometric (UPLC-ESI-MS/MS) method. The effect of valsartan was monitored by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). The pharmacokinetic parameters including the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from 0 hour to the last measureable concentration (AUCt), area under the plasma concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and time required to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) were analyzed.
The results of 24-hour blood pressure monitoring were used for further pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis. Pre- and post-dose changes in blood pressure were matched to valsartan concentration and analyzed by Pearson correlation coefficient test. Pre- and post-dose changes in blood pressure patterns were also analyzed.

Subjects and methods

1. Subjects

Twenty-one healthy Korean male volunteers aged 20 to 45 years were enrolled in the study. Subjects underwent screening examinations including a medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests (hematology, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis). Exclusion criteria included medically documented conditions, including cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, hepatic, or gastrointestinal disorders; a chronic disorder that might influence the absorption, disposition, metabolism, or excretion of valsartan; a history of disturbances of organ or acute illness; a history of hematologic disorder or blood donation within 2 months; a history of blood fraction donation within 1 month; a history of psychiatric disorder; a history of drug hypersensitivity; a history of alcohol or drug abuse; participation in another clinical trial within 3 months; consumption of over 5 glasses daily of beverages containing xanthine derivatives; smoking > 20 cigarettes daily; and use of any over-the-counter drug medication having the potential to affect the study results. The study purpose and procedures were explained before the study, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

2. Study design and sample collection

The study was a single group, two-sequence, open label, pre- and post-comparison, with a 1-week washout between study days. The study protocol was reviewed by the institutional review board of Kyung Hee University Hospital. All study procedures were conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Korean Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Subjects were assigned to free of medication in the first period; in the second period, they received the valsartan 80 mg. In both periods, subjects were admitted to the Kyung Hee University Clinical Research Center at 5 p.m. on the day before administration of valsartan or study initiation. They received a standardized dinner, and no food was permitted after 8 p.m. The next day, subjects received no drug (baseline) or valsartan (treatment) along with 240 mL of tap water. Food and water were prohibited during the first 4 hours after dosing. At 4 hours after the oral administration, all subjects were given standardized meals. The subjects were not allowed to remain in a supine position or to sleep until 8 hours after the oral administration. Blood samples (7 mL) for valsartan concentration determination were obtained through a 22-guage indwelling catheter in a forearm vein or by direct venipuncture before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, and 24-hour after dosing in each period. Each sample was collected in heparinized tubes. The blood samples were centrifuged immediately (3,000 rpm, 10 minutes), and were frozen at -80℃ until UPLC-MS/MS analysis.

3. Pharmacokinetic assessment

To determine the valsartan plasma concentration, ACQUITY UPLC (Waters, Milford, MA, USA)-QTRAP 5500 (AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA) were used as UPLC-ESI-MS/MS method.11) The chromatographic separation was performed on a 2.1 × 50 mm, 3.5 µm xBridge C18 column (Waters) maintained at 25℃ using a mobile phase of methanol-10 mM ammonium acetate (50:50, v/v), and the separation was under isocratic conditions with a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Valsartan form m/z 434.2 (Q1) to m/z 179.1 (Q3) and valsartan-D3 (IS) m/z 437.2 (Q1) to m/z 179.1 (Q3) were detected by multiple reaction monitoring with electrospray interface in the negative ion mode. The stock solution of valsartan was prepared in acetonitrile and calibration curve was linear over range in a concentration of 5, 10, 50, 200, 1,000, and 5,000 ng/mL. Concentrations at 20, 500, and 4,000 ng/mL for valsartan was prepared as quality control samples. Internal standard solution of a concentration that 150 ng/mL was prepared in acetonitrile. Human plasma sample were thawed at room temperature, and 300 µL of internal standard solution was added to a 100 µL aliquot of plasma sample for precipitate proteins. One minute vortex mixing and 10 minutes at 14,000 rpm centrifuging were conducted, and the upper clear solution layer was collected and a 3 µL aliquot of solution was injected into the UPLC-MS/MS system.
BA-CALC 2008 program ver. 1.0.0 (Korea Food and Drug Administration, Cheongwon, Korea) that supplied by the KFDA was used to assessed individual pharmacokinetic parameters which include AUCt, AUCinf, Cmax, and Tmax.

