Journal List > Korean J Orthod > v.42(4) > 1080999

Gokce, Gokce, Gorgulu, Karacay, Akca, and Olmez: Relationship between Class III malocclusion and hyoid bone displacement during swallowing: a cine-magnetic resonance imaging study

Abstract

Objective

The displacement of the hyoid bone (HB) is a critical biomechanical component of the swallowing function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the swallowing-induced vertical and horizontal displacements of the HB in subjects with 2 different magnitudes of skeletal Class III malocclusion, by means of real-time, balanced turbo-field-echo (B-TFE) cine-magnetic resonance imaging.

Methods

The study population comprised 19 patients with mild skeletal Class III malocclusion, 16 with severe skeletal Class III malocclusion, and 20 with a skeletal Class I relationship. Before the commencement of the study, all subjects underwent cephalometric analysis to identify the nature of skeletal malformations. B-TFE images were obtained for the 4 consecutive stages of deglutition as each patient swallowed 10 mL of water, and the vertical and horizontal displacements of the HB were measured at each stage.

Results

At all stages of swallowing, the vertical position of the HB in the severe Class III malocclusion group was significantly lower than those in the mild Class III and Class I malocclusion groups. Similarly, the horizontal displacement of the HB was found to be significantly associated with the severity of malocclusion, i.e., the degree of Class III malocclusion, while the amount of anterior displacement of the HB decreased with an increase in the severity of the Class III deformity.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate the existence of a relationship between the magnitude of Class III malocclusion and HB displacement during swallowing.

INTRODUCTION

Deglutition is a complex neuromuscular function involving structures in the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and esophagus. Normal deglutition is generally described in terms of 4 stages: the oral preparatory stage, oral stage, pharyngeal stage, and esophageal stage. While the first 2 stages are under voluntary control, the last 2 are involuntary and under reflexive control.1-3
The pharyngeal stage of deglutition is triggered by the propulsion of a bolus from the oral cavity into the pharyngeal cavity. This stage is complex and demands that the following series of events occurs in a timely fashion: superior and anterior displacement of the hyoid bone (HB) and thyroid cartilage, tilt and seal of the epiglottis, closure of the true and false vocal folds, opening of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES), and the contraction of pharyngeal constrictors to propel food or liquid through the pharynx and into the esophagus.3,4 Therefore, the anterior and superior displacement of the HB is essential for the protection of the airway during the swallow and for the safe and efficient passage of the bolus into the esophagus.3,5,6 The synergistic occurrence of the contraction and relaxation of the suprahyoid muscles facilitates the displacement of the HB and tongue, pulls the larynx forward and upward, closes the epiglottis, and opens the UES, thereby permitting the bolus to enter the esophagus.3,7,8
The suprahyoid muscles are attached to several craniofacial landmarks, such as the mandibular symphysis, the inferior border of the mandible, the base of the skull, and the tongue. As a result, craniofacial morphology affects the movement of the tongue and HB.3,7-9
Previous studies have examined the impact of several factors, including age,3,10 sex,10-12 volume,13,14 type15,16 of material swallowed, and dysphagia,15,17 on the amount of HB displacement. For instance, Logemann et al.10 have reported greater superior displacement among young male subjects than female subjects and greater anterior displacement among older women than younger women. Further, Ishida et al.16 have reported that swallowing solids causes significantly greater superior and anterior displacement than swallowing liquids and that anterior displacement is significantly greater than superior displacement. Perlman et al.15 reported that while swallowing solids, dysphagic patients exhibited less anterior and vertical displacement than normal subjects, although no such difference was observed between liquid and paste swallows. Both Cook et al.13 and Dodds et al.14 have shown that HB displacement increases with an increase in the bolus volume.
Many studies have demonstrated a significant correlation between craniofacial morphology and HB movement during swallowing.7,11,12,18-20 Gay et al.11 evaluated the swallowing function with bite blocks placed between the molars of male and female subjects. They hypothesized that morphological characteristics, specifically, the larger mandible in men, may play a role in the motor-control strategies employed during swallowing.11 In another study examining the effects of an orthodontic crib on swallowing, Cuozzo and Bowman20 determined that the distance between the HB and the mandibular plane increased after the use of the crib. Haralabakis et al.12 found that the distance between the HB and the palatal plane is significantly greater among men with open bite than men with normal Class I occlusion. Zhou et al.18 compared the swallowing patterns in adults with normal occlusion and those with skeletal class III malocclusion and determined that the tongue, HB, and mandible were positioned much lower in skeletal Class III patients than in normal individuals. Thus, although the abovementioned studies have demonstrated an association between craniofacial morphology and HB movement/characteristics, the nature of this association has not been explored in detail. Further, it is still unclear whether the degree of mandibular prognathism affects the initial position or movement patterns of the HB.
In addition to several other techniques,1-4,7,15,18-26 dynamic (cine) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive method that is now being used in the evaluation of the swallowing function.1,22-25,27,28 We used this technique in the current study to determine the maximum swallowing-induced superior and anterior displacement of the HB in subjects with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Since the HB is attached to the mandible by the suprahyoid musculature, the movement of the HB can be affected by the anatomical variations in the size and position of the mandible during swallowing. We hypothesized that the degree of mandibular prognathism would correlate with HB movement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was initiated after obtaining institutional approval from the Gulhane Military Medical Academy's Ethics Committee. The study participants were selected from among patients referred to the Department of Orthodontics, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Dental Science Center. Subjects were informed of the study procedure, but not the study aim, and all participants provided written informed consent. Cephalometric analysis was performed, and the subjects were grouped according to the following parameters: SNA angle (formed by the intersection of planes SN and NA), SNB angle (formed by the intersection of planes SN and NB), NVer-A distance (between the line drawn from points N and A perpendicular to FH), and NVer-Pog distance (between the line drawn from points N and Pog perpendicular to FH). The following groups were defined according to the degree of skeletal malformation:
  • Group 1: Mild Class III group (82° < SNB < 85°; -6 mm < NVer-Pog < 0 mm)

