Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening of Blue-Color Workers

Su Ho Park; Gwang Suk Kim; Jong Uk Won; Chang Gi Park

doi:10.5388/aon.2012.12.2.166

Journal List > Asian Oncol Nurs > v.12(2) > 1081729

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

This article has been corrected. See "Erratum: Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening of Blue-Color Workers" in Volume 12 on page 246.

TOOLS

Park, Kim, Won, and Park: Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening of Blue-Color Workers

Original Article

Asian Oncology Nursing

Asian Oncology Nursing 2012; 12(2): 166-174.

Published online: 30 June 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2012.12.2.166

Factors Associated with Colorectal Cancer Screening of Blue-Color Workers

Su Ho Park¹, Gwang Suk Kim², Jong Uk Won³, Chang Gi Park⁴

¹Department of Nursing, Youngdong University, Youngdong, Korea.

²College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

³College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

⁴University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA.

Address reprint requests to: Department of Nursing, Youngdong University, 310 Deahak-ro, Youngdong-eup, Youngdong 370-701, Korea. Tel: +82-43-740-1382, Fax: +82-43-740-1299, psh@yd.ac.kr

Received 17 February 2012 Accepted 31 May 2012

Abstract

Purpose

Even though the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has increased in Korea, the colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) is lower than that of other cancer screenings. The purpose of this study was to identify CRCS rate and to predict factors in blue-color workers.

Methods

A descriptive survey design was employed. Data were collected with 327 workers, recruited from 32 companies, aged 40 and over using questionnaire from August 2010 to January 2011. Collected information included CRCS, demographic characteristics, job characteristics, health behaviors, and interpersonal relationship. The definition of CRCS included fecal occult blood test (FOBT), colonoscopy, or double contrast barium enema (DCBE).

Results

Among 94 workers receiving CRCS, workers having FOBT were 37, colonoscopy were 28, and DCBE was 6 in the past. Workers who aged over 50 (OR=2.30, 95% CI=1.11-4.77), middle school educated (OR=0.30, 95% CI=0.14-0.65), less working hours (OR=0.98, 95% CI=0.96-0.99), and had family members who carried out regular cancer screening (OR=1.89, 95% CI=1.01-3.55) were more likely to perform CRCS.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that the information and notice about CRCS to increase screening uptake, providing the accessible screening method, and involving company administrators or health managers might be useful to increase the CRCS rate in workers.

Keywords: Workers, Colorectal Neoplasms, Screening, Factor

Figures and Tables

Table 1

Characteristics of the Blue-color Workers (N=327)

^*Accommodation and food service activities, maintenance and repair service.

BFMBSS=Business facilities management and business support services; CRCS=Colorectal Cancer screening.

Table 2

Colorectal Cancer Screening according to Demographic and Job Characteristics (N=327)

^*Accommodation and food service activities, maintenance and repair service; ^†Continuous variable.

BFMBSS=Business facilities management and business support services.

Table 3

Colorectal Cancer Screening according to Health Behaviors (N=327)

^*Continuous variable.

Table 4

Colorectal Cancer Screening according to Interpersonal Relationship (N=327)

CRCS=Colorectal cancer screening.

Table 5

Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening by using Logistic Regression (N=327)

Hosmer and Lemeshow test: χ²=9.406, df=8, p=.309.

^*Accommodation and food service activities, maintenance and repair service; ^†Continuous variable.

BFMBSS=Business facilities management and business support services; NCS=National cancer screening; CRCS=Colorectal cancer screening; OR=Odds ratio; CI=Confidence interval.

Notes

This article is an addition based on the first author's doctoral dissertation from Yonsei University.

This study was supported by Korean Oncology Nursing Society Research Award (Grant No. 2011-01).

References

1. Ministry of Health and Welfare. National Cancer Center. Cancer fact & figure 2010 in the Republic of Korea. 2010. Goyang: President of National Cancer Center & Minister for Health and Welfare.

2. American Cancer Society. Cancer prevention & early detection: facts & figures 2010. 2010. Atlanta, Georgia: American Cancer Society.

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Colorectal cancer screening. accessed on 16 May 2011. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/workplacehealthpromotion/evaluation/topics/colorectal-cancer.html.

4. Statistics Korea. 2006-2008 survey of work by employment type. accessed on 28 April, 2011. Available at: http://kosis.kr/nsikor/view/stat10.do.

5. Harley AE, Devine CM, Beard B, Stoddard AM, Hunt MK, Sorensen G. Multiple health behavior changes in a cancer prevention intervention for construction workers, 2001-2003. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010. 7(3):A55.

6. Choi MC, Song YH, Rhee SY, Woo JT. Framingham risk scores by occupational group: based on the 3rd Korean health and nutrition examination survey. Korean J Occup Environ Med. 2009. 21:63–75.

7. Cho EY. Perception and attitude toward regular health check-up by workers at a company [dissertation]. 2002. Daegu: Yeungnam Univ..

8. McQueen A, Vernon SW, Myers RE, Watts BG, Lee ES. Correlates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening among male automotive workers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007. 16:500–509.

9. Bagai A, Parsons K, Malone B, Fantino J, Paszat L, Rabeneck L. Workplace colorectal cancer screening awareness programs: an adjunct to primary care practice? J Community Health. 2007. 32:157–167.

10. Zapka JG, Puleo E, Vickers-Lahti M, Luckmann R. Healthcare system factors and colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 2002. 23:28–35.

11. Bea SS, Jo HS, Kim DH, Choi YJ, Lee HJ, Lee TJ, et al. Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening of Koreans based on a socio-ecological model. Proceedings of the Korean Society for Health Promotion Conference. 2007. 2007 April 263-5; Seoul, Korea: Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion.

12. Kim SE, Shim KN, Jung SA, Yoo K, Moon IH. An association between obesity and the prevalence of colonic adenoma according to age and gender. J Gastroenterol. 2007. 42:616–623.

13. Kim EJ, Park JS. Comparison of health problems, conditions, & health promoting behavior and risky environment among various industrial workers. Korean J Occup Health Nurs. 2009. 18:71–83.

14. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G^*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009. 41:1149–1160.

15. Ministry of Health and Welfare. National Cancer Center. Quality guidelines of colorectal cancer screening. 2008. Goyang: Chair of Ministry of Health and Welfare & Chair of National Cancer Center.

16. Enforcement Decree of the Occupational Safety and Health Act: Korea Standard Industrial Classification. 2010. Article 2-2(22269).

17. National Health Insurance Corporation. Health insurance guide. accessed on 30 October 2010. Available at http://www.nhic.or.kr/portal/site/main/menuitem.7a546432e80e10cc9e459ac6062310a0/.

18. Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. Health promotion lifestyle profile development psychometrics. Nurs Res. 1987. 36:76–80.

19. Peak YM. Prediction model on health promotion behaviors in male office workers [dissertation]. 2005. Seoul: Ewha Women's Univ..

20. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. accessed on 10 April, 2010. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/.

21. Madlensky L, Esplen MJ, Gallinger S, McLaughlin JR, Goel V. Relatives of colorectal cancer patients: factors associated with screening behavior. Am J Prev Med. 2003. 25:187–194.

22. National Cancer Center. National Cancer Center New letter. accessed on 29 May 2012. Available at: http://ncc.re.kr/webzine/201101/sub_01.jsp.

23. Woods VD, Montgomery SB, Belliard JC, Ramirez-Johnson J, Wilson CM. Culture, black men, and prostate cancer: What is reality? Cancer Control. 2004. 11:388–396.

24. Tilley BC, Vernon SW, Myers R, Glanz K, Lu M, Hirst K, et al. The next step trial: Impact of a work-site colorectal cancer screening promotion program. Prev Med. 1999. 28:276–283.

25. Kim EK, Kim BG, Park JT, Kim HR, Koo JW. Factors affecting the health promotion activities of workers. Korean J Occup Environ Med. 2007. 19(1):56–64.

26. Peng Y, Chang W, Zhou H, Hu H, Liang W. Factors associated with health-seeking behavior among migrant workers in Beijing, China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010. 10:69.

27. Vyas A, Madhavan S, Lemasters T, Atkins E, Gainor S, Kennedy S, et al. Factors influencing adherence to mammography screening guidelines in appalachian women participating in a mobile mammography program. J Community Health. 2012. 37:632–646.

28. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Tasks of Master Plan for Health Examination in Korea (2011-2015). accessed on 10 January 2012. Available at: http://kasod.or.kr/sub_4_01.asp?b_type=V&bb_idx=164.

29. Ministry of Employment and Labor. Occupational Health Management and Practice 98. accesed on 2 May 2012. Available at http://msd.kosha.net/cwboard_view.do?boardId=1526&articleId=286999&page=2&seq=279&relativeSeq=7&date=1230529477526&cat1=&cat2=.

30. Park SH. Colorectal cancer screening in workers: using a stage model approach to examine the ecological predictors of behavior [dissertation]. 2011. Seoul: Yonsei Univ..

TOOLS

Similar articles