Journal List > J Periodontal Implant Sci > v.45(4) > 1082460

Jung, Lim, Lee, Lee, Jung, and Choi: Comparative analysis of carrier systems for delivering bone morphogenetic proteins

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to comparatively assess the bone regenerative capacity of absorbable collagen sponge (ACS), biphasic calcium phosphate block (BCP) and collagenated biphasic calcium phosphate (CBCP) loaded with a low dose of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2).

Methods

The CBCP was characterized by X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. In rabbit calvaria, four circular 8-mm-diameter defects were created and assigned to one of four groups: (1) blood-filled group (control), (2) rhBMP-2-soaked absorbable collagen sponge (0.05 mg/mL, 0.1 mL; CS group), (3) rhBMP-2-loaded BCP (BCP group), or (4) rhBMP-2-loaded CBCP (CBCP group). The animals were sacrificed either 2 weeks or 8 weeks postoperatively. Histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed.

Results

The CBCP showed web-like collagen fibrils on and between particles. Greater dimensional stability was observed in the BCP and CBCP groups than in the control and the CS groups at 2 and 8 weeks. The new bone formation was significantly greater in the BCP and CBCP groups than in the control and CS groups at 2 weeks, but did not significantly differ among the four groups at 8 week. The CBCP group exhibited more new bone formation in the intergranular space and in the center of the defect compared to the BCP group at 2 weeks, but a similar histologic appearance was observed in both groups at 8 weeks.

Conclusions

The dose of rhBMP-2 in the present study enhanced bone regeneration in the early healing period when loaded on BCP and CBCP in rabbit calvarial defects.

Graphical Abstract

jpis-45-136-ab001

INTRODUCTION

Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) is a highly effective tool in bone engineering in the field of dentistry [1234567]. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the use of rhBMP-2 for dental use in extraction sockets and the maxillary sinus. Clinical trials for those indications have demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of rhBMP-2 in these applications [89]. In addition, the off-label use of rhBMP-2 was reportedly effective for overcoming severely defective situations [67].
There have been false and exaggerated reports regarding the safety of rhBMP-2 in spinal fusion surgery [10]. Compared to industry-sponsored publications, much higher complications were found for the same study population in FDA documents. Although clinical studies from the dental field have found no noteworthy complications [811], adverse effects associated with high doses of rhBMP-2, such as ineffective new bone formation, implant dislocation, and void formation, have been found in preclinical studies [1213]. Thus, the minimal dosages of rhBMP-2 needed for bone regeneration has been investigated [1414151617].
The optimal delivery of rhBMP-2 requires the selection of an appropriate carrier. The absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) was the first approved carrier, and its clinical efficacy has been demonstrated in human trials [9]. However, its structural durability was questioned in some situations [1819]. Moreover, it was shown that the initial burst-release pattern obtained with ACS may lead to potential adverse effects [20] and may not be beneficial in sustaining bone-inducing activity [4].
Collagenated biphasic calcium phosphate (CBCP) has recently received attention in the dental field [421]. As a bone substitute, CBCP shares the same basic characteristics of biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP), and exhibits comparable bone-regenerative potential [2223]. As a carrier for rhBMP-2, the effectiveness of both BCP and CBCP has been demonstrated independently in several animal studies [342124]. Both carriers were found to enhance new bone formation without hampering volume stability.
The addition of collagen to BCP may confer added benefits in bone regeneration. Collagen absorbs blood easily, and may create a favorable matrix for bone formation together with the network of BCP particles [25]. Previous studies have demonstrated that adding a collagen coating to a ceramic material enhances the proliferation rate, survival, and infiltration of osteoblasts [2627]. In addition, ACS and BCP have different patterns of rhBMP-2 release, with BCP known to retain rhBMP-2 longer than ACS [2829]; thus, the combination of both materials may result in the sustained release of rhBMP-2 [4].
The proportions of slowly resorbing hydroxyapatite (HA) and rapidly resorbing beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) in BCP are known to affect regenerative outcomes, such as new bone formation, space maintenance, and material resorption [30]. The higher proportion of β-TCP in BCP is known to result in a greater amount of new bone formation, but it may impede volume stability due to the highly resorptive characteristics of β-TCP [31]. The dependency of those behaviors on the HA:β-TCP ratio has also been simulated in CBCP [32]. It has been demonstrated that BCP with a higher ratio of β-TCP was more effective compared with a lower ratio of β-TCP when it was loaded with rhBMP-2 [1]. It is thus suspected that the strategy of loading rhBMP-2 onto CBCP containing a high ratio of β-TCP could be a way of enhancing the activity of rhBMP-2.
The objective of this study was to comparatively assess the bone regenerative capacity of three carriers loaded with a low dose of rhBMP-2: ACS, BCP and CBCP, each containing a high ratio of β-TCP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Characterization of CBCP

The CBCP used in this study (Osteon II collagen, Genoss, Suwon, Korea) was composed of 94-96% BCP and 4-6% collagen (by volume). The BCP in the CBCP comprised 30% HA and 70% β-TCP, and the collagen was incorporated with BCP via a coating method. The CBCP was provided in cylindrical form, with dimensions of 8 mm × 2 mm (diameter × height).
For phase analysis of the CBCP, X-ray diffraction (XRD; RigakuUitima III, Tokyo, Japan) with monochromatic Cu-Kα radiation at 40 kV and 200 mA was used; the XRD spectra were scanned at 2θ values in the range of 20°-60°. The microstructures of CBCP and BCP were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Tescan Vega II LSH, Warrendale, PA, USA).

Experimental animals

Ten male New Zealand white rabbits (14-16 weeks old, mean body weight 3.0-3.5 kg) were used for this study. The determination of the number of experimental animal followed our previous studies for evaluating bone regeneration in rabbit calvarial defects [3133]. All procedures for animal selection, management, preparation, study design, surgical protocol, and postoperative care were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Yonsei Medical Center (approval no. 2011-0031).

Study design

Four circular 8-mm-diameter defects were made in the calvarium of each rabbit and each of the four defects in each animal was assigned to one of the following four groups: (1) the defect was filled with blood coagulum (control), (2) the defect was filled with ACS soaked with rhBMP-2 (CS group), (3) the defect was filled with rhBMP-2-loaded BCP (BCP group), (4) the defect was filled with rhBMP-2-loaded CBCP (CBCP group). The ACS was manufactured in an 8 mm × 2 mm (diameter × height) cylindrical shape (type I bovine collagen, Genoss, Suwon, Korea).
The rhBMP-2 (Genoss, Suwon, Korea) was loaded onto each material (i.e., ACS, BCP, and CBCP) at a concentration of 0.05 mg/mL in a volume of 0.1 mL (0.005 mg per defect), and with a binding time of 10 minutes. An independent person performed the random assignment of the defects to the experimental groups in the first experimental animal; in each subsequent animal the experimental grouping was assigned by rotating them in a clockwise manner.

Surgical procedures

The rabbits received an intramuscular injection of a mixture of ketamine hydrochloride (Ketalar, Yuhan, Seoul, Korea) and xylazine (Rompun, Bayer Korea, Seoul, Korea). The surgical site was shaved and disinfected using povidone iodine, and after local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine HCl (Huons, Seoul, Korea), an incision was made along the midsagittal line from the frontal area to the occipital area. A full-thickness flap was elevated using a periosteal elevator, and four circular defects with a diameter of 8 mm were created on the calvarium using a trephine bur under copious saline irrigation (Dentium, Seoul, Korea). Each defect was grafted with the assigned experimental material (Fig. 1). The flaps were then repositioned and sutured using synthetic monofilament suture material (4-0 Monosyn, B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany). The animals were sacrificed either 2 weeks (n = 5) or 8 weeks (n = 5) postoperatively.

Specimen preparation

En-bloc sections including the defects and surrounding tissues were harvested, rinsed with sterilized saline, and fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 7 days. They were then decalcified in 5% formic acid for 14 days, gradually dehydrated in a series of ethanol solutions, and then embedded in paraffin. Serial sectioning was performed at a thickness of 5 µm, and the central-most section was selected, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and analyzed.

Histomorphometric analysis

The specimens were examined using a light microscope (Leica DM LB, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), and histologic images were captured (CellSens Standard 1.11, Olympus, Center Valley, PA, USA) and saved. Histomorphometric analysis was performed with an image-processing system (Photoshop CS5, Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) by a single examiner (I.H.J.). The area of total augmentation (TA; mm2), the defect closure rate (DC; %), the area of new bone (NB; mm2), and the area of residual material (RM; mm2) were measured.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (Version 20.0, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The histomorphometric records of each group are presented as mean±standard deviation (SD) values. The small number of experimental animals required the use of nonparametric statistical analyses. To test the significance of differences among groups for TA, DC, and NB at 2 and 8 weeks, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used at a significance level of 0.05 and then, the Wilcoxon rank sum tests with Bonferroni correction were used for post hoc pairwise comparisons at an adjusted significance level of 0.00833 (0.05/6). The Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for the comparison of RM between the BCP and CBCP groups at 2 and 8 weeks, and for the comparison of all parameters between the 2 and 8 weeks with a level of 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The phase analysis of the CBCP block is shown in Fig. 2; the 2θ values of the highest two intensity peaks were 31.8° and 31.0°. When they were compared with Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards card Nos. 09-0432 (HA) and 9-0169 (β-TCP), the XRD spectrum of the collagenated BCP corresponded with the composite phases of HA and β-TCP. As shown in gross view and microscopy, CBCP was able to hold easily in both dry and wet conditions and revealed a web-like structure of collagen fibrils on the BCP particles (Fig. 3).
All of the experimental animals exhibited uneventful healing, and no inflammatory changes or allergic reactions were observed. However, the specimens from one animal assigned to the group that had 8 weeks of healing were not included in the microscopic analysis due to a technical error in the histologic processing. Thus, five and four samples were analyzed for the 2 and 8 weeks groups, respectively.
At 2 weeks, the defects in the control group were almost completely filled with soft tissues, and were depressed and flattened in shape. Minimal bone ingrowth was observed and only at the defect margins. The gross morphology of the CS group was similar to that of the control group. Bone formation started mainly at the periphery of the defects, and residual collagen was observed within them. A larger number of blood vessels was observed in the CS group than in the control group. In the BCP and CBCP groups the thickness of the original calvarial bone was mostly maintained with new bone, residual particles, and fibrovascular tissues. Bone formation was more prominent in the BCP and CBCP groups than in the CS and control groups. Generally, bone formation was more prominent in the intergranular space in the CBCP group compared to the BCP group. The CBCP group exhibited more active bone formation above the dura mater than the BCP group, and this pattern was particularly distinct in the center of the defects. The number and size of blood vessels appeared to be greater in the CBCP group than in the BCP group (Fig. 4).
At 8 weeks, the control group and CS group still exhibited a depressed morphology. Bone ingrowth from the periphery of the defects had increased, and several bony islands could be observed. There was a larger number of bony islands in the CS group than in the control group. No remnants of collagen could be seen in the CS group. In the BCP and CBCP groups, the augmented space was well-maintained, and much of the space formerly filled with residual material and fibrovascular tissues at 2 weeks was replaced by new bone at 8 weeks. New bone formation was observed around the remnant material under the skin flaps in the BCP and CBCP groups. Most of the surface of residual particles was in contact with new bone. Several osteoblasts were observed near the remnant material and the front of new bone. Many osteocytes and reversal lines were observed, along with some empty lacunae (Fig. 5).
The histomorphometric results are given in Table 1 and Fig. 6. TA and NB were significantly greater in the BCP and CBCP groups compared to the control and CS groups at 2 weeks (P = 0.008 for all), but did not significantly differ among the four groups at 8 weeks. DC was significantly greater in the BCP and CBCP group compared to the control group, and was not statistically significant among the CS, the BCP, or the CBCP group at 2 weeks. At 8 weeks, a statistically significant difference in DC was not noted among the four groups. NB and DC increased significantly between 2 and 8 weeks in the control group (P = 0.014 for both) but not in the CS, BCP, or CBCP group. RM did not differ significantly between the BCP and CBCP groups at either healing time point, and decreased significantly between 2 and 8 weeks (P = 0.014 for both).

