Journal List > Ann Clin Microbiol > v.19(4) > 1078563

Kim, Kang, Yoo, Kim, Lee, Yu, Lee, Park, and Kim: Molecular Typing and Resistance Profiles of Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in Korea: Results from a National Surveillance Study, 2007–2013

Abstract

Background

To investigate the national molecular epidemiology and resistance profiles of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), we analyzed the characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) collected from clinical samples at tertiary or general hospitals participating in a nationwide surveillance program for VISA and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) in Korea during an 12-week period in each year from 2007 to 2013.

Methods

VISA was defined by agar dilution, broth dilution and E-test methods with vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations of >2 μ g/mL. All VISA isolates were characterized by multilocus sequence typing, staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec typing, spa typing, accessory gene regulator typing, Diversilab analysis, and antibiogram analysis.

Results

Of 109,345 MRSA isolates, 87,354 were screened and 426 isolates were identified as positive on brain heart infusion agar containing 4 μ g/mL vancomycin (BHI-V4). Of 426 isolates, 76 isolates were identified as VISA. No VRSA isolates were detected among the isolates. Overall, a total of 6 genotypes were identified among VISA strains and the predominant clones were ST5-II-t2460, ST72-IV-t324, and ST239-III-t037 (44.7%, 15.8%, and 10.5%, respectively). Of note, ST72-IV-t324 clones are known to be a typical community-associated MRSA. ST239-III-t037 strains were more resistant to trimethoprim-sulfa-methoxazole than any other type of strain. ST72-IV-t324 strains were susceptible to all of the antimicrobial agents tested except erythromycin and daptomycin. All of the VISA isolates were susceptible to linezolid and quinupristin-dalfopristin.

Conclusion

Although VRSA is still rare, continuous monitoring of VRSA occurrence is needed, as well as VISA prevalence, epidemic clonal shift, and antimicrobial resistance.

