Journal List > J Korean Neurotraumatol Soc > v.7(2) > 1084100

J Korean Neurotraumatol Soc. 2011 Oct;7(2):63-67. Korean.
Published online October 31, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.13004/jknts.2011.7.2.63
Copyright © 2011 Korean Neurotraumatology Society
Clinical and Radiological Outcome Analysis on Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Interbody Fusion Using Hydroxyapatite Block
Jin Gyeong Ha, MD, Jin Hoon Park, MD and Sang Ryong Jeon, MD
Department Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Address for correspondence: Sang Ryong Jeon, MD, PhD. Department of Neurological Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3010-3550, Fax: +82-2-476-6738, Email: srjeon@amc.seoul.kr
Received March 29, 2011; Revised August 22, 2011; Accepted August 22, 2011.

Abstract

Objective

Although use of autologous iliac bone graft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical degenerative diseases remain standard surgical procedure, donor site morbidity are still concerns. Several synthetic graft materials have been developed to prevent this complication. This is retrospective study of clinical and radiological outcomes of ACDF using synthetic hydroxyapatite (HA) block to evaluate the efficacy.

Methods

From May 2009 to June 2010, twenty-one patients (M 11 ; F 10) were enrolled in this study and 35 segments were involved. All patients were performed ACDF using HA block and plating system. Indications of surgery were radiculopathy caused by degenerative cervical spondylosis with or without myelopathy. The mean period of clinical follow-up was 6.6 months (range from 6 to 12 months). The change of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) at 6 month were used for clinical outcome analysis. Cervical spine radiographs including dynamic views were obtained at postoperative 3 day, 1, 3, 6 months in all patients to measure the change of disc height, overall and segmental lordosis, segmental motion. Computed tomography was done at postoperative 6 month in all patients to confirm the radiological fusion.

Results

Mean VAS and NDI score changed from 8.2 to 2.7 and from 23.4 to 10.5, respectively. The mean disc height change was from 4.5 to 7.1. Cervical lordosis and segmental lordosis changes were from 24.4 to 24.5 and from 3.93 to 4.57, respectively. Complete interbody fusion was achieved in 95.2% of patients. There was one case of non-fusion patient.

Conclusion

HA block is very efficient graft material in achieving cervical fusion, maintaining intervertebral disc height for ACDF. Further follow up study should be needed to evaluate the efficacy of this material.

Keywords: Bone fusion; Cervical lordosis; Disc height; Hydroxyapatite block; Cervical intervertebral disk

Figures


FIGURE 1
A: Mean height=(A+B)/2, A=anterior disc height, B=posterior disc height. B: C spine Stress view.
Click for larger image


FIGURE 2
VAS scores (A) and NDI (B) scores were decreased through the follow-up period since surgery. VAS: Visual Analogue Scale, NDI: Neck Disability Index.
Click for larger image


FIGURE 3
A: Disc height. Disc height increased after surgery, later decreasing but not returning to preoperative levels. B: Cervical lordosis. Cervical lordosis decreased after surgery, later returning to preoperative levels. C: Segmental lordosis. Segmental lordosis increased immediately after surgery, later decreasing but not returning to preoperative levels.
Click for larger image


FIGURE 4
A 52-year-old man who present with cervical radiculopathy and underwent ACDF with HA block. C spine CT scan at A immediately postoperative, B postoperative 6 months visits. Bone briding was formed between vertebral endplates (arrows). ACDF: anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, HA: hydroxyapatite.
Click for larger image

Tables


TABLE 1
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics
Click for larger image


TABLE 2
Non-parametric analysis on surgical outcome (VAS)
Click for larger image


TABLE 3
Non-parametric analysis on surgical outcome (NDI)
Click for larger image

Notes

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

References
1. Alvarez JA, Hardy RW Jr. Anterior cervical discectomy for one- and two-level cervical disc disease: the controversy surrounding the question of whether to fuse, plate, or both. Crit Rev Neurosurg 1999;9:234–251.
2. Bärlocher CB, Barth A, Krauss JK, Binggeli R, Seiler RW. Comparative evaluation of microdiscectomy only, autograft fusion, polymethylmethacrylate interposition, and threaded titanium cage fusion for treatment of single-level cervical disc disease: a prospective randomized study in 125 patients. Neurosurg Focus 2002;12:E4.
3. Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:1298–1307.
4. Connolly PJ, Esses SI, Kostuik JP. Anterior cervical fusion: outcome analysis of patients fused with and without anterior cervical plates. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:202–206.
5. Denissen HW, de Groot K. Immediate dental root implants from synthetic dense calcium hydroxylapatite. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:551–556.
6. el Deeb M, Waite DE, Mainous EG. Correction of the deficient alveolar ridge. Clin Plast Surg 1989;16:733–748.
7. Geer CP, Papadopoulos SM. The argument for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anterior plate fixation. Clin Neurosurg 1999;45:25–29.
discussion 21.
8. Gercek E, Arlet V, Delisle J, Marchesi D. Subsidence of stand-alone cervical cages in anterior interbody fusion: warning. Eur Spine J 2003;12:513–516.
9. Hacker RJ. Threaded cages for degenerative cervical disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002:39–46.
10. Hwang SL, Lin CL, Lieu AS, Lee KS, Kuo TH, Hwang YF, et al. Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 2004;1:160–167.
11. Madawi AA, Powell M, Crockard HA. Biocompatible osteoconductive polymer versus iliac graft. A prospective comparative study for the evaluation of fusion pattern after anterior cervical discectomy. . Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:2123–2129.
discussion 2129-2130.
12. Matge G. Anterior interbody fusion with the BAK-cage in cervical spondylosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140:1–8.
13. McConnell JR, Freeman BJ, Debnath UK, Grevitt MP, Prince HG, Webb JK. A prospective randomized comparison of coralline hydroxyapatite with autograft in cervical interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:317–323.
14. Pintar FA, Maiman DJ, Hollowell JP, Yoganandan N, Droese KW, Reinartz JM, et al. Fusion rate and biomechanical stiffness of hydroxylapatite versus autogenous bone grafts for anterior discectomy. An in vivo animal study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:2524–2528.
15. Schmieder K, Wolzik-Grossmann M, Pechlivanis I, Engelhardt M, Scholz M, Harders A. Subsidence of the wing titanium cage after anterior cervical interbody fusion: 2-year follow-up study. J Neurosurg Spine 2006;4:447–453.
16. Schneider JR, Bright RW. Anterior cervical fusion using preserved bone allografts. Transplant Proc 1976;8:73–76.
17. Zdeblick TA, Cooke ME, Kunz DN, Wilson D, McCabe RP. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using a porous hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994;19:2348–2357.