Journal List > J Korean Soc Hypertens > v.17(4) > 1089774

Kim: Current Controversies over the Management of Elderly Hypertension with Impaired Renal Function

ABSTRACT

Both hypertension and aging impact renal function. Elderly patients are more likely to have chronic kidney disease (CKD), usually defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Multiple studies over the past two decades have shown that CKD is a powerful cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor. Reduced kidney function in elderly people is a marker for adverse outcomes. The major goals of lowering blood pressure (BP) in patients with CKD include reduction of mortality, CVD events and slowing progression. Main considerations in the management of hypertension include selection of a target BP and selection of agents used to attain the chosen target. Current clinical practice guidelines for BP targets and choice of anti–hypertensive agents in elderly patients with CKD are not specific. Older patients with CKD might experience increased mortality and hospitalizations in association with lower baseline BP values. This review outlines controversies in applying current guidelines for the management of BP to older patients with CKD. Because of the high burden of other comorbidities in older patients with CKD, strict adherence to guidelines for the management of hypertension may not always represent the most adequate approach.

References

1. Aronow WS, Fleg JL, Pepine CJ, Artinian NT, Bakris G, Brown AS, et al. ACCF/AHA 2011 expert consensus document on hypertension in the elderly: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus documents developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Neurology, American Geriatrics Society, American Society for Preventive Cardiology, American Society of Hypertension, American Society of Nephrology, Association of Black Cardiologists, and European Society of Hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57:2037–114.
2. Kim MJ. Renal disease in the elderly. J Korean Med Assoc. 2004; 47:258–67.
crossref
3. Stevens LA, Coresh J, Levey AS. CKD in the elderly–old questions and new challenges: World Kidney Day 2008. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008; 51:353–7.
crossref
4. Gentile G, Strippoli GF. Should we shift toward higher blood pressure targets in patients with chronic kidney disease. J Nephrol. 2011; 24:673–85.
crossref
5. Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) . K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines on hypertension and antihypertensive agents in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004; 43:S1–290.
6. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003; 289:2560–72.
crossref
7. Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, Germano G, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2007; 25:1105–87.
8. Hemmelgarn BR, Zhang J, Manns BJ, Tonelli M, Larsen E, Ghali WA, et al. Progression of kidney dysfunction in the community-dwelling elderly. Kidney Int. 2006; 69:2155–61.
crossref
9. O’Hare AM, Choi AI, Bertenthal D, Bacchetti P, Garg AX, Kaufman JS, et al. Age affects outcomes in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007; 18:2758–65.
10. O’Hare AM, Bertenthal D, Covinsky KE, Landefeld CS, Sen S, Mehta K. et al. Mortality risk stratification in chronic kidney disease: one size for all ages? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006; 17:846–53.
11. Raymond NT, Zehnder D, Smith SC, Stinson JA, Lehnert H, Higgins RM. Elevated relative mortality risk with mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease decreases with age. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007; 22:3214–20.
crossref
12. Eriksen BO, Ingebretsen OC. In chronic kidney disease staging the use of the chronicity criterion affects prognosis and the rate of progression. Kidney Int. 2007; 72:1242–8.
crossref
13. Gullion CM, Keith DS, Nichols GA, Smith DH. Impact of comorbidities on mortality in managed care patients with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006; 48:212–20.
crossref
14. Bakris GL. Slowing nephropathy progression: focus on proteinuria reduction. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008; 3(Suppl 1):S3–10.
crossref
15. Onuigbo MA. Analytical review of the evidence for re-noprotection by renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade in chronic kidney disease - a call for caution. Nephron Clin Pract. 2009; 113:c63–9.
16. Mann JF, Schmieder RE, McQueen M, Dyal L, Schumacher H, Pogue J, et al. Renal outcomes with telmisartan, ramipril, or both, in people at high vascular risk (the ONTARGET study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Lancet. 2008; 372:547–53.
crossref
17. Agodoa LY, Appel L, Bakris GL, Beck G, Bourgoignie J, Briggs JP, et al. Effect of ramipril vs amlodipine on renal outcomes in hypertensive nephrosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001; 285:2719–28.
18. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD. The effect of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy. The Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329:1456–62.
19. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, Berl T, Pohl MA, Lewis JB, et al. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345:851–60.
crossref
20. Brenner BM, Cooper ME. de Zeeuw D, Keane WF, Mitch WE, Parving HH, et al. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345:861–9.
21. Rahman M, Pressel S, Davis BR, Nwachuku C. Wright JT Jr, Whelton PK, et al. Renal outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or a calcium channel blocker vs a diuretic: a report from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165:936–46.
22. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ. 1998. 317:p. 703–13.
23. Estacio RO, Jeffers BW, Hiatt WR, Biggerstaff SL, Gifford N, Schrier RW. The effect of nisoldipine as compared with enalapril on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes and hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338:645–52.
crossref
24. Klahr S, Levey AS, Beck GJ, Caggiula AW, Hunsicker L, Kusek JW, et al. The effects of dietary protein restriction and blood-pressure control on the progression of chronic renal disease. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994; 330:877–84.
25. Wright JT Jr, Bakris G, Greene T, Agodoa LY, Appel LJ, Charleston J, et al. Effect of blood pressure lowering and antihypertensive drug class on progression of hypertensive kidney disease: results from the AASK trial. JAMA. 2002; 288:2421–31.
crossref
26. Turnbull F, Neal B, Ninomiya T, Algert C, Arima H, Barzi F, et al. Effects of different regimens to lower blood pressure on major cardiovascular events in older and younger adults: meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2008; 336:1121–3.
crossref
27. Turgut F, Balogun RA, Abdel-Rahman EM. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade effects on the kidney in the elderly: benefits and limitations. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010; 5:1330–9.
crossref

