Journal List > J Periodontal Implant Sci > v.46(3) > 1082508

Jeong, Joo, Shin, Lim, and Park: Geographic information system analysis on the distribution of patients visiting the periodontology department at a dental college hospital

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to analyze and visualize the distribution of patients visiting the periodontology department at a dental college hospital, using a geographic information system (GIS) to utilize these data in patient care and treatment planning, which may help to assess the risk and prevent periodontal diseases.

Methods

Basic patient information data were obtained from Dankook University Dental Hospital, including the unit number, gender, date of birth, and address, down to the dong (neighborhood) administrative district unit, of 306,656 patients who visited the hospital between 2007 and 2014. The data of only 26,457 patients who visited the periodontology department were included in this analysis. The patient distribution was visualized using GIS. Statistical analyses including multiple regression, logistic regression, and geographically weighted regression were performed using SAS 9.3 and ArcGIS 10.1. Five factors, namely proximity, accessibility, age, gender, and socioeconomic status, were investigated as the explanatory variables of the patient distribution.

Results

The visualized patient data showed a nationwide scale of the patient distribution. The mean distance from each patient’s regional center to the hospital was 30.94±29.62 km and was inversely proportional to the number of patients from the respective regions. The distance from a regional center to the adjacent toll gate had various effects depending on the local distance from the hospital. The average age of the patients was 52.41±12.97 years. Further, a majority of regions showed a male dominance. Personal income had inconsistent results between analyses.

Conclusions

The distribution of patients is significantly affected by the proximity, accessibility, age, gender and socioeconomic status of patients, and the patients visiting the periodontology department travelled farther distances than those visiting the other departments. The underlying reason for this needs to be analyzed further.

Graphical Abstract

jpis-46-207-abf001

INTRODUCTION

Geographic information systems (GISs) are computer-based tools that facilitate the mapping and analysis of geographical data [1]. The recent development of GIS has enhanced accessibility to spatial data, and the development of spatial analysis has enabled the study of epidemiology in a spatiotemporal dimension of the environment, which was otherwise impossible [23]. In particular, GIS connects individuals with the environment and provides more insight for the understanding of the spatial distribution of patients affected by a certain disease [456].
Periodontitis primarily occurs as a result of inflammation caused by bacteria infiltration into the periodontium, but its pathogenesis is largely modulated by the systemic condition or environmental factors, such as smoking, nutrition, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, stress, and age [78]. Taking such risk factors into consideration is critical for a better prognosis following periodontal treatments. Conventional concepts of risk factors have been mainly focused on the systemic disease, medication, or other mechanical/chemical factors [9]. However, the current authors have postulated that a GIS analysis might unveil the geographic environment as a potential risk factor. Moreover, the study of disease clusters based on these data will specify the epidemiology of periodontal diseases, and this may contribute to a more effective treatment of periodontitis.
Recent studies in the field of dental science have attempted to utilize GIS in spatial statistics [5101112]. Further, GIS analysis has been applied to investigate the dentist-to-population ratio, regional incidence of oral cancer, and travel patterns in the case of a dental emergency, and has revealed numerous findings, which can be utilized in the daily clinic as well as academic activities [51314]. Unfortunately, these studies are mainly focused on the accessibility of patients or the incidence of dental diseases, but the risk factors from a geographical aspect have not yet been explored. In this paper, we present a hypothesis that the patients are differently located according to the proximity to the hospital, accessibility of road networks, age, gender, and socioeconomic status of the patients. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the patterns of the visualized distribution of patients, and assess the various risk factors, including the patients’ accessibility to the hospital and socioeconomic status. Furthermore, the visualized data will be useful in patient care and treatment planning, ultimately leading to high-quality dental care and preventing a high incidence of dental disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethical aspects

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Dankook University Dental Hospital (IRB no. H-1501/001/004), and the privacy of the patients was maintained during all analyses and procedures. The personal data obtained from the Dankook University Dental Hospital were used only for academic purposes.

Data collection

Basic patient information data were obtained from Dankook University Dental Hospital, in the form of an Excel file (Microsoft Excel 2013, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). The data included the unit number, gender, date of birth, and address, down to the dong (neighborhood) district unit, of 306,656 patients visiting the hospital between 2007 and 2014. The specific street address was not obtained because of privacy concerns. The data were grouped according to the departments in order to search for any correlation with the spatial distribution (data not shown and reported in another study [15]). This study analyzed the data of seven dental departments: Oral Medicine, Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Pediatric Dentistry, Orthodontics, Operative Dentistry, Prosthodontics, and Periodontology. The information of 26,457 patients who visited the Department of Periodontology was mainly examined in this study.

Software

The raw data received from the Dankook University Dental Hospital were treated with Microsoft Excel (Microsoft). SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA) was used for performing statistical analyses such as multiple regression and logistic regression. ArcGIS 10.1 (ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA) was used for the visualization of the patient distribution, mapping of coefficients, and geographically weighted regression.

Statistical analysis

In this study, we organized the data according to the characteristics of the patient visits. The dependent variable of the study model was the number of patients who visited each department of Dankook University Dental Hospital. The five explanatory variables were as follows: 1) distance to the hospital from the patient’s regional center, 2) distance to the toll gate, 3) male ratio based on the administrative region, 4) average age, and 5) annual personal income. A geographically weighted regression model was used for the statistical analysis of these variables.

Multiple and logistic regression analysis

In order to compare the characteristics of the patients visiting the periodontology department with those visiting the other departments, we use a multiple logistic regression model, which has more than one independent variable. The selection of the analysis method is based on a previous study [16].
(1)
Yi=αi+β1iD1i+β2iD2i+β3iAi+β4iSi+β5iIi+εijpis-46-207-e001
Yi: Number of patients visiting each department
D1i: Straight distance to the hospital from the patient’s regional center
D2i: Straight distance to the highway entrance from the patient’s regional center
Ai: Average patient age in a region for each department
Si: Average patient male ratio in a region for each department
Ii: Average income ratio of a region for each department
The value of the dependent variable in our study is “1” or “0,” depending on whether the patient visited the Department of Periodontology, Dankook University Dental Hospital (where “1” = patient visiting the department of periodontology).
(2)
InPα1-Pα=αi+β1iD1i+β2iD2i+β3iAi+β4iSi+β5iIi+εijpis-46-207-e002
Pa: Probability of visiting the Department of Periodontology
D1i: Straight distance to the hospital from the patient’s regional center
D2i: Straight distance from the adjacent toll gate to the patient’s regional center
Ai: Average patient age of a region
Si: Average patient male ratio of a region
Ii: Average annual personal income ratio of a region
If β has (+) then the probability of the patient visiting the periodontology department is increased by exp(β) times as compared to the other departments. For example, if β is 0.04110, then the value of exp(β) is 1.041956. This implies that the probability of a patient visiting the periodontology department is increased by 1.041956, whenever the independent variable is increased by 1 unit. A few of the variables were omitted in models 2, 3, and 4 of the multiple and logistic regressions in order to determine the most appropriate model.

Geographically weighted regression

Geographically weighted regression (GWR) is a spatial analysis technique that takes non-stationary variables into consideration (e.g., climate, demographic factors, and physical environment characteristics) and models the local relationships between these predictors and an outcome of interest. GWR is an outgrowth of the ordinary least squares regression (OLS) method; it adds a level of modeling sophistication by allowing the relationships between the independent and the dependent variables to vary by locality. The GWR model seeks to find the difference in an exceptional phenomenon premised upon the heterogeneity between areas [17].
The GWR models of this study are (3) and (4).
In model (3), we excluded the distance from the center of the region to the adjacent toll gate and the personal income because of mismatching administrative districts.
(3)
Yi=αi+β1iDi+β2iAi+β3iSi+εijpis-46-207-e003
(4)
Yi=1-pW1-1β1iDi+1-pW1-1β2iAi+1-pW1-1β3iSi+1-pW1-1β4iIi+1-pW1-1εjpis-46-207-e004
Yi: Number of patient of each department
Di: Straight distance to the hospital from the patient’s regional center
Ai: Average patient age in a region for each department
Si: Average patient male ratio in a region for each department

