Journal List > J Korean Soc Radiol > v.70(3) > 1087369

Lee, Kim, Kang, and Lee: Gastric Variceal Rebleeding by Aberrant Left Gastric Vein after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: A Case Report

Abstract

The aberrant left gastric vein can be a rare cause of gastric variceal bleeding in portal hypertensive patients. Careful examination of vascular anatomy on CT scan and simultaneous embolization of the aberrant left gastric vein during the tranjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt are necessary to prevent gastric variceal rebleeding. Herein, we report a case of gastric variceal rebleeding by the aberrant left gastric vein after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, which was retrospectively diagnosed by CT scan and portogram, and successfully treated by coil embolization.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
A 63-year-old male with massive hematemesis.
A. Abdominal contrast enhanced CT scan reveals the aberrant left gastric vein (arrow).
B. Portogram after TIPS shows gastric variceal flow fed by the left gastric and posterior gastric veins.
C. Portogram obtained 5 days after TIPS and variceal embolization reveals residual variceal flow via the aberrant left gastric vein (arrow).
D. Portogram after embolization of the aberrant left gastric artery shows complete exclusion of the residual gastric variceal flow.
Note.-TIPS = transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
jksr-70-201-g001

References

1. Miyaki T, Yamada M, Kumaki K. Aberrant course of the left gastric vein in the human. Possibility of a persistent left portal vein. Acta Anat (Basel). 1987; 130:275–279.
2. Tajima H, Murakami R, Kumazaki T. Aberrant left gastric vein directly draining into left portal venous system. A case report. Acta Radiol. 1992; 33:462–463.
3. Ohashi I, Ina H, Hanafusa K, Yoshida T, Himeno Y, Gomi N, et al. Aberrant left gastric vein demonstrated by helical CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997; 21:996–1000.
4. Ishigami K, Sun S, Berst MJ, Heery SD, Fajardo LL. Portal vein occlusion with aberrant left gastric vein functioning as a hepatopetal collateral pathway. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004; 15:501–504.
5. Boyer TD, Haskal ZJ. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Practice Guidelines: the role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation in the management of portal hypertension. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005; 16:615–629.
6. Tesdal IK, Filser T, Weiss C, Holm E, Dueber C, Jaschke W. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: adjunctive embolotherapy of gastroesophageal collateral vessels in the prevention of variceal rebleeding. Radiology. 2005; 236:360–367.
7. Sarin SK, Lahoti D, Saxena SP, Murthy NS, Makwana UK. Prevalence, classification and natural history of gastric varices: a long-term follow-up study in 568 portal hypertension patients. Hepatology. 1992; 16:1343–1349.
8. Kiyosue H, Ibukuro K, Maruno M, Tanoue S, Hongo N, Mori H. Multidetector CT anatomy of drainage routes of gastric varices: a pictorial review. Radiographics. 2013; 33:87–100.
9. Terayama N, Matsui O, Tatsu H, Gabata T, Kinoshita A, Hasatani K. Focal sparing of fatty liver in segment II associated with aberrant left gastric vein. Br J Radiol. 2004; 77:150–152.
10. Koo JH, Kim YH, Kim YJ, Seong CK, Seong NK, Park YC, et al. Prevention of potential complications related to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure: efficacy of polytetrafluoroethylene stent grfat. J Korean Radiol Soc. 2004; 51:507–513.
TOOLS
Similar articles