Journal List > Korean J Women Health Nurs > v.23(2) > 1089564

Kim and Sung: Factors Influencing HPV-related Infection Preventive Behavioral Intention among Female University Students

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify impacts of HPV-related knowledge, attitude to HPV vaccination, and health beliefs on infection preventive behavioral intention targeting female university students.

Methods

With correlational survey design, subjects of this study were 120 female students at universities located in B metropolitan city and G city. A total sample agreed to participate in the study. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, correlation, and stepwise multiple regression.

Results

Attitude to HPV vaccination, experience of smoking, and HPV-related health beliefs were significant factors influencing the HPV-related infection preventive behavioral intention. These factors accounted for 19.0% of the HPV-related infection preventive behavioral intention.

Conclusion

The most significant factor for HPV infection prevention was the attitude to HPV vaccination. These findings may be useful to develop strategies to improve the HPV infection preventive behavioral intention of the female university students who have a high risk of the HPV infection.

REFERENCES

1. National Cancer Information Center. Prevention of cancer and examination [Internet]. Goyang: National Cancer Information Center;2017. [cited 2017 February 22]. Available from:. http://www.cancer.go.kr/mbs/cancer/subview.jsp?id=cancer_010107040000.
2. Kovacic MB, Castle PE, Herrero R, Schiffman M, Sherman ME, Wacholder S, et al. Relationships of human papillomavirus type, qualitative viral load, and age with cytologic abnormality. Cancer Research. 2006; 66(20):10112–10119.
crossref
3. Lee EJ, Park JS. Knowledge about cervical cancer, health belief and human papillomavirus vaccination rate in female university students. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2011; 11(1):65–73.
4. Shin HR, Franceschi S, Vaccarella S, Roh JW, Ju YH, Oh JK, et al. Prevalence and determinants of genital infection with papillomavirus, in female and male university students in Busan, South Korea. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2004; 190(3):468–476.
crossref
5. Lee SY, Lee JY, Kang C, Ki MG. An overview of immunization and efficacy of human papillomavirus vaccines [internet]. Osong: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2014. [cited 2016 September 1]. Available from:. http://www.cdc.go.kr/CDC/contents/CdcKrContentLink.jsp?fid=31&cid=61045&ctype=6.
6. Kim JH, Park MK. Study on the knowledge of cervical cancer and human papillomavirus and preventive behavior intention of female university students. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2009; 15(2):225–231.
crossref
7. Kwon YE. Knowledge on cervical cancer & human papillomavirus infection of female university students and preventive behavior intention [master's thesis]. Busan: Kosin University;2014. p. 66.
8. Choi KA, Kim JH, Lee KS, Oh JK, Liu SN, Shin HR. Knowledge of human papillomavirus infection and acceptability of vaccination among adult women in Korea. Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008; 51(6):617–623.
9. Park JS, Lee EJ. Predictors of human papillomavirus vaccination in female university students. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2011; 17(4):346–358.
crossref
10. Kim HW, Ahn HY. Study on the knowledge of human papilloma virus in female university students. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2007; 13(1):13–20.
crossref
11. Bendik MK, Mayo RM, Parker VG. Knowledge, perceptions, and motivations related to HPV vaccination among college women. Journal of Cancer Education. 2011; 26(3):459–464.
crossref
12. Marlow LA, Waller J, Evans RE, Wardle J. Predictors of interest in HPV vaccination: A study of British adolescents. Vaccine. 2009; 27(18):2483–2488.
crossref
13. Kang HS, Moneyham L. Attitudes toward and intention to receive the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and intention to use condoms among female Korean college students. Vaccine. 2009; 28(3):811–816.
14. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;1988. p. 567.
15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guideline for isolation precautions: Preventing transmission of infectious agents in healthcare [Internet]. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2007. [cited 2016 February 4]. Available from:. https://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/2007IP/2007isolationPrecautions.html.
16. An GJ. A study on knowledge and attitude towards human papilloma virus among nursing students. Journal of Health and Medical Science. 2013; 1(2):149–154.
17. Lee MH, Kang HS, Lee KY. Knowledge, attitude, and motivation of human papillomavirus vaccination among Korean women. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society. 2010; 12(3):1365–1377.
18. Jo SE, Yoo SW. A study on the effects of risk perception attitudes and subjective norm on the preventive behaviors of cervical cancer: Testing RPA framework on Korean college women. Journal of Public Relations Research. 2011; 15(1):58–98.
19. Slade BA, Leidel L, Vellozi C, Woo EJ, Hua W, Sutherland A, et al. Postlicensure safety surveillance for quadrivalent human papillomavirus recombinant vaccine. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2009; 302(7):750–757.
crossref
20. Baek SS, Song MS, Jeon MS. Knowledge of HPV and HPV vaccine and intention for STDs prevention between male and female undergraduate students. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society. 2012; 14(6):3149–3161.
21. Jang YM, Han JS, Moon YS. Convergence study of knowledge, health beliefs and HPV preventive behavior intention about human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination among health college students. Journal of Digital Convergence. 2015; 13(9):313–321.
22. Rambout L, Tashkandi M, Hopkins L, Tricco AC. Self-reported barriers and facilitators to preventive human papillomavirus vaccination among adolescent girls and young women: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine. 2014; 58:22–32.
crossref
23. Plummer M, Herrero R, Franceschi S, Meijer CJ, Snijders P, Bosch FX, et al. Smoking and cervical cancer: Pooled analysis of the IARC multi-centric case-control study. Cancer Causes and Control. 2003; 14(9):805–814.
crossref

Table 1.
Differences in HPV Infection Preventive Behavioral Intention by Subjects' Characteristics (N=120)
Characteristics Categories n (%) or M±SD M±SD t or F p
Age (yr) 20~21 47 (39.2) 2.37±0.37 0.32 .726
22 50 (41.7) 2.43±0.39    
23 23 (19.2) 2.42±0.46    
  21.9±1.4      
Grade ≥2 46 (38.3) 2.35±0.40 0.75 .475
3 62 (51.7) 2.44±0.37    
4 12 (10.0) 2.46±0.50    
Major Health-related 66 (55.0) 2.47±0.37 2.07 .041
Health-unrelated 54 (45.0) 2.32±0.41    
Experience of smoking No 99 (82.5) 2.45±0.38 -2.53 .013
Yes 21 (17.5) 2.21±0.41    
Alcohol intake experience No 6 (5.0) 2.52±0.35 -0.75 .455
Yes 114 (95.0) 2.40±0.40    
Obstetric-Gynecology clinic visit No 92 (76.7) 2.41±0.40 -0.28 .782
Yes 28 (23.3) 2.39±0.38    
Sexual experience No 83 (69.2) 2.42±0.38 -0.56 .574
Yes 37 (30.8) 2.38±0.43    
Contraceptive experience No 86 (71.7) 2.43±0.38 -1.13 .261
Yes 34 (28.3) 2.34±0.42    
Perception of cervical cancer No 11 (9.2) 2.45±0.40 -0.43 .670
Yes 109 (90.8) 2.40±0.40    
Diagnosis of cervical cancer among family members No 109 (90.8) 2.42±0.39 -1.41 .161
Yes 11 (9.2) 2.25±0.45    
Perception of HPV∗ No 61 (50.8) 2.39±0.40 0.58 .572
Yes 59 (49.2) 2.43±0.40    
Experience of HPV education No 89 (74.2) 2.39±0.39 0.69 .491
Yes 31 (25.8) 245±0.40    
Reception of HPV vaccination No 96 (80.0) 2.39±0.39 0.75 .457
Yes 24 (20.0) 2.46±0.42    

HPV=human papilloma virus.

Table 2.
Relationships among HPV-related Knowledge, Attitude, Health Beliefs on Infection Preventive Behavioral Intention (N=120)
Variables   Knowledge Attitude Health beliefs
  Total 1 2 3 4 Total 5 6 7 8
r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p) r (p)
Attitude Total .28 (.002) 1                  
1. Safety concerns -.03 (.755) .55 (<.001) 1                
2. Perceived needs .29 (.002) .72 (<.001) .22 (.016) 1              
3. Importance of prevention .35 (<.001) .36 (<.001) -.05 (.608) .31 (.001) 1            
4. Risky sexual behavior .08 (.375) .54 (<.001) .05 (.621) .03 (.757) -.11 (.241) 1          
Health beliefs Total .40 (<.001) .01 (.936) -.38 (<.001) .16 (.080) .54 (<.001) -.13 (.167) 1        
5. Perceived sensitivity .10 (.270) -.08 (.366) -.15 (.106) .13 (.165) .23 (.012) -.28 (.002) .50 (<.001) 1      
6. Perceived seriousness .39 (<.001) .18 (.056) -.24 (.008) .33 (<.001) .45 (<.001) -.04 (.642) .79 (<.001) .24 (.008) 1    
7. Perceived benefit .46 (<.001) .27 (.003) -.09 (.342) .34 (<.001) .62 (<.001) -.10 (.297) .71 (<.001) .18 (.050) .65 (<.001) 1  
8. Perceived barrier .20 (.028) -.22 (.019) -.46 (<.001) -.18 (.053) .27 (.003) -.01 (.960) .76 (<.001) .16 (.082) .38 (<.001) .27 (.003) 1
Infection preventive .25 .33 .10 .34 .29 .06 .23 -.09 .31 .33 .11
behavioral intention (.005) (<.001) (.284) (<.001) (.001) (.548) (.012) (.314) (.001) (<.001) (.243)
Table 3.
Factors affecting on Infection Preventive Behavioral Intention (N=120)
Variables B SE β t p Tol VIF Adj. R2
(Constant) 1.26 .22   5.73 <.001      
Attitude - Perceived needs 0.11 .04 .25 2.87 .005 0.88 1.13 .11
Health beliefs - Perceived benefit 0.14 .05 .24 2.71 .008 0.88 1.13 .15
Smoking (Yes=1, No=0) -0.22 .09 -.22 2.63 .010 1.00 1.00 .19
        F=11.01, p<.001      

Tol (Tolerance): 0.88~1.00;

VIF (Variance Inflation Factor): 1.00~1.13.

TOOLS
Similar articles