RESULTS

Initially, the spatial distribution of patients visiting the Department of Periodontology at Dankook University Dental Hospital was visualized on the map of the Republic of Korea. The distribution appeared nationwide, and a significant number of patients visited from outside the province of the hospital, even from across the country. In fact, the finding that patients travel over a long distance to undergo periodontal treatment instead of visiting local clinics is novel.
The demographic information of patients visiting the Department of Periodontology is shown in Table 1. The average distance from Dankook University Dental Hospital to the center of each region was 30.94±29.62 km. The average distance from the center of each region to the nearest toll gate was 8.22±7.11 km. The range of distribution of these two variables was wide, considering the large standard deviation. The average age of the patients was 52.41±12.97 years. This overall middle-aged distribution was expected as the incidence of periodontal diseases generally increases with an increase in age [818]. The male ratio of the Department of Periodontology was 0.57. The average annual personal income was 13,466.62 thousand Korean won.
Table 1

Demographic information of patients visiting the Department of Periodontology, Dankook University Dental Hospital (n=26,457)

jpis-46-207-i001
Label Average SD Minimum Maximum
Distance from the hospital to the center of the region (km) 30.94 29.62 0.92 402.21
Distance from the adjacent toll gate to the center of the region (km) 8.22 7.11 0.19 180.95
Age 52.41 12.97 6 84
Male ratio 0.57 0.49 0 1
Personal income (1,000 KRW) 13,466.62 517.32 12,431.00 17,407.00
KRW, Korean won.
The results of the multiple regression analysis with respect to the number of patients in relevance with the five variables, namely distance from the hospital, distance from the adjacent toll gate, gender, male ratio, and annual income, are shown in Table 2. A total of four regression models were analyzed in this process. The first model took all five variables into consideration, and revealed that the distance from the hospital, distance from the adjacent toll gate, and the level of personal income had significant relevance to the number of patients visiting the Department of Periodontology, Dankook University Dental Hospital, from the corresponding region. However, the distance from the toll gate had a positive relationship with the number of patients, which implied no special significance from the perspective of this study. Therefore, the distance from the toll gate was omitted in model 2. Model 2 showed that the distance from the hospital and the level of personal income had a significant effect on the number of patients. On average, the number of patients decreased by 0.25 for every kilometer increased. With respect to the personal income, the number of patients decreased with an increase in the level of income. In model 3, age was omitted; the model showed significance for the factors of the distance from the hospital and the level of personal income. In model 4, gender was omitted instead of age; this did not reveal results of any further significance.
Table 2

Regression analysis of the number of patients in the Department of Periodontology, Dankook University Dental Hospital

jpis-46-207-i002
Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Intercept 126.3308a) 127.92349a) 126.6016a) 126.12805a)
Distance from the center of the region to the hospital (km) Parameter estimate -0.32234a) -0.25205a) -0.28177a) -0.28313a)
Standardized estimate -0.29572 -0.25876 -0.2585 -0.25975
Distance from the adjacent toll gate to the center of the region (km) Parameter estimate 0.40358a)
Standardized estimate 0.08694
Age Parameter estimate -0.0337 -0.02639 -0.02087
Standardized estimate -0.00854 -0.00669 -0.00529
Male ratio Parameter estimate -4.60487 -5.09764 -5.03195
Standardized estimate -0.02443 -0.02704 -0.02669
Personal income (1,000 KRW) Parameter estimate -0.00563a) -0.00572a) -0.00571a) -0.00583a)
Standardized estimate -0.11618 -0.11786 -0.11783 -0.01219
R-square 0.0866 0.0804 0.0803 0.0797
Adjusted R-square 0.083 0.0775 0.0782 0.0775
Akaike information criterion 10,623.84 11,630.47 10,628.54 10,629.48
Level of significance: a) P<0.01.
The dependent variables of logistic regression, such as whether the patient was treated in the periodontology department or not, are binary in nature, as in this current analysis (Table 3). Positive values denote that the corresponding variable has a more positive effect on the periodontology department than on the other departments. Model 1 analyzed all five variables and showed the significance of all variables except personal income. Model 2 omitted personal income, as it was shown to be insignificant. The results of model 2 were similar to those of model 1, which implies that the number of patients visiting the periodontology department is not affected by personal income as compared to that of the other departments. Model 3 additionally omitted the distance from the adjacent toll gate. This model indicated the significance of the following factors: distance from the hospital, age, and gender. Therefore, it could be concluded that the periodontology department had more patients from farther distances than the other departments, and that the patients visiting the periodontology department were more likely to be older and male than those visiting the other departments. Table 4 shows the results of the GWR analysis. The local model performance can be evaluated using the local R2 value (Figure 1). It can be seen that the model performance is high in regions that are close to the hospital. This indicates that the variables are better explained in closer regions. The significance can be interpreted through the OLS regression values. The only significant variable is the gender ratio. It indicates a negative significance.
Table 3

Logistic regression analysis of all patients visiting the Department of Periodontology, Dankook University Dental Hospital

jpis-46-207-i003
Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Intercept -3.9798a) -3.8236a) -3.8478a)
Distance from the center of the region to the hospital (km) Parameter estimate 0.00076a) 0.00081a) 0.00043b)
Standardized estimate 0.01320 0.01420 0.00751
Distance from the adjacent toll gate to the center of the region (km) Parameter estimate -0.00520a) -0.00533a)
Standardized estimate -0.02030 -0.02080
Age Parameter estimate 0.04110a) 0.04110a) 0.04090a)
Standardized estimate 0.44150 0.44150 0.43980
Male ratio Parameter estimate 0.28300a) 0.28320a) 0.28300a)
Standardized estimate 0.07790 0.07800 0.07790
Personal income (1,000 KRW) Parameter estimate 0.00001
Standardized estimate 0.00328
R-square 0.0677 0.0677 0.0676
Akaike information criterion 140,241.07 140,239.78 140,264.48
-2LL 140,229.07 140,229.78 140,256.48
−2LL, −2log likelihood.
Level of significance: a) P<0.01; b) P<0.05.
Table 4

Results of geographically weighted regression (GWR) in comparison with the regression analysis

jpis-46-207-i004
Variables OLSa) GWRb) SDc)
Average Maximum Minimum
Intercept 24.39582d) 38.767152 490.525167 -15.003622 99.832297
Distance from the adjacent toll gate to the center of the region (km) -0.16063 -0.655039 3.65731 -16.526972 2.710764
Age 0.01422 -0.087778 0.734365 -2.612046 0.417013
Male ratio -8.74887e) -17.703666 36.41387 -350.202422 52.366773
Local R-square 0.033804 0.21233 0.000093 0.041135
R-square 0.0033 0.4464
Adjusted R-square 0.001 0.382
Akaike information criterion 10,731.47 13,824.42
a)Ordinary least squares; b)Geographically weighted regression; c)Standard deviation.
Level of significance: d) P<0.1; e) P<0.05.
Figure 1
Color-coded local R2 values for each district. The regression model performance of the geographically weighted regression analysis is high in regions that are close to the hospital (indicated with red dots). This implies that the variables are better explained in closer regions.
jpis-46-207-g001
Figure 2 shows the mapped local coefficient of the distance from the adjacent toll gate in GWR. In the vicinity of the hospital, the number of visiting patients decreased as the distance from the adjacent toll gate increased. However, after a certain distance, the number of patients increased as the distance from the adjacent toll gate increased. Figure 3 shows the local average age of patients visiting the Department of Periodontology. The average patient age range in regions close to the hospital was 50–69 years, and some farther regions had a higher average patient age. The local male ratio of patients visiting the Department of Periodontology is mapped in Figure 4. It can be seen that a majority of regions have a male dominance.
Figure 2
Color-coded local GWR coefficients for the distance from the center of the region to the adjacent toll gate. In regions that are far from the hospital (indicated with red dots), the number of patients increases with an increase in the distance from the adjacent toll gate.
jpis-46-207-g002
Figure 3
Local average age of patients visiting the Department of Periodontology, Dankook University Dental Hospital. A majority of the regions have a local average age of 50–69 years.
jpis-46-207-g003
Figure 4
Color-coded local male ratio of patients visiting the Department of Periodontology, Dankook University Dental Hospital. A male dominance can be observed for most of the regions.
jpis-46-207-g004

DISCUSSION

In this study, we investigated the relevance between the spatial distribution and five hypothesized factors of patients visiting the periodontology department at a university dental hospital. The patient data were analyzed with the GIS program and visualized, which revealed meaningful results. This study is original in that the main subject of the spatial analysis is the patient pool itself, which is a novel approach to utilizing GIS in the field of dental science. We have explored and analyzed the relationships between patient distribution and variables such as the proximity, road networks, age, gender, and social status.
Previous GIS-based health studies have focused on the spatial distribution of a specific disease or phenomenon, such as cancer or trauma emergencies [61920]. Tennant et al., having published a number of articles on the dental field associated with the GIS analysis, performing studies mostly on public and private practice locations and the spatial distribution of a disease [131421]. However, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first attempt at a geographic analysis of patients visiting a university hospital.
The results of this study revealed a clear picture of the distribution of the patients visiting the periodontology department at a university dental hospital. The nationwide distribution of the patients can be explained by a few factors. One is that some patients would visit a university hospital for a safer and higher-quality professional treatment, despite the longer travel distance. Another reason is that university dental hospitals offer treatment that cannot be performed elsewhere, because of a lack of equipment or specialists. The distribution of patients has been shown to be affected by several factors. The most evident factor was the distance from the region to the hospital, which was inversely proportional to the number of patients. Compared with the other departments, the Department of Periodontology drew more patients from farther regions. At this point, it is not clear as to why patients travel further to undergo periodontal treatments. We are currently working on a further prospective study to elucidate the underlying mechanism for this phenomenon. The patients were mostly middle aged, as expected. The male dominance in a majority of the regions can be explained by the high smoking rate of males in Korea. Cigarette smoking is known to increase the risk of periodontitis [222324], which may contribute to a relatively high male prevalence. Further research is warranted for the verification of this explanation. The distance from the adjacent toll gate represents the accessibility of road networks from each region. This factor had various effects depending on the region. In regions that were far from the hospital, the number of patients increased with an increase in the distance from the adjacent toll gate (Figure 2). This is likely because the patients would rather visit a closer dental hospital or clinic if the road accessibility is poor in addition to the far distance. Personal income had inconsistent results between analyses. On the basis of these results, the clinicians might consider the impact of the patient’s residence when planning the treatment modalities or deciding upon recall periods.
There are some limitations regarding the methods of this research. This study is retrospective in nature, so we were limited in terms of the data collection. The obtained addresses might not be the actual residential addresses of the patients. In future prospective studies, it will be easier to gather various types of information, such as the actual residential address in a standardized format. Moreover, the study was limited to a single department in a single dental hospital, so it is not clear if all other university dental hospitals match this distribution. Subsequent studies comparing the data of other dental hospitals are needed. Further, a patient’s personal annual income does not entirely represent one’s financial capability. For instance, patients may not necessarily work but still have a high economic status. An alternative means of measuring the patients’ economic status should be utilized in future research.
Moreover, the importance of personal information, associated with the misuse or leakage of personal information should be carefully dealt with. The data obtained for this study included addresses only to the town district (zip code) level since Dankook University Dental Hospital refused to provide further specific street addresses, even for academic use. The Personal Information Protection Law of Korea, the equivalent of the Privacy Act of the United States, states that an organization or institution in possession of personal information should not provide any of it to anyone, without the permission of the owner. However, it also states numerous exceptions, including in cases where the information provided is in a form that makes it impossible to recognize an individual, for statistical or academic purposes. We therefore expect an improvement in terms of the data collection for a better analysis by GIS.
In the present pilot study, the visualized patient data indicated a more extensive patient pool distribution of the Department of Periodontology than that of the other departments, and variable factors such as proximity, accessibility, age, gender, and socioeconomic status significantly affected the visit. We expect the findings of this study to be helpful in the diagnosis, treatment planning, and understanding of the etiology of periodontal diseases. This study demonstrated the potential of a GIS analysis to further investigate the etiological factors of periodontal diseases to be studied in the future. Further information should be acquired in a prospective controlled cohort study to fully evaluate the importance of geographical information in the understanding of the etiology of periodontal diseases.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2011-0010739).

Notes

Conflict of Interest No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Horner MW, Mascarenhas AK. Analyzing location-based accessibility to dental services: an Ohio case study. J Public Health Dent. 2007; 67:113–118.
crossref
2. Caprarelli G, Fletcher S. A brief review of spatial analysis concepts and tools used for mapping, containment and risk modelling of infectious diseases and other illnesses. Parasitology. 2014; 141:581–601.
crossref
3. Naves LA, Porto LB, Rosa JW, Casulari LA, Rosa JW. Geographical information system (GIS) as a new tool to evaluate epidemiology based on spatial analysis and clinical outcomes in acromegaly. Pituitary. 2015; 18:8–15.
crossref
4. Sun W, Gong J, Zhou J, Zhao Y, Tan J, Ibrahim AN, et al. A spatial, social and environmental study of tuberculosis in China using statistical and GIS technology. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015; 12:1425–1448.
crossref
5. McGuire S, Kruger E, Tennant M. Travel patterns for government emergency dental care in Australia: a new approach using GIS tools. Aust Dent J. 2011; 56:389–393.
crossref
6. Goli A, Oroei M, Jalalpour M, Faramarzi H, Askarian M. The spatial distribution of cancer incidence in fars province: a GIS-based analysis of cancer registry data. Int J Prev Med. 2013; 4:1122–1130.
7. Genco RJ, Borgnakke WS. Risk factors for periodontal disease. Periodontol 2000. 2013; 62:59–94.
crossref
8. Kim DW, Park JC, Rim TT, Jung UW, Kim CS, Donos N, et al. Socioeconomic disparities of periodontitis in Koreans based on the KNHANES IV. Oral Dis. 2014; 20:551–559.
crossref
9. Genco RJ. Current view of risk factors for periodontal diseases. J Periodontol. 1996; 67:Suppl. 1041–1049.
crossref
10. Pereira SM, Ambrosano GM, Cortellazzi KL, Tagliaferro EP, Vettorazzi CA, Ferraz SF, et al. Geographic information systems (GIS) in assessing dental health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010; 7:2423–2436.
crossref
11. Kruger E, Whyman R, Tennant M. High-acuity GIS mapping of private practice dental services in New Zealand: does service match need? Int Dent J. 2012; 62:95–99.
crossref
12. Kurcz R, Kruger E, Tennant M. Using GIS to analyse dental practice distribution in Indiana, USA. Community Dent Health. 2013; 30:155–160.
13. Tennant M, Kruger E, Shiyha J. Dentist-to-population and practice-to-population ratios: in a shortage environment with gross mal-distribution what should rural and remote communities focus their attention on? Rural Remote Health. 2013; 13:2518.
crossref
14. Derbi HA, Kruger E, Tennant M. Incidence of oral cancer in Western Australia (1982-2009): Trends and regional variations. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2016; 12:e305–10.
crossref
15. Joo HT, Jeong BJ, Cho IW, Shin HS, Lim MH, Park JC. Geographic information system (GIS) analysis on the distribution of patients visiting at a dental college hospital: a pilot study. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci. 2015; 31:283–293.
crossref
16. Park IS. An analysis on metropolitan concentration factors of health care utilization in local cancer patients using GWR. J Community Welf. 2016; 56:29–56.
crossref
17. Jo DG. GIS and geographically weighted regression in the survey research of small areas. Surv Res. 2009; 10:1–19.
18. Eke PI, Dye BA, Wei L, Slade GD, Thornton-Evans GO, Borgnakke WS, et al. Update on prevalence of periodontitis in adults in the United States: NHANES 2009 to 2012. J Periodontol. 2015; 86:611–622.
crossref
19. Krishnatreya M, Saikia A, Kataki A, Sharma J, Baruah M. Variations in the spatial distribution of gall bladder cancer: a call for collaborative action. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014; 4:Suppl 3. S329–31.
crossref
20. Walker BB, Schuurman N, Hameed SM. A GIS-based spatiotemporal analysis of violent trauma hotspots in Vancouver, Canada: identification, contextualisation and intervention. BMJ Open. 2014; 4:e003642.
crossref
21. Tennant M, Kruger E. Turning Australia into a ‘flat-land’: what are the implications for workforce supply of addressing the disparity in rural-city dentist distribution? Int Dent J. 2014; 64:29–33.
crossref
22. Han DH, Lee HJ, Lim S. Smoking induced heavy metals and periodontitis: findings from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2008-2010. J Clin Periodontol. 2013; 40:850–858.
crossref
23. Labriola A, Needleman I, Moles DR. Systematic review of the effect of smoking on nonsurgical periodontal therapy. Periodontol 2000. 2005; 37:124–137.
crossref
24. Wan CP, Leung WK, Wong MC, Wong RM, Wan P, Lo EC, et al. Effects of smoking on healing response to non-surgical periodontal therapy: a multilevel modelling analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2009; 36:229–239.
crossref
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

Byungjoon Jeong
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1403-0131

Hyun-Tae Joo
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8575-2196

Hyun-Seung Shin
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1410-9731

Mi-Hwa Lim
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3962-1918

Jung-Chul Park
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2041-8047

Similar articles