4. Pharmacodynamic assessment

Twenty four hours blood pressure changes were monitored by ABPM. ABPM can provide a 24-hour blood pressure profile and blood pressure information over 24-hour as well as during specific periods, such as daytime, nighttime, and early morning.7) The ABPM measurement was done according to "Guideline for blood pressure monitoring" established by Korean Society of Hypertension.8) Total, daytime and nighttime systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate of each participant were automatically measured every 20 minutes during the 24 hours (8 AM to next day 8 AM) with a validated device (TM 2430 ambulatory blood pressure monitor; A&D Medical, San Jose, CA, USA). Subjects were studied by ABPM under baseline conditions at 1st period when they were free of medication and assessed the effects of valsartan at 2nd period.

5. Group assignment

The blood pressure patterns were classified as non-dipper, dipper, extreme-dipper, and reverse-dipper (Table 1). Subjects that diurnal blood pressure pattern changed from reverse dipper to non-dipper or dipper and changed from non-dipper to dipper or extreme dipper were assigned to responder group; subjects that have no change in diurnal blood pressure pattern were assigned to non-responder group; subjects that diurnal blood pressure pattern changed from non-dipper to reverse dipper and changed from dipper to non-dipper were assigned to reverse-responder group (Table 2).

6. Tolerability

Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study based on spontaneous reports by volunteers, questioning by investigators, and clinical examinations. The investigators assessed all clinical adverse effects in terms of intensity (mild, moderate, or severe), duration, outcome, and relationship to the study drug.

7. Statistical analysis

Pre- and post-dose blood pressure changes matched to pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis using SPSS ver. 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed between responder, non-responder and reverse-responder groups according to pre- and post-dose changes in ABPM pattern. SPSS ver. 20.0 was used to conduct the one-way analysis of variance to compare the differences of mean AUCt, AUCinf, and Cmax between three groups. All analysis were performed at an α level of 0.05.

Results

1. Subjects

Twenty-one healthy Korean male volunteers were participated. The mean (standard deviation, SD) age, height, and weight of subjects were 25.3 ± 3.5 years, 175.0 ± 3.9 cm, and 68.5 ± 7.8 kg, respectively. Twenty-four hours blood pressure monitoring data was summarized in Table 3.

2. Pre- and post-dose changes in blood pressure and pharmacokinetics

The ABPM results and pharmacokinetic parameters of each individual were summarized in Table 3. Although all subjects were participated entire trial, ABPM data of post-dose from three subjects (R02, R07, and R16) was missed for various reasons. After finished 2nd period, 15 subjects showed decrease in mean SBP and 3 subjects showed increase in mean SBP. To associate pharmacokinetic parameters and changes in ABPM data, Pearson correlation analysis was conducted between ABPM data and pharmacokinetic parameters(Cmax, AUCt, and AUCinf). There were no significant associations between changes of ABPM data and pharmacokinetic parameters (Table 4).