  • Group 2: Severe Class III group (85° < SNB; 0 mm < NVer-Pog)

  • Group 3: Class I (control) group (SNB = 80 ± 2°; NVer-Pog = -6 ± 1 mm)

The mild Class III group comprised 19 subjects (11 male, 8 female; age range, 18 - 25 years; mean age, 21.5 years); the severe Class III group, 16 subjects (10 male, 6 female; age range, 17 - 25 years; mean age, 19 years); and the Class I group, 20 patients (10 male, 10 female; age range, 17 - 24 years; mean age, 19.5 years).
None of the subjects had a micrognathic maxilla, bimaxillary protrusion (SNA = 82 ± 2°; NVer-A = 0 ± 1 mm), or a vertical facial high anomaly (S-Go/N-Me = 62 - 65%); further, none of them had any disorders capable of affecting swallowing, such as masticatory difficulty, dysphagia, neurological impairment, or degenerative diseases.
MRIs showing consecutive stages of deglutition were obtained for all participants. The subjects were examined in a supine position using a 1.5-Tesla superconducting MR scanner (The New Intera Nova; Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands) with a standard quadrature head coil and Version 9 software. The system was equipped with magnetic field gradients with a maximum strength of 33 mT/m and a maximum slew rate of 160 T·m-1 s-1. In order to increase the signal intensity from the oropharynx and observe soft-tissue motion during bolus propulsion, 10 mL of water delivered with a syringe was used as a bolus. The subjects were instructed to swallow the entire volume when asked. Real-time, balanced turbo-field-echo (B-TFE) images (shortest TR/TE: 2.1/1.09 ms per excitation) were obtained in the midsagittal plane (defined as the section parallel to the interhemispheric fissure and identified by preliminary images), by using a 50° flip angle, 10-mm slice thickness, autoshim, 350 × 350-mm FOV, and a 96 × 96 matrix size. A total of 100 dynamic scans were obtained in 11 seconds. The acquired images were transferred to a system workstation (Easy Vision R4; Philips Medical Systems), and the image analysis and cine-MRI scans were performed offline on a workstation. The images were individually transferred by the image-capture program provided by the vendor and carefully evaluated to identify the anatomical landmarks visible for each patient (Figures 1 and 2). The same specialist evaluated all the images and selected 4 images that best represented the 4 stages of deglutition. The following criteria were used to define each deglutition stage:
  • Stage 1 (oral preparatory stage): contact of the tongue tip with the maxillary incisors and/or palatal mucosa

  • Stage 2 (oral stage): loss of contact of the tongue dorsum with the soft palate

  • Stage 3 (pharyngeal stage): passage of the bolus head across the posterior/inferior margin of the mandibular ramus

  • Stage 4 (esophageal stage): passage of the bolus head through the esophageal opening (Figures 3, 4, and 5)

The 4 mid-sagittal images were selected and printed on radiographs, and anatomic landmarks (Figure 1) and reference lines were plotted (Figure 2) on the images by the same investigator, in order to assess the HB displacement. The vertical position of the HB was identified by measuring the distances H-S, H-NL, and H-C3RGN and the horizontal position of the HB, by the measurement of the distances H-C3 and H-RGN, as shown in Figures 1 and 2. In order to minimize the effects of methodological errors in measurement, the measurements were repeated by the same researcher after a 10-day period, and the average of the 2 measurements was recorded. The paired sample t-test was used for the statistical analysis of a random selection of 50% of the samples, and no statistically significant differences were found between the 2 measurements (p ≥ 0.05).
Statistical analysis was performed using the software MS Excel (Microsoft Co., Redmond, WA, USA) and SPSS for Windows version 15.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). The experimental subject was taken as the statistical unit of analysis, and the average values of the measurements made on each subject were processed accordingly. Descriptive values were calculated as means and standard errors. The normality of the distributions for the variables was measured using the Wilk-Shapiro normality test, which showed a normal distribution for vertical and horizontal distances between the HB and reference points. Repeated-measures multiple-way analysis of variance (MW-ANOVA) was used to assess measurements obtained for each stage, and Bonferroni post-hoc tests were performed to analyze any differences. The level of statistical significance was established as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Descriptive statistics of the measurements of the HB parameters obtained for interstage, intergroup, and group-stage interactions are presented in Table 1. No statistically significant interactions were found between the stages and groups for any of the measured parameters (Table 1). Thus, the main effects of malocclusion and swallowing stages on HB positioning were taken into consideration. To determine the change in HB positioning, the interstage interactions in all groups and intergroup interactions in all the stages were analyzed for each parameter.

Intragroup comparison of HB position according to the stages of swallowing

To determine the HB position in different stages, the mean values of all 3 groups were taken into consideration for each stage.
The H-S, H-NL, and H-C3RGN measurements indicated significant interstage differences in the vertical position of the HB (p < 0.001): the HB was positioned more inferiorly at Stages 1 and 4 than at Stages 2 and 3. In fact, the vertical positioning of the HB was nearly identical at Stages 1 and 4 and at Stages 2 and 3 (Table 2).
The H-C3 and H-RGN measurements indicated significant differences in the horizontal position of the HB between Stages 1 and 2 (p < 0.001) and between Stages 1 and 3 (p < 0.05); a significant anterior movement was noted from Stage 1 to Stages 2 and 3. Similarly, a significant posterior movement was noted in the horizontal position of the HB between Stage 2 and Stages 3 and 4 (p < 0.05): a significant posterior movement from Stage 2 to Stages 3 and 4. No significant differences were found in the horizontal position of the HB between Stages 1 and 4 or between Stages 3 and 4 (Table 2, Figure 6).

Intergroup comparison of the HB position

In order to ascertain the intergroup differences in the HB positions, the mean values of the parameters obtained for each of the 4 stages were taken into consideration.
The vertical position of the HB differed significantly between the groups. The HB was positioned significantly more superior in the mild Class III group than in the severe Class III group (p < 0.05). Similarly, the HB was positioned more superiorly in the Class I group than in the mild Class III group, but only the difference in the H-S parameter was statistically significant (p = 0.028). A significant difference was also found in the HB position between the severe Class III group and the Class I group (p < 0.001; Table 3).
Significant intergroup differences were also noted in the horizontal position of the HB. The HB was positioned more anteriorly in the mild Class III group than in the severe Class III group, as indicated by an increase in the H-C3 and decrease in the H-RGN measurements (p < 0.05). The HB was also positioned more anteriorly in the mild Class III group than in the Class I group, but only H-RGN was significantly shorter in the mild Class III group than in the Class I group (p < 0.001). Finally, the HB was positioned more anteriorly in the severe Class III group than in the Class I group, as indicated by an increase in the H-C3 and decrease in the H-RGN measurements (p < 0.001; Table 3, Figure 7).

