Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to identify attitudes of male baby boomer toward holistic health using Q-methodology.
Methods
Q-methodology is analysed through the subjectivity of each type of attitudes. Thirty-five q-statements were selected from a total of 145 statements. These statements were categorized into six areas (Physical, psychological, spiritual, work and leisure, love and friendship, culture). The recruited P-sample consisted of thirty-four male baby boomers from one town and two cities. The 35 selected Q-statements from each of 35 participants were classified into the shape of a normal distribution using a 9-point scale. The collected data were analysed using the PQMethod Program 2.11.
Results
Four types of male baby boomer attitudes towards holistic health were identified. The first is a relationship oriented-marital relationship oriented type, the second type is an economic oriented-job seeking type, the third type is a nature friendly oriented-independent living type, and the fourth type is health oriented-physical health seeking type.
REFERENCES
1.Choi YJ. The economic education as a lifelong education for baby boom generation in Korea. Andragogy Today Interdisciplinary Journal of Adult & Continuing Education. 2013. 16(1):45–67.
2.Park MJ., Suh EE., Chung MY. Health-related quality of life and its influencing factors according to gender in baby boomers. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2015. 28(3):314–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2015.27.3.314.
3.Kim HS., Yu KZ. Factors influencing subjective quality of life in male baby boom generation men. Journal Korean Academic Community Health Nursing. 2013. 24(4):461–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2013.24.4.461.
4.Chung SD., Lee HH. Life satisfaction for baby-boomers: compare 1998 with 2008. Journal of Welfare for the Aged. 2012. 55(1):105–31.
5.Shin KA., Han MJ. The Korean babyboomers as new seniors: their attitudes and perceptions about life after retirement and their content needs for successful transition. Korean Women's Communication Association. 2013. 25(1):113–42.
6.Hwang HH. The relationship between leisure life style and generativity on the baby boom generation in rural area. Journal of Leisure Studies. 2015. 13(1):105–25.
7.Statistics Korea. 2013 Survey of household finances and living conditions [Internet]. Seoul: Statistics Korea;2013. [cited 2015 August 17]. Available from:. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/4/1/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=310209.
8.Lee JY., Kim DS. An exploration of factors affecting the marital relationship, psychological health, and retirement adjustment of retired couples: a short-term longitudinal study. Korea Journal of Counseling. 2014. 15(2):903–24.
9.Sweeney TJ., Witmer JM. Beyond social interest: striving toward optimum health and wellness. Individual Psychology. 1991. 47(4):527–40.
10.Myers JE., Luecht RM., Sweeney TJ. The factor structure of wellness: reexamining theoretical and empirical models underlying the wellness evaluation of lifestyle (WEL) and the five-factor WEL. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 2004. 36(4):194–208.
11.Rhew HO., Kim KK., Kim MR. The development of a wellness enhancement program through group counseling. The Korean Journal of Counseling. 2002. 3(1):109–22.
12.Albert TC., Johnson E., Gasperino D., Tokatli P. Planning for the baby boomers' healthcare needs: a case study. Journal of hospital marketing & public relations. 2003. 15(1):77–88.
13.Kyle SM. Skilled nursing facilities: wellness requests from the baby boomer generation. [dissertation]. Texas, United Atates: Texas Woman's University;2013. p. 134.
14.Wilhelm K., Geerligs L., Peisah C. Successful transition to later life: strategies used by baby boomers. Australasian Journal on Ageing. 2014. 33(2):81–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12025.
15.Bae JH. Economic activity state of baby boom generation in daejeon and job creation policies. Management and Economics Research Institute, Chungnam National University. 2014. 36(2):71–105.
16.Lim NS. A validation study of wellness evaluation of lifestyle (WEL) in university students. [master's thesis]. Jeonju: Jeonbuk National University;2004.
17.Hong DW., Kim CK. The development of wellness scale for adolescents in Korea. Korea Journal of Counseling. 2008. 9(1):67–83.
18.Kim KH., Kim YM., Jung TY. The impact of health behavior, health status and healthcare utilization on the quality of life of the baby boom generation. Health Service Management Review. 2013. 7(1):1–12.
19.Lee JS., Choi WS. A study of a path on quality of life in elderly men: focusing on relationship among gender role attitude, social service use level, self esteem, and quality of life. Journal of Welfare for the Aged. 2014. 66(1):377–404.
20.Park YJ. The relations between attendings of senior job making business's successful aging, and health promotion effect. Korean Journal of Welfare Practice. 2012. 4(1):183–202.
21.Kim YS. Search for health from the nature and harmony of body and mind. Journal of the Korean Association for Local Finance. 2008. 10(1):180–87.
22.Lim KH., Baek SG. Residential choice and mobility of Korean babyboomer after retirement. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2014. 14(11):438–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.11.438.
23.Lee TK. A study on health behavior and life habit of natural healing method by mental health of each age group. Journal of Korean Sundo Culture. 2015. 18(2):327–53.
24.Kwak IS. Study on family strength and happiness of the pre-elderly and the elderly. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association. 2013. 51(1):1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.6115/khea.2013.51.1.001.
25.Kim KB., Kim HA., Sok OH. A study on health perception, health knowledge, and health promoting behavior in the elderly. Journal of East-West Nursing Research. 2008. 14(1):56–67.