Journal List > Korean J Obstet Gynecol > v.54(12) > 1088375

Kim, Kim, Kim, Kim, and Jeon: The impact of symptomatic urinary incontinence on female sexual function in middle- to old-aged Korean women

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the impact of symptomatic urinary incontinence (UI) on sexual function in middle- to old-aged Korean women.

Methods

From May 2009 to January 2010, a cross-sectional study was performed including middle- to old-aged, sexually active women who visited comprehensive screening clinic. We performed history taking, biometry, pelvic examination, laboratory test, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)-20, and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Symptomatic UI was said to be present when the score for the problem-specific PFDI-16/17 questions were ≥2. Participants obtaining a total FSFI score of 26.55 or less were defined as having female sexual dysfunction (FSD).

Results

Among 773 enrolled women, 318 (41.14%) had symptomatic UI. FSD was significantly frequent in symptomatic UI group than normal group (62.26% vs. 49.45%, P < 0.05). Symptomatic UI was associated significantly with a total FSFI score in multiple linear regression model (standardized β = -0.108, P < 0.05). After adjustment of clinical risk factors for FSD by analysis of covariance analyses, symptomatic UI group had significantly lower scores than those of normal groups (24.59 vs. 25.74, P < 0.05), and this was observed in all sub-domains (desire 2.88 vs. 3.05; arousal 3.75 vs. 3.96; orgasm 4.11 vs. 4.36; satisfaction 4.15 vs. 4.33; pain 4.99 vs. 5.20, P < 0.05) except lubrication domain (4.70 vs. 4.84, P = 0.056).

Conclusion

Symptomatic UI is a risk factor for sexual dysfunction of middle- to old-aged women. Further studies should be followed to evaluate whether the treatment of symptomatic UI could restore the impaired sexual function.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Baseline characteristics of the study population
kjog-54-778-i001

Data are presented as mean±standard deviation or n (%).

UI, urinary incontinence; FI, fecal incontinence; POP, pelvic organ prolapse; BP, blood pressure; LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein.

Table 2
Multiple linear regression analysis for a total Female Sexual Function Index score
kjog-54-778-i002

Data of variables with no statistical significance were omitted.

UI, urinary incontinence; BP, blood pressure.

Table 3
Mean FSFI scores for women with and without symptomatic urinary incontinence
kjog-54-778-i003

Data are presented as mean±SE after adjusting for all confounding variables (age, menopause, married, parity ≥1, smoking, alcohol drinking, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, prior hysterectomy, prior sexual assault, symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse, symptomatic fecal incontinence, depression, body mass index, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, glucose, triglyceride, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, education, and monthly household income) using analysis of covariance.

FSFI, Female Sexual Function Index; UI, urinary incontinence; LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein.

References

1. Basson R, Berman J, Burnett A, Derogatis L, Ferguson D, Fourcroy J, et al. Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: definitions and classifications. J Urol. 2000. 163:888–893.
2. Song SH, Jeon H, Kim SW, Paick JS, Son H. The prevalence and risk factors of female sexual dysfunction in young korean women: an internet-based survey. J Sex Med. 2008. 5:1694–1701.
3. Hansen BL. Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and sexual function in both sexes. Eur Urol. 2004. 46:229–234.
4. Jiann BP, Su CC, Yu CC, Wu TT, Huang JK. Risk factors for individual domains of female sexual function. J Sex Med. 2009. 6:3364–3375.
5. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC. Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA. 1999. 281:537–544.
6. Moreira ED Jr, Kim SC, Glasser D, Gingell C. Sexual activity, prevalence of sexual problems, and associated help-seeking patterns in men and women aged 40-80 years in Korea: data from the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors (GSSAB). J Sex Med. 2006. 3:201–211.
7. Aslan G, Köseoğlu H, Sadik O, Gimen S, Cihan A, Esen A. Sexual function in women with urinary incontinence. Int J Impot Res. 2005. 17:248–251.
8. Barber MD, Visco AG, Wyman JF, Fantl JA, Bump RC. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Sexual function in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2002. 99:281–289.
9. Rogers GR, Villarreal A, Kammerer-Doak D, Qualls C. Sexual function in women with and without urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001. 12:361–365.
10. Sutherst J, Brown M. Sexual dysfunction associated with urinary incontinence. Urol Int. 1980. 35:414–416.
11. Salonia A, Zanni G, Nappi RE, Briganti A, Dehò F, Fabbri F, et al. Sexual dysfunction is common in women with lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary incontinence: results of a cross-sectional study. Eur Urol. 2004. 45:642–648.
12. Sen I, Onaran M, Aksakal N, Acar C, Tan MO, Acar A, et al. The impact of urinary incontinence on female sexual function. Adv Ther. 2006. 23:999–1008.
13. Rosen RC, Link CL, O'Leary MP, Giuliano F, Aiyer LP, Mollon P. Lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual health: the role of gender lifestyle and medical comorbidities. BJU Int. 2009. 103:Suppl 3. 42–47.
14. Handa VL, Harvey L, Cundiff GW, Siddique SA, Kjerulff KH. Sexual function among women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. 191:751–756.
15. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA. 2008. 300:1311–1316.
16. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005. 193:103–113.
17. Barber MD, Neubauer NL, Klein-Olarte V. Can we screen for pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination in epidemiologic studies? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006. 195:942–948.
18. Kim HY, So HS, Park KS, Jeong SJ, Lee JY, Ryu SB. Development of the Korean-version of Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Korean J Androl. 2002. 20:50–56.
19. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000. 26:191–208.
20. Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 2005. 31:1–20.
21. Norton P, Brubaker L. Urinary incontinence in women. Lancet. 2006. 367:57–67.
22. Paick JS, Cho MC, Oh SJ, Kim SW, Ku JH. Influence of self-perceived incontinence severity on quality of life and sexual function in women with urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007. 26:828–835.
23. Bekker M, Beck J, Putter H, Venema P, Lycklama à Nijeholt A, Pelger R, et al. Sexual function improvement following surgery for stress incontinence: the relevance of coital incontinence. J Sex Med. 2009. 6:3208–3213.
24. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010. 29:4–20.
25. Serati M, Salvatore S, Uccella S, Cromi A, Khullar V, Cardozo L, et al. Urinary incontinence at orgasm: relation to detrusor overactivity and treatment efficacy. Eur Urol. 2008. 54:911–915.
26. Serati M, Salvatore S, Uccella S, Nappi RE, Bolis P. Female urinary incontinence during intercourse: a review on an understudied problem for women's sexuality. J Sex Med. 2009. 6:40–48.
TOOLS
Similar articles