Abstract
Purpose
This study attempted to examine those who experienced working after breast cancer diagnosis or job retention after timeoff or resignation.
Methods
Data collection and analysis were conducted using the biggest community website which contains articles written and discussed by breast cancer survivors. We used semantic network analysis to identify context of various keywords from collected 1,186 articles. After refining, we analyzed 212 keywords. Data were analyzed using two methodological approaches, ‘network analysis and data visualization’ (NodeXl & PFnet).
Results
As a result, 6 groups were classified; ‘conflict between breast cancer and job’, ‘difficulty of working and treatment parallel’, ‘breast cancer management while working’, ‘busy and hard life but showing gratitude’, ‘my body needs’, and ‘my heart needs’. We found that even though they had difficulties of working and treatment at the same time, they were thankful for their life. and they also reprogrammed their mind for more positive thinking through exercise for the health management and establishing a good eating habit.
References
1. Spelten ER, Sprangers MA, Verbeek JH. Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psychooncology. 2002; 11:124–131.
2. Korean Breast Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts & figures. Seoul: Korean Breast Cancer Society;2015.
3. Han KT, Park EC, Kim SJ, Jang SI, Shin J, Kim CO, et al. Factors affecting the quality of life of Korean cancer survivors who return to the workplace. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014; 15:8783–8788.
5. Rasmussen DM, Elverdam B. The meaning of work and working life after cancer: an interview study. Psychooncology. 2008; 17:1232–1238.
6. Nachreiner NM, Dagher RK, McGovern PM, Baker BA, Alexander BH, Gerberich SG. Successful return to work for cancer survivors. AAOHN J. 2007; 55:290–295.
7. Park JH, Park EC, Park JH, Kim SG, Lee SY. Job loss and re-employment of cancer patients in Korean employees: a nationwide retrospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26:1302–1309.
8. Brandberg Y, Sandelin K, Eriksonm S, Jurell G, Liljegren A, Lindblom A, et al. Psychological reactions, quality of life, and body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer: A prospective 1-year followup study. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26:3943–3949.
9. Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, Sauer H, Holzel D. Quality of life following breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: Results of a 5-year prospective study. Breast J. 2004; 10:223–231.
10. Kim S, Shin DW, Yang HK, Kim SY, Ko YJ, Cho B, et al. Public perceptions on cancer incidence and survival: a nation-wide survey in Korea. Cancer Res Treat. 2016; 48:775–788.
11. Ahn E, Cho J, Shin DW, Park BW, Ahn SH, Noh D, et al. Impact of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment on work-related life and factors affecting them. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009; 116:609–616.
12. Islam T, Dahlui M, Majid HA, Nahar AM, Mohd Taib NA, Su TT. Factors associated with return to work of breast cancer survivors: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:Suppl 3. S8.
13. Johnsson A, Fornander T, Olsson M, Nystedt M, Johansson H, Erik Rutqvist L. Factors associated with return to work after breast cancer treatment. Acta Oncol. 2007; 46:90–96.
14. Johnsson A, Fornander T, Rutqvist LE, Olsson M. Factors influencing return to work: A narrative study of women treated for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010; 19:317–323.
15. Tamminga SJ, de Boer A, Verbeek J, Frings-Dresen H. Breast cancer survivors' views of factors that influence the return-to-work process-a qualitative study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012; 38(2):144–154.
16. Heo EK, Kang HS, Kim KH, Hong YP. Return-to-work experiences among breast cancer survivors. J Korean Soc Matern Child Health. 2011; 15:92–102.
17. Heo G. A study of structural equational modeling for teachers' knowledge sharing behavior in online educational community. J Korean Data Anal Soc. 2009; 11(5):2735–2747.
18. Lee BE, Kim SI. Evaluation of the usability of local portal site community cafe service: focused on the comparison between the Naver cafe and Daum cafe. J Digit Des. 2013; 13:439–448.
19. Yi MS, Noh DY, Kim KJ, Yih BS. Content analysis of questions related to breast cancer raised through internet counseling in Korea. Asian Oncol Nurs. 2007; 7:119–130.
20. Swichert RJ, Hittner JB, Harris JL, Herring JA. Relationships among internet use, personality, and social support. Comput Human Behav. 2002; 18:437–451.
21. Kwon SY. A study on the factors influencing semantic relation in building a structured glossary. J Korean Soc Libr Inf Sci. 2014; 48:353–378.
22. Shim JS. Analysis of conflict frames using semantic network analysis. Korea Public Adm J. 2010; 20:183–212.
23. Park HW, Leydesdorff L. Understanding and application of KrKwic program for Korean content analysis. J Korean Data Anal Soc. 2004; 6:1377–1387.
24. Kim MH, Kim JS, Kim HN. Return-to-work experiences among nurses after receiving cancer treatment. J Korea Acad Ind Coop Soc. 2016; 17:215–225.
25. Kim SG. Life at work of worker with cancer. Health Ind. 2013; 2:32–46.
26. Kim DS, Park AH, Kang NJ. An analysis of cancer survival narratives using computerized text analysis program. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2014; 44:328–338.
27. Kim KO, Park H, Chun M, Lee EH, Kim HS. Eating patterns and use of nutritional information in breast cancer survivors treated with radiation therapy in South Korea. J Nutr Health. 2013; 46:250–260.
28. Jang HK, Park YH. Concept analysis of cancer rehabilitation for cancer survivors. Perspect Nurs Sci. 2011; 8:1–9.
29. Park E, Kim JH. The effect of social support in on-line community on community involvement and self-esteem. Korean J Soc Pers Psychol. 2005; 19:13–25.