Abstract
Purpose
Methods
Results
Figures and Tables
![]() | Fig. 1Abdominal subcutaneous fat on ultrasonography image. (A) Midline abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness (about 3.9 cm) was measured transversely at the one centimeter caudal to the umbilicus level. (B) Right flank abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness (about 1.9 cm) was measured coronally at two locations of the right flank, and the average value was recorded. The image was captured when the transducer just had contact with the skin to avoid compressing the subcutaneous adipose fascia. |
![]() | Fig. 2Analysis of variance between grade of hepatic steatosis and midline abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness (MASFT), *p<0.01. |
![]() | Fig. 3Analysis of variance between grade of hepatic steatosis and right flank abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness (RFASFT), *p<0.01. |
Table 1
Subjective Characteristics

Values are presented as range or mean±standard deviation.
BMI: body mass index, MASFT: midline abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness, RFASFT: right flank abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness, TG: triglyceride, TC: total cholesterol, HDL: high density lipoprotein, LDL: low density lipoprotein, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase.
Table 3
Midline Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat Thickness and Right Flank Abdominal Subcutaneous Fat Thickness according to the Grade of Hepatic Steatosis

Table 4
Spearman Correlation between Abdominal Fat Thickness, and Body Mass Index, Serum Lipid, and Liver Transaminases

MASFT: midline abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness, RFASFT: right flank abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness, BMI: body mass index, TG: triglyceride, TC: total cholesterol, HDL: high density lipoprotein, LDL: low density lipoprotein, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase.
*p<0.01, †p<0.05.
References














