Journal List > Asian Oncol Nurs > v.15(1) > 1081831

Kang and Suh: The Influence of Stress, Spousal Support, and Resilience on the Ways of Coping among Women with Breast Cancer

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of stress, spousal support, and resilience on the types of coping among women with breast cancer.

Method

Using a cross-sectional survey design, a total of 120 participants, diagnosed with breast cancer, had a mass removal surgery, and were fluent in Korean, were recruited at a cancer center in Seoul, Korea. Self-reported questionnaires of stress, spousal support, resilience, and ways of coping were administered upon the permission from the original developers. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 Win program.

Result

Ways of coping was positively correlated with spousal support, resilience, and stress. Positive correlations were found between problem-focused coping, spousal support, and resilience. Positive correlations were found between emotion-focused coping with stress and resilience. Hierarchical multiple regressions revealed that spousal support had significant moderating effect on the relationship between stress and emotion-focused coping.

Conclusion

Women perceived their diagnosis and surgery as more stressful, they more like to use emotion-focused coping. Women with more spousal support and resilience were found to use problem-focused coping more. Based on the findings of this study, a tailored intervention for women with breast cancer for improving their coping is expected in future research.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Moderation Model: Spousal Support Moderates the Relationship between Stress and Emotion-focused Coping.

aon-15-1-g001
Fig. 2

Moderation Effect among Stress, Spousal Support, and Emotion-focused Coping.

aon-15-1-g002
Table 1

Demographic Characteristics and Disease Characteristics (N=120)

aon-15-1-i001
Characteristics Classification M±SD Range n (%)
Age (year) <40 50.0±7.4 32~71 6 (5.0)
40~49 55 (45.8)
50~59 45 (37.5)
≥60 14 (11.7)
Spousal age (year) <40 53.1±7.9 35~74 3 (2.6)
40~49 40 (33.3)
50~59 55 (45.8)
≥60 22 (18.3)
Marital status Married 113 (94.2)
Couple not legally married 7 (5.8)
Number of children 0~1 0~5 28 (23.3)
2 78 (65.0)
≥3 14 (11.7)
Education ≤Middle school graduate 23 (19.2)
High school graduate 51 (42.5)
≥College graduate 46 (38.3)
Employment status Employed 30 (25.0)
Housewife 84 (70.0)
Others 6 (5.0)
Religion Christian 41 (34.1)
Catholic 21 (17.5)
Buddhist 32 (26.7)
None 20 (16.7)
Others 6 (5.0)
Combined income* (10,000 won) <200 431.2±244.5 100~1,200 16 (13.3)
200~400 54 (45.0)
400~600 15 (12.5)
≥600 15 (12.5)
Missing 20 (16.7)
Cancer stage Stage 0 0~3 11 (9.1)
Stage 1 41 (34.2)
Stage 2 51 (42.5)
Stage 3 17 (14.2)
Type of surgery Modified radical mastectomy 29 (24.2)
Breast conserving surgery 91 (75.8)
Tumor site Right 65 (54.2)
Left 55 (45.8)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Yes 24 (20.0)
No 96 (80.0)

*Combined income of patients and spouses; It includes quadrantectomy, lumpectomy, and wide local excision.

Table 2

Descriptive Statistics for Outcome Variables (N=120)

aon-15-1-i002
Variables Cronbach's α Possible range Reported range Total score Items score
M ± SD M ± SD
Stress .93 36~180 46~144 99.93±20.20 2.78±1.04
Spousal support .97 18~90 19~90 65.96±15.22 3.67±1.07
Resilience .94 25~175 34~167 126.08 ± 22.38 5.04 ± 1.41
 Factor I .93 17~119 23~115 87.26 ± 16.25 5.13 ± 1.40
 Factor II .77 8~56 11~52 38.82 ± 7.11 4.85 ± 1.44
Coping .87 0~108 26~98 63.74 ± 12.38 1.77 ± 0.82
 PFC .83 0~63 18~60 40.28 ± 8.05 1.92 ± 0.79
 EFC .73 0~45 8~39 23.45 ± 5.88 1.56 ± 0.85

Factor I=Personal Competence; Factor II=Acceptance of Self and Life; PFC=Problem-focused Coping; EFC=Emotion-focused Coping.

Table 3

Correlations among Stress, Spousal Support, Resilience and Ways of Coping

aon-15-1-i003
Variables Stress Spousal support Resilience Ways of coping PFC EFC
r r r r r r
Stress 1 - .05 - .17 .21* .14 .25
Spousal support 1 .28 .30 .35 .16
Resilience 1 .48 .48 .36

*p<.05, p<.01 (2~tailed); PFC=Problem-focused Coping; EFC=Emotion-focused Coping.

