Journal List > Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr > v.17(2) > 1080800

Kim, Cho, and Kim: Two Cases of Infantile Intra-abdominal Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor

Abstract

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is rare mesenchymal solid tumor that consists of proliferating myofibroblasts with an inflammatory infiltrate background. It has a very low prevalence in infants and occurs mainly in children and young adults. IMT are mainly located in the thoracic cavity, but intra-abdominal lesions are rare. IMT can exhibit locally aggressive neoplastic processes and metastases similar to malignancies, so, have clinical importance. Herein, we describe two infantile intra-abdominal IMT cases presenting with incidentally found palpable abdominal mass. A 4-month-old male infant had IMT at the ileal mesentery and a 5-month-old male infant had IMT at liver. Both cases were successfully treated by complete surgical resection without complication or recurrence. Considering the biological behavior of the intermediate type of neoplasm in IMT, we expect good survivals when achieving appropriate surgical resection without adjuvant therapy in infantile intra-abdominal IMT.

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is rare mesenchymal solid tumor that consists of proliferating myofibroblasts with an inflammatory infiltrate background. It occurs mainly in children and young adults, but has a low prevalence in infants [1,2]. IMTs may be located in various organs, mainly those in the thorax, but intra-abdominal lesions are relatively rare [3].
Intra-abdominal IMTs have clinical importance due to their relationship to malignancy. Intra-abdominal IMTs are difficult to distinguish preoperatively from other malignancies, such as sarcomas, lymphomas, and metastases [4]. IMTs were originally reported to be benign tumors, but can exhibit locally aggressive neoplastic processes and metastases similar to malignancies. Based on such findings, surgical excision of IMTs is recommended [2].
In this report we describe two cases of infantile intra-abdominal IMT that were histopathologically diagnosed following surgical excision.

CASE REPORT

Case 1

A 4-month-old male infant was transferred to our institution for further evaluation of a palpable upper abdominal mass. The mass was found incidentally during the screening for a regular vaccination. He was vaginally delivered at 37 weeks of gestation and weighed 3,260 g. He had no previous medical or familial history. Physical examination revealed a soft, non-tender mass in the right upper quadrant of the abdomen.
Computed tomography scan revealed a 7.5×6.8×6.3 cm cyst-like mass attached to the small intestine and located in the right abdomen, inferior to the liver and anterior to the kidney (Fig. 1). We performed the laparoscopic exploration to evaluate the mesenteric cyst. An 8.5×7.2×6.3 cm solid, not cystic, mass was located at the ileal mesentery. Tumor excision with preservation of the ileum was performed (Fig. 2).
Histological examination revealed a proliferation of spindled myofibroblasts in a background with infiltration of chronic inflammatory cells such as lymphocytes and plasma cells. On immunohistochemical staining, the tumor cells showed cytoplasmic positivity for desmin, smooth muscle actin (SMA), D2-40, and anaplastic lymphoma tyrosine kinase receptor (ALK) 1 and negativity for HMB45, c-kit, S-100, Factor VIII, CD34, CK5/6, h-caldesmon, epithelial antigen membrane, pan-CK, and calretinin (Fig. 3).
His postoperative course was uneventful. The patient is currently doing well with no evidence of recurrence during the 3 months of follow-up.

Case 2

A 5-month-old male infant was referred to our hospital for further evaluation of a hepatomegaly found during the screening for a regular vaccination. He was born at 40 weeks of gestation via Cesarean section and weighed 3,380 g. He had no previous medical or familial history. Physical examination revealed a hepatomegaly for which the liver margin was palpable by 6 cm below the costal margin without pain or tenderness.
Ultrasound scan showed about 10 cm-sized mass in right lobe of liver. For evaluating the relationships with neighboring structures and differential diagnosis, magnetic resonance image (MRI) was conducted. MRI showed a 10.4×9.5×9.0 cm mass in the right lobe of the liver. The mass exhibited low signal intensity on T1-weighted images, heterogeneous signal intensity on T2-weighted images, and positive enhancement and diffusion restriction on diffusion-weighted images (Fig. 4). We assumed the mass was a benign hepatic mass such as focal nodular hyperplasia or mesenchymal hamartoma. Sono-guided biopsy was performed and IMT was diagnosed histologically. At operation, a solid mass measuring 11.5×9.5 cm was presented at the right lobe of the liver (Fig. 5) and right hemihepatectomy was performed.
Pathological examination revealed spindle cell proliferation with infiltration of lymphocytes and plasma cells, compatible with IMT. On immunohistochemical staining, the tumor cells showed positivity for ALK and SMA, focal weak positivity for c-kit, and negativity for desmin, h-caldesmon, S-100, CD21, and CD34.
His postoperative course was uneventful. The patient is currently doing well with no evidence of recurrence during the 14 months of follow-up.

