Journal List > J Korean Soc Radiol > v.65(4) > 1087014

TOOLS
Jeong, Kim, Ahn, Kim, Hong, Kim, Byun, and Oh: Preliminary Report of Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Tapered Stent
Interventional Radiology
Original Article

Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology 2011; 65(4): 365-372.

Published online: 31 October 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2011.65.4.365

Preliminary Report of Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Tapered Stent

Chang Woo Jeong, MD1, Dong Hyun Kim, MD1, Seong Hwan Ahn, MD2, Dong Uk Kim, MD2, Seung Jeong Hong, MD1, Young Suk Kim, MD1, Joo Nam Byun, MD1, Jae Hee Oh, MD1

1Department of Radiology, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.

2Department of Neurology, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.

Corresponding author: Dong Hyun Kim, MD. Department of Radiology, Chosun University College of Medicine, 588 Seoseok-dong, Dong-gu, Gwangju 501-717, Korea. Tel. 82-62-220-3163, Fax. 82-62-228-9061, radkdh@chosun.ac.kr

Received 17 May 2011       Accepted 15 August 2011

Copyright © 2011 The Korean Society of Radiology

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the results of carotid artery stenting using a tapered stent and to evaluate the effectiveness of the tapered stent compared to previously reported studies using non-tapered stents.

Materials and Methods

From October 2008 to August 2010, elective carotid artery stenting using a tapered stent was attempted in 39 lesions from 36 consecutive patients. Post-procedural complications were evaluated by neurologic symptoms and magnetic resonance imaging. Restenosis or occlusion was evaluated by carotid Doppler ultrasound and computerized tomography with angiography. Newly developed neurologic symptoms were evaluated clinically.

Results

The self-expandable tapered stent was placed across the carotid artery stenosis. A total stroke was noted in 3 patients, while a major stroke was noted in 1 patient. On diffusion weighted imaging, new lesions were observed in 15 patients, but 13 patients were clinically silent. Follow-up imaging studies were performed in the 13 clinically silent lesions, and no evidence of restenosis or occlusion was found any of the 13 lesions. During clinical follow-up in 34 lesions from 31 patients, there were newly developed neurological symptoms in only 1 patient.

Conclusion

Carotid artery stenting using a tapered stent may be safe and useful for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis.

Keywords: Carotid Arteries, Carotid Artery Stenosis, Stents, Transluminal Angioplasty

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

In a 67-year-old woman patient, MRI shows focal stenosis at the right carotid bulb and complete occlusion of a left internal carotid artery (arrow) (A). 3D digital subtraction angiography before the procedure shows focal stenosis with ulcerated plaque at the right carotid bulb (arrow) (B). Post-procedural angiography shows well conformable stent structure (C). Post-procedural diffusion weighted-MR image shows newly developed high signal intensity in left middle cerebral artery territory (D). Surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm was performed at 1 month after carotid artery stenting. Post-operative diffusion weighted-MR images shows high signal intensity in anterior inferior cerebellar artery territory, both and left middle cerebral artery territory (E, F).

jksr-65-365-g001
Fig. 2

Diffusion weighted-MR image of a 69-year-old man with severe stenosis of right carotid artery.

A, B. Compared with pre-procedural image (A), post-procedural diffusion weighted-MR image (B) shows high signal intensity in right parietal lobe (arrow), the patient had neurologic symptoms such as left hemianopsia and left tactile neglect, but the neurological symptoms completely disappeared within 5 days.
jksr-65-365-g002
Fig. 3

Post-procedural follow-up studies of a 59-year-old man with severe stenosis of left carotid artery (A, B) and a 69-year-old man with severe stenosis of carotid artery (C, D, E).

Computerized tomography with angiography (A, B) and carotid Doppler ultrasound (C, D, E) show no restenosis.
jksr-65-365-g003
Table 1

Patient Demographic Characteristics

jksr-65-365-i001
Table 2

The Results of Carotid Artery Stenting

jksr-65-365-i002

Note.-TIA = transient ischemic attack

Table 3

Embolic Lesions

jksr-65-365-i003

Note.-DWI = diffusion weighted image

Table 4

Follow-Up Examination

jksr-65-365-i004
Table 5

Previously Published Studies of Carotid Artery Stenting

jksr-65-365-i005

Note.-CAS = carotid artery stenting

References

1. Yadav J. Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy (SAPPHIRE). Chicago: American Heart Association;2002.
2. Roubin GS, New G, Iyer SS, Vitek JJ, Al-Mubarak N, Liu MW, et al. Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis. Circulation. 2001; 103:532–537.
3. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2001; 357:1729–1737.
4. Bosiers M, de Donato G, Deloose K, Verbist J, Peeters P, Castriota F, et al. Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007; 33:135–141. discussion 142-143.
5. Hart JP, Peeters P, Verbist J, Deloose K, Bosiers M. Do device characteristics impact outcome in carotid artery stenting? J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44:725–730. discussion 730-731.
6. Skelly CL, Gallagher K, Fairman RM, Carpenter JP, Velazquez OC, Parmer SS, et al. Risk factors for restenosis after carotid artery angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44:1010–1015.
7. Kirsch EC, Khangure MS, Morling P, York TJ, McAuliffe W. Oversizing of self-expanding stents: influence on the development of neointimal hyperplasia of the carotid artery in a canine model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23:121–127.
8. Piamsomboon C, Roubin GS, Liu MW, Iyer SS, Mathur A, Dean LS, et al. Relationship between oversizing of self-expanding stents and late loss index in carotid stenting. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998; 45:139–143.
9. Yoon SM, Jo KW, Baik MW, Kim YW. Delayed carotid wallstent shortening resulting in restenosis following successful carotid artery angioplasty and stenting. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009; 46:495–497.
10. Brown KE, Usman A, Kibbe MR, Morasch MD, Matsumura JS, Pearce WH, et al. Carotid stenting using tapered and nontapered stents: associated neurological complications and restenosis rates. Ann Vasc Surg. 2009; 23:439–445.
11. Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Ferguson GG, Haynes RB, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339:1415–1425.
12. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989; 20:864–870.
13. Rajagopal V, Rockson SG. Coronary restenosis: a review of mechanisms and management. Am J Med. 2003; 115:547–553.
14. Schwartz RS, Henry TD. Pathophysiology of coronary artery restenosis. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2002; 3:Suppl 5. S4–S9.
15. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS. Coronary in-stent restenosis - predictors, treatment and prevention. Eur Heart J. 2000; 21:1739–1749.
16. Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG, Edwards WD, Camrud AR, Vlietstra RE, et al. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 19:267–274.
17. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Mehran R, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Satler LF, et al. Tissue proliferation within and surrounding Palmaz-Schatz stents is dependent on the aggressiveness of stent implantation technique. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 83:1170–1174.
18. Sullivan TM, Ainsworth SD, Langan EM, Taylor S, Snyder B, Cull D, et al. Effect of endovascular stent strut geometry on vascular injury, myointimal hyperplasia, and restenosis. J Vasc Surg. 2002; 36:143–149.
19. Wholey MH, Al-Mubarek N, Wholey MH. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003; 60:259–266.
20. Christiaans MH, Ernst JM, Suttorp MJ, van den Berg JC, Overtoom TT, Kelder JC, et al. Restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting: a follow-up study with duplex ultrasonography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003; 26:141–144.
21. Bosiers M, Peeters P, Deloose K, Verbist J, Sievert H, Sugita J, et al. Does carotid artery stenting work on the long run: 5-year results in high-volume centers (ELOCAS Registry). J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2005; 46:241–247.
22. de Donato G, Setacci C, Deloose K, Peeters P, Cremonesi A, Bosiers M. Long-term results of carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 48:1431–1440. discussion 1440-1441.
23. Eskandari MK, Brown KE, Kibbe MR, Morasch MD, Matsumura JS, Pearce WH. Restenosis after carotid stent placement in patients with previous neck irradiation or endarterectomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007; 18:1368–1374.
24. Gröschel K, Riecker A, Schulz JB, Ernemann U, Kastrup A. Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke. 2005; 36:367–373.
25. Meyers PM, Higashida RT, Phatouros CC, Malek AM, Lempert TE, Dowd CF, et al. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after percutaneous transluminal stenting of the craniocervical arteries. Neurosurgery. 2000; 47:335–343. discussion 343-345.
26. Hart R, Hindman B. Mechanisms of perioperative cerebral infarction. Stroke. 1982; 13:766–773.
TOOLS
Similar articles