Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study is to report our initial experience using XperGuide cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for percutaneous needle aspiration of the paraspinal lesions.
Materials and Methods
Between September 2011 and September 2012, 12 patients who underwent percutaneous needle aspiration of the paraspinal lesions for suspected pyogenic spondylitis, tuberculous spondylitis, or metastasis were included. The procedure was performed on the XperGuide CBCT. Based on the initial CBCT, target points and entrance were determined, using dedicated guidance software (XperGuide), and the needle pathway was visualized in various reconstructed images. Needle aspiration was performed using Westcott needle and correct needle positioning was confirmed with the second CBCT. The technical success was defined as the needle tip reached within 5 mm of the target point. Culture, smear, and polymerase chain reaction of obtained samples were performed.
Figures and Tables
References
1. Kang M, Gupta S, Khandelwal N, Shankar S, Gulati M, Suri S. CT-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of spinal lesions. Acta Radiol. 1999. 40:474–478.
2. Ozsarlak O, De Schepper AM, Wang X, De Raeve H. CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy in spine lesions. JBR-BTR. 2003. 86:294–296.
3. Kang KJ, Kim WH, Byun JS, Cho YK, Cho KJ, Moon KH, et al. Diagnostic usefulness of CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of the spine. J Korean Radiol Soc. 1999. 41:1195–1199.
4. Siewerdsen JH, Moseley DJ, Burch S, Bisland SK, Bogaards A, Wilson BC, et al. Volume CT with a flat-panel detector on a mobile, isocentric C-arm: pre-clinical investigation in guidance of minimally invasive surgery. Med Phys. 2005. 32:241–254.
5. Ritter D, Orman J, Schmidgunst C, Graumann R. 3D soft tissue imaging with a mobile C-arm. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2007. 31:91–102.
6. Braak SJ, van Strijen MJ, van Leersum M, van Es HW, van Heesewijk JP. Real-Time 3D fluoroscopy guidance during needle interventions: technique, accuracy, and feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010. 194:W445–W451.
7. Leschka SC, Babic D, El Shikh S, Wossmann C, Schumacher M, Taschner CA. C-arm cone beam computed tomography needle path overlay for image-guided procedures of the spine and pelvis. Neuroradiology. 2012. 54:215–223.
8. Rimondi E, Staals EL, Errani C, Bianchi G, Casadei R, Alberghini M, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of the spine: results of 430 biopsies. Eur Spine J. 2008. 17:975–981.
9. Nourbakhsh A, Grady JJ, Garges KJ. Percutaneous spine biopsy: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008. 90:1722–1725.
10. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007. 357:2277–2284.
11. Stoker J, Kipp JB, Geleijns K, van der Molen AJ, Venema HW. [Radiation exposure in computed tomography in the Netherlands: risk-benefit analysis]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009. 153:348–352.
12. Braak SJ, van Strijen MJ, van Es HW, Nievelstein RA, van Heesewijk JP. Effective dose during needle interventions: cone-beam CT guidance compared with conventional CT guidance. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011. 22:455–461.
13. Strocchi S, Colli V, Conte L. Multidetector CT fluoroscopy and cone-beam CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic biopsy: comparison based on patient doses. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012. 151:162–165.
14. Hwang CM, Shin MJ, Kim SM, Lee SH, Lee SM, Shin JH, et al. The diagnostic usefulness of CT-guided needle biopsy or aspiration in infectious spondylitis. J Korean Radiol Soc. 2003. 48:497–504.