3. ABPM patterns and pharmacokinetics

The ABPM patterns and pharmacokinetic parameters of each individual were summarized in Table 5. Ten, four, and seven subjects showed dipper, non-dipper, and reverse dipper pattern in 1st period, respectively. After finished 2nd period, eleven, one, and four subjects showed dipper, non-dipper, and reverse dipper pattern in 1st period, respectively. The mean AUCt (mean ± SD), total amount of absorbed valsartan was 25,808 ± 6,863.0 ng·hr/mL, 20,683 ± 8,782.7 ng·hr/mL, and 12,502 ± 5,566.6 ng·hr/mL in responder, non-responder, and reverse responder, respectively. There were significant differences between mean AUCt of three groups (p = 0.041), and mean AUCt of responder group was significant higher than reverse group (p = 0.035, Turkey honestly significant difference [HSD]). The mean AUCinf (mean ± SD), total amount of absorbed valsartan was 26,710 ± 7,024.4 ng·hr/mL, 22,895 ± 8,344.0 ng·hr/mL, and 12,942 ± 5,589.2 ng·hr/mL in responder, non-responder, and reverse responder, respectively. There were significant differences between mean AUCinf of three groups (p = 0.025), and mean AUCt of responder group was significant higher than reverse group (p = 0.025, Turkey HSD). Cmax was 4,314 ± 1,522.6 ng/mL, 2,588 ± 1,273.9 ng/mL, and 2,056 ± 1,075.5 ng/mL in responder, non-responder, and reverse responder, respectively. There were significant differences between mean Cmax of three groups (p = 0.034), and mean Cmax of responder group was significant higher than reverse group (p = 0.037, Turkey HSD). In Tmax, time required to reach maximum plasma concentration was 3 ± 0.8 hours, 4 ± 0.7 hours, and 3 ± 1.3 hours in responder, non-responder, and reverse responder, respectively. There were no significant differences between mean Tmax of three group (p = 0.239). The mean plasma concentration versus time profiles of valsartan in responder, non-responder, and reverse-responder group were shown in Fig. 1.

4. Tolerability

No serious AEs were reported, and no subjects discontinued the study due to AEs. But three subjects were failure to obtain ABPM data at the second period, and total 18 subjects were enrolled the statistical analysis.

Discussion

In pharmacotherapy, response of drug mainly depends on the amount of drug absorbed. Other factors, such as age, gender, genetic factor, and individual susceptibility affect the effect of drug.9-13)
In this study, we hypothesized that individual difference of valsartan effect mainly caused by amount of drug absorbed. So a single group, two-sequence, open label, pre- and post-comparison pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study was conducted. Total 21 subjects were enrolled and pre- and post-dose ABPM and pharmacokinetic data was used for PK/PD analysis.
We expected that blood pressure lowering effect of valsartan may be associated with amount of drug absorbed. However, there were no positive correlations between pharmacokinetic parameters of valsartan and blood pressure changes. These results showed that response to valsartan did not correlate with pharmacokinetic parameters of valsartan. Although there were no relations between response and pharmacokinetic parameters, this study has some limitations. Subjects were healthy volunteers and dose of valsartan was not sufficient to prove the effect of drugs in healthy volunteers. And other individual factors can affect the blood pressure status of two periods. So we analyzed pre- and post-dose changes in blood pressure patterns according to pharmacokinetic parameters.
Interestingly, three groups (responder, non-responder, and reverse responder) showed statistically different drug absorption pattern. In AUCt which represents amount of drug absorbed, three groups showed statistically different valsartan absorption. Especially, difference between responder and reverse-responder was more than two fold (25,808 ± 6,863.0 ng·hr/mL and 12,502 ± 5,566.6 ng·hr/mL in responder and reverse responder, respectively). The maximum concentration of valsartan (Cmax) also showed similar results.
These results showed that response to valsartan do not depend on amount of drug absorbed in this study. Because this study has some limitations, if subject factors (healthy volunteer) and clinical trial design had been changed, some significant results could be obtained. In conclusion, for tailored pharmacotherapy of valsartan, genetic and other factors which might affect the valsartan's effect should be studied.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Plasma concentration-time curves. Valsartan mean plasma concentration versus time profile of response group, non-response group and reverse response group. Values are presented as mean ± standard error of mean.
jksh-18-88-g001
Table 1
The classification of blood pressure patterns
jksh-18-88-i001
Table 2
Groups according to response to valsartan
jksh-18-88-i002
Table 3
Twenty-four hours ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) data for 21 subjects
jksh-18-88-i003

Blood pressure (BP) data of subjects 2, 7, and 16 were lossed during trial.

mSBP, mean systolic blood pressure; mDBP, mean diastolic blood pressure; mdSBP, mean daytime systolic blood pressure; mdDBP, mean daytime diastolic blood pressure; mnSBP, mean nighttime systolic blood pressure; mnDBP, mean nighttime diastolic blood pressure.

