Journal List > J Korean Med Assoc > v.48(1) > 1080566

Sohn: Thimerosal in Vaccine and Risk Communication

Abstract

The long-term vaccination has reduced the public awareness of the risk associated with the disease, while increasing the general concerns about the safety of vaccines and their potential risks of adverse reactions. In late 1990s concerns were raised about a possible link between the presence of thimerosal in vaccine and neuro-developmental disorders such as autism in children. In 2001 Bernard postulated a hypothesis that autism is a novel form of mercury poisoning based on a comprehensive review of the literature. Several other studies reported that the mercury concentrations in children with autism were significantly higher than in non-autistic children. There were controversial viewpoints on this link between the government agencies and independent researchers. In 2001 the U.S. FDA declared that all licensed pediatric vaccines that are routinely recommended and are being manufactured for the U.S. market contain no or only trace amounts of thimerosal. In 2004 the situation of pediatric vaccines in Korea is more or less comparable to that in the U.S.. The KFDA and vaccine manufacturers in Korea should be urged to work to reduce or eliminate mercury-containing preservatives in vaccine. Risk communication is more effective when the uncertainty is stated and when the risks are quantified as much as the scientific evidence permits. The benefits and risks of vaccines containing thimerosal should be discussed with parents. The risk of not vaccinating children far outweighs any known risk of exposure to thimerosal-containing vaccines.

References

3. Plotkin SA. Lessons learned concerning vaccine safety. Vaccine. 2002. 20:S16–S19.
crossref
4. Duclos P. How to improve communication on vaccine safety at international level? Vaccine. 2002. 20:S96–S97.
crossref
5. Siegrist CA, Desgrandchamps D, Heiniger U, Vaudaux B. How to improve communication on vaccine safety at the national level? Vaccine. 2002. 20:S98–S100.
6. Aston R. Analysis of factors influencing vaccine uptake from various perspectives. Vaccine. 2002. 20:S1.
crossref
7. Goldman LR, Shannon MW. Committee on Environmental Health. Technical report: Mercury in the environment: Implications for pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2001. 108:197–204.
8. Clarkson TW. Mercury: major issues in environmental health. Environ Health Perspect. 1993. 100:31–38.
crossref
9. Hoover AW, Goldwater LJ. Absorption and excretion of mercury in man X. Dental amalgam as a source of urinary mercury. Arch Environ Health. 1966. 12:506–508.
10. Clarkson TW. The toxicology of mercury. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1997. 34:369–403.
crossref
11. Harada M. Minamata disease: Methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1995. 25:1–24.
crossref
12. Bakir F, Damlugi SF, Amin-Zaki L, Murtadha M, Khalidi A, Doherty RA, et al. Methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. Science. 1973. 181:230–241.
crossref
13. Axton JMH. Six cases of poisoning after a parenteral organic mercurial compound (merthiolare). Postgrad Med J. 1972. 48:417–421.
crossref
14. Davison PW, Myeres GJ, Cox C, Axtell C, Shamlaye C, Clarkson TW, et al. Effects of prenatla and postnatal methylmercury exposure from fish consumption on neurodevelopment Outcomes at 66 months of age in the Seychelles child development study. JAMA. 1998. 280:701–707.
crossref
15. Grandjean P, Weihe P, White R, Debes F, Araki S, Dahl R, et al. Cognitive deficit in 7 year old children with prenatal exposure methylmercury. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1997. 6:417–428.
16. CDC. Notice to Readers: Thimerosal in vaccines: A joint statement of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Public Health Service. Morb Mort Wkly Rev. 1999. 48:563–565.
17. Faran DG, Prtchard JS, Clarkson TW, Greenwood MR. Organ mercury levels in infants with omphaloceles treated with organic mercurial antiseptic. Arch Dis Child. 1977. 52:962–964.
crossref
18. Lowell HJ, Burgess S, Shenoy S, Peter M, Howard TK. Mercury poisoning associated with hepatitis B Immunoglobulin. Lancet. 1996. 347:480.
19. Matheson DS, Clarkson TW, Gelfand EW. Mercury toxicity (acrodynia) induced by long-term injection of gammaglobulin. J Pediatr. 1980. 98:153–155.
crossref
20. Pfab R, Mückter H, Roider G, Zilker T. Clinical course of severe poisoning with thiomersal. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 1996. 34:453–460.
crossref
21. Geier DA, Geier MR. An assessment of the impact of thimerosal on childhood neurodevelopmental disorders. Pediatric Rehabilitation. 2003. 6:97–102.
crossref
22. Geier DA, Geier MR. A comparative evaluation of the effects of MMR immunization and mercury doses from thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines on the population prevalence of autism. Med Sci Monit. 2004. 10:PI33–PI39.
23. Geier MR, Geier DA. Neurodevelopmental disorders after thimerosal-containing vaccines: A brief communication. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2003. 228:660–664.
crossref
24. IOM(Insitutue of Medicine). Thimerosal-containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders. 2001. Washington DC: National Academu Press.
25. Parker SK, Schwartz B, Todd J, Pickering LK. Thimerosal-containing vaccines and autistic spectrum disorder: a critical review of published original data. Pediatrics. 2004. 114:793–804.
crossref
26. Hornig M, Chian D, Villiers J, Soman A, Valdman O, Lipkin WI, et al. Neurotoxic effects of postnatal thimerosal are mouse strain-dependent. Molecular Psychiatry 9. 2004. advance on line publication. http://www.greeneidab.columbia.edu/pressreleases/Thimabstract%20IMFAR.pdf.
27. Committee on Infectious Diseases and Committee on Environmental Health. Thimerosal in vaccine-An interim report to clinicians. Pediatrics. 1999. 104:570–574.
28. Ball LK, Ball R, Pratt RD. An assessment of thimerosal use in childhood vaccines. Pediatrics. 2001. 107:1147–1154.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles