INTRODUCTION
The prevalence of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) differs according to the method of diagnosis, but in the United States, it has been reported to be 3-10% in all children, and 20-53% in overweight children [
1]; in Korea, according to the National Health and Nutrition Survey conducted in 1998, an increase in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of 3.6% in boys and 2.8% in girls, aged 10 through 19, was reported [
2]; and in a Japanese study using an ultrasound, the prevalence of pediatric NAFLD was found to be 2.6% [
3]. Pediatric NAFLD cases have been reported in patients as young as two, but are most common in 11- to 13-year-olds and increase with age [
4]. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is defined as NAFLD cases that involve damages to hepatocytes, hepatic fibrosis and inflammatory cell infiltration. Pediatric NASH is a risk factor for cirrhosis (2-10%) [
4], hepatic insufficiency, and in rare cases, hepatoma [
5].
The pathophysiology of NASH has yet to be fully elucidated. However, currently, the most widely accepted hypothesis is the 'two hit' theory. The first hit is an increased movement of free fatty acids (FFA) and fat storage within hepatocytes, due to insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. The second hit is inflammation and necrosis of the liver acini, caused by increased oxidative stress to the hepatocytes.
It is known that, at present, no treatment has proven effective for NAFLD. However, weight loss, through diet and exercise, constitutes a basic therapy regime, and treatment of metabolic disorders, such as diabetes and hyperlipidemia, as well as weight loss and drug treatment to improve insulin resistance, and treatment with antioxidants and hepatoprotective agents to control oxidative stress and hepatic fibrosis, are all under investigation.
There has not been a study of pediatric NAFLD patients where vitamin E and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) are jointly administered, but Dufour and colleagues [
6] treated 48 adults with vitamin E (800 IU) and UDCA (12-15 mg/kg/day) for two years and found significant improvements in hepatic enzyme levels and NAFLD activity score, relative to the placebo. The present study was conducted to investigate whether or not pharmacological treatment with vitamin E and UDCA, in conjunction with weight loss through diet and exercise, would improve patients' clinical profile more effectively.
RESULTS
All 29 of the pediatric patients were obese, beyond being overweight. Of them, male patients were the majority, with 25 males and 4 females, the mean age was 11.07±2.00 years (range: 7-14), and their clinical profiles (BMI, TG, ALT, AST) were compared according to the NAFLD activity index, as shown in
Table 1 and
Fig. 1.
According to whether or not their BMI had decreased, and whether or not vitamin and UDCA had been administered, the 29 patients diagnosed with NAFLD were divided into four groups: a group that had carried out both tasks, two that had performed either one or the other, and one that had simply observed their progress without a reduction in their BMI or drug treatment (
Tables 2 and
3).
Patients were observed for 16.76±10.05 months on average, and 20 received drug treatment for an average of 11.00±9.40 months, with some still under treatment and others discontinuing treatment due to poor drug compliance or completed treatment. No unusual side effects were observed during the treatment.
The efficacy of treatment was analyzed by comparing the biochemical profiles of the four patient groups, and in the group that had successfully reduced their BMI and simultaneously carried out drug treatment, statistically significant improvements were observed in AST, ALT, AST/ALT ratio, ALP, total bilirubin and γ-GT levels in the follow-up, compared to the initial levels (
Table 4). In particular, an improvement in ALT levels from an average of 151.2 IU/L to 54.5 IU/L, and normalization in AST levels from 75.8 IU/L to 32.3 IU/L were found.
In the group that underwent drug treatment without showing reduction in their BMI, ALT levels tended to improve from an average of 124.3 IU/L to 84.9 IU/L; however, this was not statistically significant, nor were any other differences in their biochemical profile (
Table 5). In the group with successful BMI reduction, but without drug treatment, there were statistically significant differences in the levels of ALT and the AST/ALT ratio (
Table 6).
Finally, in the group whose progress was simply monitored without BMI reduction or drug treatment, no notable improvements were found (
Table 7).
