Journal List > J Gastric Cancer > v.17(2) > 1077053

Kim, Kim, Choi, Sohn, Bae, and Kim: Multiple Primary Malignancies in Patients with Multiple Early Gastric Cancer

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between multiple early gastric cancer (MEGC) and multiple primary malignancies during the follow-up of patients with gastrectomy.

Materials and Methods

The number of primary tumors detected in other organs after gastrectomy for early gastric cancer (EGC) has been increasing because of improved survival and surveillance programs. A total of 3,129 patients underwent radical gastrectomy for treatment of EGC at Samsung Medical Center from January 2000 to December 2005. Of these, 3,057 patients were selected and their medical records were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Among the 3,057 patients, 148 (4.8%) had MEGC, 84.5% were male, 57.4% were over 60 years old, 42.6% had a macroscopic type EGC IIb main lesion, and 68.9% had well-differentiated tumors with a significantly high incidence of MEGC. There were no differences between patients with solitary early gastric cancer (SEGC) and those with MEGC with regard to overall survival or recurrence-free survival, but MEGC was an independent risk factor for metachronous primary malignancies in other organs (P=0.004, hazard ratio [HR]=2.444).

Conclusions

MEGC is not a risk factor for poor prognosis after curative gastrectomy, but it is a risk factor for metachronous primary malignancies in other organs during postoperative follow-up; therefore, careful surveillance is needed.

INTRODUCTION

Multiple early gastric cancer (MEGC) is easily overlooked during cancer surgery if not detected during preoperative endoscopic examination, and it can be the cause of remnant gastric cancer and positive resection margins [1]. According to Moertel et al. [2], multiple gastric cancers are defined as follows: 1) each lesion must be pathologically proven to be malignant, 2) all lesions must be distinctly separated by microscopically normal gastric walls, and 3) the possibility that one of the lesions represents a local extension or metastatic tumor must be completely eliminated. The incidence of MEGC has been reported to range between 4% and 11.7%. Compared to younger individuals, older individuals have a higher incidence of MEGC [3456]. Compared to solitary early gastric cancer (SEGC), MEGC more frequently accompanies intestinal metaplasia in the mucous membranes [6], although it is not related to lymph node metastasis [578] or prognosis [78].
Recently, the number of multiple primary malignancies detected in other organs has been increasing because of improved diagnostic technology, and increased lifespan and survival following operation [9]. The incidence of multiple primary cancers in other organs ranges between 2.04% and 3.4% [910]. The concept of field cancerization states that organ systems that have developed a neoplasm are likely to develop multiple and independent neoplasms, because all cells have been exposed to the same dose of carcinogens for the same duration of time [101112]. Field cancerization is thought as a possible mechanism of multiple gastric cancers and multiple primary malignancies in other organs; however, there are no reports on the correlation between the two. This study aimed to determine the clinicopathological features of MEGC and to investigate the correlation between MEGC and multiple primary malignancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 3,107 patients with pathologically proven early gastric cancer (EGC) who underwent radical gastrectomy at Samsung Medical Center from January 2000 to December 2005, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 3,057 patients who had clinicopathological features of EGC and adequate medical records, and were available for postoperative follow-up. Follow-up was conducted through October 2010, and the mean follow-up period of all patients was 68.1±21.0 months. The mean follow-up duration for the SEGC and MEGC groups was 68.3±21.0 and 63.0±20.2 months, respectively. Follow-up observations were performed at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery, after which the patients were followed up every year. Complete blood count, liver function tests, tumor markers, chest radiography, abdominal computed tomography (CT), and endoscopy were used as follow-up tests. Recurrences or multiple primary malignancies were evaluated by physical examination, chest radiography, ultrasonic inspection, colonoscopy, CT, and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT, and/or histological biopsy. Five years after surgery, patients were not routinely followed up in outpatient clinics, but they were recommended to undergo a mass screening test on a yearly basis. Our basic practice for gastrectomy entails radical resection of the primary tumor and D2 lymph node dissection under the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma. D1, D1+α, or D1+β was performed selectively in patients with a high operative risk, such as those with liver, lung, or heart disease, or in those who had undergone laparoscopic surgery [13]. According to Warren and Gates [14], multiple primary malignancies are defined by the following criteria: 1) each of the tumors must present a definite picture of malignancy, 2) each tumor must be distinct, and 3) the probability that even one of these lesions is a metastatic lesion must be excluded. According to Moertel [15], if a second tumor is discovered at the same time or within 6 months of the first tumor, it should be defined as a synchronous primary malignancy; if it is discovered after 6 months, it should be defined as a metachronous primary malignancy. The main lesion was defined as the largest lesion if the gastric wall invasion was the same.
IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 18.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Clinicopathological features were verified using the χ2 test, survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and significance testing was performed using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 3,057 patients, there were 2,032 male patients (66.5%) and 1,025 female patients (33.5%), and their mean age was 55.6±11.4 years. MEGC was detected in 148 patients (4.8%), and it was more frequent in patients with the following characteristics: male sex (65.6% vs. 84.5%, P<0.001), old age (40.8% vs. 57.4%, P<0.001), total gastrectomy (11.2% vs. 25.0%, P<0.001), macroscopic type tumors (P=0.022), tumors less than 2 cm in size (70.1% vs. 61.5%, P=0.026), and differentiated-type tumors (58.1% vs. 68.9%, P=0.009). Fifty-three patients with SEGC (1.8%) and 5 patients with MEGC (3.4%) were found to have synchronous primary malignancies in other organs, but this difference was not statistically significant (Table 1). The percentages of accessory lesions located in the same anatomical region as the main lesions were as follows: 26.7% in the upper one-third, 64.7% in the middle one-third, and 54.9% in the lower one-third. Even with the macroscopic type, there was a tendency for agreement in type IIb (66.7%) and IIc (55.0%) lesions, and 95.1% of the lesions showed agreement when the main lesion was a differentiated-type tumor. The overall 5-year survival rates of SEGC and MEGC groups were 95.4% and 95.5%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups.
Table 1