Table 4
Pearson correlation coefficient analysis of pre- and post-dose changes in blood pressure and pharmacokinetics
jksh-18-88-i004

AUCt, area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from 0 hour to the last measurable concentration; AUCinf, area under the plasma concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity; Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure.

Table 5
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of three groups
jksh-18-88-i005

Diurnal BP pattern, 1 = non dipper (with a BP drop at night time of less than 10%); 2 = dipper (with a BP drop at night time of 10% to 20%); 3 = extreme dipper (with a BP drop at night time of more than 20%); 4 = reverse dipper (with a BP increase at night time).

AUCt, area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from 0 hour to the last measurable concentration; AUCinf, area under the plasma concentration versus time curve extrapolated to infinity; Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; Tmax, time required to reach maximum plasma concentration; BP, blood pressure; SD, standard deviation.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. J.Y. Jang for 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measurement during the experiment.

Notes

Conflict of interest: none declared.

References

1. Criscione L, de Gasparo M, Buhlmayer P, Whitebread S, Ramjoue HP, Wood J. Pharmacological profile of valsartan: a potent, orally active, nonpeptide antagonist of the angiotensin II AT1-receptor subtype. Br J Pharmacol. 1993. 110:761–771.
crossref
2. Corea L, Cardoni O, Fogari R, Innocenti P, Porcellati C, Provvidenza M, et al. Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: a comparative study of the efficacy and safety against amlodipine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1996. 60:341–346.
crossref
3. Mazayev VP, Fomina IG, Kazakov EN, Sulimov VA, Zvereva TV, Lyusov VA, et al. Valsartan in heart failure patients previously untreated with an ACE inhibitor. Int J Cardiol. 1998. 65:239–246.
crossref
4. Cohn JN. Improving outcomes in congestive heart failure: Val-HeFT. Valsartan in Heart Failure Trial. Cardiology. 1999. 91:Suppl 1. 19–22.
5. Neutel J, Weber M, Pool J, Smith D, Fitzsimmons S, Chiang YT, et al. Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist: antihypertensive effects over 24 hours. Clin Ther. 1997. 19:447–458.
crossref
6. Lasko BH, Laplante A, Hebert D, Bonnefis-Boyer S. Canadian valsartan study in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Blood Press Monit. 2001. 6:91–99.
crossref
7. Shimizu M, Kario K. Perfect 24-Hour BP Management for High-Risk Hypertension. J Korean Soc Hypertens. 2010. 16:1–8.
8. Korean Society of Hypertension. Blood pressure monitoring guidelines. 2007. Seoul: Korean Society of Hypertension.
9. Sioufi A, Marfil F, Jaouen A, Cardot JM, Godbillon J, Ezzet F, et al. The effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of valsartan. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1998. 19:237–244.
crossref
10. Okumura M, Iwai M, Ide A, Mogi M, Ito M, Horiuchi M. Sex difference in vascular injury and the vasoprotective effect of valsartan are related to differential AT2 receptor expression. Hypertension. 2005. 46:577–583.
11. Asmar R, Oparil S. Comparison of the antihypertensive efficacy of irbesartan/HCTZ and valsartan/HCTZ combination therapy: impact of age and gender. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2010. 32:499–503.
crossref
12. Konoshita T, Kato N, Fuchs S, Mizuno S, Aoyama C, Motomura M, et al. Genetic variant of the Renin-Angiotensin system and diabetes influences blood pressure response to Angiotensin receptor blockers. Diabetes Care. 2009. 32:1485–1490.
crossref
13. Li H, Wang Y, Jiang Y, Tang Y, Wang J, Zhao L, et al. A liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous quantification of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide in human plasma. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2007. 852:436–442.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles