Journal List > Korean J Obstet Gynecol > v.54(5) > 1088280

Park, Cho, Lee, Shin, Lee, Lee, and Paik: Prenatal diagnosis of caudal regression syndrome: A case report

Abstract

Caudal regression syndrome is rare congenital defect, characterized by the absence of the sacrum, and defects of variable portion of lumbar spine, associated with anomalies from different systems. Although hyperglycemia related to maternal diabetes, genetic predisposition, teratogens, and vascular anomalies altering blood flow have been hypothesized to play a role in its pathogenesis, but the cause of this rare condition is not clear. We report a case of caudal regression syndrome diagnosed by prenatal ultrasonography at 16 weeks of gestation.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
(A) Transabdominal sonography shows abrupt termination of spine at lumbosacral level (arrow). (B) A 3-Dimensional mode image showing that the vertebral column ends at the lumbar level (arrow).
kjog-54-265-g001
Fig. 2
Infantogram shows absence of lumbosacral vertebrae (arrow), frog-like position of the Rt. lower extremities, Lt. knee dislocation and absence of Lt. foot bone (open arrow).
kjog-54-265-g002

References

1. Duhamel B. From the mermaid to anal imperforation: the syndrome of caudal regression. Arch Dis Child. 1961. 36:152–155.
2. Jaffe R, Zeituni M, Fejgin M. Caudal regression syndrome. Fetus Spinal Anomalies. 1991. 7561:1–3.
3. Rojansky N, Fasouliotis SJ, Ariel I, Nadjari M. Extreme caudal agenesis. Possible drug-related etiology? J Reprod Med. 2002. 47:241–245.
4. Subtil D, Cosson M, Houfflin V, Vaast P, Valat A, Puech F. Early detection of caudal regression syndrome: specific interest and findings in three cases. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998. 80:109–112.
5. Hirano H, Tomura N, Watarai J, Kato T. Caudal regression syndrome: MR appearance. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1998. 22:73–76.
6. Kucera J. Rate and type of congenital anomalies among offspring of diabetic women. J Reprod Med. 1971. 7:73–82.
7. Reece EA, Homko CJ. Why do diabetic women deliver malformed infants? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000. 43:32–45.
8. Singh SK, Singh RD, Sharma A. Caudal regression syndrome: case report and review of literature. Pediatr Surg Int. 2005. 21:578–581.
9. Wang J, Spitz L, Hayward R, Kiely E, Hall CM, O'Donoghue DP, et al. Sacral dysgenesis associated with terminal deletion of chromosome 7q: a report of two families. Eur J Pediatr. 1999. 158:902–905.
10. Rodríguez L, Sanchís A, Villa A, Cánovas A, Peris S, Estívalis M, et al. Ring chromosome 7 and sacral agenesis. Am J Med Genet. 2000. 94:52–58.
11. Bashiri A, Sheizaf B, Burstein E, Landau D, Hershkovitz R, Mazor M. Three dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of caudal regression syndrome at 14 gestational weeks. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009. 280:505–507.
12. Twickler D, Budorick N, Pretorius D, Grafe M, Currarino G. Caudal regression versus sirenomelia: sonographic clues. J Ultrasound Med. 1993. 12:323–330.
13. Moon Y, Kim JH, Ahn OJ, Jeon SW, Hwang BC. A case of caudal regression syndrome diagnosed by prenatal ultrasonography. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2005. 48:1788–1792.
TOOLS
Similar articles