Clinicopathological features in SEGC and MEGC

jgc-17-154-i001
Variable SEGC MEGC P-value
Sex <0.001
Male 1,907 (65.6) 125 (84.5)
Female 1,002 (64.4) 23 (15.5)
Age (yr) <0.001
Mean 55.4±11.4 60.9±10.0
<60 1,722 (59.2) 63 (42.6)
≥60 1,187 (40.8) 85 (57.4)
Location 0.107
Lower 1,856 (63.8) 82 (55.4)
Middle 835 (28.7) 51 (34.5)
Upper 218 (7.5) 15 (10.1)
Surgery <0.001
Subtotal gastrectomy* 2,582 (88.8) 111 (75.0)
Total gastrectomy 327 (11.2) 37 (25.0)
Proximal resection margin 0.051
Mean 5.9±3.6 5.3±3.6
T category 0.347
T1a 1,628 (56.0) 77 (52.0)
T1b 1,281 (44.0) 71 (48.0)
N category 0.517
N0 2,629 (90.4) 130 (87.8)
N1 179 (6.2) 13 (8.8)
N2 63 (2.2) 4 (2.7)
N3 38 (1.3) 1 (0.7)
Macroscopic type 0.022
I 117 (4.0) 3 (2.0)
IIa 269 (9.2) 22 (14.9)
IIb 1,095 (37.6) 63 (42.6)
IIc 1,336 (47.0) 60 (40.5)
III 62 (2.1) 0 (0.0)
Tumor size (cm) 0.026
<2 869 (29.9) 57 (38.5)
≥2 2,040 (70.1) 91 (61.5)
Differentiation 0.009
Differentiated 1,691 (58.1) 102 (68.9)
Undifferentiated 1,218 (41.9) 46 (31.1)
Lymphatic invasion 0.172
Negative 2,531 (87.0) 123 (83.1)
Positive 378 (13.0) 25 (16.9)
Vascular invasion 1.000
Negative 2,884 (99.1) 147 (99.3)
Positive 25 (0.9) 1 (0.7)
Perineural invasion 1.000
Negative 2,887 (99.2) 147 (99.3)
Positive 22 (0.8) 1 (0.7)
Synchronous primary malignancy 0.176
Negative 2,856 (98.2) 143 (96.6)
Positive 53 (1.8) 5 (3.4)
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).
SEGC = solitary early gastric cancer; MEGC = multiple early gastric cancer.
*Including 64 cases of proximal gastrectomy.
There was no difference in recurrence-free survival between the MEGC and SEGC groups, and the recurrent-free 5-year survival rates of SEGC and MEGC were 98.1% and 97.3%, respectively. MEGC was a risk factor for metachronous primary malignancies in other organs. During the postoperative follow-up, multiple primary malignancies were detected in 172 patients (5.6%), and the mean time interval of the diagnosis of the metachronous malignancies after gastrectomy was 54.0±3.4 months. Of these patients, 58 had synchronous multiple primary malignancies, and 114 had metachronous primary malignancies. Among the patients with SEGC, metachronous primary malignancy occurred in 102 patients (3.5%), and the median time to occurrence was 60.6±1.2 months. Multiple primary malignancies in the other organs occurred most frequently in the lung (n=33, 19.3%) and colorectum (n=29, 17.0%). Metachronous primary malignancies occurred in 12 patients with MEGC (10.5%), and the median time to occurrence was 51.0±2.8 months (Fig. 1). In univariate analysis for metachronous primary malignancies in the other organs, male sex (P=0.007), age greater than 60 years (P<0.001), and MEGC (P<0.001) were risk factors; there were no other differences in the clinicopathological findings (Table 2). In the multivariate analysis, male sex (P=0.027; hazard ratio [HR]=1.644), age greater than 60 years (P<0.001; HR=2.335), and MEGC (P=0.004; HR=2.444) were significant and independent risk factors for the development of metachronous primary malignancies after gastric cancer surgery (Table 3).
Fig. 1
SEGC = solitary early gastric cancer; MEGC = multiple early gastric cancer.
jgc-17-154-g001
Table 2

Univariate analysis of the risk factors for metachronous primary malignancies after gastrectomy

jgc-17-154-i002
Variable No. (%) Five-year multiple primary malignancy-free survival (%) P-value
Sex 0.007
Male 2,032 (66.5) 96.4
Female 1,025 (33.5) 97.7
Age (yr) <0.001
<60 1,785 (58.4) 97.9
≥60 1,272 (41.6) 95.4
MEGC <0.001
Negative 2,909 (95.2) 97.0
Positive 148 (4.8) 94.7
Location 0.203
Lower 1,938 (63.4) 97.3
Middle 886 (29.0) 96.9
Upper 233 (7.6) 94.4
T category 0.658
T1a 1,705 (55.8) 97.2
T1b 1,352 (44.2) 96.5
N category 0.264
N0 2,759 (90.4) 97.1
N1 192 (6.3) 98.2
N2 67 (2.2) 100.0
N3 39 (1.3) 100.0
Gross type 0.500
I 120 (3.9) 97.1
IIa 291 (9.5) 97.2
IIb 1,158 (37.9) 96.5
IIc 1,426 (46.6) 97.3
III 62 (2.0) 95.9
Tumor size (cm) 0.941
<2 926 (30.3) 97.6
≥2 2,131 (69.7) 96.6
Differentiation 0.105
Differentiated 1,793 (58.7) 96.7
Undifferentiated 1,264 (41.3) 97.1
Lymphatic invasion 0.136
Negative 2,654 (86.8) 96.8
Positive 403 (13.2) 98.7
Vascular invasion 0.904
Negative 3,031 (99.1) 96.9
Positive 26 (0.9) 100.0
Perineural invasion 0.940
Negative 3,034 (99.2) 96.9
Positive 23 (0.8) 94.7
MEGC = multiple early gastric cancer.
Table 3

Multivariate analysis of risk factors for development of multiple primary malignancies during follow-up of patients with gastric cancer

jgc-17-154-i003
Clinicopathological feature β-coefficient SE 95% CI HR P-value
Sex
Female - - - - -
Male 0.497 0.224 1.059–2.553 1.644 0.027
Age (yr)
<60 - - - - -
≥60 0.848 0.190 1.608–3.391 2.335 <0.001
MEGC
Negative - - - - -
Positive 0.894 0.308 1.336–4.472 2.444 0.004
SE = standard error; CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; MEGC = multiple early gastric cancer.