DISCUSSION

IMT has been described with a variety of terms in the past [5]. However, it is generally recognized as a neoplasm with the possible presence of local recurrence, multifocality, and distant metastasis. Because IMT has distinctive histopathologic features, comprising myofibroblastic mesenchymal cells mixed with an inflammatory infiltration of lymphocytes, plasma cells, and histiocytes, it has been designated as a specific entity. Although it usually occurs in the lung, the extra-pulmonary region, such as head and neck, abdominopelvic cavity, retroperitoneum, and rarely solid organs in the abdomen, can be involved. Consequently, IMT can present with variable clinical symptoms according to the site of tumor origin. IMT is primarily a soft tissue tumor in young adults, most frequently occurring in the first two decades of life, but IMT may occur over a wider age range (3 weeks to 74 years) [2,5,6,7]. In Korea, there have been few reported infantile cases with the youngest patient being a 3 month-old infant with IMT at the transverse colon mesentery [8].
The etiology of IMT has not been fully described and is currently regarded as a specific neoplastic lesion with inflammatory sclerosing and fibrosing processes that may be recognized by cytogenetic aberrations such as ALK gene rearrangement, p53 mutation, and MDM2 expression [3,7]. Those associations may act as prognostic indicators that could suggest the need for aggressive clinical behavior, particularly when the IMT exhibits a combination of cellular atypia, ganglion-like cells, aneuploidy, and p53 overexpression [3,9].
Although the appropriate treatment for IMT is variable, surgical excision has been the cornerstone in managing this tumor. In one case, when complete resection of a hepatic IMT was impossible, total hepatectomy and liver transplantation were performed [3]. Other authors have suggested the use of steroids, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, especially COX-2 inhibitors as an adjuvant therapy, but there is no consensus on an effective non-surgical therapy [2,10].
ALK expression is found in 36-60% of IMT and considered that having relations with aggressive behaviors, including more frequent intraabdominal location and epithelioid tumoral morphology, larger tumor size, and higher recurrent rate. But, though ALK expression is positive, complete surgical resection is known to be able to improve the prognosis [11,12].
In our cases, two different abdominal IMT types were described: one originating in mesentery and the other in a solid organ (liver). Fortunately, complete resection was successful in both cases done. In IMT, recurrence and metastasis are rare and they have been associated with certain conditions, including more aggressive behavior and multifocal tumors, retroperitoneal location, infiltration of adjacent structures, and incomplete excision [5]. In our cases there has been no recurrence.
In summary, examples of abdominal IMT are infrequent in infants and our two cases were successfully treated by complete surgical resection. Considering the biological behavior of the intermediate type of neoplasm in IMT, we expect good survivals when achieving appropriate surgical resection without adjuvant therapy.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Computed tomography scan. A cyst-like mass attached to small intestine and located at right abdomen, inferior to liver and anterior to kidney.
pghn-17-116-g001
Fig. 2
Resected mass from mesentery of ileum.
pghn-17-116-g002
Fig. 3
Pathologic findings. (A) Spindle myofibroblastic cells in a fibromyxoid background with intermingled inflammatory cells (H&E, ×200). (B) Tumor cells highlighted by ALK (×400). (C) Tumor cells highlighted by SMA (×400).
pghn-17-116-g003
Fig. 4
Magnetic resonance images. (A) T1 weighted image showing a large mass at right liver lobe with low signal intensities. (B) T2 weighted image showing a mass with heterogenous signal intensities along with central high and focal intermediate signal intensities.
pghn-17-116-g004
Fig. 5
Intraoperative findings. Large mass at right lobe of liver.
pghn-17-116-g005

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by a 2013 research grant from Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital.

References

1. Kim EY, Lee IK, Lee YS, Yang N, Chung DJ, Yim KI, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor in colon. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012; 82:45–49.
crossref
2. Kovach SJ, Fischer AC, Katzman PJ, Salloum RM, Ettinghausen SE, Madeb R, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2006; 94:385–391.
crossref
3. Kim HY, Moon SB, Jung SE, Lee SC, Park KW, Kim WK. Abdominal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor in children. J Korean Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2008; 14:153–163.
crossref
4. Kim SJ, Kim WS, Cheon JE, Shin SM, Youn BJ, Kim IO, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors of the abdomen as mimickers of malignancy: imaging features in nine children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193:1419–1424.
crossref
5. Singhal M, Ramanathan S, Das A, Singh G, Bagga R, Khandelwal N. Omental inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour mimicking peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Imaging. 2011; 11:19–22.
6. Ong HS, Ji T, Zhang CP, Li J, Wang LZ, Li RR, et al. Head and neck inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT): evaluation of clinicopathologic and prognostic features. Oral Oncol. 2012; 48:141–148.
crossref
7. Fragoso AC, Eloy C, Estevão-Costa J, Campos M, Farinha N, Lopes JM. Abdominal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor a clinicopathologic study with reappraisal of biologic behavior. J Pediatr Surg. 2011; 46:2076–2082.
8. Woo MJ, Yu HY, Kim BS, Won SC, Lyu CJ, Oh JT. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor in a 3 months old infant. Clin Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011; 18:62–65.
9. Kye BH, Kim HJ, Kang SG, Yoo C, Cho HM. A case of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor originated from the greater omentum in young adult. J Korean Surg Soc. 2012; 82:380–384.
crossref
10. Bertocchini A, Lo Zupone C, Callea F, Gennari F, Serra A, Monti L, et al. Unresectable multifocal omental and peritoneal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor in a child: revisiting the role of adjuvant therapy. J Pediatr Surg. 2011; 46:e17–e21.
crossref
11. Li J, Yin WH, Takeuchi K, Guan H, Huang YH, Chan JK. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with RANBP2 and ALK gene rearrangement: a report of two cases and literature review. Diagn Pathol. 2013; 8:147.
12. Chun YS, Wang L, Nascimento AG, Moir CR, Rodeberg DA. Pediatric inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) expression and prognosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005; 45:796–801.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles