Journal List > J Periodontal Implant Sci > v.45(3) > 1082456

Yu, Lee, Jung, Park, Kim, and Choi: Effect of fibroblast growth factor on injured periodontal ligament and cementum after tooth replantation in dogs

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this animal study was to perform a histological and histomorphometric analysis in order to elucidate the effect of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) on injured periodontal ligament (PDL) and cementum after tooth replantation in dogs.

Methods

The roots of 36 mandibular premolars from six mongrel dogs were used in this study. The roots were randomly divided into three groups: (1) a positive control group (n=12), in which the PDL was retained; (2) a negative control group (n=12), in which the PDL and the cementum between the notches were removed; and (3) an experimental group (n=12), in which the PDL and the cementum between the notches were removed and the roots were soaked in an FGF-2 solution (30 µg/0.1 mL). After treating the root surfaces, the extracted roots were replanted into extraction sockets. The animals were sacrificed four and eight weeks after surgery for histologic and histomorphometric evaluation.

Results

At four and eight weeks, normal PDLs covered the roots in the positive control group. In the negative control group, most replanted roots showed signs of replacement resorption. In the experimental group, new PDL-like tissue and cementum-like tissue were observed to partially occupy the region between the root surfaces and the newly formed bone. Histomorphometric analysis showed that the mean length of the newly formed cementum-like tissue on the roots treated with FGF-2 was significantly greater than that of the tissue on the roots in the negative control group (four weeks, P=0.008; eight weeks, P=0.042). However, no significant differences were observed between the roots treated with FGF-2 and the negative control roots with respect to newly formed PDL-like tissue.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that use of FGF-2 on injured root surfaces promotes cementogenesis after tooth replacement in dogs.

Graphical Abstract

jpis-45-111-ab001

INTRODUCTION

Transplantation and replantation of teeth are methods that were developed to resolve tooth loss, especially in situations where dental implants and other prosthetic treatments are contraindicated [123]. Nevertheless, due to the frequent development of ankylosis and root resorption, the outcomes of these methods become less favorable over time, and hence, they are not considered the first-line treatment for tooth loss. However, the proportion of patients who want to preserve their own teeth is increasing, and the use of tooth transplantation and replantation is increasing due to the efforts of many clinicians to reduce ankylosis and root resorption.
Andreasen [4] and Löe et al. [5] reported that substantial ankylosis and inflammatory root resorption develop if the periodontal ligament (PDL) is exposed for some time (≥18 minutes) prior to tooth transplantation or replantation. This type of root resorption is referred to as replacement resorption (ankylosis), inflammatory resorption, or superficial root resorption, and the pattern of root resorption is determined by factors including the extent of injury to the PDLs attached to the root and in the presence of infection in the pulp [6]. Replacement resorption occurs when PDLs are lost in a wide area and results in the fusion of bone tissue and roots. In contrast, inflammatory resorption develops in teeth with an infected pulp cavity. Furthermore, when the PDL is partially lost, even dentin is resorbed.
If the injury to the PDL is minor, it may frequently occur that the area of ankylosis disappears and the affected PDL is restored by adjacent PDLs and cells adjacent to the alveolar bone [7]. Nevertheless, ankylosis and root resorption are unavoidable when the area of PDL loss exceeds approximately 2 mm2 [8] and when some time has passed prior to replantation, which results in the PDL drying out over a wide area. Furthermore, ankylosis can develop when replantation is performed in cases where a wide area of damage to the PDL and cementum has occurred due to periodontal disease.
A method of transplanting soft tissue to injured PDL regions has been introduced in order to treat wide areas of PDL damage [9], and good clinical outcomes have been reported for the transplantation of PDL tissue directly to areas where the PDL and cementum have been injured [10]. Current research programs have been directed towards the development of cell-based techniques for periodontal regeneration. Furthermore, the application of tissue engineering to periodontal regeneration provides excellent models for study [11]. The choice of the stem cell population is the most critical component of tissue engineering [12]; of the various types of stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells hold special promise for tissue regeneration due to their accessibility, capacity for growth, and multipotentiality. In addition, endogenous mesenchymal stem cells and/or progenitor cells are believed to exist within PDL tissue, suggesting that PDL cells might be useful for the treatment of periodontal disease [1314].
Recently, some researchers have tried to develop new techniques to accelerate the regeneration of periodontal tissue by applying human recombinant cytokines locally to stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of undifferentiated mesenchymal cells among PDL cells. To date, the direct local applications of various growth factors, such as platelet-derived growth factor, insulin-like growth factor-1, bone morphogenetic protein-2, transforming growth factor-β, and fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), have been reported to stimulate and promote the regeneration of regional periodontal tissue.
Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2 is a heparin-binding protein with several physiological functions. It is produced primarily by fibroblasts and endothelial cells, enhances PDL cell proliferation, and has a dose-dependent migratory effect on PDL cells and gingival fibroblasts [1516]. FGF-2 also potently stimulates the angiogenic and mitogenic activities of mesenchymal cells. Previous studies have shown that the application of FGF-2 enhances the healing of periodontal tissue without ankylosis, root resorption, or epithelial downgrowth in experimental alveolar bone defects in beagle [17] and primate models [18]. In addition, studies employing animal models with artificial periodontal tissue defects or surgically induced periodontitis have found that FGF-2 effectively promotes the regeneration of periodontal tissues [1819]. However, the degree to which FGF-2 promotes PDL regeneration after tooth replantation remains unclear.
The purpose of this study was perform a histological and histomorphometric investigation of the effect of FGF-2 on injured PDL and cementum after tooth replantation in dogs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