Table 1.
NKF K/DOQI 2002. Classification of the severity of CKD
Stage Description eGFR
mL/min/1.73m2
Typical
Scr
Consequences Actions required
0 Patients↑at - risk >90 with risk factors N None Screening risk reduction
1 Kidney damage with normal or ↑ GFR >90 N None Diagnosis and treatment of comorbid conditions, slow progression of CKD risk
2 Kidney damage with mild ↓ GFR 60–89 1.5–2 Hypertension 2° HPTH Treatment hypertension (<130/80 mm Hg), estimate progression, start PO4 restriction
3 Moderate ↓ GFR 30–59 2–4 Hypertension 2° HPTH anemia Restrict Na & K modest protein restriction, evaluation & treatment complications
4 Severe ↓ GFR 15–29 5–8 Above plus salt & water retention Prepare for RRT
5 ESRD <10–14 >10 Above plus pulm edema ↑ K acidosis Start of RRT to sustain life

NKF, National Kidney Foundation; K/DOQI, Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative; CKD, chronic kidney disease; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; Scr, serum creatinine; N, normal; ESRD, end–stage renal disease; HPTH, hyperparathyroidism; PO4, phosphate; RRT, renal replacement therapy.

Table 2.
Published guidelines on BP targets in patients with non–dialysis CKD (stages 1–4)
Guideline agency Country Year Tagert recommendation(mmHg) Agent(s) recommended
Hypertension Society Guidelines including recommendations for CKD
JNC 7 United States 2003 <130/80 ACEI or ARB (diabetic kidney disease or nondiabetic kidney disease)
ESH/ESC Europe 2007 <130/80 ACEI or ARB (diabetic kidney disease or nondiabetic kidney disease)
BHC–IV United Kingdom 2004 <130/80
<125/75 in the presence of proteinuria ≥1g/24hr
ACEI (nondiabetic kidney disease)
ARB (diabetic kidney disease, type2 diabetes)
ACEI or ARB (diabetic kidney disease, type 1 diabetes)
Renal Society Guidelines
NKF/KDOQI United States 2004 <130/80
<125/75 (in the presence of proteinuria >1g/24hr)
ACEI or ARB (diabetic kidney disease or nondiabetic kindey disease with proteinuria)
EBPG Europe EBPG Endorsed the 2004 NKF/DOQI See NKF/KDOQI guidelines See NKF/KDOQI guidelines
CSN Canada 2008 <130/80 ACEI or ARB (diabetic kidney disease)
ACEI, ARB, thiazide diuretic, ß–blocker (patients aged 60 yr or younger)
BRA United Kingdom 2010, 2011 <140/90 (no significant proteinuria)
<130/80 (proteinuria of diabetes)
ACEI or ARB (diabetic kindey disease or nondiabetic kidney disease with proteinuria >0.5 g/day

BP, blood pressure; CKD, chronic kidney disease; JNC 7, Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; ACEI, angiotensin–converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; ESH/ESC, European Society of Hyper–tension/European Society of Cardiology; BHC–IV, British Hypertension Society; NKF/KDOQI, National Kidney Foundation Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative; EBPG, European Best Practice Guideline; CSN, Canadian Society of Nephrology; BRA, British Renal Association.

Table 3.
Trials examining the effect of blood pressure lowering on progression of CKD
Target BP Results Subgroup analysis A Age (yr) Mean age (yr)
Diabetes
Estacio et al.22) DBP <75 vs. 80–89 No difference in progression 40–74 59.5
UKPDS23) <150/85 vs. <180/105 No difference in progression Reduced risk ofmicroalbuminuria at 6 yr 25–65 56.0
Non diabetes
Wright et al.24) MAP 102–107 vs. ≤92 (125/75) No difference in progression Trend toward greaterbenefit in patients with proteinuria 18–70 54.6
Klahr et al.25) MAP ≤107 vs. <92 No difference in Progression Secondary analysis showed greater benefit in patients with greater degrees of proteinuria 18–70 52.0

The MDRD study had different blood pressure targets based on age and required a MAP 107 (equivalent to 140/90) for patients 18 to 60 years of age and MAP 113 for patients 61 years of age (equivalent to 160/90).

CKD, chronic kidney disease; BP, blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease.

TOOLS
Similar articles