Abstract
Purpose
To perform high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HRMRI) and determine clinical features of patients with acute symptomatic middle cerebral artery (MCA) dissection.
Materials and Methods
Thirteen patients with acute symptomatic MCA dissection underwent HRMRI within 3 days after initial clinical onset. They also underwent routine brain MR imaging. HRMRI examinations included time-of-flight MR angiography (MRA), T2-weighted, T1-weighted, proton-density-weighted, and three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequences. Conventional angiography and MRA were used as reference standard to establish the diagnosis of MCA dissection. The angiographic findings and HRMRI findings such as intimal flap, double lumen, and intramural hematoma were analyzed in this study.
Results
All patients presented cerebral ischemia (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score = 4, range = 0-18). String sign was seen on MRA in seven patients. However, double lumen was seen in all patients on HRMRI by intimal flap. High signal lesion on MPRAGE sequences around the dissection lumen due to intramural hematoma was seen in three patients.
Recently, the number of cases of intracranial dissection is being increasingly recognized due to advances in non-invasive angiographic diagnostic procedures. Dissections are typically diagnosed based on clinical presentation, imaging studies [conventional angiography, CT/CT angiography, MR imaging/MR angiography (MRA)], and exclusion of other arterial disease, particularly atherosclerosis (1). Dissection of middle cerebral artery (MCA) is an uncommon cause of stroke. It is less frequent compared to dissection of vertebrobasilar system or carotid artery (2). It is still challenging for neuroradiologists and stroke specialists to diagnose MCA dissection.
Conventional angiography has historically been considered as the gold standard for dissection diagnosis. However, it has limitations, including its cost and invasiveness (3). Although the angiographic appearance of dissection is often characteristic, it cannot assess the vessel wall for intramural hematoma or thrombosis. Due to this feature, dissections in unusual locations or atypical morphology may be misclassified or attributed to other processes (3). Recently, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HRMRI) has emerged as a potential technique for atherosclerotic plaque imaging in MCA (4). Bachmann et al. (5) have used HRMRI for short-term follow-up of patients with proven cervical artery dissection.
HRMRI of acute MCA dissection at 1.5 T or 3.0 T permits refined cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of morphologic features of MCA (6789). Increased signal-to-noise ratio at 1.5 T or 3.0 T allows for high spatial resolution, permitting detailed analysis of diseased vessel segment. Thus, an unequivocal distinction between intramural hematoma and thrombus is possible. Information could be gained with regard to the degree of stenosis, the formation of pseudoaneurysm, and the appearance of new dissections in patients with acute MCA dissection. The aim of this study was to obtain HRMRI findings compared to angiographic MR findings and determine the clinical features of patients with acute symptomatic MCA dissection.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this retrospective study. Informed consent was waived. A total of 121 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke and occlusion or stenosis of MCA from January 2011 to September 2014 were included in this study. The diagnosis of MCA dissection was made by consensus of stroke specialists and neuroradiologists at our institute based on clinical and radiologic features. Clinical features were sudden onset of ischemic or hemorrhagic symptoms. Radiological features suggestive of MCA dissection included one or more of the following characteristic signs on MRA or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or HRMRI: a double lumen sign, a pearl-and-string sign (alternating widening and narrowing), string sign (stenosis), and intimal flap with false lumen. A total of 13 patients who met our study criteria were used in our final analysis. These patients underwent stroke MR imaging within 6 hours after clinical onset. They also underwent HRMRI within 2 days after stroke MR imaging. The following clinical data were collected from these patients: age, sex, initial symptom, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission, traumatic history, past history (hypertension, smoking, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia), and treatment methods. Clinical outcome was assessed using NIHSS and modified Rankin Scale when a patient was discharged from the hospital.
HRMRI was performed with a 3-tesla MRI scanner (Achieva; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) using a 32-channel head coil. All patients initially underwent stroke MR imaging including three-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF)-MRA. TOF-MRA was obtained in the axial plane. Data were reconstructed using a dedicated online post-processing tool to determine the blood vessel architecture.
HRMRI was included in the following four different scans using black blood technique: T1-weighted, T2-weighted, proton density-weighted, and magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo (MPRAGE). The black blood technique with pre-regional saturation pulses of 80 mm thickness to saturate incoming arterial flow was used for all scans. Parameters of each sequence were summarized in Table 1.
