PDF
Citation
Print
Abstract
Authors are actual contributors on article's academic and publication procedure. The contributions on publication process include the establishment of conception and design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting or correction of article and final approval of the paper. Recently, the relationship between researchers becomes more complex because of more numbers of researchers and more co-works with various specialized research fields than before. Authorship is the deciding of roles between authors. It is very important on performing scholarly work in terms of academic and publication ethics. Inappropriate authorship encompasses gift, honorary, ghost, swapping and disguised authorship. Inappropriate authorship often lead legal problem as well as ethic problem or conflict of interest. Therefore obvious establishment of authorship is ethically and legally important to researchers.
References
1. Mabe M, Amin M. Growth dynamics of scholarly and scientific journals. Scientometrics. 2001. 51:147–162.
2. Larsen PO, Ins M. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage. Scientometrics. 2010. 84:575–603.
3. Casati F, Giunchiglia F, Marchese M. Publish and perish:why the current publication and review model is killing research and wasting your money[internet]. Ubiquity. 2007. cited 2007 Jan. Available from: http://ubiquity.acm.org/article.cfm?id=1226695.
4. Cottingham K. The Ethics of Authorship: Feature overview-how should authorship be decided?[internet]. 2001. cited 2001 March 30. Available from: http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2001_03_30/noDOI.1470170286102423077.
5. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. Publication ethics: sponsorship, authorship, and accountability [internet]. Updated 2010 Apr. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors;Available from: http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf.
6. Graf C, Wager E, Bowman A, Fiack S, Scott-Lichter D, Robinson A. Best practice guidelines on publication ethics: a publisher's perspective. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2007. (152):1–26.
7. Korean Associated of medical journal editors. Good publication practice guideline for medical journals [internet]. 2008. cited 2008 Jan. Korean Associated of medical journal editors;Available from: http://www.kamje.or.kr/intro.php?body=publishing_ethics.
8. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Ethical considerations in the conduct and reporting of research: Authorship and contributorship [internet]. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors;Available from: http://www.icmje.org/ethical_1author.html.
9. Committee on Publication Ethics. Albert T, Wager E. How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers. The COPE Report 2003 [internet]. cited 2003. Committee on Publication Ethics;Available from: http://publicationethics.org/files/2003pdf12.pdf.
10. Mowatt G, Shirran L, Grimshaw J, Rennie D, Flanagin A, Yank V, et al. Prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in cochrane reviews. JAMA. 2002. 287:2769–2771.
11. Wislar JS, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, DeAngelis CD. Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: across sectional survey. BMJ. 2011. 343:d6128.
12. Ahmed SM, Maurana CA, Engle JA, Uddin DE, Glaus KD. A method for assigning authorship in multiauthored publications. Fam Med. 1997. 29:42–44.
XML Download