Journal List > Urogenit Tract Infect > v.13(1) > 1084235

Kim, Hwang, Park, and Lee: Epidemiology and Outcomes of Acute Flank Pain in University-Affiliated Regional Emergency Medical Centers

Abstract

Purpose:

Acute abdominal pain accounts for 7-10% of all emergency department visits. The purpose of this study is to investigate the epidemiology and outcome of acute flank pain at regional emergency medical centers (EMC) and to investigate the necessity of urologists.

Materials and Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed all records of EMC visits for flank pain between 1 July 2015 and 30 June 2017. The renal colic was defined according to the code allocation of the Korean standard classification of disease-6 code N132, N200-N203, and N210-N211. The results of this study were retrospectively analyzed and the characteristics of the patients.

Results:

The total number of visits to the EMC was 67,792, and the number of visits for acute abdominal pain was 9,641. The number of visits for acute flank pain was 1,133 and the number of patients was 1,018. The departments included emergency medicine (n=235), urology (n=711), internal medicine (n=132), general surgery (n=19), gynecology (n=10), and others (n=26). The causes of urological flank pain were urolithiasis in 628 cases, infection in 41 cases, and other diseases in 42 cases. Among these, 244 cases were admitted, and 193 cases of them were urolithiasis patients, and 171 patients underwent stone removal surgery.

Conclusions:

According to our study, patients with flank pain accounted for 11.8% of patients with abdominal pain. However, considering hospitalization and frequency of surgery, it is necessary to take the national measurement for the long-term supply of urology.