DISCUSSION

The pathogenesis of multiple gastric cancers remains unknown; however, synchronous tumors arising within a single organ may represent tumors of independent origin or, alternatively, may reflect lateral spread from a single source that results in multiple tumors with the same genetic alterations [16]. The clinicopathological features of multiple gastric cancers were more frequently observed in males, older patients, and patients with differentiated-type tumors. These results are consistent with those of previous studies [581718]. Therefore, we recommend that preoperative gastroscopy should be performed meticulously, especially in older men.
Similar to the findings of previous studies, we observed correlations among the location, macroscopic type, and microscopic type of accessory lesions [58]. Owing to similarities between the main lesion and accessory lesion, it is difficult to prove multicentricity in conventional pathologic studies on multiple gastric cancer [19]. Kang et al. [16] reported that the histologic type in multiple gastric cancer is related to loss of heterozygosity in APC and MCC, but not in p53. Additionally, they reported that loss of heterozygosity in APC and MCC does not occur in poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas. These findings indicate the existence of a multicentric origin, even if the main and accessory lesions have the same histologic or macroscopic features. Therefore, APC, MCC, or p53 mutations in the main and accessory lesion may not be the same, and this inconsistency supports a multicentric rather than a monoclonal origin for multiple gastric cancers. Sozzi et al. [11] suggested that specific genetic changes are discordant in multiple lung cancers, although the locations of the tumors or histologic diagnoses conformed to those of the main and accessory lesions. Inconsistencies such as these support the field cancerization theory, which states that multiple tumors occur from independent events resulting from the same carcinogenic exposure of multiple cells within the same organ or parenchymal field over the same time; multiple synchronous tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract are a well-known example [1011]. Age greater than 60 years and MEGC have been shown to be risk factors for metachronous primary malignancies. As long as the risk of cancer is constant, precancerous lesions are more likely to develop into clinical cancer in elderly individuals because of the longer duration of carcinogen exposure [12]. We believe that these findings add evidence to the field of cancerization hypothesis.
Multiple gastric cancers and solitary gastric cancer are known to have the same prognosis [78]. Kitamura et al. [7] attributed the difference in the survival rates between SEGC and MEGC to the high rate of complete cure for EGC, although missed accessory lesions may be fatal. Therefore, there are no significant differences in survival between the groups of patients with SEGC and MEGC, and the proportion of overlooked accessory lesions has decreased owing to the advancements in preoperative and intraoperative diagnostic examinations. Although MEGC was not a prognostic risk factor in our study, it was a risk factor for the development of metachronous primary malignancies. Dinis-Ribeiro et al. [20] reported that multiple primary malignancies in the other organs were detected in 3.4% of patients with gastric cancer and that 27% of them were synchronous, 73% were metachronous, and the most frequently associated tumors were colon cancer and breast cancer. Ryu et al. [21] reported that multiple primary malignancies were detected in 2.07% of patients with gastric cancer, and that 63% of them were synchronous and 37% were metachronous. In our study, multiple primary cancers were detected in 172 patients (5.6%), and metachronous primary malignancies were detected more often than synchronous primary malignancies. This could be attributed to the fact that the detection rate of metachronous primary malignancies increases with an extended follow-up period, and certain patients with EGC have a higher survival rate after gastric cancer surgery.
The pathogenesis of multiple primary malignancies has not yet been established. Watanabe et al. [22] reported that multiple malignancies occur mostly in the associated organs, and that the combination of multiple cancers that do not occur in organs such as the lungs and kidneys was the result of circulating carcinogens within the body. In our study, we found that lung cancer, liver cancer, and colorectal cancer were most commonly detected in patients with SEGC as the metachronous primary malignancy; in patients with MEGC, lung cancer and colorectal cancers, along with hematologic malignancies, were the most frequent primary malignancies. We believe that the metachronous primary malignancy was commonly detected in the non-adjacent organs (e.g., the lungs and the liver) in patients with MEGC, possibly owing to a circulating carcinogenic effect.
We believe that the metachronous primary malignancy was commonly detected in the patients with MEGC. Although MEGC was not a prognostic risk factor, it was a risk factor for the occurrence of metachronous primary malignancies after curative gastrectomy. Hence, when MEGC is diagnosed, careful observation of metachronous primary malignancies, especially lung cancer and colon cancer, is necessary during gastric cancer surveillance.