References

1. Howden BP, Peleg AY, Stinear TP. The evolution of vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and heterogenous-VISA. Infect Genet Evol. 2014; 21:575–82.
crossref
2. Hiramatsu K, Hanaki H, Ino T, Yabuta K, Oguri T, Tenover FC. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997; 40:135–6.
crossref
3. Richter SS, Satola SW, Crispell EK, Heilmann KP, Dohrn CL, Riahi F, et al. Detection of Staphylococcus aureus isolates with heterogeneous intermediate-level resistance to vancomycin in the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49:4203–7.
crossref
4. Rybak MJ, Leonard SN, Rossi KL, Cheung CM, Sader HS, Jones RN. Characterization of vancomycin-heteroresistant Staphylococcus aureus from the metropolitan area of Detroit, Michigan, over a 22-year period (1986 to 2007). J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46:2950–4.
5. Adam HJ, Louie L, Watt C, Gravel D, Bryce E, Loeb M, et al. Detection and characterization of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Canada: results from the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program, 1995–2006. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010; 54:945–9.
6. Sun W, Chen H, Liu Y, Zhao C, Nichols WW, Chen M, et al. Prevalence and characterization of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 14 cities in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009; 53:3642–9.
7. Kirby A, Graham R, Williams NJ, Wootton M, Broughton CM, Alanazi M, et al. Staphylococcus aureus with reduced glyco-peptide susceptibility in Liverpool, UK. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010; 65:721–4.
crossref
8. Wootton M, Howe RA, Hillman R, Walsh TR, Bennett PM, MacGowan AP. A modified population analysis profile (PAP) method to detect heteroresistance to vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus in a UK hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001; 47:399–403.
crossref
9. Campanile F, Borbone S, Perez M, Bongiorno D, Cafiso V, Bertuccio T, et al. Heteroresistance to glycopeptides in Italian meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010; 36:415–9.
crossref
10. Garnier F, Chainier D, Walsh T, Karlsson A, Bolmström A, Grelaud C, et al. A 1 year surveillance study of glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus strains in a French hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006; 57:146–9.
crossref
11. Bartley J. First case of VRSA identified in Michigan. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002; 23:480.
12. Melo-Cristino J, Resina C, Manuel V, Lito L, Ramirez M. First case of infection with vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Europe. Lancet. 2013; 382:205.
crossref
13. Moravvej Z, Estaji F, Askari E, Solhjou K, Naderi Nasab M, Saadat S. Update on the global number of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) strains. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013; 42:370–1.
crossref
14. Walters MS, Eggers P, Albrecht V, Travis T, Lonsway D, Hovan G, et al. Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus – Delaware, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015; 64:1056.
15. Tenover FC and Moellering RC Jr. The rationale for revising the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration interpretive criteria for Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44:1208–15.
16. van Hal SJ, Lodise TP, Paterson DL. The clinical significance of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration in Staphylococcus aureus infections: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 54:755–71.
crossref
17. Chung G, Cha J, Han S, Jang H, Lee K, Yoo J, et al. Nationwide surveillance study of vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus strains in Korean hospitals from 2001 to 2006. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010; 20:637–42.
18. Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38:1008–15.
19. Harmsen D, Claus H, Witte W, Rothgänger J, Claus H, Turnwald D, et al. Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41:5442–8.
20. Koreen L, Ramaswamy SV, Graviss EA, Naidich S, Musser JM, Kreiswirth BN. spa typing method for discriminating among Staphylococcus aureus isolates: implications for use of a single marker to detect genetic micro- and macrovariation. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42:792–9.
21. Oliveira DC and de Lencastre H. Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002; 46:2155–61.
22. Gilot P, Lina G, Cochard T, Poutrel B. Analysis of the genetic variability of genes encoding the RNA III-activating components Agr and TRAP in a population of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from cows with mastitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002; 40:4060–7.
23. Shutt CK, Pounder JI, Page SR, Schaecher BJ, Woods GL. Clinical evaluation of the DiversiLab microbial typing system using repetitive-sequence-based PCR for characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43:1187–92.
24. Chung DR, Lee C, Kang YR, Baek JY, Kim SH, Ha YE, et al. Genotype-specific prevalence of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in Asian countries. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015; 46:338–41.
crossref
25. Zhang S, Sun X, Chang W, Dai Y, Ma X. Systematic review and metaanalysis of the epidemiology of vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus isolates. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0136082.
crossref
26. Hu J, Ma XX, Tian Y, Pang L, Cui LZ, Shang H. Reduced vancomycin susceptibility found in methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in Northeast China. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e73300.
crossref
27. Liu C and Chambers HF. Staphylococcus aureus with heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin: epidemiology, clinical significance, and critical assessment of diagnostic methods. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003; 47:3040–5.
28. Havaei SA, Azimian A, Fazeli H, Naderi M, Ghazvini K, Samiee SM, et al. Genetic characterization of methicillin resistant and sensitive, vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from different iranian hospitals. ISRN Microbiol. 2012; 2012:215275.
crossref
29. DeLeo FR, Otto M, Kreiswirth BN, Chambers HF. Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2010; 375:1557–68.
crossref
30. Chuang YY and Huang YC. Molecular epidemiology of community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Asia. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013; 13:698–708.
31. Park SH, Park C, Yoo JH, Choi SM, Choi JH, Shin HH, et al. Emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains as a cause of healthcare-associated bloodstream infections in Korea. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009; 30:146–55.
32. Joo EJ, Choi JY, Chung DR, Song JH, Ko KS. Characteristics of the community-genotype sequence type 72 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates that underlie their persistence in hospitals. J Microbiol. 2016; 54:445–50.
crossref
33. Prakash V, Lewis JS 2nd, Jorgensen JH. Vancomycin MICs for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates differ based upon the susceptibility test method used. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008; 52:4528.
34. Sader HS, Rhomberg PR, Jones RN. Nine-hospital study comparing broth microdilution and Etest method results for vancomycin and daptomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009; 53:3162–5.