This experimental study was performed according to the guidelines approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Yonsei Medical Center, Seoul, Korea (2012-0251-1). Six mongrel dogs (12 to 16 kg, six to eight months old) were used for this study.

Study design

Twenty-four mandibular third and fourth premolars were selected and extracted. Any tooth found to be fused, fractured, or damaged on the root surface during hemisection was excluded from the experiment. A total of 36 roots were used in this study. The roots were randomly divided into three groups: (1) a positive control group (n=12), in which the PDL was retained; (2) a negative control group (n=12), in which the PDL and the cementum between the notches were removed; and (3) an experimental group (n=12), in which the PDL and the cementum between the notches were removed and the roots were soaked in FGF-2 (Fig. 1). Each group was subdivided into a four-week group and an eight-week group as the experiment was conducted, with six roots in each subgroup.

Surgical protocol

Before the experimental operation, scaling and oral hygiene were performed. During the surgical procedures, animals were placed under general anesthesia by Gerolan (Choongwae Pharmaceutical, Seoul, Korea) inhalation along with an intravenous injection of Zoletil (5 mg/kg; Virbac, Carros, France) and xylazine (0.2-0.5 mg/kg; Rompun, Bayer Korea, Seoul, Korea). In addition, lidocaine hydrochloride containing 1:80,000 epinephrine was administered for local anesthesia. The third and fourth mandibular premolars were extracted from the mandibles with forceps using rotary movements, after separating the roots (Fig. 2A). Four notches were formed on the coronal parts of the root surfaces at intervals of approximately 5 mm with a #1/2 round bur (Fig. 2B). In the negative control group and the experimental group, the PDL and the cementum between the notches were removed with a sharp-edged Gracey curette (Fig. 2C). The extraction sockets were also curetted. Next, the roots in the experimental group were soaked in 0.1 mL saline containing 30 µg of recombinant human FGF-2 (Genoss Institute, Suwon, Korea) for two minutes (Fig. 2D). The roots in the control group were covered with saline solution for two minutes to prevent dryness. The extraction sockets were curetted. After treating the root surfaces, the extracted roots were replanted into their respective sockets and the tooth crowns were severed using a carbide bur (Fig. 2E). The roots were completely covered with coronally repositioned flaps (Fig. 2F). For three days after surgery, 20 mg/kg of cefazoline sodium (Yuhan, Seoul, Korea) was injected intramuscularly, and soft foods were given. One week after surgery, the sutures were removed. Oral hygiene was maintained through the weekly application of 0.2% chlorohexidine solution (Hexamedin, Bukwang Pharmaceutical, Seoul, Korea) for infection control.

Histological processing

The dogs were euthanized with an overdose of pentobarbital sodium (90-120 mg/kg, intravenously) at four or eight weeks. The jaws were removed and the specimens were placed in 10% neutral buffered formaldehyde, decalcified in 5% formic acid, trimmed, and embedded in paraffin. Sections were cut in the mesiodistal plane, and serial 5-µm sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or Masson's trichrome.

