Journal List > Hip Pelvis > v.25(3) > 1081982

Kim, Jung, Jeon, Lee, Park, and Hwang: Ultrasonographic Usefulness for Diagnosis of Acetabular Labral Tear

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluated the usefulness of ultrasonography for a diagnosis of acetabular labral tear in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

Materials and Methods

From March 2010 to October 2011, an ultrasonographic examination was performed in 58 patients(58 hips: 26 men and 32 women) with acetabular labral tear. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of ultrasonography were evaluated for 58 cases with acetabular labral tear confirmed by hip arthroscopy.

Results

The sensitivity and positive predictive value for an acetabular labral tear using ultrasonography was 89.6% and 100%, respectively. The concordance rate of an acetabular labral tear between arthroscopy and ultrasonography was 84.6%.

Conclusion

Hip ultrasonography can make a significant contribution to a pathologic diagnosis and isa useful diagnostic tool for acetabular labral tears.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Femoral head-neck view (A: acetabulum, L: labrum, FH: femoral head, SR: synovial recess).
hp-25-189-g001
Fig. 2
Hypoechoic pathologic image around labrum. (A) Paralabral cyst (asterisk). (B) Intra-labral cyst (arrow head).
hp-25-189-g002
Fig. 3
Location of acetabular labral tear under USG (ASIS: anterior superior iliac spine, AS: anterosuperior, A: anterior).
hp-25-189-g003
Fig. 4
(A) Identification of ultrasonographic image. (B) Magnetic resonance arthrography. (C) Arthroscopic image.
hp-25-189-g004
Table 1
Summary of Acetabular Labral Tear
hp-25-189-i001

A: anterior, AS: anterosuperior, P: posterior, PS: posterosuperior.

References

1. Martinoli C, Valle M, Malattia C, Beatrice Damasio M, Taqliafico A. Paediatric musculoskeletal US beyond the hip joint. Pediatr Radiol. 2011; 41:Suppl 1. S113–S124.
crossref
2. Connell DA, Bass C, Sykes CA, Young D, Edwards E. Sonographic evaluation of gluteus medius and minimus teninopathy. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13:1339–1347.
crossref
3. Blankenbaker DG, Tuite MJ. The painful hip: new concepts. Skeletal Radiol. 2006; 35:352–370.
crossref
4. Beck M, Leuig M, Parvizi J, Boutier V, Wyss D, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement: Part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (418):67–73.
5. Troelsen A, Jacobsen S, Bolvig L, Gelineck J, Rømer L, Søballe K. Ultrasound versus magnetic resonance arthrography in acetabular labral tear diagnostics: a prospective comparison in 20 dysplastic hips. Acta Radiol. 2007; 48:1004–1010.
crossref
6. Beck M, Kalhor M, Leunig M, Ganz R. Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabualr impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87:1012–1018.
7. Blankenbaker DG, De Smet AA, Keene JS, Fine JP. Classification and localization of acetabular labral tears. Skeletal Radiol. 2007; 36:391–397.
crossref
8. Jamadar DA, Jacobson JA, Caoili EM, et al. Musculoskeletal sonography technique: focused versus comprehensive evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 190:5–9.
crossref
9. Troelsen A, Mechlenburg I, Gelineck J, Bolvig L, Jacobsen S, Søballe K. What is the role of clinical tests and ultrasound in acetabular labral tear diagnostics? Acta Orthop. 2009; 80:314–318.
crossref
10. McCarthy J, Barsoum W, Puri L, Lee JA, Murphy S, Cooke P. The role of hip arthroscopy in the elite athlete. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (406):71–74.
crossref
11. Tannast M, Goricki D, Beck M, Murphy SB, Siebenrock KA. Hip damage occurs at the zone of femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466:273–280.
crossref
12. Kivlan BR, Martin RL, Sekiya JK. Response to diagnostic injection in patients with femoroacetabular impingement, labral tears, chondral lesions, and extra-articular pathology. Arthroscopy. 2011; 27:619–627.
crossref
13. Scheel AK, Schmidt WA, Hermann KG, et al. Interobserver reliability of rheumatologists performing musculosckeletal ultrasonography: results from a EULAR "Train the trainers" course. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005; 64:1043–1049.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles