Journal List > Transl Clin Pharmacol > v.24(4) > 1082633

Jin, Yoo, Oh, Yang, Jung, and Park: Pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of tadalafil/ tamsulosin HCl fixed-dose combination capsule under fasted and fed condition in healthy volunteers

Abstract

Co-administration of tadalafil and tamsulosin HCl in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia and erectile dysfunction is increasing in clinical settings. Development of fixed-dose combination (FDC) of tadalafil and tamsulosin HCl could contribute to improving patients’ adherence and treatment efficacy. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of a newly developed fixed-dose combination capsule of tadalafil 5 mg/tamsulosin HCl 0.4 mg in comparison with co-administration of each formulation in healthy volunteers under fasted and fed conditions. Two randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-way, crossover studies were completed in 29 subjects under fasted condition, and 33 subjects under fed condition. Serial blood sample collection for PK analysis was conducted up to 72 hours after dosing, and PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of the Cmax and AUClast were used to evaluate comparative bioavailability. In both fasted and fed condition studies, the bioequivalence was established. The most common adverse drug reactions were orthostatic hypotension and headache with no statistical difference between treatment groups. All subjects with orthostatic hypotension recovered at follow-up test. Although changes in vital signs from baseline were statistically significant, there were no subjects with systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg and there were no clinically meaningful signs or symptoms associated. FDC of tadalafil and tamsulosin HCl can be an alternative to co-administration of individual drugs for providing better compliance. Changes in blood pressure should be kept in mind when tadalafil and tamsulosin HCl are co-administered in clinical settings.

REFERENCES

1.Auffenberg GB., Helfand BT., McVary KT. Established medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am. 2009. 36:443–59. v-vi.
crossref
2.Lee C., Kozlowski JM., Grayhack JT. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors controlling benign prostatic growth. Prostate. 1997. 31:131–138.
crossref
3.Garraway WM., Collins GN., Lee RJ. High prevalence of benign prostatic hypertrophy in the community. Lancet. 1991. 338:469–471.
crossref
4.Park HK., Park H., Cho SY., Bae J., Jeong SJ., Hong SK, et al. The prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia in elderly men in Korea: A community-based study. Kor J Urol. 2009. 50:843–847.
crossref
5.Bae WJ., Sohn DW., Kim SD., Kim SJ., Hong SH., Lee JY, et al. The correlation between cardiovascular risk factors and penile hemodynamic parameters in men with erectile dysfunction. Kor J Urol. 2009. 50:689–693.
crossref
6.Braun M., Wassmer G., Klotz T., Reifenrath B., Mathers M., Engelmann U. Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: results of the 'Cologne Male Survey'. Int J Impot Res. 2000. 12:305–311.
crossref
7.McVary KT., Roehrborn CG., Kaminetsky JC., Auerbach SM., Wachs B., Young JM, et al. Tadalafil relieves lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2007. 177:1401–1407.
crossref
8.Oh SY., Min KS., Choi SH. Effects of prostate volume and lower urinary tract symptoms on erectile function. Kor J Urol. 2007. 48:24–28.
crossref
9.U. S. Food and Drug Administration. Flomax Capsules, 0.4mg Prescribing Information. Accessed 20 June 2016.http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2005/020579s016lbl.pdf.
10.Montorsi F., Verheyden B., Meuleman E., Jünemann KP., Moncada I., Valiquette L, et al. Long-term safety and tolerability of tadalafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2004. 45:339–344. discussion 344-345.
crossref
11.McMahon CG. Treatment of erectile dysfunction with chronic dosing of tadalafil. Eur Urol. 2006. 50:215–217.
crossref
12.U. S. Food and Drug Administration. CIALIS Highlights of Prescribing Information. Accessed 20 June 2016.http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/021368s20s21lbl.pdf.
13.Bechara A., Romano S., Casabé A., Haime S., Dedola P., Hernández C, et al. Comparative efficacy assessment of tamsulosin vs. tamsulosin plus tadalafil in the treatment of LUTS/BPH. Pilot study. J Sex Med. 2008. 5:2170–2178.
crossref
14.Reges R., Regadas R., Moraes F., Manoel O., Jamacaru F., Vagnaldo F, et al. The association of tamsulosin and daily tadalafil for the treatment of lower urianry tract symptoms is safe and effective? J Urol. 2012. 187:e507.
crossref
15.Forgue ST., Patterson BE., Bedding AW., Payne CD., Phillips DL., Wrishko RE, et al. Tadalafil pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006. 61:280–288.
crossref
16.World Health Organization. Guidelines for registration of fixed-dose combination medicinal products, in WHO Technical Report Series. 2005.
17.Chapple CR. Selective alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists in benign prostatic hyperplasia: rationale and clinical experience. Eur Urol. 1996. 29:129–144.
18.de Mey C. Cardiovascular effects of alpha-blockers used for the treatment of symptomatic BPH: impact on safety and well-being. Eur Urol. 1998. 34(Suppl 2):18-28; discussion 47.
crossref
19.Yasukawa K., Swarz H., Ito Y. Review of orthostatic tests on the safety of tamsulosin, a selective alpha1A-adrenergic receptor antagonist, shows lack of orthostatic hypotensive effects. J Int Med Res. 2001. 29:236–251.

Figure 1.
Plasma concentration-time profiles for (A) tadalafil, (B) tamsulosin HCl in fasted condition study as a fixed-dose combination or concomitant administration of individual drugs. Data are shown as mean ± SD. FDC, fixed-dose combination; Reference, concomitant administration of individual drugs.
tcp-24-175f1.tif
Figure 2.
Plasma concentration-time profiles for (A) tadalafil, (B) tamsulosin HCl in fed condition study as a fixed-dose combination or concomitant administration of individual drugs. Data are shown as mean ± SD. FDC, fixed-dose combination; Reference, concomitant administration of individual drugs.
tcp-24-175f2.tif
Figure 3.
Changes in (A) systolic blood pressure, (B) diastolic blood pressure over time in fasted condition study. Data are shown as mean ± SD. R, concomitantly administrated as individual drugs; T, administered as a fixed-dose combination
tcp-24-175f3.tif
Figure 4.
Changes in (A) systolic blood pressure, (B) diastolic blood pressure over time in fed condition study. Data are shown as mean ± SD. R, concomitantly administrated as individual drugs; T, administered as a fixed-dose combination
tcp-24-175f4.tif
Table 1.
Demographics of study participants
Variables   Fasted Study     Fed Study P-value
T-R (N=15) R-T (N=15) P-value T-R (N=17) R-T (N=18)
Age (years) 24.5 ± 4.3 24.9 ± 3.5 0.82 27.0 ± 5.7 30.9 ± 6.5 0.07
Height (cm) 175.1 ± 4.8 175.5 ± 5.8 0.52 176.2 ± 5.2 174.7 ± 4.5 0.84
Weight (kg) 67.7 ± 6.0 69.1 ± 5.4 0.84 70.0 ± 4.9 70.4 ± 6.6 0.37
BMI (kg/m2) 22.0 ± 1.8 22.4 ± 1.7 0.59 22.5 ± 1.1 23.0 ± 1.7 0.29

Notes: Data are summarized as arithmetic mean ± standard deviation. P-values were derived by Student's t-test. T-R, FDC followed by concomitant administration of individual drugs; R-T, concomitant administration of individual drugs followed by FDC

Table 2.
Pharmacokinetic parameters of tadalafil and tamsulosin HCl after a single oral administration given as fixed-dose combination or concomitant administration of individual drugs in both studies
Study Type Parameter Tadalafil
Tamsulosin HCl
FDC Reference Geometric Mean Ratio a(90% CI) FDC Reference Geometric Mean Ratio a(90% CI)
Tmax (h) 1.0 [0.5-4.5] 1.5 [0.5-4.5] 4.5 [3.0-6.0] 4.5 [3.0-6.0]
Cmax (ng/ml) 103.80 ± 25.99 103.33 ± 21.24 0.99 (0.92-1.07) 15.38 ± 3.74 15.20 ± 4.12 1.02 (0.96-1.08)
Fasted condition study (N=29) AUClast (ng·h/ml) 1835.35 ± 442.93 1877.44 ± 469.36 0.98 (0.93-1.03) 185.96 ± 62.01 180.46 ± 61.64 1.03 (0.98-1.09)
AUCinf (ng·h/ml) 2005.80 ± 589.04 2078.39 ± 695.02 193.54 ± 64.56 188.83 ± 66.68
t1/2 (h) 18.82 ± 5.61 19.56 ± 7.18 11.15 ± 2.87 12.45 ± 3.91
CL/F (L/h) 2.70 ± 0.79 2.63 ± 0.76 2.30 ± 0.77 2.37 ± 0.80
Vd/F (L) 69.51 ± 14.69 68.84 ± 11.55 35.98 ± 7.92 39.75 ± 10.27
Tmax (h) 4.0 [2.0-5.6] 2.75 [1.0-5.0] 5.0 [3.0-7.0] 5.0 [3.0-7.1]
Cmax (ng/ml) 91.13 ± 15.48 95.94 ± 18.54 0.95 (0.91-1.00) 10.43 ± 3.37 10.03 ± 2.46 1.02 (0.96-1.09)
Fed condition study (N=32) AUClast (ng·h/ml) 2144.83 ± 626.33 2146.43 ± 553.55 0.99 (0.95-1.03) 144.20 ± 61.90 144.24 ± 60.00 0.99 (0.94-1.05)
AUCinf (ng·h/ml) 2485.43 ± 930.43 2459.07 ± 777.79 152.14 ± 64.12 153.45 ± 61.06
t1/2 (h) 22.43 ± 7.08 22.62 ± 6.19 12.47 ± 3.18 14.09 ± 10.19
CL/F (L/h) 2.28 ± 0.81 2.22 ± 0.66 3.03 ± 1.11 2.94 ± 0.97
Vd/F (L) 67.33 ± 11.29 68.22 ± 12.31 52.40 ± 19.91 56.54 ± 36.22