Histological and histomorphometric evaluations

All measurements were obtained using a light microscope (LEICA DM750, Wetzlar, Hesse, Germany) equipped with a digital camera (LEICA ICC50, Wetzlar, Hesse, Germany). Measurements were made using the i-SOLUTION Lite® processing and analysis program (IMT i-Solution Corporation, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada) on a personal computer. Six randomly chosen sections from each experimentally treated tooth were used for morphometric evaluation. The following measurements were obtained (Fig. 3): (1) newly formed PDL-like tissue (N-PDL-T), reflecting the length of the connective tissue attached to the root-planed surface; (2) replacement resorption (ankylosis) (R-R), comprising the combined longitudinal height of areas with ankylosis; and (3) newly formed cementum (N-C), reflecting the longitudinal length of the regenerated cementum or cementum-like deposits on roots. The values of N-PDL-T and R-R were expressed as percentages of planed root lengths, and values of N-C were expressed in percentages of the N-PDL-T lengths. The results are presented in the format of mean±standard deviation.

Statistical analysis

The mean and standard deviation for each measurement were calculated for each group. The Kruskall-Wallis test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the Bonferroni correction were used to assess whether the differences between the control groups and the experimental groups were statistically significant. P-values < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance, and the analysis was performed using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

Clinical observations

Eight weeks after surgery, the extraction wounds had healed and were covered by healthy mucosa, although gingival recession was observed in one root of the positive control group at eight weeks and one root of the experimental group at four weeks. Extensive inflammatory root resorption also occurred in these roots.

Histologic observations

The positive control group

At four and eight weeks, normal PDL covered the roots (Fig. 4A, 5A, 6A). Superficial root resorption was observed in some areas. Root resorption was the predominant feature in the cervical portions of the roots (Fig. 4A, 5A). However, the PDL close to the dentin surface in the regions of root resorption was partially occupied by newly formed cementum (Fig. 5A).

The negative control group

At four and eight weeks, most of the replanted roots showed signs of replacement resorption at the lateral portions of all roots upward of the notch. Connective tissue fibers were not observed between the dentin surface and the alveolar bone above the notch (Fig. 4B, 5B, 6B).

The experimental group

At four weeks, PDL-like tissue partially separated the root surfaces and the newly formed bone (Fig. 4C). The connective tissue fibers of the PDL-like tissue appeared to consist of thin and randomly oriented fibers. Some of these fibers attached to dentin surfaces and newly formed cementum-like tissue (Fig. 4D).
At eight weeks, PDL-like tissue partially separated the root surfaces and the newly formed bone, and newly formed bone covered the entire area of the roots of the replanted teeth (Fig. 5C, 6C). Newly synthesized cementum-like tissue formed from the edges of the notches. In some areas, newly formed cementum-like tissue had formed in regions of superficial root resorption. In addition, cementoblast-like cells were visible in newly formed cementum-like tissue (Fig. 5D).

Histomorphometric analysis

The histomorphometric results are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. One root of the positive control group at eight weeks and one root of the experimental group at four weeks were excluded from the analysis because they displayed extensive inflammatory root resorption. Ankylosis was observed in part of the positive control group. However, four weeks after surgery, the mean length of the PDL tissue on the roots of the positive control group was significantly greater than that of the newly formed PDL-like tissue on the roots treated with FGF-2. At four and eight weeks after surgery, the mean length of newly formed cementum-like tissue on the roots treated with FGF-2 was significantly greater than on the positive control roots (four weeks, P=0.010; eight weeks, P=0.027) and the negative control roots (four weeks, P=0.008; eight weeks, P=0.042) (Tables 1, 2). The mean length of newly formed PDL-like tissue on the roots treated with FGF-2 was greater than on the negative control roots, and the mean length of replacement resorption on the roots treated with FGF-2 was lower than on the negative control roots. However, no significant differences were observed between the roots treated with FGF-2 and the negative control roots with respect to newly formed PDL-like tissue and replacement resorption (Tables 1, 2).

