Journal List > J Korean Soc Radiol > v.74(2) > 1087621

Jeong, Kim, Byun, Kang, Choi, Kim, Kim, Choi, and Park: Effect of Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty on the Stenosis of Autogenous Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula for Hemodialysis

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) on stenosis of autogenous radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (RCF) for hemodialysis and to determine the factors influencing patency.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included 136 patients referred for PTA of RCF stenosis between March 2005 and July 2014. The technical success rate, complications, and patency rate were evaluated. The following factors were analyzed as they might influence patency: age, gender, site and duration of arteriovenous fistula, underlying disease, body mass index, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, peripheral artery or coronary artery occlusive disease, stenosis length/grade, cutting balloon, and balloon size.

Results

The initial technical success rate was 91.9% (125/136). Complications included vessel rupture (n = 2) and vessel dissection (n = 2). The patency rates at 6, 12, 24, and 48 months after PTA were 81.9, 67.1, 52.7, and 42.3%, respectively. The patency rate was higher in cases with longer (> 3 cm) stenosis (p = 0.04). Use of cutting balloon and larger size of balloon catheter made the patency longer, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.637, 0.258).

Conclusion

PTA is a safe and effective way to manage stenosis in RCF. The length of stenosis was the only factor which affected the patency rate in this study.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Angiographic evaluation of perianastomotic stenosis.

A. Anastomotic stenosis.
B. Juxtaanastomotic stenosis.
C. Arterial stenosis.
Arrow = stenosis site, A = artery, V = vein
jksr-74-105-g001
Fig. 2

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty findings of stenosis of the venous limb in RCF before (A), during (B), and after (C) ballooning.

Arrow = stenosis site, A = artery, RCF = radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula, V = vein
jksr-74-105-g002
Fig. 3

Primary and secondary patency rates of PTA in patients with dysfunctional RCF. Missing data: patient death or incomplete follow-up data.

PTA = percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, RCF = radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula
jksr-74-105-g003
Fig. 4

Patency rate of PTA in juxtaanastomotic stenosis of RCF according to balloon size. Missing data: patient death or incomplete follow-up data.

PTA = percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, RCF = radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula
jksr-74-105-g004
Fig. 5

Patency rate of PTA in the juxtaanastomotic stenosis of RCF with or without a cutting balloon. Missing data: patient death or incomplete follow-up data.

PTA = percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, RCF = radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula
jksr-74-105-g005
Table 1

Characteristics of the Patient Population (n = 136)

jksr-74-105-i001
Age (yr) 56 (30-79)*
Sex, n (%)
 Male 70 (52)
 Female 66 (48)
Underlying disease, n (%)
 DM + HTN 76 (56)
 HTN 28 (21)
 DM 11 (8)
 Glomerulonephritis 7 (5)
 ADPKD 3 (2)
 Congenital agenesis 1 (1)
 Obstructive nephropathy 1 (1)
 Unknown 9 (7)
Stenosis site, n (%)
 Perianastomosis stenosis 105 (77)
  Juxtaanastomotic stenosis 75
  Anastomotic stenosis 0
  Arterial stenosis 3
  Combined stenosis 27
 Distal stenosis 15 (11)
 Central stenosis 0 (0)
 Perianastomosis + distal or central stenosis 15 (11)
 Distal + central stenosis 1 (1)

*Age range in the parenthesis.

Combined stenosis are the cases that there are more than two stenosis in the juxtaanastomotic and aterial site, juxtaanastomotic and anastomotic site, or arterial and anastomotic site.

ADPKD = autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, DM = diabetes mellitus, HTN = hypertension

Table 2

Primary Patency Rate According to Factors in Patient with RCF

jksr-74-105-i002
Risk Factor Patency (%) p-Value
6 Month 12 Month 24 Month 48 Month
Sex 0.23
 Female (n = 63) 78.1 63.9 50.0 32.0
 Male (n = 62) 85.3 69.2 53.6 49.8
Age 0.764
 < 60 yrs (n = 72) 78.4 65.8 48.6 43.7
 ≥ 60 yrs (n = 53) 86.6 67.0 57.2 30.0
Site of RCF 0.776
 Left (n = 98) 81.0 66.7 49.8 44.8
 Right (n = 27) 83.2 68.5 63.2 33.7
Underlying disease 0.705
 DM (n = 11) 75.0 60.0 30.0
 DM + HTN (n = 69) 85.9 68.6 52.6 46.0
 HTN (n = 25) 77.6 72.5 55.2 46.0
 Other (n = 20) 74.2 54.0 54.0 30.0
Duration of use* 0.551
 ≤ 12 mo (n = 76) 78.0 67.8 48.9 44.4
 > 12 mo (n = 26) 85.0 68.3 53.1 25.3
BMI (kg/m2) 0.788
 Normal (< 25, n = 95) 82.1 64.7 50.1 43.0
 Overweight (25–29.9, n = 25) 81.0 76.2 58.9 33.7
 Obesity (≥ 30, n = 4) 75.0 37.5 37.5 37.5
Hypercholesterolemia 0.924
 Yes (n = 30) 81.9 61.5 48.8 39.1
 No (n = 95) 81.4 68.2 52.8 43.1
Smoking 0.363
 Yes (n = 14) 88.9 88.9 61.0 61.0
 No (n = 111) 80.8 64.3 50.8 40.3
PAOD 0.878
 Yes (n = 10) 77.8 66.7 44.4 44.4
 No (n = 115) 82.0 66.5 52.7 41.0
CAOD 0.206
 Yes (n = 29) 76.9 69.0 64.7 57.5
 No (n = 96) 83.2 65.5 46.6 36.8
Site of stenosis 0.192
 Perianastomsis (n = 96) 82.3 69.9 54.7 44.3
 Perianastomosis + distal/central (n = 15) 84.5 53.8 53.8 40.4
 Distal/central (n = 14) 71.8 57.4 57.4
Grade of stenosis 0.992
 50–69% (n = 55) 78.5 68.0 49.1 43.0
 70–100% (n = 70) 83.6 65.4 53.3 41.0
Length of stenosis 0.04
 < 3 cm (n = 57) 71.8 56.8 39.5 31.6
 ≥ 3 cm (n = 68) 89.4 74.2 60.3 48.8

*There are 23 cases of data loss about duration of use.

There are one case of data loss about BMI.

BMI = body mass index, CAOD = coronary artery occlusive disease, DM = diabetes mellitus, HTN = hypertension, PAOD = peripheral arterial occlusive disease, RCF = radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula

Table 3

Primary Patency Rate According to Cutting Balloon and Balloon Size in Patient with Juxtaanastomosis Stenosis of Radiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula

jksr-74-105-i003
Factor Patency (%) p-Value
6 month 12 month 24 month 48 month
Cutting balloon 0.637
 Yes (n = 16) 92.9 71.4 56.3 56.3
 No (n = 89) 81.9 68.5 54.8 45.2
Balloon size 0.258
 4–5 mm (n = 30) 72.2 63.9 53.7 53.7
 6 mm (n = 51) 85.5 64.8 48.5 44.5
 7–8 mm (n = 24) 95.0 85.0 73.7 53.6

References

1. Berkoben M, Schwab SJ. Maintenance of permanent hemodialysis vascular access patency. ANNA J. 1995; 22:17–24.
2. Porile JL, Richter M. Preservation of vascular access. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993; 4:997–1003.
3. Fan PY, Schwab SJ. Vascular access: concepts for the 1990s. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1992; 3:1–11.
4. Turmel-Rodrigues L, Pengloan J, Baudin S, Testou D, Abaza M, Dahdah G, et al. Treatment of stenosis and thrombosis in haemodialysis fistulas and grafts by interventional radiology. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000; 15:2029–2036.
5. Manninen HI, Kaukanen ET, Ikäheimo R, Karhapää P, Lahtinen T, Matsi P, et al. Brachial arterial access: endovascular treatment of failing Brescia-Cimino hemodialysis fistulas--initial success and long-term results. Radiology. 2001; 218:711–718.
6. Kim YO, Yoon SA, Kim YS, Kim MK, Oh HJ, Ku YM, et al. Early dysfunction of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula: primary and secondary patency rate of percutaneous angioplasty. Korean J Nephrol. 2003; 22:414–419.
7. Long B, Brichart N, Lermusiaux P, Turmel-Rodrigues L, Artru B, Boutin JM, et al. Management of perianastomotic stenosis of direct wrist autogenous radial-cephalic arteriovenous accesses for dialysis. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 53:108–114.
8. Heye S, Maleux G, Vaninbroukx J, Claes K, Kuypers D, Oyen R. Factors influencing technical success and outcome of percutaneous balloon angioplasty in de novo native hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81:2298–2303.
9. Choi CS, Goo DE, Kim KS, Kim HH, Kim DH, Choi DL, et al. Effect of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in insufficiency of arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis. J Korean Radiol Soc. 1999; 40:1105–1111.
10. Jung YS, Kim MD, Shin HS, Jung GS, Yoo CH, Kim HK, et al. The effect of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty on hemodialysis shunt insufficiency. Korean J Nephrol. 2002; 21:276–284.
11. Kariya S, Tanigawa N, Kojima H, Komemushi A, Shomura Y, Shiraishi T, et al. Primary patency with cutting and conventional balloon angioplasty for different types of hemodialysis access stenosis. Radiology. 2007; 243:578–587.
12. Beathard GA, Arnold P, Jackson J, Litchfield T. Physician Operators Forum of RMS Lifeline. Aggressive treatment of early fistula failure. Kidney Int. 2003; 64:1487–1494.
13. Gray RJ, Sacks D, Martin LG, Trerotola SO. Society of Interventional Radiology Technology Assessment Committee. Reporting standards for percutaneous interventions in dialysis access. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003; 14(9 Pt 2):S433–S442.
14. Lay JP, Ashleigh RJ, Tranconi L, Ackrill P, Al-Khaffaf H. Result of angioplasty of brescia-cimino haemodialysis fistulae: medium-term follow-up. Clin Radiol. 1998; 53:608–611.
15. Vascular Access 2006 Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006; 48:Suppl 1. S176–S247.
TOOLS
Similar articles