DISCUSSION
In children, liver biopsy is again considered the gold standard for diagnosing NAFLD. The grading system for NAFLD was first established in 1999 by Brunt and colleagues, who, adapting the grading system for chronic hepatitis, described the disease stages on a scale according to the degree of adiposis, ballooning degeneration, and inflammation of liver acini and portal vein, as well as the degree of fibrosis and structural remodeling. Since then, NAFLD CRN has devised a more detailed grading system for lesions pertaining to NAFLD on the basis of the grading and stage criteria, suggested by Brunt and others [
7].
Hepatic enzyme levels, such as ALT, AST, γ-GT, TG, and LDL, are known to be elevated in NAFLD patients [
8], and ALT is used as a screening test especially in the diagnosis of pediatric NAFLD. However, in obese children, medical imaging tests can diagnose NAFLD even with normal hepatic enzyme levels [
9]. In a study of 176 pediatric NAFLD patients, whose diagnoses were confirmed by liver biopsy, the severity of NAFLD was correlated to an increase in AST and γ-GT levels and the severity of hepatic fibrosis was related to increased levels of AST among others [
10], and a prospective study using indicators of NAFLD fibrosis (age, waist size, neutral fat) reported that the presence or absence of fibrosis could be predicted in children [
11]. There have also been reports that the degree of NAFLD activity and fibrosis in children is related to the ratios of TG/HDL, cholesterol/HDL, and LDL/HDL [
12]. Currently, there are no serum or biomarker tests that can replace a biopsy [
4]. However, there has been a study in which needless biopsy was avoided in approximately half of the cases by using serum biomarkers in a single or in combination [
4]. In a study by Jee et al. [
13], the severity of liver pathology and the results of liver ultrasound tests were highly correlated, and in pediatric patients, who are less amenable to invasive tests, the severity of NAFLD could even be estimated when tested by a professional medical imaging specialist.
Most NAFLD patients have elevated levels of blood glucose, insulin and FFA due to inappropriate nutrition or overnutrition. Such conditions cause resistance to glucose uptake in insulin-responsive adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, as well as resistance to the inhibition of neutral fat hydrolysis [
1,
4]. Numerous studies have reported that weight loss can reduce hepatic steatosis and hepatic enzyme levels in the serum, and in 85 biopsy-confirmed pediatric NAFLD patients, controlling life habits for one year resulted in improved ultrasound contrast and hepatic enzyme levels in 57 patients [
14]. However, there has not been a large-scale randomized controlled trial, and moreover, it is difficult to standardize the appropriate level of weight reduction and the period of sustained weight loss, or to quantify dietary and exercise regimen [
15]. However, an improved insulin sensitivity is known to be correlated to the length of exercise [
16].
UDCA, a hydrophilic bile acid, tends to reduce liver damage by competitively opposing the activity of endogenous hydrophobic bile acids that promote apoptosis in hepatocytes. Many studies have reported on diseases in which UDCA is effective, in particular, cholestatic disorder [
17]. In a year-long open-label trial in adult NASH patients, UCDA improved the degree of fatty degeneration among hepatic enzyme levels and histological results [
18]. However, in a subsequent large-scale controlled study, low doses of UDCA (13-15 mg/kg/day) were prescribed to adult patients for two years and no improvements in hepatic enzyme levels or histological profile were observed, relative to the placebo [
19]. Leuschner et al. [
20] conducted a randomized, double-blind clinical trial of high-dose UDCA in adult NASH patients, treating them with high doses of UDCA (23-28 mg/kg/day) and comparing their Brunt scores and NAFLD activity scores histologically, but did not find significant differences overall in the histological scores and fibrosis compared to the placebo. However, in the treatment group, inflammation of hepatic lobules and γ-GT levels were improved. In another report, adults treated with UDCA (30 mg/kg/day) for 12 months showed improved ALT, AST and γ-GT levels, albeit without a histological report [
21].
Oxidative stress plays a central role in the pathophysiology of NASH. Lipid peroxidation stimulates cytokine production, leading to hepatic stellate cell activation and promotion of fibrosis. In a study of patients in the NASH risk group, decreased serum vitamin E concentrations were found [
22]. In addition, a study has demonstrated improved serum ALT and histological profiles in an open-label trial with adults treated with vitamin E (300 IU every day) for one year [
23], and a placebo-controlled study administered a larger dose of vitamin E (1,000 IU every day) with vitamin C to adults for six months and saw a marked improvement in the degree of fibrosis, although a similar degree of improvement was seen in the placebo group [
24]. Lavine et al. [
25] conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-institutional clinical trial in children, in which patients were given 800 IU of vitamin E (58 patients) or 1,000 mg metformin (57 patients) or placebo (58 patients) for 96 weeks (two years). The results indicated that ALT was inadequate for predicting inflammation or fibrosis of hepatocytes in children, but was significantly correlated to NAFLD activity score and the degree of fibrosis. Moreover, a significant effect was observed histologically in the ballooning degeneration score, NAFLD activity score and the improvement rate of NASH in vitamin E-treated group relative to placebo.
The most accurate indicator of the efficacy of NAFLD treatment would be a second liver biopsy, but this could not be performed as a follow-up test since most guardians did not consent due to the invasive nature of the test; instead, a comparative analysis of the biochemical profiles was conducted.
Rather than using weight loss as one of the indicators for assigning groups to compare the treatment efficacy, we looked at BMI reduction, achieved through exercise, behavioral control and dietary therapy. A problem arises if treatment efficacy is to be demonstrated by weight loss, since children are growing individuals unlike adults; and as such, weight loss cannot simply be interpreted as fat reduction, and one must take into account of the changes in body composition according to the age, sex and level of maturity. Additionally, this study is a retrospective one, where the lengths of therapy and drug treatment are not uniform in each group; therefore, BMI is more appropriate than weight loss as an indicator of the changes in patients over a time period that cannot be considered short.
In this study, we confirmed that for pediatric NAFLD patients, BMI reduction through exercise and dietary therapy must be the basic and primary therapeutic approach. It was observed that in conjunction with BMI reduction, vitamin E and UDCA treatment has a therapeutic effect, but no marked improvements in biochemical profiles, typified by the levels of ALT and others, were seen if pharmacological treatment was given without BMI reduction. However, drug treatment may be expected to improve patients' clinical profile more effectively, since combining drug treatment with BMI reduction, rather than BMI reduction alone, led to a clear improvement, not only in ALT levels and AST/ALT ratio but also in a greater number of indicators, such as BMI, AST, ALP, total bilirubin, and γ-GT levels.
The limitations of this study are as follows: first, statistical analyses were difficult given that a small number of patients, 29, were divided into four groups to judge the treatment efficacy; second, the lengths of treatment and follow-up were not uniform for all patients, as this was a retrospective test; and third, hepatic enzyme levels at the time of the biopsy were set as the reference, such that pediatric NAFLD patients with normal hepatic enzyme levels might have been excluded.
Moreover, in order to prove the efficacy of drug administration in treating NAFLD, one must draw a comparison between drug treatment and non-treatment groups, regardless of BMI reduction, and verify whether or not it has statistical significance; in the present study, it was shown not to be statistically significant. However, it was difficult to compare the therapeutic efficacy due to the small number of patients in each group, and as mentioned above, it may be meaningful that the biochemical indicators that were improved in the drug treatment group with BMI reduction were clearer and more numerous than in the untreated group with BMI reduction only; a comparative study with a larger group of patients would demonstrate more clearly, whether or not the drug treatment is effective. Unfortunately, the difficulty of obtaining patient and parental consent for invasive tests in pediatric patients poses a problem for clinical studies.
In this study of NAFLD pediatric patients, whose diagnoses were confirmed by liver biopsy, we saw that combining vitamin E and UDCA treatment with BMI reduction through exercise and dietary therapy improve the patients' clinical symptoms and biochemical profiles, and that drug treatment alone, without BMI reduction, does not improve NAFLD. More accurate clinical information may be obtained through liver biopsy, which is an invasive procedure, but a randomized comparative study with a larger number of patients in the future may yield better information. A range of approaches are required in treating obesity-related NAFLD patients, but in patients that do not readily improve upon BMI reduction through exercise and dietary therapy alone, supplementary pharmacological treatment may be expected to enhance the therapeutic results.