DISCUSSION

Root resorption is the major complication after tooth transplantation or replantation. Of the three categories of root resorption, replacement resorption is the most irreversible because it is a component of the physiological process of normal bone remodeling. Furthermore, ankylosis is largely responsible for the low five-year survival of teeth after tooth injury [20], and for this reason, it is important to prevent ankylosis in replanted teeth. In the present study, the PDL and cementum in the coronal portion of replanted roots were removed to model root surface damage. After healing, roots treated with FGF-2 were found to have shown favorable healing with respect to newly formed cementum-like tissue. Furthermore, FGF-2 induced the formation of newly formed PDL-like tissue in previously denuded coronal areas. However, the roots in the negative control group frequently showed ankylosis. This pattern of favorable healing and reduction in replacement resorption (ankylosis) in teeth treated with FGF-2 suggests that FGF-2 effectively promotes the regeneration of the injured PDL and cementum.
Many attempts have been made to prevent ankylosis and to encourage the production of new PDL tissue and newly formed cementum tissue after the transplantation or replantation of teeth. Seshima et al. [21] reported that the incidence of ankylosis in their FGF-2 treatment group was significantly lower than in the control group (3.6%±4.0% of total root length versus 25.4%±1.0% of total root length; P<0.01) at eight weeks after surgery. Shiratani et al. [22] reported that roots treated with FGF-2 exhibited the formation of new PDL-like tissue and new cementum with inserting collagen fibers after delayed transplantation, and Sato et al. [23] reported that teeth treated with 1 µg of basic FGF in collagen gel exhibited the formation of dense fibers bound to alveolar bone and new cementum at eight weeks. Similarly, the histomorphometric analysis conducted in the present study showed that the amount of replacement resorption in the FGF-2-treated group was less than in the negative control group at four and eight weeks (four weeks, 34.7%±11.0% of the denuded surface of the roots versus 65.8%±27.8% of the denuded surface of the roots; eight weeks, 36.9%±30.0% of the denuded surface of the roots versus 72.1%±22.7% of the denuded surface of roots). No significant difference was observed between the FGF-2-treated group and the negative control group. However, the amount of newly formed cementum-like tissue in the FGF-2-treated group was significantly greater than in the negative control group (four weeks, 81.1%±22.5% of the denuded surface of the roots versus 11.5%±16.8% of the denuded surface of the roots; eight weeks, 55.0%±37.2% of the denuded surface of the roots versus 14.1%±27.0% of the denuded surface of the roots, P<0.05). Although the amounts of newly formed cementum-like tissue in the FGF-2-treated group at four and eight weeks were not significantly different, these findings enable us to confirm that FGF-2 cytokine therapy prevents ankylosis and promotes cementogenesis and the regeneration of PDL-like tissues on injured root surfaces.
However, the proportion of roots showing ankylosis in the negative control group and the experimental group of this study was considerably higher than in other studies. Moreover, the width of the newly formed PDL-like tissue on roots treated with FGF-2 was less than that observed in other studies. Three reasons for this difference may be suggested. First, a lower amount of remaining PDL was present, because curettage of the remaining PDL tissue was performed on extraction sockets and on experimental roots. Second, the distances between the root surfaces and the extraction sockets were small because replantation was performed without further reduction of the extraction sockets. Third, the roots were submerged to prevent exposure to occlusal forces, and thus, the activities of PDL tissue might have been blocked.
The best method for increasing the amount of remaining PDL is to preserve vital PDL cells on the root surfaces and the extraction socket walls. In order to maintain the viability of the PDL cells, the extra-alveolar time of an avulsed tooth should be less than five minutes prior to replantation [24]. Soder et al. [25] reported that the number of visible PDL cells decreases in proportion to extra-alveolar time, and Andreasen [4] reported a greater incidence of replacement resorption in teeth with an extra-alveolar time of 18 minutes versus 0 minutes. However, Iqbal and Bamaas [26] reported no significant observable differences in the incidence of root resorption for extra-alveolar times of 15, 30, and 60 minutes, but a decreased incidence of periodontal healing was found corresponding to increased extraoral dry time. In the present study, the roots were replanted within five minutes to maintain PDL cell vitality. This explains why intact PDL tissue was found on a large proportion of the root surfaces in the positive control group. However, we also found that short-term replantation had no effect on the regeneration of injured PDL and cementum in the negative control group. Although it is important to maintain the viability of PDL cells during short-term replantation, the histologic results of FGF-2-treated roots showed that a signaling factor, such as FGF-2, was required for the regeneration of injured PDL and cementum.
The ability of storage media to maintain tooth viability during transplantation and replantation is considered to be more important than extra-alveolar time [2728]. Different types of wet storage media, such as Hank's balanced salt solution, minimum essential medium, saline, water, saliva, bovine milk, propolis, and green tea, have been investigated [29]. In the present study, saline was used to avoid tooth dehydration. However, although saline is a physiological match in terms of osmolality and pH, it does not contain essential ions and glucose, which are fundamental requirements of cells [3031]. Moreira-Neto et al. [32] evaluated the viability of cultured cells in saline, finding that 55% of cells remained alive after storage in saline for four hours. Consequently, saline is not a suitable medium for long-term storage, but is probably suitable for short periods of time, as demonstrated by the fact that intact PDL tissue was observed in many areas in the positive control group of this study.
The distance between recipient bone tissue and the root surface of a transplanted tooth is another important consideration. Optimal contact with the recipient site can improve the supply of blood and nutrients to PDL cells, thereby improving success rates after tooth transplantation [33]. In fact, good blood supply has been shown to be important for wound healing [34]. Furthermore, optimal contact between donor teeth and recipient bone ensures immobilization. However, to our knowledge, no study has been performed to determine the optimal distance between transplanted root surfaces and alveolar bone during tooth transplantation. In an effort to provide better blood supply and make the seating of donor teeth easier, Nethander [35] advocated a two-stage transplantation procedure. Promising results were obtained after a follow-up period of up to five years, and it was found that this two-stage surgical technique made it possible to transplant autogenous teeth with little risk of root resorption or other complications. For transplantation, it has been suggested that the donor site should be made 1-2 mm wider than the transplanted tooth in order to preserve the PDL [36]. Hence, in the present study, a small gap between the root surface and the socket wall promoted higher rates of replacement resorption, because the osteogenic action of granulation tissue on the surface of the extraction socket wall is activated soon after the tooth is extracted.
Furthermore, in the present study, tooth crowns were removed and the roots were submerged for protection. However, several reports have suggested that masticatory stimulation during the healing period may activate the function of the periodontal membrane area, promote the proliferation of PDL cells, and thus improve the prognosis of transplantation [3738]. Yang et al. [39] concluded that the application of orthodontic forces promotes PDL healing and possibly prevents dentoalveolar ankylosis. However, they did recommend a rest period of at least two weeks before loading the transplants, because the outcomes of regenerative procedures are critically dependent on initial wound stability [24]. This fact shows that complete coverage by a flap may have a beneficial influence on the wound healing of the PDL and cementum during the initial two weeks, while subsequently disrupting the stimulation of PDL cells. This may explain our finding that N-PDL-T did not increase and R-R did not decrease from four to eight weeks.
Moreover, in the present study, the application of FGF-2 did not completely prevent replacement resorption, and more instances of ankylosis were observed in roots treated with FGF-2 than has been reported in other experiments [2122]. Nonetheless, the results of this study clearly show that FGF-2 stimulates adjacent PDL tissue on the root surface and exerts a positive influence on the regeneration of the PDL and cementum.
FGF-2 enhances PDL cell proliferation, but inhibits cell differentiation by downregulating intracellular alkaline phosphatase activity [17]. However, the effects of FGF-2 on hard tissue formation and mineralization are probably cell-type dependent [40]. In addition, FGF-2 plays a significant role in the migration and proliferation of PDL fibroblasts, and their migration into areas of healing is key during the initial phase of periodontal regeneration. Murakami et al. [19] reported that FGF-2 expression could be detected in immature granulation tissue one week after flap surgery, and suggested that the aggregates formed by FGF-2 during the early phase of wound healing constituted a favorable environment for periodontal cell proliferation.
In present study, the standard deviation was high because the sample size was small, and healing dynamics vary considerably among individuals. Further studies are required with larger samples.
In summary, the histological and histomorphometric results obtained in the present study demonstrate that the use of FGF-2 reduces ankylosis and promotes the formation of newly formed periodontal tissue on injured PDLs and cementum after tooth replantation in dogs.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Diagram illustrating replantation. CO, coronal part: This area was root-planed. AP, apical part: The periodontal ligament was retained in this area. Extraction sockets were curetted.

jpis-45-111-g001
Figure 2

Surgical procedures. (A) The crowns and furcation areas of the premolars were severed with an apical-coronal cut using a carbide bur. (B) Notches were prepared with a round bur; (C) The periodontal ligament and cementum were removed between notches by scaling and root planing. (D) The roots were soaked in FGF-2 solution. (E) After replanting the roots, the crowns were removed; (F) The roots were covered using a coronally repositioned flap.

jpis-45-111-g002
Figure 3

Schematic drawing representing histological analysis of regeneration on replanted roots. N-PDL-T, newly formed periodontal ligament-like tissue; R-R, replacement resorption (ankylosis); N-C, newly formed cementum; PDL, normal periodontal ligament; black arrow, notch.

jpis-45-111-g003
Figure 4

Histological observations of specimens retrieved at 4 weeks after surgery (positive control group, A; negative control group, B; experimental group, C-D) (H&E stained). (A) Well-preserved periodontal ligaments were observed. In the coronal root portion, some resorption cavities were found in the root surfaces (original magnification 40×). (B) Replacement resorption at the root surface was observed. Resorbed surfaces were in direct contact with newly formed bone (original magnification 40×). (C) Newly formed periodontal ligament (PDL)-like tissue was observed between the root surfaces and newly formed bone in the notches. In regions coronal to the notches, newly formed cementum-like tissue surfaces were observed on the dentin surfaces (original magnification 40×). (D) Newly formed cementum-like tissue was observed at the dentin surface. (original magnification 200×). Ab, alveolar bone; De, dentin; Ce, cementum; Pd, periodontal ligament; nCe, newly formed cementum-like tissue; nPd, newly formed periodontal ligament-like tissue; black asterisk, surface resorption; white asterisk, ankylosis (replacement resorption).

jpis-45-111-g004
Figure 5

Histological observations of specimens retrieved at 8 weeks after surgery (positive control group, A; negative control group, B; experimental group, C-D) (H&E stain). (A) The periodontal ligament typically extended to the apical portions of the roots (original magnification ×40). (B) Large areas of replacement resorption and superficial resorption were observed. The periodontal ligament was completely replaced by bone (original magnification 40×). (C) Newly formed periodontal ligament (PDL)-like tissue formed between the root surface and new bone in the area coronal to the notch (original magnification 40×). (D) Spaces in the alveolar bone and root surface were filled with newly formed PDL-like tissue. Root surfaces exhibited new cementum-like tissue formation (original magnification 200×). Ab, alveolar bone; De, dentin; Ce, cementum; Pd, periodontal ligament; nCe, newly formed cementum-like tissue; nPd, newly formed periodontal ligament-like tissue; black asterisk, surface resorption; white asterisk, ankylosis (replacement resorption).

jpis-45-111-g005
Figure 6

Histological observations of specimens retrieved at 8 weeks after surgery (positive control group, A; negative control group, B; experimental group, C) (MT stain, original magnification 200×). (A) Connective tissue fibers of the periodontal ligament (PDL) were observed between the root surfaces and alveolar bone. (B) The root surfaces were fused with alveolar bone. Connective tissue fibers of the periodontal ligament could not be observed on root surface. (C) Loosely organized fibers of the newly formed PDL-like tissue were observed in spaces between root surfaces and alveolar bone. Ab, alveolar bone; De, dentin; Ce, cementum; Pd, periodontal ligament; nPd, newly formed periodontal ligament-like tissue; black arrows, ankylosis (replacement resorption).

jpis-45-111-g006
Table 1

Histomorphometric evaluations of periodontal healing patterns at four weeks after surgery (mean±standard deviation).

jpis-45-111-i001
Groups PDL / N-PDL-T (%) R-R (%) N-C (%)
Control (+) (n = 6) 92.1 ± 12.6 8.3 ± 13.5 32.1 ± 21.4
Control (-) (n = 6) 34.2 ± 27.8 65.8 ± 27.8 11.5 ± 16.8
Experimental (FGF-2) (n = 5) 64.7 ± 10.7 34.7 ± 11.0 81.1 ± 22.5a)
P-value (positive control vs. negative control vs. FGF-2) 0.004b) 0.005b) 0.006b)
P-value (positive control vs. FGF-2) 0.009c), d) 0.015c), d) 0.010c), d)
P-value (negative control vs. FGF-2) 0.100 0.100 0.008c), d)
P-value (positive control vs. negative control) 0.006c), d) 0.006c), d) 0.161
Control (+), positive control roots; control (-), negative control roots; experimental (FGF-2), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2)-treated roots; PDL, periodontal ligament tissue (in the positive group); N-PDL-T, newly formed periodontal ligament-like tissue (in the negative group and experimental group); R-R, replacement resorption (ankylosis); N-C, newly formed cementum.
a)Statistically significant difference between the negative control and experimental groups at the same week (P<0.05) (Mann-Whitney U test).
b)Statistically significant difference (P<0.05) (Kruskall-Wallis test).
c)Statistically significant difference (P<0.05) (Mann-Whitney U test).
d)Statistically significant difference (P<0.017) (Bonferroni correction).
Table 2

Histomorphometric evaluations of periodontal healing patterns at eight weeks after surgery (mean ± standard deviation).

jpis-45-111-i002
Groups PDL / N-PDL-T (%) R-R (%) N-C (%)
Control (+) (n = 5) 88.2 ± 26.4 11.8 ± 26.4 11.5 ± 17.7
Control (-) (n = 6) 27.9 ± 22.7 72.1 ± 22.7 14.1 ± 27.0
Experimental (FGF-2) (n = 6) 63.2 ± 30.0 36.9 ± 30.0 55.0 ± 37.2a)
P-value (positive control vs. negative control vs. FGF-2) 0.020b) 0.020b) 0.037b)
P-value (positive control vs. FGF-2) 0.126 0.126 0.027c)
P-value (negative control vs. FGF-2) 0.055 0.055 0.042c)
P-value (positive control vs. negative control) 0.015c), d) 0.015c), d) 1.000
Control (+), positive control roots; control (-), negative control roots; experimental (FGF-2), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2)-treated roots; PDL, periodontal ligament tissue (in the positive group); N-PDL-T, newly formed periodontal ligament-like tissue (in the negative group and experimental group); R-R, replacement resorption (ankylosis); N-C, newly formed cementum.
a)Statistically significant difference between the negative control and experimental groups at the same week (P<0.05) (Mann-Whitney U test).
b)Statistically significant difference (P<0.05) (Kruskall-Wallis test).
c)Statistically significant difference (P<0.05) (Mann-Whitney U test).
d)Statistically significant difference (P<0.017) (Bonferroni correction).

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Health technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea. (A101578).

References

1. Kim E, Jung JY, Cha IH, Kum KY, Lee SJ. Evaluation of the prognosis and causes of failure in 182 cases of autogenous tooth transplantation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 100:112–119.
crossref
2. Temmerman L, De Pauw GA, Beele H, Dermaut LR. Tooth transplantation and cryopreservation: state of the art. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129:691–695.
crossref
3. Lee EU, Lim HC, Lee JS, Jung UW, Kim US, Lee SJ, et al. Delayed intentional replantation of periodontally hopeless teeth: a retrospective study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2014; 44:13–19.
crossref
4. Andreasen JO. Effect of extra-alveolar period and storage media upon periodontal and pulpal healing after replantation of mature permanent incisors in monkeys. Int J Oral Surg. 1981; 10:43–53.
crossref
5. Löe H, Waerhaug J. Experimental replantation of teeth in dogs and monkeys. Arch Oral Biol. 1961; 3:176–184.
crossref
6. Andreasen JO. Experimental dental traumatology: development of a model for external root resorption. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1987; 3:269–287.
crossref
7. Beertsen W, McCulloch CA, Sodek J. The periodontal ligament: a unique, multifunctional connective tissue. Periodontol 2000. 1997; 13:20–40.
crossref
8. Andreasen JO. Relationship between cell damage in the periodontal ligament after replantation and subsequent development of root resorption. A time-related study in monkeys. Acta Odontol Scand. 1981; 39:15–25.
crossref
9. Andreasen JO, Kristerson L. Evaluation of different types of autotransplanted connective tissues as potential periodontal ligament substitutes. An experimental replantation study in monkeys. Int J Oral Surg. 1981; 10:189–201.
crossref
10. Akbay A, Baran C, Günhan O, Ozmeriç N, Baloş K. Periodontal regenerative potential of autogenous periodontal ligament grafts in Class II furcation defects. J Periodontol. 2005; 76:595–604.
crossref
11. Modino SA, Sharpe PT. Tissue engineering of teeth using adult stem cells. Arch Oral Biol. 2005; 50:255–258.
crossref
12. Hynes K, Menicanin D, Gronthos S, Bartold PM. Clinical utility of stem cells for periodontal regeneration. Periodontol 2000. 2012; 59:203–227.
crossref
13. Melcher AH. On the repair potential of periodontal tissues. J Periodontol. 1976; 47:256–260.
crossref
14. Zhou Y, Hutmacher DW, Sae-Lim V, Zhou Z, Woodruff M, Lim TM. Osteogenic and adipogenic induction potential of human periodontal cells. J Periodontol. 2008; 79:525–534.
crossref
15. Okamoto T, Yatsuzuka N, Tanaka Y, Kan M, Yamanaka T, Sakamoto A, et al. Growth and differentiation of periodontal ligament-derived cells in serum-free defined culture. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 1997; 33:302–309.
crossref
16. Nishimura F, Terranova VP. Comparative study of the chemotactic responses of periodontal ligament cells and gingival fibroblasts to polypeptide growth factors. J Dent Res. 1996; 75:986–992.
crossref
17. Murakami S, Takayama S, Ikezawa K, Shimabukuro Y, Kitamura M, Nozaki T, et al. Regeneration of periodontal tissues by basic fibroblast growth factor. J Periodontal Res. 1999; 34:425–430.
crossref
18. Takayama S, Murakami S, Shimabukuro Y, Kitamura M, Okada H. Periodontal regeneration by FGF-2 (bFGF) in primate models. J Dent Res. 2001; 80:2075–2079.
crossref
19. Murakami S, Takayama S, Kitamura M, Shimabukuro Y, Yanagi K, Ikezawa K, et al. Recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) stimulates periodontal regeneration in class II furcation defects created in beagle dogs. J Periodontal Res. 2003; 38:97–103.
crossref
20. Humphrey JM, Kenny DJ, Barrett EJ. Clinical outcomes for permanent incisor luxations in a pediatric population. I. Intrusions. Dent Traumatol. 2003; 19:266–273.
crossref
21. Seshima F, Ota M, Kinumatsu T, Shibukawa Y, Yamada S. Effect of recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor on reimplanted teeth in beagle dogs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 109:142–148.
crossref
22. Shiratani S, Ota M, Fujita T, Seshima F, Yamada S, Saito A. Effect of basic fibroblast growth factor on root resorption after delayed autotransplantation of tooth in dogs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012; 114:e14–e21.
crossref
23. Sato Y, Kikuchi M, Ohata N, Tamura M, Kuboki Y. Enhanced cementum formation in experimentally induced cementum defects of the root surface with the application of recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor in collagen gel in vivo. J Periodontol. 2004; 75:243–248.
crossref
24. Schwartz O, Andreasen JO. Allo- and autotransplantation of mature teeth in monkeys: a sequential time-related histoquantitative study of periodontal and pulpal healing. Dent Traumatol. 2002; 18:246–261.
crossref
25. Söder PO, Otteskog P, Andreasen JO, Modéer T. Effect of drying on viability of periodontal membrane. Scand J Dent Res. 1977; 85:164–168.
crossref
26. Iqbal MK, Bamaas N. Effect of enamel matrix derivative (EMDOGAIN) upon periodontal healing after replantation of permanent incisors in beagle dogs. Dent Traumatol. 2001; 17:36–45.
crossref
27. Gopikrishna V, Thomas T, Kandaswamy D. A quantitative analysis of coconut water: a new storage media for avulsed teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 105:e61–e65.
crossref
28. Thomas T, Gopikrishna V, Kandaswamy D. Comparative evaluation of maintenance of cell viability of an experimental transport media "coconut water" with Hank's balanced salt solution and milk, for transportation of an avulsed tooth: An in vitro cell culture study. J Conserv Dent. 2008; 11:22–29.
crossref
29. Jung IH, Yun JH, Cho AR, Kim CS, Chung WG, Choi SH. Effect of (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate on maintaining the periodontal ligament cell viability of avulsed teeth: a preliminary study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2011; 41:10–16.
crossref
30. Goswami M, Chaitra T, Chaudhary S, Manuja N, Sinha A. Strategies for periodontal ligament cell viability: An overview. J Conserv Dent. 2011; 14:215–220.
crossref
31. Malhotra N. Current developments in interim transport (storage) media in dentistry: an update. Br Dent J. 2011; 211:29–33.
crossref
32. Moreira-Neto JJ, Gondim JO, Raddi MS, Pansani CA. Viability of human fibroblasts in coconut water as a storage medium. Int Endod J. 2009; 42:827–830.
crossref
33. Andreasen JO. Periodontal healing after replantation and autotransplantation of incisors in monkeys. Int J Oral Surg. 1981; 10:54–61.
crossref
34. Goerig AC, Nagy WW. Successful intentional reimplantation of mandibular molars. Quintessence Int. 1988; 19:585–588.
35. Nethander G. Periodontal conditions of teeth autogenously transplanted by a two-stage technique. J Periodontal Res. 1994; 29:250–258.
crossref
36. Northway W. Autogenic dental transplants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 121:592–593.
crossref
37. Andersson L. Dentoalveolar ankylosis and associated root resorption in replanted teeth. Experimental and clinical studies in monkeys and man. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1988; 56:1–75.
38. Mine K, Kanno Z, Muramoto T, Soma K. Occlusal forces promote periodontal healing of transplanted teeth and prevent dentoalveolar ankylosis: an experimental study in rats. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75:637–644.
39. Yang Y, Bai Y, Li S, Li J, Gao W, Ru N. Effect of early orthodontic force on periodontal healing after autotransplantation of permanent incisors in beagle dogs. J Periodontol. 2012; 83:235–241.
crossref
40. Klagsbrun M, Smith S, Sullivan R, Shing Y, Davidson S, Smith JA, et al. Multiple forms of basic fibroblast growth factor: amino-terminal cleavages by tumor cell- and brain cell-derived acid proteinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987; 84:1839–1843.
crossref
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

Sang-Joun Yu
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8818-549X

Jung-Seok Lee
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1276-5978

Ui-Won Jung
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-4172

Joo-Cheol Park
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3162-7557

Byung-Ock Kim
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8952-617X

Seong-Ho Choi
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6704-6124

Similar articles