Fig. 1.
Cluster analysis and virtual gel image from Diversilab-generated fingerprints of the 76 VISA isolates, including corresponding typing data from molecular type (class 2) and year (class 3). Colored marks indicate the clonal clustering results.
acm-19-88f1.tif
Table 1.
Screening of resistance to vancomycin of clinical MRSA isolates from 2007 to 2013 in Korea
Characteristics Year Total
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
No. of S. aureus 16,158 17,489 21,399 21,766 22,383 27,546 28,292 155,033
No. of MRSA (%) 10,959 12,167 14,854 15,152 16,045 19,926 20,242 109,345
  (67.8) (69.5) (69.4) (69.6) (70.8) (72.3) (71.5) (70.5)
No. of MRSA screened with BHI- V4 9,920 10,390 12,618 11,949 13,219 14,505 14,753 87,354
No. of screening-test positive 93 82 47 53 65 43 43 426
No. of VISA (% of MRSA) 6 (0.05) 15 (0.12) 7 (0.05) 16 (0.10) 20 (0.12) 2 (0.01) 10 (0.05) 76 (0.07)
No. of participating hospitals 48 52 64 65 73 71 69
Table 2.
Comparison of vancomycin MICs determined by broth microdilution, agar dilution, and E-test
Vancomycin MIC (μ g/mL) No. of isolates (%) with MIC (μ g/mL) determined by
Broth microdilution Agar dilution E-test
1 1 (1.3) 1 (1.3) 0 (0)
2 45 (59.2) 35 (46.1) 1 (1.3)
3 N/A N/A 44 (57.9)
4 29 (38.2) 40 (52.6) 29 (38.2)
6 N/A N/A 2 (2.6)
8 1 (1.3) 0 (0) 0 (0)

Abbreviation: N/A, not applicable.

Table 3.
Molecular characteristics of VISA isolates
MLST (n) spa type (n) SCC mec type (n) agr type (n) Specimens (n)
ST1 (3) t286 (3) IV (3) III (3) Pus (1), urine (1), others (1)*
ST5 (52) t2460 (34) II (34) II (34) Sputum (10), pus (5), blood (4), wound (3), catheter (3), tracheal aspirate (1), fluid (1), skin and soft tissue (1), others (6)*
  t002 (10) II (9), IV (1) II (9), I (1) Sputum (2), skin and soft tissue (2), fluid (2), pus (1), bone (1), lung PCD aspirate (1), others (1)*
  t9353 (5) II (5) II (5) Sputum (3), wound (1), bronchial aspirate (1)
  t601 (2) II (2) II (2) Sputum (1), pus (1)
  t264 (1) II (1) II (1) Blood (1)
ST72 (12) t324 (10) IV (10) I (9), III (1) Pus (5), sputum (2), eye discharge (1), blood (1), others (1)*
  t901 (1) IV (1) I (1) Fluid (1)
  New type (1) IV (1) I (1) Others (1)
ST239 (8) t037 (8) III (8) I (8) Skin and soft tissue (2), wound (2), pus (1), sputum (1), others (2)*
Novel (1) t324 (1) IV (1) I (1) Wound (1)

*Chemoport, percutaneous nephrostomy aspiration, tip, transtracheal aspirate. Abbreviation: PCD, percutaneous catheter drainage.

Table 4.
Antimicrobial resistance profiles of VISA clones
ST-SCC mec-spa type No. of isolates No. (%) of isolates with resistance to:
E C G O R S T D L Q
ST5-II-t2460 34 34 (100) 34 (100) 29 (85.3) 34 (100) 11 (32.4) 2 (5.9) 6 (17.6) 3 (8.8) 0 (0) 0 (0)
ST5-II-t002 10 10 (100) 9 (90) 90 (90) 10 (100) 3 (33.3) 0 (0) 3 (30) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
ST5-II-t9353 5 5 (100) 5 (100) 4 (80) 5 (100) 2 (40) 0 (0) 1 (20) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
ST239-III-t037 8 8 (100) 7 (87.5) 8 (100) 8 (100) 2 (25) 7 (87.5) 0 (0) 1 (12.5) 0 (0) 0 (0)
ST72-IV-t324 10 2 (20) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (20) 0 (0) 0 (0)
ST1-IV-t286 3 2 (66.7) 0 (0) 3 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)

Abbreviations: E, erythromycin; C, clindamycin; G, gentimicin; O, ofloxacin; R, rifampicin; S, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; T, tigecycline; D, daptomycin L, linezolid; Q, quinupristin-dalfopristin.

TOOLS
Similar articles