Journal List > Endocrinol Metab > v.26(1) > 1085870

TOOLS
Lee: The Understanding of Research Ethics for a Desirable Academic Writing
Review Article
Endocrinology and Metabolism

Endocrinology and Metabolism 2011; 26(1): 12-24.

Published online: 31 March 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2011.26.1.12

The Understanding of Research Ethics for a Desirable Academic Writing

In Jae Lee

Department of Ethics Education, Seoul National University of Education, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author: In Jae Lee. Department of Ethics Education, Seoul National University of Education, 161 Umyeon-ro, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-742, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3475-2411, Fax: +82-2-3475-2263, ijlee@snue.ac.kr

Copyright © 2011 Korean Endocrine Society

References

1. Harvey G. Writing with sources: a guide for Harvard students. Expository Writing Program, 1995. cited 2010 Nov 15. Available from URL: http://people.brandeis.edu/~teuber/usemplagiarism.html.
2. Department of Health and Human Services, Part III. Federal Register. National Archives and Records Administration. 2005. 05. 17. cited 2010 Oct 25. Available from URL: http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/42_cfr_parts_50_and_93_2005.pdf.
3. Lipson C. Doing honest work in college: how to prepare citations, avoid plagiarism, and achieve real academic success. 2004. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press;1–189. (Chicago guides to academic life).
4. Posner RA. The little book of plagiarism. 2007. New York: Beth Vesel Literary Agency.
5. Lee IJ. The issues of the self-plagiarism and the establishment of research ethics. Ethics Stud. 2009. 73:1–19.
6. Korea copyright commission. A study on solving ways of plagiarism problems III. 2009.
7. Martin B. Plagiarism: a misplaced emphasis. J Infor Ethics. 1994. 3:36–47.
8. Park NG. An alleviating measure of self-plagiarism. Kyosu Papers. 2006. 09. 06.
9. Lee IJ. Problems of redundant publication and the establishment ways of research ethics. J Korean Philos Hist. 2009. 26:305–323.
10. Roig M. Recycling portions of text from the same author's previously published papers in psychology: an exploratory study. Paper presented at the Second Office of Research Integrity's Conference on Research Integrity. 2002. 11. Bethesda:
11. Lee IJ. The plagiarism of academic writing: what are issues? Chemistry World. 2008. 108–115.
12. Abraham P. Duplicate and salami publications. Indian J Surg. 2006. 68:119–121.
13. Kim SY. Duplicate publication. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 2006. 27:687–692.
14. von Elm E, Poglia G, Walder B, Tramér MR. Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews. JAMA. 2004. 291:974–980.
15. Hahm CK. Ethical issues of multiple publication. J Korean Med Assoc. 2007. 50:375–381.
16. Park GB. Investigation of researcher's perception of research integrity, policy research-2009-004-Research Ethics. 2009.
17. Jeong HM, et al. College writing. 2008. Seoul: Samin.
18. Roig M. Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: a guide to ethical writing, revised on-line version published in August, 2006. http://facpub.stjohns.edu/~roigm/plagiarism/index.html.
TOOLS
Similar articles