Journal List > J Korean Soc Hypertens > v.18(2) > 1089801

Lee, Kim, Lee, Bae, Hwang, Kim, and Cho: Usefulness of Home Blood Pressure Reflected Anti-hypertensive Treatment and the Evolution of Blood Pressure Profiles

Abstract

Background

It is still unclear how self-measured home blood pressure (BP) evolves over time in treated hypertensive patients, and the usefulness of home BP based treatment is under debate.

Methods

The patients whose anti-hypertensive medications had not been changed at least 6 months were enrolled. They measured home BP at enrollment and at study end. The patients were classified into controlled hypertension (CH), hypertension with white coat effect (WCH), hypertension with reverse white coat effect (RWCH), and uncontrolled hypertension (UH), based on their clinic and home BP. Their home BP profiles were reflected in the patients' treatments, instead of relying solely on clinic BP.

Results

Ninety patients (mean age, 56.5 ± 9.9; male, 57.8%) were analyzed and mean follow-up duration was 34.1 ± 3.6 months. CH, WCH, RWCH, and UH patients were 33.3% (30 patients), 37.8% (34 patients), 5.6% (5 patients), and 23.3% (21 patients), respectively at enrollment. Almost all CH and WCH patients remained in normal range of home BP whereas about half of RWCH and UH patients moved to CH or WCH. As a result, the proportion of RWCH and UH decreased at the end of follow-up. Overall clinic and home BP reduced significantly in all groups. Clinic BP declined significantly in WCH and UH, whereas home BP declined significantly in RWCH and UH. That means the BP profiles shifted toward more reasonable states.

Conclusions

BP profiles shifted toward more reasonable states after home BP based adjustment of anti-hypertensive medication. Measurement of home BP might be beneficial in anti-hypertensive treatment.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Baseline characteristics of the study population
jksh-18-63-i001

Values are presented as number (%) or mean ± standard deviation.

Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria (for obesity, a waist circumference > 90 cm in male or > 80 cm in female). We defined cardiovascular risk factors as cigarette smoking, DM (fasting blood glucose ≥126mg/dL or taking oral hypoglycemic agent or under insulin therapy), dyslipidemia (total cholesterol ≥240 mg/dL or LDL cholesterol ≥160 mg/dL or HDL cholesterol < 40 mg/dL in male, < 50 mg/dL in female), obesity (BMI ≥25 kg/m2 or waist circumference > 90 cm in male, > 80 cm in female), physical inactivity (exercise < 2 hours/week), old age (≥45 years-old in male, ≥55 years-old in female) and familial history of premature cardiovascular disease (< 55 years-old in the first relative male, < 65 years-old in the first relative female).

CH, controlled hypertension; WCH, hypertension with white coat effect; RWCH, hypertension with reverse white coat effect; UH, uncontrolled hypertension; BMI, body mass index; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; DM, diabetes mellitus.

*p-value < 0.05 in inter-group comparison using Fisher's exact test.

Table 2
Changes in overall BP profiles
jksh-18-63-i002

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

BP, blood pressure; CH, controlled hypertension; WCH, hypertension with white coat effect; RWCH, hypertension with reverse white coat effect; UH, uncontrolled hypertension.

*p-value < 0.05 in intra-group comparison using paired t-test.

Table 3
Transition of the BP distribution
jksh-18-63-i003

BP, blood pressure; CH, controlled hypertension; WCH, hypertension with white coat effect; RWCH, hypertension with reverse white coat effect; UH, uncontrolled hypertension.

References

1. Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R. Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002. 360:1903–1913.
2. Verdecchia P, Porcellati C, Schillaci G, Borgioni C, Ciucci A, Battistelli M, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure: an independent predictor of prognosis in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1994. 24:793–801.
crossref
3. Clement DL, De Buyzere ML, De Bacquer DA, de Leeuw PW, Duprez DA, Fagard RH, et al. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood-pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2003. 348:2407–2415.
crossref
4. Ohkubo T, Imai Y, Tsuji I, Nagai K, Kato J, Kikuchi N, et al. Home blood pressure measurement has a stronger predictive power for mortality than does screening blood pressure measurement: a population-based observation in Ohasama, Japan. J Hypertens. 1998. 16:971–975.
5. Bobrie G, Chatellier G, Genes N, Clerson P, Vaur L, Vaisse B, et al. Cardiovascular prognosis of "masked hypertension" detected by blood pressure self-measurement in elderly treated hypertensive patients. JAMA. 2004. 291:1342–1349.
crossref
6. Little P, Barnett J, Barnsley L, Marjoram J, Fitzgerald-Barron A, Mant D. Comparison of acceptability of and preferences for different methods of measuring blood pressure in primary care. BMJ. 2002. 325:258–259.
crossref
7. Imai Y. Clinical significance of home blood pressure and its possible practical application. J Korean Soc Hypertens. 2012. 18:1–16.
crossref
8. On YK. Accuracy of home blood pressure measurement. Korean Hypertension J. 2005. 2:1–4.
9. Nesbitt SD, Amerena JV, Grant E, Jamerson KA, Lu H, Weder A, et al. Home blood pressure as a predictor of future blood pressure stability in borderline hypertension. The Tecumseh Study. Am J Hypertens. 1997. 10:1270–1280.
crossref
10. Bidlingmeyer I, Burnier M, Bidlingmeyer M, Waeber B, Brunner HR. Isolated office hypertension: a prehypertensive state? J Hypertens. 1996. 14:327–332.
crossref
11. Polonia JJ, Gama GM, Silva JA, Amaral C, Martins LR, Bertoquini SE. Sequential follow-up clinic and ambulatory blood pressure evaluation in a low risk population of white-coat hypertensive patients and in normotensives. Blood Press Monit. 2005. 10:57–64.
12. Mancia G, Bombelli M, Facchetti R, Madotto F, Quarti-Trevano F, Polo Friz H, et al. Long-term risk of sustained hypertension in white-coat or masked hypertension. Hypertension. 2009. 54:226–232.
crossref
13. Staessen JA, Den Hond E, Celis H, Fagard R, Keary L, Vandenhoven G, et al. Antihypertensive treatment based on blood pressure measurement at home or in the physician's office: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004. 291:955–964.
14. Verberk WJ, Kroon AA, Lenders JW, Kessels AG, van Montfrans GA, Smit AJ, et al. Self-measurement of blood pressure at home reduces the need for antihypertensive drugs: a randomized, controlled trial. Hypertension. 2007. 50:1019–1025.
15. Imai Y, Otsuka K, Kawano Y, Shimada K, Hayashi H, Tochikubo O, et al. Japanese society of hypertension (JSH) guidelines for self-monitoring of blood pressure at home. Hypertens Res. 2003. 26:771–782.
16. Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, Metoki H, Asayama K, Obara T, Hashimoto J, et al. Prognosis of "masked" hypertension and "white-coat" hypertension detected by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 10-year follow-up from the Ohasama study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005. 46:508–515.
crossref
17. Liu JE, Roman MJ, Pini R, Schwartz JE, Pickering TG, Devereux RB. Cardiac and arterial target organ damage in adults with elevated ambulatory and normal office blood pressure. Ann Intern Med. 1999. 131:564–572.
crossref
18. Pickering TG, Shimbo D, Haas D. Ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring. N Engl J Med. 2006. 354:2368–2374.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles