Journal List > Korean J Women Health Nurs > v.22(3) > 1089537

Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2016 Sep;22(3):170-181. Korean.
Published online September 27, 2016.  https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2016.22.3.170
© 2016 Korean Society of Women Health Nursing
Identification of Nursing Diagnosis-Outcome-Intervention Linkages for Inpatients in Gynecology Department Nursing Units
Min Ji Yang,1 and Hye Young Kim2
1Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.
2College of Nursing · Research Institute of Nursing Science, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.

Corresponding author: Kim, Hye Young. College of Nursing, Chonbuk National University, 567 Baekje-daero, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju 54896, Korea. Tel: +82-63-270-4618, Fax: +82-63-270-3127, Email: tcellkim@jbnu.ac.kr
Received May 25, 2016; Revised July 14, 2016; Accepted August 02, 2016.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to identify the nursing diagnosis-outcome-intervention (NANDA-NOC-NIC) linkages for gynecology inpatients shown in their electronic nursing records.

Methods

This retrospective and descriptive research was conducted in two steps and based on the 287 electronic nursing records for 253 patients. First, nursing diagnoses, outcomes and interventions were collected. To identify major nursing diagnoses, a comparison was done with the top 10 nursing diagnoses from this research and with previous research selected using a content validity index developed by a team of professionals. Second, nursing outcomes and interventions that were associated with major nursing diagnoses were identified.

Results

Nineteen nursing diagnoses, 12 nursing outcomes, and 40 nursing interventions were collected. The top 5 major nursing diagnoses were identified and 7 nursing outcomes and 18 nursing interventions associated with these diagnoses were checked.

Conclusion

The identified NANDA-NOC-NIC linkages can contribute to improving nursing practice and will help in the establishment of standardized nursing care.

Keywords: Nursing process; Gynecology department; Inpatient

Tables


Table 1
Demographic Characteristics of Patients Nursing Record in Gynecology Department Nursing Unit
Click for larger imageClick for full tableDownload as Excel file


Table 2
Nursing Diagnosis Used in Gynecology Department Nursing Unit
Click for larger imageClick for full tableDownload as Excel file


Table 3
Nursing Outcome Used in Gynecology Department Nursing Unit
Click for larger imageClick for full tableDownload as Excel file


Table 4
Nursing Intervention Used in Gynecology Department Nursing Unit
Click for larger imageClick for full tableDownload as Excel file


Table 5
NANDA-NOC-NIC Linkage Used in Gynecology Department Nursing Unit
Click for larger imageClick for full tableDownload as Excel file

Notes

This article is based on a part of the first author's master's thesis from Chonbuk National University.

Summary Statement

▪ What is already known about this topic?

A computer-based nursing process documentation system was developed through NANDA-NOC-NIC linkages to facilitate the standardized nursing process.

▪ What this paper adds?

The NANDA-NOC-NIC linkages for inpatients of gynecology department nursing unit were identified through their electronic nursing records. The top 5 major nursing diagnoses were identified and 7 nursing outcomes and 18 nursing interventions associated with these diagnoses were checked.

▪ Implications for practice, education and/or policy

The identified NANDA-NOC-NIC linkages can contribute to improving standardized nursing care and provide evidence-based nursing.

References
1. Choi SH, Kim YJ, Moon H, Park MJ, Sun JJ. In: Nursing process. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa; 2010. pp. 12-20.
2. Lundberg CB, Warren JJ, Brokel J, Bulechek GM, Butcher HK, Dochterman JM, et al. Selecting a standardized terminology for the electronic health record that reveals the impact of nursing on patient care. Online J Nurs Inform 2008;12(2):1–19.
3. Park HJ, Lee EJ. Incorporating standardized nursing languages into an electronic nursing documentation system in Korea: A pilot study. Int J Nurs Knowl 2015;26(1):35–42.
4. Saranto K, Kinnunen UM, Kivekäs E, Lappalainen AM, Liljamo P, Rajalahti E, et al. Impacts of structuring nursing records: A systematic review. Scand J Caring Sci 2014;28(4):629–647.
5. NANDA-International. Nursing diagnoses: Definition and classification 2012-2014. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Blackwell; 2012.
6. Johnson M, Bulechek GM, Butcher HK, Maas ML, Moorhead S, Swanson E. In: NOC and NIC linkages to NANDA-I and clinical conditions. 3rd ed. Saint Louis: Mosby Elserver; 2011.
7. Kim YJ, Jo KH. Effects of nurse presence program on anxiety and physiological indicators in patients with gynecological surgery. J Korean Biol Nurs Sci 2014;16(4):326–333.
8. Ko E, So HS. Construction and application of nursing information system using NANDA-NOC-NIC linkage in medicalsurgical nursing units. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs 2013;25(4):365–376.
9. Chi MK, Chi SA. Linkages of nursing diagnosis, nursing intervention and nursing outcome classification of breast cancer patients using nursing database. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm 2003;9(4):651–661.
10. Hughes R, Sheerin F, McCourt F. Identifying and defining the problems, interventions, and outcomes of spinal cord injured patients in the Irish Spinal Cord Injury Service using standardized nursing language: A delphi study. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif 2006;17(1):36–37.
11. Park IS, Yoo CS, Lee SH, Woo KS, Joo YH, Choi WH, et al. Evaluation on the record completeness of the nursing process in electronic nursing record for patients undertaken gastrectomy. J Korean Clin Nurs Res 2009;15(3):107–116.
12. Yoo HS, Chi SA. Construction of linkage database on nursing diagnoses, interventions, outcomes in abdominal surgery patients. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm 2001;7(3):425–437.
13. Minthorn C, Lunney M. Participant action research with bedside nurses to identify NANDA-International, nursing interventions classification, and nursing outcomes classification categories for hospitalized persons with diabetes. Appl Nurs Res 2012;25(2):75–80.
14. Song SM, So HS, An MJ. Identification of major nursing diagnosis, nursing outcomes, and nursing interventions (NNN) linkage for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs 2014;26(4):413–423.
15. Azzolin K, Mussi CM, Ruschel KB, de Souza EN, de Fátima Lucena A, Rabelo-Silva ER. Effectiveness of nursing interventions in heart failure patients in home care using NANDA-I, NIC, and NOC. Appl Nurs Res 2013;26(4):239–244.
16. Park HJ. Identifying Core NANDA-I Nursing Diagnoses, NIC interventions, NOC outcomes, and NNN linkages for heart failure. Int J Nurs Knowl 2014;25(1):30–38.
17. Moon MK. In: Relationship of nursing diagnoses, nursing outcomes, and nursing interventions for patient care in intensive care units [dissertation]. Iowa: University of Iowa; 2011.
18. Barreto LN, Swanson EA, de Abreu Almeida M. Nursing outcomes for the diagnosis impaired tissue integrity (00044) in adults with pressure ulcer. Int J Nurs Knowl 2016;27(2):104–110.
19. Cho EJ, Kim NC. Validation of major nursing diagnosis-outcome-intervention (NANDA-NOC-NIC) linkage for adult surgery patients of post anesthetic care unit. J Korean Clin Nurs Res 2008;14(3):141–151.
20. Kim MJ. Analysis on military hospital nursing records by NANDA, NIC, NOC system. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm 2010;16(1):73–85.
21. Lee EJ, Choi SH. Identification of nursing diagnosis-outcomeintervention (NANDA-NOC-NIC) linkages in surgical nursing unit. Korean J Adult Nurs 2011;23(2):180–188.
22. Noh HK, Lee EJ. Relationships among NANDA-I diagnoses, nursing outcomes classification, and nursing interventions classification by nursing students for patients in medical-surgical units in Korea. Int J Nurs Knowl 2015;26(1):43–51.
23. Kim JK. A study on nursing diagnoses, interventions, outcomes frequently used and linkage to NANDA-NOC-NIC in major nursing departments. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm 2010;16(2):121–142.
24. Hong SJ, Lee SH, Kim HS. Analysis of nursing interventions performed by gynecological nursing unit nurses using the nursing interventions classification. Korean J Women Health Nurs 2011;17(3):275–284.
25. Lampe S. In: Focus charting: Documentation for patient-centered care. Minneapolis: Creative Nursing Management; 1994. pp. 193-197.
26. Moorhead S, Johnson M, Mass ML, Swanson E. In: Nursing outcomes classification (NOC). 5th ed. Saint Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2013.
27. Bulechek GM, Butcher HK, Dochterman JM, Wagner C. In: Nursing interventions classification (NIC). 6th ed. Saint Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2013.
28. Choi SH, Cho BH, Chi HR, Lee EJ, Kim HS, Park MJ. In: Standardized NANDA, NOC, NIC linkage. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa; 2004.
29. Fehring RJ. Method to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart Lung 1987;16(6 Pt 1):625–629.
30. Park JE, Chung KA, Cho H, Kim HS. Construction of the nursing diagnosis ontology in obstetric and gynecologic nursing unit using nursing process and SNOMED CT. Korean J Women Health Nurs 2013;19(1):1–12.