Notes

Conflict of Interest No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Peng J, Wang Y. Epidemiology, pathology and clinical management of multiple gastric cancers: a mini-review. Surg Oncol. 2010; 19:e110–e114.
2. Moertel CG, Bargen JA, Soule EH. Multiple gastric cancers; review of the literature and study of 42 cases. Gastroenterology. 1957; 32:1095–1103.
3. Noh SH, Chung WY, Min JS. Clinical study of synchronous multiple early gastric cancer. J Korean Surg Soc. 1995; 49:328–334.
4. Park SS, Ryu KW, Song TJ, Mok YJ, Kim CS, Kim SJ. Multiple early gastric cancer. J Korean Gastric Cancer Assoc. 2001; 1:150–154.
5. Takeshita K, Tani M, Honda T, Saeki I, Kando F, Saito N, et al. Treatment of primary multiple early gastric cancer: from the viewpoint of clinicopathologic features. World J Surg. 1997; 21:832–836.
6. Honmyo U, Misumi A, Murakami A, Haga Y, Akagi M. Clinicopathological analysis of synchronous multiple gastric carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1989; 15:316–321.
7. Kitamura K, Yamaguchi T, Okamoto K, Otsuji E, Taniguchi H, Hagiwara A, et al. Clinicopathologic features of synchronous multifocal early gastric cancers. Anticancer Res. 1997; 17:643–646.
8. Ahn YJ, Oh SJ, Song JW, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, et al. The clinicopathologic features and prognosis of multiple early gastric cancer. J Korean Gastric Cancer Assoc. 2008; 8:198–202.
9. Shah BK, Khanal A, Hewett Y. Second primary malignancies in adults with gastric cancer: a US population-based study. Front Oncol. 2016; 6:82.
10. Chung KY, Mukhopadhyay T, Kim J, Casson A, Ro JY, Goepfert H, et al. Discordant p53 gene mutations in primary head and neck cancers and corresponding second primary cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract. Cancer Res. 1993; 53:1676–1683.
11. Sozzi G, Miozzo M, Pastorino U, Pilotti S, Donghi R, Giarola M, et al. Genetic evidence for an independent origin of multiple preneoplastic and neoplastic lung lesions. Cancer Res. 1995; 55:135–140.
12. Luciani A, Balducci L. Multiple primary malignancies. Semin Oncol. 2004; 31:264–273.
13. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 2nd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998; 1:10–24.
14. Warren S, Gates O. Multiple primary malignant tumors. A survey of the literature and statistical study. Am J Cancer. 1932; 16:1358–1414.
15. Moertel CG. Multiple primary malignant neoplasms: historical perspectives. Cancer. 1977; 40:1786–1792.
16. Kang GH, Kim CJ, Kim WH, Kang YK, Kim HO, Kim YI. Genetic evidence for the multicentric origin of synchronous multiple gastric carcinoma. Lab Invest. 1997; 76:407–417.
17. Mitsudomi T, Watanabe A, Matsusaka T, Fujinaga Y, Fuchigami T, Iwashita A. A clinicopathological study of synchronous multiple gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 1989; 76:237–240.
18. Kosaka T, Miwa K, Yonemura Y, Urade M, Ishida T, Takegawa S, et al. A clinicopathologic study on multiple gastric cancers with special reference to distal gastrectomy. Cancer. 1990; 65:2602–2605.
19. Esaki Y, Hirokawa K, Yamashiro M. Multiple gastric cancers in the aged with special reference to intramucosal cancers. Cancer. 1987; 59:560–565.
20. Dinis-Ribeiro M, Lomba-Viana H, Silva R, Moreira-Dias L, Lomba-Viana R. Associated primary tumors in patients with gastric cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002; 34:533–535.
21. Ryu DD, Um JW, Son GS, Cho MY, Song TJ, Kim CS, et al. Multiple primary malignant tumors in patients with gastric cancer. J Korean Gastric Cancer Assoc. 2003; 3:139–144.
22. Watanabe S, Kodama T, Shimosato Y, Arimoto H, Sugimura T, Suemasu K, et al. Multiple primary cancers in 5,456 autopsy cases in the National Cancer Center of Japan. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1984; 72:1021–1027.
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

Dae Hoon Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9873-4907

Su Mi Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0272-4662

Min Gew Choi
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3394-5177

Tae Sung Sohn
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9553-3234

Jae Moon Bae
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2995-672X

Sung Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0058-8230

Similar articles