Journal List > Korean J Obstet Gynecol > v.55(11) > 1088551

Hwang, Lee, Kim, Choi, Shin, and Choi: The successful conservative management of tubal pregnancy with poor prognosis through ultrasound-guided intraamnionic methotrexate injection: Two case reports

Abstract

Ectopic pregnancy occurs in about 2% of pregnant women, and may seriously compromise women's health. Extra uterine implantation can occur anywhere along the reproductive tract with the most common implantation site in the fallopian tube. At early stages of presentation where the risk of rupture of a tubal pregnancy is minimal, medical therapy using methotrexate (MTX) given systemically or injected directly into the ectopic pregnancy is an option occasionally used with good results. In addition, ultrasound technology, particularly the introduction of high-resolution transvaginal probes, has been the driving force behind the revolutionary change towards conservative management strategies in ectopic pregnancy care. Tubal pregnancy can be successfully managed without surgical intervention through local injection of MTX. This treatment not only ablates the ectopic pregnancy but also preserves the salpinx without systemic side effect. In this report, we present two cases of tubal pregnancy which treated successfully with ultrasound-guided intraamnionic MTX injection.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Doppler ultrasound-guided intraamnionic methotrexate injection was done arrows.
kjog-55-848-g001
Fig. 2
Transvaginal sonogram shows tubal pregnancy containing embryo before methotrexate injection (A) and collapased G-sac after the procedure (B).
kjog-55-848-g002
Fig. 3
Comparison of serial serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin concentration between salpingectomy, systemic methotrexate (MTX), and case 1, 2.
kjog-55-848-g003

References

1. Ankum WM, Hajenius PJ, Schrevel LS, Van der Veen F. Management of suspected ectopic pregnancy. Impact of new diagnostic tools in 686 consecutive cases. J Reprod Med. 1996. 41:724–728.
2. Verma U, Goharkhay N. Conservative management of cervical ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2009. 91:671–674.
3. Sowter MC, Farquhar CM. Ectopic pregnancy: an update. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2004. 16:289–293.
4. Monteagudo A, Minior VK, Stephenson C, Monda S, Timor-Tritsch IE. Non-surgical management of live ectopic pregnancy with ultrasound-guided local injection: a case series. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005. 25:282–288.
5. Marchbanks PA, Annegers JF, Coulam CB, Strathy JH, Kurland LT. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy. A population-based study. JAMA. 1988. 259:1823–1827.
6. Sand PK, Stubblefield PA, Ory SJ. Methotrexate inhibition of normal trophoblasts in vitro. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986. 155:324–329.
7. Yao M, Tulandi T. Current status of surgical and nonsurgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1997. 67:421–433.
8. Barnhart KT, Gosman G, Ashby R, Sammel M. The medical management of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis comparing "single dose" and "multidose" regimens. Obstet Gynecol. 2003. 101:778–784.
9. Carson SA, Buster JE. Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1993. 329:1174–1181.
10. Isaacs JD Jr, McGehee RP, Cowan BD. Life-threatening neutropenia following methotrexate treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a report of two cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1996. 88:694–696.
11. Feichtinger W, Kemeter P. Conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy by transvaginal aspiration under sonographic control and methotrexate injection. Lancet. 1987. 1:381–382.
12. Nazac A, Gervaise A, Bouyer J, de Tayrac R, Capella-Allouc S, Fernandez H. Predictors of success in methotrexate treatment of women with unruptured tubal pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003. 21:181–185.
13. Son IP, Kim HS, Jung JY, Lee SJ, Park JM, Kwon HC, et al. Nonsurgical Mmanagement of unruptured tubal pregnancy with Intra-amnionic methotrexate. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 1990. 33:948–953.
14. Lee HH, Choi YS, Kim SK, Lee EH, Min YS, Lee SH, et al. A clinical study of unruptured ectopic pregnancies with the treatment of systemic or local methotrexate injecton. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2000. 43:616–624.
15. We JS, Kwak SH, Chung YJ, Choi SK, Choi JS, Ahn HY, et al. The comparison of beta-hCG levels according to treatment modalities in tubal pregnancy. Korean J Perinatol. 2008. 19:150–158.
TOOLS
Similar articles