DISCUSSION

Despite a great deal of research effort, the ideal treatment modality using rhBMP-2 for bony defects has yet to be established. When using a particular dose of rhBMP-2 the various carrier systems can be similarly effective, but the efficacy may vary widely when a lower dose of rhBMP-2 is used. Thus, determination of the optimal combination of carrier and rhBMP-2 is essential. In the present study it was found that BCP and CBCP loaded with a low dose of rhBMP-2 had greater bone-forming capacity than ACS in rabbit calvarial defects, and particularly at 2 weeks post-procedure.
Our previous studies on the optimal dose of rhBMP-2 involved the testing of several doses (ranging from 0.015 mg to 0.15 mg) in rabbit models [412161718]. In the rabbit sinus, a dose of 0.15 mg loaded on BCP led to inhomogeneous bone formation (confined to the area adjoining the sinus membrane) [12], and a dose of 0.015 mg resulted in only an insignificant increase in new bone [17]. In the rabbit calvaria, the lower dose of 0.01 mg loaded on BCP significantly enhanced bone formation [16]. In the present study, the dose of 0.005 mg (the lowest dose in the studies by our group) was loaded on ACS, BCP and CBCP. New bone was significantly greater in the BCP and CBCP groups than in the control and ACS groups at 2 week, but insignificantly greater at 8 weeks. This indicates that the optimal dose of rhBMP-2 may vary depending on anatomical sites and carrier materials.
Regeneration with a high purity of target tissue requires a completely resorbing scaffold, such as ACS, but tension or pressure at the recipient site may predetermine the limit or jeopardize the immature regenerated tissue in specific situations [34]. Thus, the mechanical stability of the scaffold may also be a prerequisite, depending on the characteristics of the recipient site. The BCP and the CBCP groups in the present study exhibited enhanced space-maintaining stability compared to the CS group, which might be one of the contributing factors for greater bone regeneration. Consistent with the present study, Lu et al. demonstrated that the combination of collagen, β-TCP, and HA loaded with rhBMP-2 resulted in significantly increased new bone in the supra-alveolar peri-implant defect model compared to the ACS carrier [19].
Compared to conventional BCP, CBCP may provide a more favorable environment for bone induction. Although new bone formation in the CBCP group was not significantly enhanced at 8 weeks in the present study, an altered bone-induction pattern could be detected in the histologic sections, especially at 2 weeks. Newly formed bone in the CBCP group was found more frequently in the intergranular spaces and in the center of the defect than it was in the BCP group, which indicates that the web-like collagen network in CBCP may have enhanced the proliferation and infiltration of osteoblasts [2627] and vascular endothelial cells around [3536] and lastly strengthened the effect of rhBMP-2. This finding was also demonstrated in the canine mandibular defect model [21], whereby CBCPs with different ratios of HA and β-TCP loaded with rhBMP-2 resulted in enhanced bone formation compared to noncollagenated BCPs loaded with rhBMP-2.
The content of collagen in the CBCP in the present study was 4-7% (by volume). Given that the addition of this small amount of collagen increased the mean area of new bone and favorably affected the bone healing pattern, using a larger volume of collagen in CBCP may alter the effect of rhBMP-2. In a pilot study, Yun et al. [21] recently compared the CBCPs containing 4-7% and 47% collagen (by volume). In that study, the CBCP with the lower collagen content resulted in more new bone formation than that with the higher collagen content; the volume stability of the latter may have been impaired due to collagen comprising almost half of its volume. From a clinical viewpoint, an increased collagen content may enhance the clinical manageability of the carrier due to the concomitant increase in tensile and shear strengths. Thus, determining the optimal balance between the regenerative capacity and clinical manageability of carriers, in terms of the ratio of collagen content, requires further study.
Collagenated bone substitutes including CBCP in the present study have received attention for several indications, such as ridge preservation, lateral onlay grafting, periodontal regeneration, and sinus augmentation. They offer improved clinical manageability in unfavorable types of defect, preventing scattering of graft particles and providing moldability to fit the specific defect morphology. Bovine HA incorporated with collagen matrix was found to be easily fixed to the lateral surface of the canine maxilla [2], and CBCP was shown to be useful for the vertical augmentation of rabbit calvaria [16]. When loaded with rhBMP-2, the three-dimensionally prefabricated porous structure of these carriers provides a favorable environment for new bone formation and angiogenesis [24].
The term “optimal” can be defined as “providing efficacy with a small dose” in regard to rhBMP-2 application. However, clinical situations and carrier materials should be taken into consideration for this optimization. Within the limitations of the present study, 0.005 mg of rhBMP-2 could improve bone regeneration at an early healing period when loaded on BCP and CBCP in the rabbit calvarium. Different healing patterns of CBCP, such as more new bone formation along the intergranular space at an early healing period may give additional benefits together with easy clinical manageability. Future studies should be performed to confirm those findings in a larger number of animals and in different models.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Clinical photograph of the surgical procedure. The 8-mm-diameter defects were filled with blood coagulum (control), recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2)-loaded absorbable collagen sponge (CS), rhBMP-2-loaded biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP), or rhBMP-2-loaded collagenated BCP (CBCP).

jpis-45-136-g001
Figure 2

X-ray diffraction patterns of collagenated biphasic calcium phosphate (CBCP). The X-ray diffraction spectrum of the CBCP corresponded with the composite phases of hydroxyapatite and β-tricalcium phosphate.

jpis-45-136-g002
Figure 3

Gross view and microstructure of biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) and collagenated BCP (CBCP). (A) Clinical photographs in wet or dry conditions of BCP and CBCP. (B) Scanning electron microscopy views of BCP and CBCP.

jpis-45-136-g003
Figure 4

Histologic observations at 2 weeks postsurgery. (A, B) the control group, (C, D) the collagen sponge (CS) group, (E, F) the biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) group, (G, H) the collagenated BCP (CBCP) group. (B, D, G, F) Higher magnification views of the boxed area in A, C, E, and G, respectively. The black arrows indicate the margins of the defect. The black and yellow arrowheads indicate osteoblasts and osteoclasts, respectively. Hematoxylin-eosin stain; scale bar (A, C, E, G)= 1 mm, (B, D, G, F)= 200 µm. NB, newly formed bone; RM, residual material.

jpis-45-136-g004
Figure 5

Histologic observations at 8 weeks postsurgery. (A, B) the control group, (C, D) the collagen sponge (CS) group, (E, F) the biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) group, (G, H) the collagenated BCP (CBCP) group. (B, D, G, F) Higher magnification views of the boxed area in A, C, E, and G, respectively. The black arrows indicate the margins of the defect. The black and yellow arrowheads indicate osteoblasts and osteoclasts, respectively. Hematoxylin-eosin stain; scale bar (A, C, E, G)= 1 mm, (B, D, G, F)= 200 µm. NB, newly formed bone; RM, residual material.

jpis-45-136-g005
Figure 6

Histomorphometric graphs of the measured parameters. The total length of each bar indicates the total augmented area of each group at each healing period. NB, the area of new bone; FA, the area of fibrovascular tissue; RM, the area of residual material.

jpis-45-136-g006
Table 1

Histomorphometric results of total augmentation (TA), the defect closure rate (DC), the area of new bone (NB) and the area of residual material (RM)

jpis-45-136-i001
TA (mm2) DC (%) NB (mm2) RM (mm2)
2 weeks (n = 5)
 Control 2.97 ± 0.57 15.81 ± 6.00 0.30 ± 0.07 -
 CS 3.33 ± 0.69 30.22 ± 14.08 0.46 ± 0.18 -
 BCP 15.08 ± 1.33a,b) 65.59 ± 24.56a) 1.72 ± 0.41a,b) 5.21 ± 1.02
 CBCP 15.59 ± 1.79a,b) 66.81 ± 29.48a) 2.46 ± 1.25a,b) 5.23 ± 1.22
8 weeks (n = 4)
 Control 4.40 ± 0.89 42.73 ± 5.51c) 1.32 ± 0.40c) -
 CS 6.77 ± 4.03 66.76 ± 28.80 2.23 ± 1.23 -
 BCP 10.94 ± 3.56 74.78 ± 24.81 3.46 ± 2.43 3.00 ± 1.02c)
 CBCP 12.55 ± 3.88 85.76 ± 16.85 4.82 ± 2.17 2.95 ± 0.85c)
Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.
CS, the group received rhBMP-2-soaked absorbable collagen sponge; BCP, the group received rhBMP-2-loaded biphasic calcium phosphate; CBCP, the group received rhBMP-2-loaded collagenated biphasic calcium phosphate.
a)Significantly different compared to the control group (P < 0.083, an adjusted significance level using Bonferroni correction).
b)Significantly different compared to the CS group (P < 0.083, an adjusted significance level using Bonferroni correction).
c) Significantly different compared to the corresponding parameter at 2 weeks (P < 0.05).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by 2014 faculty research grant of Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Alam I, Asahina I, Ohmamiuda K, Enomoto S. Comparative study of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics impregnated with rhBMP-2 as bone substitutes. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001; 54:129–138.
crossref
2. Chang YY, Lee JS, Kim MS, Choi SH, Chai JK, Jung UW. Comparison of collagen membrane and bone substitute as a carrier for rhBMP-2 in lateral onlay graft. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26:e13–e19.
crossref
3. Jung RE, Weber FE, Thoma DS, Ehrbar M, Cochran DL, Hämmerle CH. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 enhances bone formation when delivered by a synthetic matrix containing hydroxyapatite/tricalciumphosphate. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19:188–195.
crossref
4. Kim JS, Cha JK, Cho AR, Kim MS, Lee JS, Hong JY, et al. Acceleration of Bone Regeneration by BMP-2-Loaded Collagenated Biphasic Calcium Phosphate in Rabbit Sinus. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014; Forthcoming.
crossref
5. Kim JW, Choi KH, Yun JH, Jung UW, Kim CS, Choi SH, et al. Bone formation of block and particulated biphasic calcium phosphate lyophilized with Escherichia coli-derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 in rat calvarial defects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 112:298–306.
crossref
6. Lopes NM, Vajgel A, de Oliveira DM, de Santana Santos T, Wassall T. Use of rhBMP-2 to reconstruct a severely atrophic mandible: a modified approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 41:1566–1570.
crossref
7. Mehanna R, Koo S, Kim DM. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 in lateral ridge augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33:97–102.
crossref
8. Kim YJ, Lee JY, Kim JE, Park JC, Shin SW, Cho KS. Ridge preservation using demineralized bone matrix gel with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 72:1281–1290.
crossref
9. Triplett RG, Nevins M, Marx RE, Spagnoli DB, Oates TW, Moy PK, et al. Pivotal, randomized, parallel evaluation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2/absorbable collagen sponge and autogenous bone graft for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67:1947–1960.
crossref
10. Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Weiner BK. A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. Spine J. 2011; 11:471–491.
crossref
11. Kim MS, Lee JS, Shin HK, Kim JS, Yun JH, Cho KS. Prospective randomized, controlled trial of sinus grafting using Escherichia-coli-produced rhBMP-2 with a biphasic calcium phosphate carrier compared to deproteinized bovine bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; Forthcoming.
crossref
12. Choi Y, Lee JS, Kim YJ, Kim MS, Choi SH, Cho KS, et al. Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 stimulates the osteogenic potential of the Schneiderian membrane: a histometric analysis in rabbits. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013; 19:1994–2004.
crossref
13. Leknes KN, Yang J, Qahash M, Polimeni G, Susin C, Wikesjö UM. Alveolar ridge augmentation using implants coated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: radiographic observations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19:1027–1033.
crossref
14. Boerckel JD, Kolambkar YM, Dupont KM, Uhrig BA, Phelps EA, Stevens HY, et al. Effects of protein dose and delivery system on BMP-mediated bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2011; 32:5241–5251.
crossref
15. Choi H, Park NJ, Jamiyandorj O, Hong MH, Oh S, Park YB, et al. Improvement of osteogenic potential of biphasic calcium phosphate bone substitute coated with synthetic cell binding peptide sequences. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2012; 42:166–172.
crossref
16. Kim JW, Jung IH, Lee KI, Jung UW, Kim CS, Choi SH, et al. Volumetric bone regenerative efficacy of biphasic calcium phosphate-collagen composite block loaded with rhBMP-2 in vertical bone augmentation model of a rabbit calvarium. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012; 100:3304–3313.
crossref
17. Kim MS, Kwon JY, Lee JS, Song JS, Choi SH, Jung UW. Low-dose recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 to enhance the osteogenic potential of the Schneiderian membrane in the early healing phase: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 72:1480–1494.
crossref
18. Choi Y, Yun JH, Kim CS, Choi SH, Chai JK, Jung UW. Sinus augmentation using absorbable collagen sponge loaded with Escherichia coli-expressed recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 in a standardized rabbit sinus model: a radiographic and histologic analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23:682–689.
crossref
19. Lu SX, Fiorini T, Lee J, Prasad HS, Buxton AN, Bisch FC, et al. Evaluation of a compression resistant matrix for recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. J Clin Periodontol. 2013; 40:688–697.
crossref
20. McClellan JW, Mulconrey DS, Forbes RJ, Fullmer N. Vertebral bone resorption after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2). J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006; 19:483–486.
crossref
21. Yun PY, Kim YK, Jeong KI, Park JC, Choi YJ. Influence of bone morphogenetic protein and proportion of hydroxyapatite on new bone formation in biphasic calcium phosphate graft: two pilot studies in animal bony defect model. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014; 42:1909–1917.
crossref
22. Kim DM, Nevins ML, Lin Z, Fateh A, Kim SW, Schupbach P, et al. The clinical and histologic outcome of dental implant in large ridge defect regenerated with alloplast: a randomized controlled preclinical trial. J Oral Implantol. 2013; 39:148–153.
crossref
23. Nevins M, Nevins ML, Schupbach P, Kim SW, Lin Z, Kim DM. A prospective, randomized controlled preclinical trial to evaluate different formulations of biphasic calcium phosphate in combination with a hydroxyapatite collagen membrane to reconstruct deficient alveolar ridges. J Oral Implantol. 2013; 39:133–139.
crossref
24. Jang JW, Yun JH, Lee KI, Jang JW, Jung UW, Kim CS, et al. Osteoinductive activity of biphasic calcium phosphate with different rhBMP-2 doses in rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012; 113:480–487.
crossref
25. Yang CR, Wang YJ, Chen XF, Zhao NR. Biomimetic fabrication of BCP/COL/HCA scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Lett. 2005; 59:3635–3640.
crossref
26. Brodie JC, Goldie E, Connel G, Merry J, Grant MH. Osteoblast interactions with calcium phosphate ceramics modified by coating with type I collagen. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005; 73:409–421.
crossref
27. Brodie JC, Merry J, Grant MH. The mechanical properties of calcium phospate ceramics modified by collagen coating and populated by osteoblasts. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006; 17:43–48.
crossref
28. Hsu EL, Ghodasra JH, Ashtekar A, Nickoli MS, Lee SS, Stupp SI, et al. A comparative evaluation of factors influencing osteoinductivity among scaffolds designed for bone regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013; 19:1764–1772.
crossref
29. Seeherman H, Wozney J, Li R. Bone morphogenetic protein delivery systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27:S16–S23.
crossref
30. LeGeros RZ, Lin S, Rohanizadeh R, Mijares D, LeGeros JP. Biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics: preparation, properties and applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003; 14:201–209.
31. Yang C, Unursaikhan O, Lee JS, Jung UW, Kim CS, Choi SH. Osteoconductivity and biodegradation of synthetic bone substitutes with different tricalcium phosphate contents in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014; 102:80–88.
crossref
32. Maté-Sánchez de Val JE, Mazón P, Guirado JL, Ruiz RA, Ramírez Fernández MP, Negri B, et al. Comparison of three hydroxyapatite/beta-tricalcium phosphate/collagen ceramic scaffolds: an in vivo study. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014; 102:1037–1046.
crossref
33. Hwang JW, Park JS, Lee JS, Jung UW, Kim CS, Cho KS, et al. Comparative evaluation of three calcium phosphate synthetic block bone graft materials for bone regeneration in rabbit calvaria. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012; 100:2044–2052.
crossref
34. Wikesjö UM, Huang YH, Polimeni G, Qahash M. Bone morphogenetic proteins: a realistic alternative to bone grafting for alveolar reconstruction. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007; 19:535–551. vi–vii.
crossref
35. Montesano R, Orci L, Vassalli P. In vitro rapid organization of endothelial cells into capillary-like networks is promoted by collagen matrices. J Cell Biol. 1983; 97:1648–1652.
crossref
36. Raines EW. The extracellular matrix can regulate vascular cell migration, proliferation, and survival: relationships to vascular disease. Int J Exp Pathol. 2000; 81:173–182.
crossref
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

Im-Hee Jung
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8645-1587

Hyun-Chang Lim
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7695-1708

Eun-Ung Lee
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1900-870X

Jung-Seok Lee
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1276-5978

Ui-Won Jung
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-4172

Seong-Ho Choi
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6704-6124

Similar articles