Image analysis was performed on a workstation (SyngoVia; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). This study used color map function of SyngoVia program for lesion morphology. First, we analyzed stroke MR and conventional angiographic findings such as lesion sites, location of infarction, and MRA findings (double lumen, stenosis with dilatation, and stenosis). Second, HRMRI images were analyzed for abnormalities of the artery wall and lumen such as double lumen, intimal flap, and hemorrhage into the false lumen. These factors were evaluated based on consensus between two neuroradiologists.
Intimal flap was identified as a linear signal intensity that divided the lumen into double lumen. If the linear signal intensity was continuous over the vessel wall, it was considered as an artifact. Differential diagnosis included atherosclerosis without intraplaque hemorrhage and vasculitis. Atherosclerosis without intraplaque hemorrhage was identified as wall thickening that had iso-signal intensity compared to adjacent muscle. In addition, there was no double lumen. Vasculitis was identified as circumferential wall enhancement on enhanced T1 sequence.
Hemorrhage in the false lumen was detected by high signal intensity in the false lumen on MPRAGE sequence. Its differential diagnosis was intraplaque hemorrhage whose signal intensity was higher than muscle. It could be distinguished because hemorrhage in the false lumen had brighter signal intensity due to continuous flow from a true lumen rather than an intraplauqe hemorrhage whose signal was less bright and vague due to stagnant blood product.
The basic clinical characteristics of the 13 cases of MCA dissection and treatment methods are shown in Table 2. Their median age was 57 years old, ranging from 42 to 72 years old. Of these patients, 12 (92.3%) did not have any traumatic history. Only one case presented traumatic history related to a car accident 3 months ago. Ten (76.9%) patients had acute ischemic symptoms such as hemiparesis, dysarthria, or weakness. Three patients had symptoms similar to transient ischemic attack. The median NIHSS score at admission was 2 (range, 0-18). Four patients received IV recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. All patients underwent cerebral angiography for examination or occlusion treatment or MCA stenosis.
Stroke MR and MRA findings of this study are summarized in Table 3. Nine (69.2%) patients had MCA dissection at the left side. Three (23.1%) patients had complete obstruction of MCA on initial MRA with high NIHSS score at admission. Of the three patients with complete obstruction of MCA on initial MRA, two underwent conventional angiography for endovascular treatment of MCA lesion. The other one underwent medical treatment because of delayed admission after symptom onset. Ten (76.9%) patients had a diffusion restriction on diffusion weighted imaging. Vessel segment of involved MCA dissection was short (< 1 cm) in ten (76.9%) patients. No patient had a sign of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) related to MCA dissection.
The findings of MCA dissection on HRMRI, MRA, and conventional angiography are summarized in Table 4. Eight (61.5%) patients had positive dissection findings such as string sign, pearl string sign, and double lumen on MRA. Five patients including three with complete obstruction did not show any MRA findings for the diagnosis of MCA dissection. Seven (53.8%) patients had string sign on conventional angiography. Five had a pearl-string sign. Five had a double lumen sign. Three patients showed focal eccentric stenosis of MCA on initial conventional angiography. All (100%) patients, including the three with complete obstruction on MRA, showed intimal flap and double lumen findings on HRMRI (Fig. 1). Three (23.1%) patients had focal hemorrhage in the false lumen on MRPRAGE sequence of HRMRI (Fig. 2).
The main finding of this study was that all patients with acute MCA dissection had HRMRI findings of intimal flap and double lumen. However, only some patients had focal hemorrhage in the false lumen.
Intracranial dissection is an important cause of stroke, particularly in young individuals. Most intracranial dissections have been reported to involve the extracranial carotid and vertebral arteries. The annual incidence of carotid artery dissection is 2.5-3 per 100000 and that of vertebral artery dissection is 1-1.5 per 100000 (10). In clinical practice, isolated MCA dissection is an extremely rare clinical entity. Although the etiology of MCA dissection is trauma in some cases, the etiology in most patients is uncertain or idiopathic (1). In our study, nine (90%) patients, excluding the one with traumatic history, had uncertain etiology.
