The analysis of Trends and Contents of Nursing Intervention Research for Cancer Patients in Korea

Myung Sun Hong; Young Hee Yom; Geun Myun Kim

doi:10.5388/aon.2012.12.4.247

Journal List > Asian Oncol Nurs > v.12(4) > 1081741

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Hong, Yom, and Kim: The analysis of Trends and Contents of Nursing Intervention Research for Cancer Patients in Korea

Review

Asian Oncology Nursing

Asian Oncology Nursing 2012; 12(4): 247-256.

Published online: 31 December 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2012.12.4.247

The analysis of Trends and Contents of Nursing Intervention Research for Cancer Patients in Korea

Myung Sun Hong¹, Young Hee Yom², Geun Myun Kim³

¹Department of Global Healthcare Management, Gachon University, Seongnam, Korea.

²Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.

³Department of Nursing, Seoul Women's College of Nursing, Seoul, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Kim, Geun Myun. Department of Nursing, Seoul Women's College of Nursing, 38 Ganho-daero, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-742, Korea. Tel: +82-2-2287-1725, Fax: +82-395-8018, hellena71@hanmail.net

Received 1 November 2012 Accepted 25 December 2012

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

In this study, the articles which developed and applied nursing interventions for patients with cancer were reviewed and analyzed.

Methods

The analysis was performed in light of 171 pieces of literature on nursing interventions for patients with cancer published between 1991 and 2010.

Results

Approximately half of the studies have been published between 2006 and 2010. The quasi-experimental designs using nonequivalent control group and no-synchronized design were the most common form of research design among the 71 papers constituting 41.52% of the total. The most commonly used nursing intervention was education (25.2%), followed by massage (20.4%) and exercise (11.5%). The most common outcome variable was anxiety (11.8%), followed by pain (8.0%) and nausea and vomiting (7.3%).

Conclusion

The results of this study can provide useful information for the development of nursing interventions in specialized areas. Systematic literature review or meta-analysis is needed in this area.

Keywords: Nursing Research, Neoplasms, Intervention Studies

Figures and Tables

Table 1

General Characteristics of Articles (N=171)

Table 2

Distribution of Cancer Intervention Articles Publication according to Year (N=171)

Table 3

Nursing Intervention according to Year (N=226)

Table 4

Nursing Intervention according to Cancer type (N=226)

Table 5

Nursing Outcome according to Cancer type (N=399)

Notes

This research was supported by Gachon University Research Fund (GCU-2012_R206).

References

1. Statistics Korea. Cause of death statistics. Accessed September 12, 2012. http://kosis.kr/abroad/abroad_01List.jsp.

2. National Cancer Information Center. Cancer facts & figures 2012. Accessed September 12, 2012. http://www.cancer.go.kr.

3. Choi KS, Kim MS, Lee IJ, Han SY, Park JA, Lee JH. Analysis of nursing intervention studies on patients with breast cancer in Korea. J Korean Oncol Nurs. 2011. 11:74–82.

4. McCloskey JC, Bulecheck GM. Nursing intervention classification (NIC). 2000. St. Louis: Mosby.

5. Kim KH. Evidence-based nursing. Korean Nurse. 2003. 42:54–63.

6. McNeely ML, Campbell KL, Rowe BH, Klassen TP, Mackey JR, Courneya KS. Effects of exercise on breast cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2006. 175:34–41.

7. Choi SH, Nam YH, Ryu EJ, Baek MW, Suh DH, Suh SR, et al. An integrative review of oncology nursing research : 1980-1998. J Korean Acad Nurs. 1998. 28:786–800.

8. Oh PJ. An integrative review of oncology nursing research in Korea:1998-2003. J Korean Oncol Nurs. 2003. 3:112–121.

9. Lim SO, Hong EY. An integrative review and meta-analysis of oncology nursing research: 1985-1997. J Nurs Acad Soc. 1997. 27:857–870.

10. Smith MC, Stullenbarger E. An integrative review and meta-analysis of oncology nursing research: 1981-1990. Cancer Nurs. 1995. 18:167–179.

11. Suh M. The current trends of the nursing interventions classification systems. Seoul J Nurs. 1998. 12:1–14.

12. Bulechek GM, Butcher HK, McCloskey DJ. Nursing intervention classification (NIC). 2008. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby.

13. National Health Insurence. Accessed May 17, 2012. http://www.nhic.or.kr/portal/site/main/menuitem.

14. Moorhead S, Johnson M, Maas M, Swanson E. Nursing outcomes classification (NOC). 2008. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby.

15. Park MH. Survey on the prevalence and intervention of oral mucositisin hospitalized cancer patients receiving chemotherapy [dissertation]. 2012. Daegu: Keimyung Univ..

16. Yabro CH, Frogge MH, Goodman M, Groenwald SL. Cancer nursing principles and practice. 2000. 5th ed. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publisher.

17. Choi EH, Chung BY, Kim GD, Kim KH, Byun HS. Literature review of cognitive developmental interventions on patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy. J Korean Oncol Nurs. 2011. 11:26–32.

18. Lu M, Moritz S, Lorenzetti D, Sykes L, Straus S, Quan H. A systematic review of interventions to increase breast and cervical cancer screening uptake among Asian women. BMC Public Health. 2012. 12:413–429.

TOOLS

Similar articles