A basilar artery dissection (BAD) is an extremely rare disease and often associated with grave outcomes.5)11)12)15)22) Expansion of the mural hematoma causes luminal stenosis, and eventually brings hemodynamic insufficiencies distal to the basilar artery and at the pontine perforating arteries of the diseased segment. On the other hand, enlargement of the false lumen causes fusiform aneurysmal dilatation, and the fragile portion can be ruptured. Although the etiology of BAD remains to be unclear in many cases, factors such as atherosclerosis, cervical trauma, cervical manipulation, and fibromuscular dysplasia are generally thought to be related with the occurrence of BAD.4)5)11)12)14)

Since a dissection confined to the basilar artery has much lower incidence than a vertebral artery dissection and the prognosis is inconsistent, the proper managements for BAD are often in controversy.1)13) Aggressive manipulations of the diseased segment or rough handlings of instruments may lead to a devastating result such as an arterial rupture due to the instability of the intimal flap and the fragility of the false lumen.

Herein, we report on two rare cases of BAD from strenuous physical effort; one from sexual intercourse and another from defecation. The treatment modalities and the outcomes are also discussed.

Dissection of intracranial arterial system is rare. Approximately 90% of these dissections occur in the posterior circulations, and most of the previous reports focus on the dissections of the vertebral artery.7)8)19)21)22) The incidence of vertebral artery dissection is approximately 1-1.5 per 100,000,2) and its mortality rate is estimated to be 17-46%.10) However, dissections confined to the basilar artery have been reported much less frequently and little is known about the clinical course, proper managements, and prognosis. Although extremely rare, a BAD generally seemed to have even a worse prognosis than a vertebral artery dissection. The cause of BAD remains unclear but it can be associated with atherosclerosis, cervical trauma, cervical manipulation, and fibromuscular dysplasia.4)5)12)13)15) Strenuous physical efforts such as sexual intercourse and defecation, as in our report, can also be causative factors.3) However, it is not yet proven how these physical stresses can mechanically induce strain in the vessel and initiate the arterial dissection. Despite rare incidence and obscure cause of BAD, the outcome can be tragic because BAD can lead to hemorrhage or infarction of the brain stem.6)9) Hence, strict neurological examinations and appropriate image work-ups are significant to prevent a misdiagnosis.

MRI is a useful tool for diagnosis of BAD because it is non-invasive and may demonstrate the presence of intramural hematoma.11) Nonetheless, conventional angiography is a crucial diagnostic tool for confirmation of the hemodynamic status and, moreover, the anatomical configuration including the relationship between the true and false lumens.16) In addition to the result of image work-ups, the severity of neurological status is important factor for deciding the treatment strategy. Moreover, regular image follow-ups such as MRI and conventional angiography are crucial especially for the patients who underwent conservative treatments because BAD can have a dynamic clinical course with changes in anatomical configuration.

There have been controversies on the modality of treatment for BAD. Pozzati et al. advocated conservative treatment because of possibility of spontaneous healing of dissection and risk of the surgical interventions.17) Willing et al. referred to risk of endovascular intervention for BAD, which can be evoked if a false lumen is incorrectly cannulated.20) However, some other authors have emphasized the necessity and efficacy of stenting and other procedures.9)18) Shin et al.18) mentioned that although stenting for BAD may have some technical difficulties and carry procedural risks, it can be the only effective method for management of acute symptomatic BAD if incorrect cannulation into a false lumen is avoided.

Our cases represent that a strenuous physical effort even without underlying vasculopathy as in Case 1 or direct trauma as in Case 1 and 2 can possibly be a causative factor for occurrence of BAD. In the Case 1, the patient suffered from progressive brain stem ischemia with profound hemodynamic insufficiency, and an immediate endovascular treatment led to dramatic improvements of the symptoms. In this case, stenting would not be beneficial for already sacrificed basilar perforators which caused the pontine infarction, but would be beneficial for partially compromised perforators and those supplied by insufficient perfusion pressure mostly at the distal to the lesion. Moreover, stenting not only improved perfusion but also prevented progression of the dissection by inhibiting enlargement of the false lumen. In the Case 2, the patient showed some improvements at the early stage and underwent a conservative treatment. However, due to formation of a fusiform aneurysmal dilatation, he underwent stenting in order to prevent a rupture. Stenting might stabilize the intimal flap and enhance healing of dissection, thereby reducing the period exposed to the risk of hemorrhage. In the both cases, judicious approach and delicate handling of instruments were required for successful navigation across the true lumen, and their outcomes after endovascular treatments were excellent. Based on our experiences and previous reports, stenting is effective and technically feasible for the treatment of BAD if a correct cannulation into the true lumen is possible. We suggest that endovascular treatments such as stenting should be cautiously recommended for hemorrhagic or ruptured BAD, recurrent or progressive hemodynamic ischemia due to BAD, and relatively large or growing aneurysmal formation at the false lumen. We also emphasize the necessity of follow-up angiography for those who underwent conservative treatments at the early stage, and if subsequent aneurysmal formation is evident, an endovascular therapy is required in order to prevent a hemorrhagic crisis.

Although BAD is extremely rare, it is potentially a life-threatening disease. Strenuous physical effort such as sexual intercourse or defecation can be one of causative factors. Detailed inspection of MRI and cerebral angiography is essential for the accurate diagnosis and proper treatment. Stenting can be a feasible treatment option for management of BAD. Precise navigation into the true lumen with delicate control of instruments is the key to the successful and safe endovascular treatment.