REFERENCES

1.Gans SL., Pols MA., Stoker J., Boermeester MA. expert steering group. Guideline for the diagnostic pathway in patients with acute abdominal pain. Dig Surg. 2015. 32:23–31.
crossref
2.Hastings RS., Powers RD. Abdominal pain in the ED: a 35 year retrospective. Am J Emerg Med. 2011. 29:711–6.
crossref
3.Selbst SM., Friedman MJ., Singh SB. Epidemiology and etiology of malpractice lawsuits involving children in US emergency departments and urgent care centers. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005. 21:165–9.
4.Kachalia A., Gandhi TK., Puopolo AL., Yoon C., Thomas EJ., Griffey R, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the emergency department: a study of closed malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers. Ann Emerg Med. 2007. 49:196–205.
crossref
5.Patterson BW., Venkatesh AK., AlKhawam L., Pang PS. Abdominal computed tomography utilization and 30-day revisitation in emergency department patients presenting with abdominal pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2015. 22:803–10.
crossref
6.Medford-Davis L., Park E., Shlamovitz G., Suliburk J., Meyer AN., Singh H. Diagnostic errors related to acute abdominal pain in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2016. 33:253–9.
crossref
7.Preminger GM., Tiselius HG., Assimos DG., Alken P., Buck C., Gallucci M, et al. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol. 2007. 178:2418–34.
crossref
8.Wilkinson H. Clinical investigation and management of patients with renal stones. Ann Clin Biochem. 2001. 38:180–7.
crossref
9.Lee HN., Yoon HN., Shim BS. The trend change of incidence and treatment of urolithiasis between the 1980s and 2000s. Korean J Urol. 2007. 48:40–4.
crossref
10.Liu W., Esler SJ., Kenny BJ., Goh RH., Rainbow AJ., Stevenson GW. Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic: assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent. Radiology. 2000. 215:51–4.
crossref
11.Graham A., Luber S., Wolfson AB. Urolithiasis in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2011. 29:519–38.
12.Hong DY., Kim JW., Lee KR., Park SO., Baek KJ. Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of patients presenting with renal colic in Korea. Urol J. 2015. 12:2148–53.
13.Paolillo C., Spallino I., Cervellin G., Catena F. Is there still a role for abdominal plain X-ray in acute abdomen? Emerg Care J. 2015. 11:50–1.
crossref
14.Laméris W., van Randen A., van Es HW., van Heesewijk JP., van Ramshorst B., Bouma WH, et al. Imaging strategies for detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ. 2009. 338:b2431.
crossref
15.Caporale N., Morselli-Labate AM., Nardi E., Cogliandro R., Cavazza M., Stanghellini V. Acute abdominal pain in the emergency department of a university hospital in Italy. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016. 4:297–304.
crossref
16.Palmer J., Pontius E. Abdominal pain mimics. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2016. 34:409–23.
crossref
17.Cervellin G., Lippi G. Abdominal migraine in the differential diagnosis of acute abdominal pain. Am J Emerg Med. 2015. 33:864. .e3-5.
crossref
18.Tayal VS., Bullard M., Swanson DR., Schulz CJ., Bacalis KN., Bliss SA, et al. ED endovaginal pelvic ultrasound in nonpregnant women with right lower quadrant pain. Am J Emerg Med. 2008. 26:81–5.
crossref
19.Cervellin G., Comelli I., Sartori E., Lippi G. A four-year survey on unexpected pregnancy diagnoses in a large urban emergency department in Parma, Italy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014. 127:51–4.
crossref
20.Chen YK., Lin HC., Chen CS., Yeh SD. Seasonal variations in urinary calculi attacks and their association with climate: a population based study. J Urol. 2008. 179:564–9.
crossref
21.Cupisti A., Pasquali E., Lusso S., Carlino F., Orsitto E., Melandri R. Renal colic in Pisa emergency department: epidemiology, diagnostics and treatment patterns. Intern Emerg Med. 2008. 3:241–4.
crossref
22.Manfredini R., Gallerani M., Cecilia Ol., Boari B., Fersini C., Portaluppi F. Circadian pattern in occurrence of renal colic in an emergency department: analysis of patients' notes. BMJ. 2002. 324:767.
crossref
23.Boari B., Manfredini R. Circadian rhythm and renal colic. Recenti Prog Med. 2003. 94:191–3.
24.Robert M., Roux JO., Bourelly F., Boularan AM., Guiter J., Monnier L. Circadian variations in the risk of urinary calcium oxalate stone formation. Br J Urol. 1994. 74:294–7.
25.Laerum E. Urolithiasis in general practice. An epidemiological study from a Norwegian district. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1983. 17:313–9.
26.Cervellin G., Comelli I., Comelli D., Cortellini P., Lippi G., Meschi T, et al. Regional short-term climate variations influence on the number of visits for renal colic in a large urban Emergency Department: results of a 7-year survey. Intern Emerg Med. 2011. 6:141–7.
crossref
27.Cervellin G., Comelli I., Comelli D., Meschi T., Lippi G., Borghi L. Mean temperature and humidity variations, along with patient age, predict the number of visits for renal colic in a large urban Emergency Department: results of a 9-year survey. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2012. 2:31–8.
crossref
28.Ahlstrand C., Tiselius HG. Renal stone disease in a Swedish district during one year. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1981. 15:143–6.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Analysis of patient's arrival time in the emergency room.
uti-13-14f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Seasonal analysis.
uti-13-14f2.tif
Table 1.
Number and rate of patients admitted with renal colic
Variable Data
All cases 67,792
  Acute abdominal pain 9,641 (14.2)
  Acute flank pain 1,133 (1.7)
Acute flank pain patient 1,018
  Sex  
   Male 547 (53.7)
   Female 471 (46.3)
Mean age (y) 53.8
  Male 51.7
  Female 56.3
Treated by urology cases 711
Treated by urology patient 622
  Sex  
   Male 388 (62.4)
   Female 234 (37.6)
  Mean age (y) 52.8
   Male 51.8
   Female 55.3

Values are presented as number only or number (%).

Table 2.
Care trends of patients with acute flank pain in the emergency room
Variable Data
All cases 1,251 (100)
  Emerency medicine 273 (21.8)
  Urology 722 (57.7)
  Internal medicine 158 (12.6)
  General surgery 22 (1.8)
  Gynecology 11 (0.9)
  Others 65 (5.2)
Diagnosis  
  Urinary stone 699 (61.7)
  Infection 231 (20.4)
  Others 203 (17.9)
After treatment  
  Inpatients 349 (30.8)
  Outpatients 784 (69.2)
The final medical department 1,133 (100.0)
  Emerency medicine 235 (20.7)
  Urology 711 (62.8)
  Internal medicine 132 (11.7)
  General surgery 19 (1.7)
  Gynecology 10 (0.9)
  Others 26 (2.3)

Values are presented as number (%).

Table 3.
Care trend of urology patients in the emergency room
Variable Data
The final urology treatment patient 711 (100.0)
  Urinary stone 628 (88.3)
  Infection 41 (5.8)
  Others 42 (5.9)
After treament  
  Inpatients 244 (34.3)
  Outpatients 467 (65.7)
Stone in inpatients 193 (79.1)
Patients undergoing surgery 171 (70.1)
  Male 98 (57.3)
  Female 73 (42.7)
  Mean age (y) 55.6

Values are presented as number (%) or mean.

TOOLS
Similar articles