Notes

This article is a condensed form of the first author's master's thesis from Seoul National University.

References

1. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Lee DH, Lee JS. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2011. Cancer Res Treat. 2014; 46(2):109–123.
crossref
2. Suh EE, Park YH, Kim S. The patients' experiences of the diagnosis and pre-treatment period of breast cancer. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs. 2008; 15(4):495–503.
3. Antoni MH, Lehman JM, Kilbourn KM, Boyers AE, Culver JL, Alferi SM, et al. Cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention decreases the prevalence of depression and enhances benefit finding among women under treatment for early-stage breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2001; 20(1):20–32.
crossref
4. Kwon EJ, Yi M. Distress and quality of life in breast cancer survivors in Korea. Asian Oncol Nurs. 2012; 12(4):289–296.
crossref
5. Suh EE. The processes of coping with breast cancer among Korean women. Korean J Stress Res. 2008; 16(4):305–315.
6. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer;1984.
7. Cuevas BT, Hughes DC, Parma DL, Treviño-Whitaker RA, Ghosh S, Li R, et al. Motivation, exercise, and stress in breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2014; 22(4):911–917.
crossref
8. Chung C, Hwang E, Hwang S. Marital intimacy and quality of life in women with breast cancer. J Korean Oncol Nurs. 2009; 9(2):122–128.
9. Duggleby W, Bally J, Cooper D, Doell H, Thomas R. Engaging hope: the experiences of male spouses of women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012; 39(4):400–406.
crossref
10. Gremore TM, Baucom DH, Porter LS, Kirby JS, Atkins DC, Keefe FJ. Stress buffering effects of daily spousal support on women's daily emotional and physical experiences in the context of breast cancer concerns. Health Psychol. 2011; 30(1):20.
crossref
11. Hasson-Ohayon I, Goldzweig G, Braun M, Galinsky D. Women with advanced breast cancer and their spouses: diversity of support and psychological distress. Psychooncology. 2010; 19(11):1195–1204.
crossref
12. Lewis FM, Fletcher KA, Cochrane BB, Fann JR. Predictors of depressed mood in spouses of women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(8):1289–1295.
crossref
13. Wagnild GM, Collins JA. Assessing resilience. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2009; 47(12):28–33.
crossref
14. Kang G, Oh S. Effects of mndfulness meditation program on perceived stress, ways of coping, and stress response in breast cancer patients. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2012; 42(2):161–170.
crossref
15. Jang S. Effects of meditation program on power, anxiety, depression and quality of life in women with breast cancer. J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2013; 22(3):205–215.
crossref
16. Volicer BJ, Bohannon MW. A hospital stress rating scale. Nurs Res. 1975; 24(5):352–359.
crossref
17. Nam KS. A study on the correlation between spouse support and the body image of female patients who have done mastectomy and hysterectomy [dissertation]. Seoul: Ewha Womans Univ;1988.
18. Wagnild GM, Young HM. Development and psychometric evaluation of the resilience scale. J Nurs Meas. 1993; 1(2):165–178.
19. Mishel MH, Sorenson DS. Revision of the ways of coping checklist for a clinical population. West J Nurs Res. 1993; 15(1):59–74.
crossref
20. Kotrlik J, Higgins C. Organizational research: determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Inf Technol Learn Perform J. 2001; 19(1):43–50.
21. Do HK. Stress and coping with cancer patients [master's thesis]. Seoul: Kyung Hee Univ;2008.
22. Kim EJ. Hospitalization-related stress and coping strategies of colon cancer patients [master's thesis]. Seoul: Ewha Womans Univ;2007.
23. Song YS. Determinants of resilience of the physically disabled at home [master's thesis]. Pusan: Kosin Univ;2004.
24. So HS. Changes on the uncertainty, ways of coping, and depression for patients with uterine cervical cancer during the early adaptation process: a longitudinal study [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei Univ;1996.
25. Kim HY, So HS. A structural model for psychosocial adjustment in patients with early breast cancer. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2012; 42(1):105–115.
crossref
26. Lindley P, Walker SN. Theoretical and methodological differentiation of moderation and mediation. Nurs Res. 1993; 42(5):276–279.
crossref
27. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psycho. 1986; 51(6):1173–1182.
crossref
28. Bennett JA. Mediator and moderator variables in nursing research: conceptual and statistical differences. Res Nurs Health. 2000; 23(5):415–420.
crossref
29. Kim YM, Park HS. Relationship between perceived spouse support and health promoting behavior in the mastectomy patients. Asian Oncol Nurs. 2014; 14(4):203–211.
crossref
30. Lee EK. A study on factors affecting cancer patients. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2007; 13(1):52–58.
TOOLS
Similar articles