DISCUSSION

This study employed the relatively simple and noninvasive method of cine-MRI to elucidate the (1) HB location in patients with skeletal Class I occlusion and 2 different magnitudes of Class III malocclusions and (2) the mechanism of HB displacement during the 4 stages of deglutition. To eliminate the effects of age and sex10 on the swallowing function, we conducted the study on a homogeneous population. Subjects were classified according to anteroposterior dentofacial discrepancies assessed on the basis of the SNA and SNB angles, as measured by Steiner cephalometric analysis. These angles are the most commonly used parameters in similar scientific studies, and their selection for this study was aimed at facilitating comparisons with other studies.29 Additionally, the NVer-Pog distance was taken into consideration to determine the severity of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Only subjects with mandibular prognathism were included in the Class III groups. Subjects with anteroposterior maxillary deficiencies, retrognathism, or vertical facial anomalies were excluded from the study. Stable S, C3 point, and NL line measurements were considered as indicators of mandibular prognathism. A constant relationship is known to exist between the mandible and the HB.9,12 The location of the HB is determined by the musculature attached to the mandible through the influence of genioglossus muscle activity on tongue protrusion.9 Consistently, this study revealed clear differences in the HB location between subjects with Class I occlusion and those with Class III malocclusions of different severities.
In this study, the deglutition process has been evaluated in 4 stages: oral preparatory, oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal, as is the general practice.1,2 Previous studies have been conducted using different bolus volumes13,14 and swallowing materials,16 both of which have an effect on HB displacement. In the present study, however, a standardized bolus of 10 mL of water was used in order to easily identify the swallowing stages and monitor the swallowing patterns.24
Deglutition has been investigated using a variety of techniques, including videofluoroscopy, cineradiography, surface electromyography (sEMG), electropalatography, electromagnetic articulography, and ultrasonography.1-4,7,15,18-26 Both cineradiography and videofluoroscopy have been reported to be acceptable methods for the assessment of deglutition; however, radiation exposure, the risk of barium aspiration, and the indirect visualization of structures render the use of these techniques questionable.21,23 Technical limitations related to skin/electrode impedance and individual variations in muscle depth and size are concerns restricting the use of sEMG.24,26 In the case of electropalatography, on the other hand, the acrylic plate base may affect the position and movement of the tongue during deglutition.24,25 Similarly, with electromagnetic articulography, the receiver coils may prevent subjects from swallowing normally.21 Ultrasonography, although noninvasive, cannot be used to examine the pharynx or larynx because of skeletal interference.24
A new technology known as cine-MRI, or kinetic MRI, helps obtain a series of anatomic images showing periodic motion, and it has been used effectively to evaluate different areas of the body during physiological movement.1,2,23,24 This promising dynamic diagnostic modality has the advantages of noninvasiveness, absence of radiation exposure, and the ability to image soft-tissue anatomy during motion in a multiplanar mode.1,2,16,24,27,28 Panebianco et al.28 were able to obtain good-quality images using a temporal resolution of 3 - 4 slices/seconds, thereby demonstrating that dynamic MRI is a very promising tool in the evaluation of normal pharyngeal anatomy and physiology. Further, the availability of turbo fast low-angle shot acquisition provides the best anatomical and functional information available to evaluate the process of swallowing.1,24,28 We chose to evaluate the movement of the HB by using dynamic MRI for its noninvasive nature and reliability, which have been successfully shown in previous studies.1,22,24,27,28 Accordingly, a TFE sequence was implemented to evaluate the HB and related pharyngeal structures in the present study.