Notes: Data are summarized as arithmetic mean ± standard deviation except for Tmax, for which median [min-max] is presented. a Geometric mean ratio of fixed-dose combination to concomitant administration Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; Tmax, time to Cmax; Cmax, the maximum concentration of drug; AUClast, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration; AUCinf, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from dosing time extrapolated to infinity; t1/2, elimination half-life; CL/F, apparent clearance; Vd/F, apparent volume of distribution

Table 3.
Comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters of tadalafil and tamsulosin HCl after a single oral administration as a fixed-dose combination capsule in the fasted and fed conditions
Parameter Tadalafil Tamsulosin HCl
Fasted Study (N=29) Fed Study (N=32) Fed/Fasted Geometric Mean Ratio (90% CI) Fasted Study (N=29) Fed Study (N=32) Fed/Fasted Geometric Mean Ratio (90% CI)
Tmax (h) 1.0 [0.5-4.5] 4.0 [2.0-5.6]   4.5 [3.0-6.0] 5.0 [3.0-7.0]  
Cmax (ng/ml) 103.80 ± 25.99 91.13 ± 15.48 0.89 (0.81-0.97) 15.38 ± 3.74 10.43 ± 3.37 0.67 (0.59-0.75)
AUClast (ng∙h/ml) 1835.35 ± 442.93 2144.83 ± 626.33 1.16 (1.03-1.30) 185.96 ± 62.01 144.20 ± 61.90 0.76 (0.65-0.88)
AUCinf (ng∙h/ml) 2005.80 ± 589.04 2485.43 ± 930.43   193.54 ± 64.56 152.14 ± 64.12  
t1/2 (h) 18.82 ± 5.61 22.43 ± 7.08   11.55 ± 2.87 12.47 ± 3.18  
CL/F (L/h) 2.70 ± 0.79 2.28 ± 0.81   2.30 ± 0.77 3.03 ± 1.11  
Vd/F (L) 69.51 ± 14.69 67.33 ± 11.29   35.98 ± 7.92 52.40 ± 19.91  

Notes: Data are summarized as arithmetic mean ± standard deviation except for Tmax, for which median [min-max] is presented. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; Tmax, time to Cmax; Cmax, the maximum concentration of drug; AUClast, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration; AUCinf, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from dosing time extrapolated to infinity; t1/2, elimination half-life; CL/F, apparent clearance; Vd/F, apparent volume of distribution

Table 4.
The incidence of common adverse drug reactions
Adverse Drug Reaction Treatment Fasted Study Fed Study Total P-value#
Orthostatic hypotension FDC 8/30 (26.7%) 3/34 (8.8%) 11/64 (17.2%) 0.059
Reference 7/29 (24.1%) 4/34 (11.8%) 11/63 (17.5%)
Total 12/30 (40.0%) 6/35 (17.1%)    
Headache FDC 3/30 (10.0%) 2/34 (5.9%) 5/64 (7.8%) 0.659
Reference 2/29 (6.9%) 4/34 (11.8%) 6/63 (9.5%)
Total 4/30 (13.3%) 6/35 (17.1%)    
Dizziness FDC 0/30 1/34 (2.9%) 1/64 (1.6%) 0.999
Reference 0/29 1/34 (2.9%) 1/64 (1.6%)
Total 0/30 2/35(5.7%)    

Notes: the number of subjects with ADRs / total subjects (percentage). P-values were derived by chi-square test.

Subjects whose ADRs occurred in both treatment groups were counted once.

# Statistical difference in the incidence of ADRs between studies in fixed-dose combination group was estimated.

TOOLS
Similar articles