Patients with intracranial dissection are relatively young. They commonly have ischemia or SAH. Asaithambi et al. (11) has reported analyzed studies and case reports on isolated MCA dissection. Literature review yielded 61 cases [62.3% male, median age 46 years (range, 1.66-79)] from 54 published case reports/series of isolated MCA dissection. Approximately 14.8% (n = 9) of cases occurred from traumatic injury. A total of 28 (45.9%) patients were younger than 45 years old, whereas 33 (54.1%) patients were older than 45 years. Approximately 27.9% (n = 17) of patients were 45-59 years old. However, 26.2% of patients (n = 16) were older than 60 years. In patients whose cause was traumatic injury, their median age was 25 years (range, 15-56 years). In this study, only one patient (case 7) had traumatic injury. A total of 54% (n = 7) patients was 45-59 years whereas only 46% (n = 6) of patients was older than 60 years. Age distribution was different. This could be due to the fact that traumatic cause was rare. Ohkuma et al. (12) has reported the neuroradiological and clinical features of patients with dissection aneurysms of MCA. In this study, 9 (69.2%) of 13 patients with dissection aneurysms of MCA presented bleeding events such as SAH and/or ICH, while 4 presented ischemia. Li et al. (1) has reported that the dissection of anterior circulation typically will manifest as ischemia. However, dissection of posterior circulation usually manifests as SAH. In our study, 7 (70%) patients with MCA dissection had acute ischemic symptoms related to multifocal or massive lobar infarction without SAH or ICH associated with the dissection and stenosis or occlusion without aneurysmal dilatation.
Typical angiographic findings of MCA dissection are similar to those observed with dissection of extracranial arteries, including string sign, irregular stenosis, pseudoaneurysm, and total occlusion (1213). Angiographic finding of a double lumen with the presence of an intimal flap (string sign) is relatively common (12). However, findings of pseudoaneurysm or occlusion are relatively uncommon. Segmental stenosis of involved vessel segment is the most common findings. In our study, ten (76.9%) patients had a segment stenosis of the MCA and three (23.4%) had complete occlusion on MRA. Three patients with complete obstruction of the involved vessel segment on initial MRA were diagnosed as acute stroke by MCA occlusion. These patients were diagnosed with MCA dissection by findings such as pearl string sign and string sign on cerebral angiography. In this study, one case (case 1) had negative finding in both DSA and MRA. However, MCA dissection was diagnosed because there were suggestive findings in HRMRI such as double lumen and intimal flap. Even though DSA was considered as a gold standard for diagnosing MCA dissection, it cannot show an internal structure of the involved vessel. On the other hand, HRMRI can show internal structures such as intimal flap that is a direct cause of dissection. Therefore, it is reasonable to diagnose MCA dissection by HRMRI in patients who had negative findings on both DSA and MRA.
Recently, HRMRI has emerged as a potentially useful technique for atherosclerotic plaque imaging in MCA (6789). HRMRI sequences including MPRAGE have successfully eliminated the flowing blood signal, allowing the assessment of lumen of stenotic intracranial artery and the depiction of atherosclerotic plaque in MCA. In addition, the high signal-to-noise ratio and minimal scan duration offer great advantages in clinical settings. In our study, all patients had double lumen by the intimal flap without dilatation in the MCA on HRMRI.
Hemorrhage in the false lumen of patients with arterial dissection is a common finding. Our HRMRI protocol included MPRAGE sequence for detecting intraplaque hemorrhage or hemorrhage in the false lumen of MCA dissection. Compared to T1 or TOF sequences, MPRAGE demonstrated higher diagnostic capability for the detection and quantification of intraplaque hemorrhage (14). Turan has reported that abnormal intraplaque T1 signal compatible with hemorrhage or blood products is equal to or higher than 150% of T1 signal of adjacent muscle (15). In our study, three patients had high signal intensity compatible with hemorrhage in the false lumen of MCA dissection on MP-RAGE sequence.
In conclusions, we were able to easily detect double lumen by intimal flap in patients with MCA dissection on HRMRI. In addition, we were able to detect hemorrhage in false lumen of MCA dissection on MPRAGE sequence. Further studies are required to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with MCA dissection and the serial changes of involved vessel segment of MCA dissection on HRMRI.
Figures and Tables
![]() | Fig. 1A 60-year-old woman with left MCA dissection and acute infarction of the basal ganglia (case 8).
A. Diffusion weighted imaging showing diffusion restriction of the basal ganglia and multifocal focal infarction in the MCA territory.
B. MRA showing severe stenosis of the left MCA (arrow).
C. Cerebral angiography showing eccentric focal stenosis on the MCA (arrow).
D. Proton density-weighted HRMRI showing intimal flap in the left MCA (arrow).
HRMRI = high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, MCA = middle cerebral artery
|
![]() | Fig. 2A 46-year-old man with right MCA dissection and acute massive infarction of the MCA territory (case 2).
A. Diffusion weighted imaging showing diffusion restriction of the right MCA territory.
B. Volume rendering imaging of MRA showing complete occlusion of the right MCA (arrow).
C, D. T1-weighted imaging (C) and MPRAGE imaging (D) showing high signal intensity (arrow) in the false lumen of the MCA dissection.
MCA = middle cerebral artery, MPRAGE = magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo, MRA = MR angiography
|
Table 1
Parameters of Each Sequence

Table 2
Basic Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Methods of This Study

Table 3
Morphological Findings on MRI, MRA, and HRMRI of 13 Patients (Reviewer No. 2-5)

Table 4
Findings of MCA Dissection on HRMRI, MRA, and Conventional Angiography of This Study (Reviewer No. 2, 3)

References
1. Li S, Yan B, Kaye A, Mitchell P, Dowling R, Collins M, et al. Prognosis of intracranial dissection relates to site and presenting features. J Clin Neurosci. 2011; 18:789–793.
2. Kurino M, Yoshioka S, Ushio Y. Spontaneous dissecting aneurysms of anterior and middle cerebral artery associated with brain infarction: a case report and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 2002; 57:428–436. discussion 436-438
3. Vertinsky AT, Schwartz NE, Fischbein NJ, Rosenberg J, Albers GW, Zaharchuk G. Comparison of multidetector CT angiography and MR imaging of cervical artery dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008; 29:1753–1760.
4. Lee HO, Kwak HS, Chung GH, Hwang SB. Diagnostic usefulness of high resolution cross sectional MRI in symptomatic middle cerabral arterial dissection. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2011; 49:370–372.
5. Bachmann R, Nassenstein I, Kooijman H, Dittrich R, Stehling C, Kugel H, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0 Tesla in the short-term follow-up of patients with proven cervical artery dissection. Invest Radiol. 2007; 42:460–446.
6. Chung GH, Kwak HS, Hwang SB, Jin GY. High resolution MR imaging in patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81:4069–4074.
7. Li ML, Xu WH, Song L, Feng F, You H, Ni J, et al. Atherosclerosis of middle cerebral artery: evaluation with high-resolution MR imaging at 3T. Atherosclerosis. 2009; 204:447–452.
8. Ryu CW, Jahng GH, Kim EJ, Choi WS, Yang DM. High resolution wall and lumen MRI of the middle cerebral arteries at 3 tesla. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009; 27:433–442.
9. Xu WH, Li ML, Gao S, Ni J, Zhou LX, Yao M, et al. In vivo high-resolution MR imaging of symptomatic and asymptomatic middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic stenosis. Atherosclerosis. 2010; 212:507–511.
10. Dziewas R, Konrad C, Dräger B, Evers S, Besselmann M, Lüdemann P, et al. Cervical artery dissection--clinical features, risk factors, therapy and outcome in 126 patients. J Neurol. 2003; 250:1179–1184.
11. Asaithambi G, Saravanapavan P, Rastogi V, Khan S, Bidari S, Khanna AY, et al. Isolated middle cerebral artery dissection: a systematic review. Int J Emerg Med. 2014; 7:44.
12. Ohkuma H, Suzuki S, Shimamura N, Nakano T. Dissecting aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery: neuroradiological and clinical features. Neuroradiology. 2003; 45:143–148.
13. Ohkuma H, Suzuki S, Kikkawa T, Shimamura N. Neuroradiologic and clinical features of arterial dissection of the anterior cerebral artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003; 24:691–699.
14. Ota H, Yarnykh VL, Ferguson MS, Underhill HR, Demarco JK, Zhu DC, et al. Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage imaging at 3.0-T MR imaging: comparison of the diagnostic performance of three T1-weighted sequences. Radiology. 2010; 254:551–556.
15. Turan TN, Bonilha L, Morgan PS, Adams RJ, Chimowitz MI. Intraplaque hemorrhage in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. J Neuroimaging. 2011; 21:e159–e161.