Despite the fact that the subjects in the present study were placed in the supine position during MRI imaging, the sequences obtained afforded clear visibility of the tongue and surrounding structures both during motion and at rest. Numerous reports in the literature1,22,24,27,28 have referred to the use of kinetic MRI techniques for the evaluation of swallowing in the supine position. The tongue position and function may be affected when a subject is in the supine position, since the tongue can slip into the throat, making it difficult to swallow. In an MRI-based study conducted by Gilbert et al.,22 tongue behavior during swallowing was examined by having subjects draw 5 mL of water into their mouths through a plastic tube and swallowing the entire volume on command while in a supine position. The results of this study were similar to those obtained in previous videofluoroscopy and ultrasonography studies in which the subjects were seated upright during swallowing. Moreover, a study by Pracharktam et al.30 that used 2-dimensional cephalometry to examine the upper airway passage yielded similar information with subjects in both the supine and upright positions. While it is possible that the position of the subject may have affected tongue functioning in the present study, the effect would have been similar for all subjects, including controls, and would not have influenced intergroup comparisons. Nevertheless, the natural function of the tongue may have been influenced by the position of the subjects in this study and contributed to some extent to the differences between the results of this study and those obtained using other visualization techniques.21,27
The HB has previously been described as first moving upward, then forward, and then returning to its original position during swallowing.17 In the present study, the obtained measurements showed that in all the groups, the HB was positioned most inferiorly at the beginning of the swallow, progressed superiorly from Stage 1 to Stage 2 and from Stage 2 to Stage 3, reached its most superior position at Stage 3, again moved inferiorly from Stage 3 to Stage 4, and then returned to its position at the start of Stage 1. Furthermore, the HB was shown to be positioned most posteriorly at Stage 1, moving anteriorly from Stage 1 to Stage 2, during which it attained its most anterior position; it then progressed posteriorly from Stage 2 through Stages 3 and 4 to return close to its original position at the start of the swallow (Figure 6). In other words, the general path of motion of the HB during swallowing was similar in all groups, regardless of the nature of the occlusion.
Previous studies have found vertical displacement of the HB to range from 1.3 to 1.9 cm during swallowing.10,17 Similar values for the vertical displacement of the HB were obtained in the current study, as indicated by the values of the parameter H-S (range, 99.75 - 110.06 mm in the mild Class III group; 101.17 - 115.11 mm, severe Class III group; and 95.85 - 105.05 mm, Class I group); horizontal displacement, assessed in terms of H-C3, was found to be less than the vertical displacement in all the groups (range, 37.67 - 40.94 mm, 40.06 - 43.56 mm, and 35.70 - 39.05 mm, respectively; Table 1). These findings are consistent with those reported by Ishida et al.,16 who found that the upward displacement of the HB during swallowing was less that its forward displacement.
In line with a number of previous studies demonstrating that variations in normal skeletal morphology affect HB movement,7,9,11,12,18,19 this study revealed that skeletal Class III malocclusion influences HB movement. The main finding was that the increase of the HB movement in accordance with the mandible and its related structures, since the initial location of the HB was more lower and frontal in the severe Class III group than the other groups. The paths of the HB and the tongue root were similar, which can be expected, given that the HB is attached to the tongue.7-9,19
With a decrease in the magnitude of the Class III deformity, an increase was noted in the anterior and vertical displacements of the HB during swallowing. On comparing the swallowing patterns in adults, Zhou et al.18 found that the tongue, the HB, and the mandible were positioned much lower in individuals with normal occlusion than in those with skeletal Class III malocclusion. In their study examining the relationship of the HB and posterior surface of the tongue in prognathism and micrognathia, Yamaoka et al.9 found significant correlations between the posterior surface of the tongue and the position of the HB in skeletal Class III malocclusion. They also reported that the HB was protruded and positioned more anteriorly in individuals with mandibular protrusion compared to those with retrognathia. The findings of the present study were in agreement with the findings of both these earlier studies. Additionally, our study enabled the elucidation of the dynamic displacement of the HB during each stage of deglutition (Figure 7).
While Class III malocclusion did not appear to affect the overall pattern of HB motion, the magnitude of skeletal Class III malocclusion was found to influence the degree of HB displacement. As expected, HB displacement was greater in patients with severe Class III malocclusion than those with mild Class III malocclusion as well as controls with normal occlusion. To obtain greater details of the information about the effects of malocclusion on swallowing patterns, it is necessary to conduct cine-MRI studies with larger sample sizes and samples that include different types of malocclusions.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this swallowing study showed that dynamic MRI is a reliable technique for evaluating swallowing patterns. Cine-MRI images showed that the forward and upward displacements of the HB during bolus swallowing were significantly related to craniofacial morphology. Although the pattern of HB movement during swallowing was similar in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and control subjects with normal occlusion, differences were noted in the degree of this movement. Specifically, as the magnitude of the skeletal Class III deformity increased, the amount of forward and upward displacement of the HB increased.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1
Definition of cephalometric points traced on the MR images. H, hyoidale, the most anterosuperior point of the hyoid bone; S, sella, the point representing the midpoint of the pituitary fossa (sella turcica); RGN, retrognathion, the most prominent point of the posterior border of the mandibular symphysis; C3, the most inferoanterior point on the body of the third cervical vertebra; ANS, anterior nasal spine, the tip of the bony anterior nasal spine, in the median plane; PNS, posterior nasal spine, the tip of the bony posterior nasal spine, in the median plane; NL, nasal line, a horizontal line running through ANS and PNS.
kjod-42-190-g001
Figure 2
Definition of the linear measurements of the hyoid bone traced on the magnetic resonance images. H-S (mm), the vertical distance between point H and point S; H-NL (mm), the vertical distance between point H and point NL; H-C3RGN (mm), the vertical distance between point H and the line connecting points C3 and RGN; H-C3 (mm), the horizontal distance between point H and C3; H-RGN (mm), the horizontal distance between point H and RGN.
kjod-42-190-g002
Figure 3
Four contiguous dynamic cine-magnetic resonance images obtained during swallowing for patients with mild skeletal Class III malocclusion. A, Stage 1, contact of the tongue tip with the maxillary incisors and/or the palatal mucosa (oral preparatory stage). B, Stage 2, loss of contact of the dorsum of the tongue with the soft palate (oral stage). C, Stage 3, passage of the bolus head across the posterior/inferior margin of the ramus of the mandible (pharyngeal stage). D, Stage 4, passage of the bolus head through the opening of the esophagus (esophageal stage).
kjod-42-190-g003
Figure 4
Four contiguous dynamic cine-magnetic resonance images obtained during swallowing for patients with severe skeletal Class III malocclusion. A, Oral preparatory stage. B, Oral stage. C, Pharyngeal stage. D, Esophageal stage.
kjod-42-190-g004
Figure 5
Four contiguous dynamic cine-magnetic resonance images obtained during swallowing for patients with normal skeletal Class I occlusion (control group). A, Oral preparatory stage. B, Oral stage. C, Pharyngeal stage. D, Esophageal stage.
kjod-42-190-g005
Figure 6
Intragroup comparison of the hyoid bone positions at different stages.
kjod-42-190-g006
Figure 7
Intergroup comparison of the hyoid bone positions.
kjod-42-190-g007
Table 1
Descriptive statistics of hyoid bone parameters for each stage, group, and group-stage interaction
kjod-42-190-i001

Values related to HB are represented in millimeters.

Table 2
Interstage comparison of hyoid bone parameters (mean value of all 3 groups) for all groups
kjod-42-190-i002

Values related to HB are represented in millimeters.

MD, Mean difference; SE, standard error.

Table 3
Intergroup comparison of hyoid bone parameters (mean value of all 4 stages) for all stages
kjod-42-190-i003

Values related to HB are represented in millimeters.

MD, Mean difference; SE, standard error.

Notes

The authors report no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

References

1. Anagnostara A, Stoeckli S, Weber OM, Kollias SS. Evaluation of the anatomical and functional properties of deglutition with various kinetic high-speed MRI sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001. 14:194–199.
crossref
2. Hartl DM, Albiter M, Kolb F, Luboinski B, Sigal R. Morphologic parameters of normal swallowing events using single-shot fast spin echo dynamic MRI. Dysphagia. 2003. 18:255–262.
crossref
3. Kim Y, McCullough GH. Maximum hyoid displacement in normal swallowing. Dysphagia. 2008. 23:274–279.
crossref
4. Robbins J, Hamilton JW, Lof GL, Kempster GB. Oropharyngeal swallowing in normal adults of different ages. Gastroenterology. 1992. 103:823–829.
crossref
5. Lundy DS, Smith C, Colangelo L, Sullivan PA, Logemann JA, Lazarus CL, et al. Aspiration: cause and implications. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999. 120:474–478.
crossref
6. Humbert IA, Poletto CJ, Saxon KG, Kearney PR, Crujido L, Wright-Harp W, et al. The effect of surface electrical stimulation on hyolaryngeal movement in normal individuals at rest and during swallowing. J Appl Physiol. 2006. 101:1657–1663.
crossref
7. Mays KA, Palmer JB, Kuhlemeier KV. Influence of craniofacial morphology on hyoid movement: a preliminary correlational study. Dysphagia. 2009. 24:71–76.
crossref
8. Sivarao DV, Goyal RK. Functional anatomy and physiology of the upper esophageal sphincter. Am J Med. 2000. 108:Suppl 4a. 27S–37S.
crossref
9. Yamaoka M, Furusawa K, Uematsu T, Okafuji N, Kayamoto D, Kurihara S. Relationship of the hyoid bone and posterior surface of the tongue in prognathism and micrognathia. J Oral Rehabil. 2003. 30:914–920.
crossref
10. Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, Kahrilas PJ. Oropharyngeal swallow in younger and older women: videofluoroscopic analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002. 45:434–445.
11. Gay T, Rendell JK, Spiro J, Mosier K, Lurie AG. Coordination of oral cavity and laryngeal movements during swallowing. J Appl Physiol. 1994. 77:357–365.
crossref
12. Haralabakis NB, Toutountzakis NM, Yiagtzis SC. The hyoid bone position in adult individuals with open bite and normal occlusion. Eur J Orthod. 1993. 15:265–271.
crossref
13. Cook IJ, Dodds WJ, Dantas RO, Massey B, Kern MK, Lang IM, et al. Opening mechanisms of the human upper esophageal sphincter. Am J Physiol. 1989. 257:G748–G759.
crossref
14. Dodds WJ, Man KM, Cook IJ, Kahrilas PJ, Stewart ET, Kern MK. Influence of bolus volume on swallow-induced hyoid movement in normal subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988. 150:1307–1309.
crossref
15. Perlman AL, VanDaele DJ, Otterbacher MS. Quantitative assessment of hyoid bone displacement from video images during swallowing. J Speech Hear Res. 1995. 38:579–585.
crossref
16. Ishida R, Palmer JB, Hiiemae KM. Hyoid motion during swallowing: factors affecting forward and upward displacement. Dysphagia. 2002. 17:262–272.
crossref
17. Paik NJ, Kim SJ, Lee HJ, Jeon JY, Lim JY, Han TR. Movement of the hyoid bone and the epiglottis during swallowing in patients with dysphagia from different etiologies. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008. 18:329–335.
crossref
18. Zhou Y, Fu M, Wang C. Swallowing pattern in skeletal Class III malocclusion. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1995. 30:355–358.
19. Cheng CF, Peng CL, Chiou HY, Tsai CY. Dentofacial morphology and tongue function during swallowing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002. 122:491–499.
crossref
20. Cuozzo GS, Bowman DC. Hyoid positioning during deglutition following forced positioning of the tongue. Am J Orthod. 1975. 68:564–570.
crossref
21. Fujiki T, Inoue M, Miyawaki S, Nagasaki T, Tanimoto K, Takano-Yamamoto T. Relationship between maxillofacial morphology and deglutitive tongue movement in patients with anterior open bite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004. 125:160–167.
crossref
22. Gilbert RJ, Reese TG, Daftary SJ, Smith RN, Weisskoff RM, Wedeen VJ. Determination of lingual myoarchitecture in whole tissue by NMR imaging of anisotropic water diffusion. Am J Physiol. 1998. 275:G363–G369.
23. Honda Y, Hata N. Dynamic imaging of swallowing in a seated position using open-configuration MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007. 26:172–176.
crossref
24. Karaçay S, Akin E, Sayin MO, Bulakbaşi N. Real time balanced turbo field echo Cine-MRI in the analysis of deglutition events and transit times. J Oral Rehabil. 2006. 33:646–653.
crossref
25. Hiiemae KM, Palmer JB. Tongue movements in feeding and speech. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003. 14:413–429.
crossref
26. Monaco A, Cattaneo R, Spadaro A, Giannoni M. Surface electromyography pattern of human swallowing. BMC Oral Health. 2008. 8:6.
crossref
27. Mehnert J, Landau H, Mussler A, Reinicke J, Müller-Hartwich R, Orawa H, et al. Comparison between logopedic and MRI findings in evaluating tongue function. J Orofac Orthop. 2009. 70:455–467.
crossref
28. Panebianco V, Ruoppolo G, Pelle G, Schettino I, Roma R, Bernardo S, et al. Morpho-functional patterns of physiologic oropharyngeal swallowing evaluated with dynamic fast MRI. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010. 267:1461–1466.
crossref
29. Alves PV, Zhao L, O'Gara M, Patel PK, Bolognese AM. Three-dimensional cephalometric study of upper airway space in skeletal class II and III healthy patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2008. 19:1497–1507.
crossref
30. Pracharktam N, Nelson S, Hans MG, Broadbent BH, Redline S, Rosenberg C, et al. Cephalometric assessment in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996. 109:410–419.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles