Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of thisstudywas to test theeffect sizeof interventionprograms formarriedimmigrant women as well as to suggest the basic data for health care practices for married migrant women.
Methods
Metaanalysis wasconductedwith27articlesfromdomesticKoreamaster'sanddoctoratedegreedissertations andKoreaacadem-ic journals from2007 to 2014.
Results
Overall average effect sizewas 1.17and'parental education' of Intervention Variables was the biggest effect size. Intervention Variables were also identified to be the most desirable in cases whentotal sessionswereapplied with10-18sessions, 1 sessionper week, 90-120minutes per sessionactivitytime andwithless than10subjects ingroupsize. Regardingeffect variables, psychological variablegroupwas identified to show the biggest effect size and in sub-variables, self-efficacy was identified to show the biggest effect size.
REFERENCES
1. Statistics Korea. Multicultural Family Survey. Seoul: Statistics Korea;2014.
2. Kim MJ, Yoo MK, Lee HK, Chung KS. Being "Korean" wives: Dilemmas and choices of Vietnamese and Filipino migrants. Korean Society for Cultural Anthropology. 2006; 39(1):159–176.
3. Jo IH, Sung SY. The effect of a group counseling program based on the MBTI for parents on self-esteem and parenting attitude of multicultural families mothers. The Korean Journal of East West Science. 2011; 14(1):73–89.
4. Kim HS. Impacts of social support and life satisfaction on depression among international marriage migrant women in Daegu and Kyungpook area. Journal of Korean Academy Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2011; 20(2):188–198.
5. Kim YK, Choi HM, Choi SY, Kim KH. Multicultural family standard for support improvement plan research. Seoul: Ministry of Gender Equality and Family;2013.
7. Cho MK, Kim Y. A study on the relationship between bicultural identity and sociocultural adaptation of immigrants in Korea. Korean Political Science Review. 2010; 18(2):263–291.
8. Koo JH. The awareness of educated married immigrant women in Korean culture and multicultural education implications. Journal of Education and Culture. 2011; 17(3):285–311.
9. Brownson RC, Baker EA, Leet TL, Gillespie KN, True WR. Evidence-based public health. Oxford: Oxford University Press;.
10. Kim TI, Kim JY, Choi SM, Jung GH. Analysis of intervention studies for married immigrant women. Journal of Korean Academic Community Health Nurse. 2013; 24(2):);. 172–184.
11. Ahn OH, Jeon MS, Hwang YY, Kim KA, Youn MS. An analysis of articles for international marriage immigrant women related to health. Journal of Agricultural Medicine & Community Health. 2010; 35(2):134–150.
12. Lee EJ, Jun MK. A metaanalysis of the related variables with martial satisfaction for marriage migrant women. Korea Social Policy Review. 2014; 21(4):9–44.
13. Lee KS, Yeun YR. Systematic review of research on acculturative stress among married immigrant women in Korea. Korean Journal of Health Psychology. 2012; 17(3):697–709.
14. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to metaanalysis. West Sussex: Wiley.;2009.
15. Malchiodi CA. Handbook of art therapy. New York: The Guilford Press. 2005.
16. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. HIRA's guideline for undertaking systematic reviews. Seoul: Author;2011.
17. Oh PJ, Jung JA. A metaanalysis of intervention studies on cancer-related fatigue in Korea: 1990-2010. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 2011; 17(2):163–175.
18. Rosenthal R. The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin. 1979; 86(3):638–641.
19. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate;1988.
20. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of intervention. New Jersey; Wiley-Blackwell. 2008.
21. Goedendorp MM, Gielissen MF, Verhagen CA, Bleijenberg G. Psychosocial interventions for reducing fatigue during cancer treatment in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009; 21(1):CD006953.
22. Park HO, Lee EK. A comparative study of multicutural families mothers’ educational view and perception of parenting roles for their young children. Multi-Cultural Contents Studies. 2012; 12:65–94.
23. Kweon GY, Park KW. A study on influence factors to the mental health of foreign wives. Korean Journal of Social Issues. 2007; 14(2):187–219.
24. Ha JY, Kim YJ. Factors influencing depression in married immigrant women in Korea. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing. 2013; 19(4):254–264.
25. Schweitzer R, Melville F, Steel Z, Lacherez P. Trauma, post-migration living difficulties, and social support as predictors of psychological adjustment in resettled Sudanese refugees. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2006; 40(2):179–187.
26. Kim NY. Development and effect of a salutogenic program for married immigrant women [dissertation]. Daegu: Kyungpook National University;2014.
27. Kim HJ. Cognitive behavioral therapy for improving parenting efficacy of married immigrant women [dissertation]. Seoul: Myongji University;2014.
28. Lee JY, Park SO. A study on the effect of music-based Korean language learning program on the linguistic ability and psychological stability of the women naturalized by marriage. Journal of Arts Psychotherapy. 2012; 8(4):73–93.
29. Shin JW. The influence of clinical art therapy on the improvement of mental health and cultural adaptation stress levels of marriage migrant women. Journal of The Korean Academy of Clinical Art Therapy. 2013; 8(2):38–45.
30. Park SK. Effects of happiness enhancement group counseling on the happiness, self-esteem and marital satisfaction of marriage migrant women. Journal of Psychology and Behavior. 2012; 4(2):57–82.
Table 1.
TS=total sesson; WS=week sesson; SM=time per 1 sessionl; Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group; RM=randomization; DA=dropout accounted; ABS=assessor's blind stated; PBS=participant's blind stated; SSOsubject selection criteria; SSSOsample size selection criteria; MPT=mediation providers training; PE=proliferation of an experiment; FT=Future test.
Table 2.
Table 3.
Variables | K | ES | U3 (%) | 95% | % CI | I2 | | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The total average effect size | 83 | 1.17 | 88 | 0.92 | 1.10 | 60.89 | 209.64∗∗∗ | ||
Intervention | Program | Parent education | 21 | 1.55 | 94 | 1.21 | 1.89 | 58.18 | |
variables | type | Psychological counseling | 6 | 1.32 | 91 | 0.55 | 2.09 | 66.31 | 25.20∗∗∗ |
Art therapy | 32 | 1.17 | 88 | 0.93 | 1.40 | 59.40 | |||
Social skills | 24 | 0.89 | 81 | 0.69 | 1.10 | 49.36 | |||
Total session | Session 10~18 | 55 | 1.22 | 89 | 1.03 | 1.40 | 53.12 | ||
Session 9 or less | 20 | 1.12 | 87 | 0.82 | 1.42 | 70.47 | 21.20∗∗∗ | ||
Session 19~24 | 6 | 0.71 | 76 | 0.41 | 1.02 | 34.58 | |||
Week session | Once a week | 56 | 1.35 | 91 | 1.19 | 1.51 | 86.63 | 15.74∗∗∗ | |
More than twice a week | 23 | 0.77 | 79 | 0.54 | 1.07 | 61.17 | |||
1 hour activity | 60 minutes or less | 25 | 1.09 | 86 | 0.82 | 1.36 | 66.62 | ||
session | 90~120 minutes | 50 | 1.14 | 87 | 0.96 | 1.32 | 49.29 | 23.80∗∗∗ | |
More than 150 minutes | 4 | 1.01 | 84 | 0.13 | 1.90 | 81.30 | |||
Group size | 10 or less people | 39 | 1.40 | 92 | 1.17 | 1.64 | 40.62 | ||
11~20 people | 27 | 1.35 | 91 | 1.09 | 1.61 | 62.59 | 53.40∗∗∗ | ||
More than 21 people | 17 | 0.65 | 74 | 0.49 | 0.81 | 29.68 | |||
Effect | Social | Social support | 2 | 1.54 | 94 | 0.77 | 2.30 | 0.00 | |
variables | variable | Integration sense | 6 | 1.11 | 87 | 0.64 | 1.57 | 55.14 | 3.20∗∗ |
Communication | 5 | 1.10 | 86 | 0.63 | 1.57 | 31.70 | |||
Knowledge | 5 | 0.97 | 83 | 0.38 | 1.56 | 74.13 | |||
Sub total | 18 | 1.09 | 86 | 0.82 | 1.36 | 52.80 | 36.09∗ | ||
Physical | Cortisol levels | 1 | 0.83 | 80 | 0.19 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 2.98 | |
variable | Immune | 1 | 0.05 | 52 | -0.56 | 0.66 | 0.00 | ||
Sub total | 2 | 0.44 | 67 | -0.33 | 1.20 | 62.08 | 2.98 | ||
Psychological | Self esteem | 9 | 1.86 | 97 | 1.25 | 2.48 | 65.06 | ||
variable | Efficacy | 10 | 1.59 | 94 | 1.10 | 2.07 | 65.39 | ||
Depressed | 7 | 1.50 | 93 | 0.81 | 2.18 | 70.36 | |||
Anxiety | 4 | 1.42 | 92 | 0.58 | 2.26 | 70.34 | |||
Negative automatic thoughts | 2 | 1.42 | 92 | 0.65 | 2.18 | 0.00 | 34.62∗∗∗ | ||
Quality of life | 5 | 0.99 | 84 | 0.28 | 1.69 | 69.42 | |||
Parenting stress | 5 | 0.96 | 83 | 0.34 | 1.57 | 59.46 | |||
Marital satisfaction | 4 | 0.93 | 82 | 0.33 | 1.54 | 41.62 | |||
Mental health | 2 | 0.86 | 81 | 0.05 | 1.67 | 59.61 | |||
Acculturation stress | 15 | 0.85 | 80 | 0.61 | 1.08 | 23.79 | |||
Sub total | 63 | 1.24 | 89 | 1.06 | 1.42 | 62.09 | 7.15∗∗∗ |